>Never had a job his entire life
>never washed and had boils all over his body as a result
>cheated on his wife with his maid, who he never paid, with whom he had an illegitimate child
>leeched off his parents in early life, his wife later on, and then Friedrich Engels for the rest of his life
>didn't bother to attend his father's funeral, and instead demanded his mother to give him more money that his father could no longer provide
>looked for facts and data to support his theories instead of forming his theories around the facts and data
>refused to pay rent to his landlords
>refused to pay loans back
>lived off Friedrich Engels, who in turn lived off the profits he made from his private business, which, according to Marx's theories, means that he was feeding off the workers
>refused to see his kids
>all applications of his theories have led to the deaths of over 100 million people in total
Why do people look up to this scumbag of a human being?
Because potato
>b-but never tried
>>76185846
Marx became popular right around the time women we're allowed to vote or hold position of power.
Marxism is a woman's ideology. Circlejerking over overblown ego, having bulls and sacrificing progress and innovation for safety.
>Merkel
>>76185846
Because many people are scumbags, and would love to live their lives just like Marx.
>>76186404
The one thing I will say is that Marx wasn't a Feminist. He didn't really think women were equal to men. But his theories are very applicable to Feminism because it's all about class.
>>76185934
How are mass killings an argument against Marxism? We support mass killings of blacks and Jews on here.
I'm against Marxism because it's wrong to steal the property of the rich and wrong to enforce equality, but violence isn't a good argument against Marxism.
>>76185846
he is a rolemodel for pseudo-intellectual NEETs all over the world, those are the ones who support him. try finding a self-admitted marxist with a respectable job outside of meme fields of academia, i guarantee you will struggle.
>>76185934
What is this, sarcasm for ants?
>>76186607
the violence inevitably results in the destruction of the middle class, who are absolutely vital for successfully running a country. it isn't the violence that is the issue, it is the targets.
>>76186762
>it isn't the violence that is the issue
100 million people! How is that not a huge issue with the implementation of Marxism?
>>76186907
Nothing wrong with that as long as the right people are dying.
>>76187003
But it was never even the 'right people', whatever that means; it was the poor, the workers, the farmers and the general peasantry. Y'know, innocent people.
>>76187251
Blacks are poor in the US, don't defend the poor. They're inferiors.
One country that could actually use wealth distribution and removal of bourgeois class is India. You will not believe the wealth gap and the poverty conditions in Pooloonistan.
Marx was the worst thing to happen in the west. Life isn't fair and equality through force is impossible.
>>76188719
it's that sort of thinking that got us into this mess desu
>>76188719
You're missing the point though. Marxism calls for coercion and removal of agency for the population. That is why it always doomed to fail.
If India wants to redistribute wealth, let it do so voluntarily. To do it at the point of a gun destroys India.
>>76189371
Nepal didn't and doesn't have a ruling wealth class. As for the monarchy, I was always strongly for it and strongly against the maoists.
India meanwhile... Maybe tax the billionare actors more so that Pajeet Rajpooinloo has better bathroom facilities.
>>76188719
>One country that could actually use wealth distribution and removal of bourgeois class is Russia. You will not believe the wealth gap and the poverty conditions in Slavland.
>>76189556
That's exactly what I mean, though. Any movement that uses glib and riling up people to cause destruction and hindrance is bad no matter what.
Example, empathy for the Middle east ends when they start cutting people's heads off.
>>76189723
>Nepal didn't and doesn't have a ruling wealth class.
Yes it does. It may not be as apparent as it is in India, but it is almost certainly there.
>>76188719
lol fuck off commie
Marx was a great man, I support his theories
>>76190539
poo in loo
>>76190366
I don't see any Ferraris racing past here, man. The politicians and their nepotism is apparent but it's not as severe and worrying as India.
>>76185846
You've been watching Molyneux too, aren't you Seamus?
>>76189875
https://youtu.be/ixJgY2VSct0
I don't see any solutions, man.
>>76185846
>never had a job
That's bullshit. He was at various times a journalist, writer, political activist, philosopher, historian, sociologist, economist, and revolutionary.
>never washed and had boils
Not an argument. Victorian London wasn't exactly clean. He had hidradenitis suppurativa, which is caused by many factors.
>cheated on his wife
So did Bill Clinton.
>leeched off his parents
So did everyone to a degree, and many people today
>refused to attend his father's funeral
That's bullshit. He was emotionally close to his father. If he didn't attend the funeral, it wasn't because he didn't care.
>looked for facts and data to support his theories instead of forming his theories around the facts and data
Source?
>refused to pay loans back
Source?
>lived off Friedrich Engels
Engels wasn't a factory owner. It was Engels' father who was a factory owner. One of the early things that set Engels on his political path was seeing the awful conditions in which the textile factory workers operated.
>refused to see his kids
Also bullshit.
>all applications of his theories have led to the deaths of 100+ million people
>who is Rosa Luxemburg
>what is the Paris Commune
>what is any of the dozens of non-authoritarian Marxist movements
You're full of shit and you know it.
>>76185934
nice meme
>>76186607
To most of /pol/ mass killings are okay when they're the ones doing it.
>>76185846
>his pussy ass ancestors got kicked out of israel by arabshits
>>76191503
>He was at various times a journalist, writer, political activist, philosopher, historian, sociologist, economist, and revolutionary.
He was an "intellectual" who refused to work for a wage.
Revolutionary isn't even a job, especially when you fail.
>Engels wasn't a factory owner. It was Engels' father who was a factory owner.
And Marx still lived off of Engel's wealth.
>refused to see his kids
>Also bullshit.
Not in the slightest, he treated his family like shit.
>You're full of shit and you know it.
You're projecting and defensive and you know it. Marxism's dying boy, have fun watching the sunset.
>>76191503
>>76191989
Marxism will never die. There will always be middle class college students wishing for their own demise whilst feeding off of the Capitalist nation they're residing in, all because of those two fucking books (Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital) written by that disgusting human being.
So many innocent people dead, and yet this crap is still taught in colleges.
>>76185846
Sounds a lot like bernie Sanders...never had a real job
notice something?
Hand in pocket? It was a common sign for being a freemason, both of these people were freemasons.
Freemasons are satanic and destroying the world, america was founded to be an satanic nation, look what it has become.
Get redpilled.
