Chart to be updated soon guys!
Thanks :)
So any "intellectual" with a political agenda automatically becomes a pseudo-intellectual? Name me a single real intellectual from our day and age.
>>75751918
>Zizek on the list
What's your fucking problem, faggot?
>>75751918
>The b8 jpg bha grown
>>75752037
>>75752132
All people on the list are carefully decided upon by a group including myself.
Please, do suggest others or do suggest we take some people off the chart but unfortunately, the ones you have both suggested must remain. They meet our necessary criteria.
>>75751918
>filthy frank
Kek
>>75751918
Good Work anon. Can't wait to spread this.
Especially glad to see the memesters Stephan Memeux and Lauren on there. Biggest profiteers off of pseudo rightist highschoolers these days.
>>75751918
This aggression will not stand man.
Kill yourself
>>75751918
Like yourself? Fuck off tripfag.
>>75751918
Peter Hitchins and Noam Chomsky should be removed from that list.
Peter is genuinely intelligent and thoughtful, and above all respects others so long as they actually hold an opinion.
Noam's work in linguistics and epistemology is actually quite fantastic. He is not a stupid man. His political views are disagreeable, but he knows his stuff in regards to his specialty.
>>75751918
Ignore all right-wing conservative commentators. They are all conspiracy theorists.
>>75752507
Peter Hitchens has never conceded a point in his life or had a proper debate whereby both parties grow to form an understanding.
He is no intellectual, with him, it is either his way or no way.
>>75751918
Nice b8 OP
>>75751918
What do you have against Hitchens? No one thinks comedians are intellectuals, they're entertainers. You've also bunched a lot of pundits and vbloggers together with actual academics who do occasionally comment on subjects outside their field. From what I can tell you think, anyone who isn't running for office or part of the established media isn't worth hearing.
>>75751918
>Neil Degrasse Tyson
>""Pseudo intelectual""
shit man, are astrophysicists now Pseudo too?
>>75752037
Bill Nye
Neil Degrasse Tyson
George Takei
>>75752752
What is wrong about believing that you are right, and defending that belief. If you have to concede your beliefs, it means that you are poor at arguing, or, ironically by your standards, using rhetorical devices to appear to be accommodating in a false manner.
I suggest watching some of his one-on-one interviews. They're quite interesting and genuine.
>>75751918
>Yuri Bezmenov
>Pseudo
>>75752973
these people are entertainers, bill nye just has a bachelors degree in engineering and we're supposed to take his science for granted
>>75751918
Dawkins is legit tho
>>75751918
You have John Oliver but are missing Stewart / Colbert
Why is Chris Mercer on the list?
>>75752132
Of all the people that you feel shouldn't be on that list, Zizek is the one that stands out to you. Fuck Zizek. He's a cunt, and so are you by proxy.
>>75753379
Ah, never mind, I completely missed Jew Stewart at the bottom.
>>75752973
Filthy Frank is a true intellectual. Please remove him from this list.
what's wrong with brother nathaniel?
what do you have against george carlin?
>>75753437
he's not a pseudo-intellectual. you are just duped by his post-modern "i'm being dumb on purpose" aesthetic. pleb.
>>75751918
This made me cringe
>a chart of people OP doesn't like and who make OP feel like an inferior butthurt faggot.
>>75751918
NOT
Dawkins and Yuri shouldn't be on that list. They are essential red pill.
>John Stewart not in the first row
dropped
why would you lump Stefan Moly with the rest of that trash?
>>75751918
>Michio Kaku
Thank god someone else can see it. If anyone deserves to be on that chart it's this fucking gook. Everytime he opens his mouth on politics or anything not related to physics he sounds like a cookie-cutter facebook nu-male with HuffPost subscription.
>>75751918
There are probably 5 or 6 people on that list I watch/listen to regularly and I agree they can all be a bit biased at times, but there is literally nothing wrong with Sargon of Akkad.
>>75751918
Take your grubby mitts off my meme, plebeian.
>>75753288
By your standards?
Maybe instead of ignoring them, we can take their guidance with a grain of salt?
>Yuri on the list
>>75751918
Yanis, Zizek, Yuri, Chomsky, Peter Hitchens Molymeme and Dawkins are pretty smart. But yeah, a lot of those people are twats (Sargon, Nye, Green, Jones and Will Self come to mind)
>>75753760
>but there is literally nothing wrong with Sargon of Akkad.
Except he talks way too fucking much. He could sum up all his videos to be like 3 minutes , but makes them 20
>>75751918
>Brother Nathaniel
The single most based guy on youtube.
Why should I ignore him?
>>75754178
great "argument"
When was the last time you sat down and read a thousand page book?
>>75751918
>sees TJ and his other atheist fuck buddies
>remembering my edgy atheist phase
I'm glad I grew out of that phase man
>>75751918
>implying rhetoric isn't an important part of any intellectual debate
Just because some people aren't aspies and have political views, doesn't mean they aren't intellectual. In fact, you'd probably say just the opposite. If you're "smart" but have no ability to communicate your ideas, then you might as well be retarded.
>ethan is a pseudo intellectual
>not the wiset man who ever lived
dropped
>>75753760
a sophist.
hyper-individualist.
muslim apologetic.
a quadroon which affects his lack of acceptance to race realism arguments.
etc
>>75751918
> karl marx is not on the list of pseudo-intellectuals.
kill yourself you fucking commie OP.
>>75752037
the /pol/ gestalt
>>75751918
thanks for the nice chart my friend
>>75751918
How dare you lump Alex Jones in with this filth. The flouride is really getting to your head.
Buy the damn filter.
>>75751918
ignoring everything chomsky said is stupid. the man made/makes some good points.
>>75754343
That's not the point. I'm not saying he's wrong, but the guy does ramble on and on. If he condensed his videos he might attract a larger crowd.
>>75754595
You don't seem to understand the nature of the chart.
The people must be from recent times.
Picking men from the 19th century is a profound misunderstanding of the chart and attempting to insert a quota of simply who you don't like which is entirely not what our group is trying to do here.
Thanks you for your contribution :).
>>75751918
>Christopher Hitchens a pseudo-intellectual
I'll fucking kill you m8
>>75754708
does not take away the fact that marx was a pseudo-intellectual who served no purpose for the progression of humanity.
never did you explicitly state that pseudo-intellectuals must be from the 21st century.
>>75751918
>laci green
>rhetorician
Wew
>>75754486
So you are basically upset that he has bothered to read the classical literature that modern western civilization was built on?
>>75754355
I'm still technically there, but never fell to his level of autism
>>75751918
What is William Buckley doing there? You think he was John Oliver tier? You know he has founded National Review?
Why the hell is Zoe Quinn on there. All she does is get money from the internet to not make games.
>Yuri
Why?
>>75754997
that has nothing to do with the points i made.
>>75751918
Stupid Goys and their Pseudo-Intellectuals
>>75751918
I could have sworn that Paul Joseph Watson's most recent video was about Israel but it's not there anymore? Hmmm...
Have all the guys on there done any certain errors in their use of logic or arguing or do they just disagree with you OP?
>Filthy Frank
>>75751918
Can't let anyone rock the boat eh anon?
>>75752037
Kristen Titus
>>75755787
Feels cherry picked
>George Carlin
>Boogie2988
What the fuck even is this list? Hey Mohammed, I think I found a video you might like... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dbR2JZmlWo
