Is 4chan and the internet degeneracy?
We're here pretending we're actually doing anything to help the West but we're really just sitting here typing, to ourselves and each other. Not to anyone who needs to hear it.
>pic unrelated
>>75951179
Visit data suggests roughly 25 percent of the United States population between ages 16-25 lurks 4chan. Not many post.
Internet spreads information and influences people. Can't really deny that much.
You need to ask whether or not 4chan is degenerate? Was it the trap threads or the cartoob rape of 4 year animated japanese girls that gave you sone niggling doubts about 4chan's family friendly nature?
>>75951179
Society is comprised by checks and balances. Western society broke the system, so nothing is degenerate anymore.
Just quit your idealism and enjoy the collapse. There is no saving society anymore.
Just enjoy the collapse. You're in for a wild ride.
>>75951179
Ok yes sure but the only people that say this are people that browse everyday from their parents basement until they get depressed and want to DO SOMETHING. Go outside and get into politics don't write a stupid blog about how you WANT to do something.
>we're really just sitting here typing
We're trying to make a platform where we could lure in then normalize radicalized and polarized "leftist" extremists.
>>75951355
That stuff is family friendly, for the modern family.
>>75951635
Yes, because it's worked so fucking well so far.
>>75951635
Both the EUSSR and social media giants decided to try and one-up eachother
trying to get the 2016 reward for the most obnoxious group of people there are.
Facebook, twitter, microsoft, google - have decided to censor their platforms in
an attempt to polarize their (mostly anti-patriot) userbase. Shutting down on free
speech and deciding for people what they should and should not see.
EU decided to hop the dimwit bandwagon and actually try to outlaw words, the
madmen. Some say it's to censor Brexit, others, to be able to prosecute their
citizens that have committed the crime of thinking differently. I wouldn't be sur
prised if Apple came out of this a winner openly stating that morally and crimi
nally wrong things aside - they will not censor their users.
Any which way, I think we have a great opportunity here; I've tried to make an
anti-social platform two years ago, getting the idea from /pol/ in the midst of a
similar situation (something about free speech I can't remember). I am still int
erested to spearhead such a project, if /pol/ would be interested in it. I already
>have experience doing almost exactly the same thing
>can write the system
>have the VPS and domains
>have an interest in doing so
To be straight forward, my profit from doing this is so I can tunnel traffic, lead
parts of the audience towards my other projects.
inb4s:
>you can't kill facebook, even google tried but failed
Not trying to kill it, just take a shot at it, and I have nothing to lose, no matter
how much traffic the site naturally generates.
>they'll hijack it the moment it starts becoming successful
Not if it's not profitable. The concept and mechanism itself is going to be built
in such a way that you can't make loads of money on it.
>>75951776
>this isn't /pol/, what is it even?
Basically what I want to do is build a platform where free speech, albeit mode
rated, is protected. Where two sides of the same coin - a patriot and an anti-
patriot for example - can passionately debate something then come to a mid
dle ground, without the platform automatically censoring one or the other.
No echo chambers, no censorship tools. Open discussion, free content. Want
to repost cat videos? Ok. Porn? Ok. Worship people on the "wrong side of his
tory"? Ok.
These are the values we're interested in.
And no "Please upload a govt. issued photo ID so we can verify your account"
type of shit either. We're going to use IP for bans, and past that anything you
want to put on your account is purely your choice. The UX flow will be somet
hing like:
>visit site
>get a temp ID
>use site anonymously with that ID
>or register it with two passwords instead of an e-mail address
>want your real name and info on there? Sure, put in whatever you want
>still you can just use the ID as your identity
Pretty straightforward isn't it?
>>75951179
If there is a happening I am getting news here faster, in more details than in my leading mainstream newspaper or their website.
A lot of shilling and bulshit too but then again. ...
>>75951765
No one did this before.
