[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Dont be coy Bin that, goy
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 53
Thread images: 16
File: Hand it over.jpg (97 KB, 1194x624) Image search: [Google]
Hand it over.jpg
97 KB, 1194x624
Dont be coy
Bin that, goy
>>
File: PULL OVER.jpg (93 KB, 1195x572) Image search: [Google]
PULL OVER.jpg
93 KB, 1195x572
Just incase you don't know how to surrender these dangerous weapons
>>
oi mate i don't think you have a license for that shitpost
>>
>license
>for air guns

good god almighty
>>
>>75581116
This is Scotland only. In the slighly less cucked parts of the UK we still have our slightly less completely fucking insane gun legislation.
>>
File: BLANKET BAN.jpg (97 KB, 1201x822) Image search: [Google]
BLANKET BAN.jpg
97 KB, 1201x822
>>75581116
Its ridiculous they should just put an outright ban on all weapons and white list the ones that can be taxed
>>
File: image.png (631 KB, 1224x563) Image search: [Google]
image.png
631 KB, 1224x563
>air gun

They will fuck you up, but I've not ever heard of anyone dying from them except for extremely good shots to the head.

I don't think you can even milk yourself with one
>>
People do not need wepaons
>>
>>75581116
This. Not even Brasil went that far. Here you just have to be 18 and have the receipt in case you wanna move it.
>>
>>75581733
You "need" to kill yourself.
>>
>>75582444
Violent rethuglicans at it again/
>>
>>75580457

Might alwell get a licence for butter knifes next.
>>
>>75580457
You can take my air when you suck it out of my cold collapsed lungs
>>
>>75581285
>ban on legal highs
Get ready to lose your alcohol.
Sharia has already begun.
>>
File: shirou2.png (47 KB, 180x240) Image search: [Google]
shirou2.png
47 KB, 180x240
>>75581733
>when people tell you that you don't need weapons but your whole life was unlimited blade works
>>
File: 1460544642089.jpg (16 KB, 600x367) Image search: [Google]
1460544642089.jpg
16 KB, 600x367
>>75580457

>Power to purchase, own, and carry arms rests with the people, because there is no legislation to say otherwise.

>Someone comes up with this bright idea: "Let's pass legislation requiring a permit to own arms, and create a separate permit that allows you to carry them."

The effects of this are of course rather horrifying.

1. Surrender to the state a right which previously had rested in your own hands.

2. Give the state the power to then license this right back to you as a privilege which you may have access to for a nominal fee, and which will only be issued if you meet the qualifications set up by people you don't know and will never meet.

Licenses, permits, and other forms of "authorization" exist solely because people have surrendered their rights to the state, so that they may then be received back as privileges covered in red tape and taxes.

WHY THE HELL DOES ANY CITIZEN EVER BELIEVE THIS IS A GOOD IDEA?

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
>>75582966
They won't ban alcohol or caffeine. The alcohol makes people stupid/happy enough to stay content with the way things are. The caffeine keeps them productive.
>>
>>75581285
>>75580457
Total police state.

To think you once fought against fascism.
>>
File: 1460603066552.png (182 KB, 769x366) Image search: [Google]
1460603066552.png
182 KB, 769x366
>>75583072
>When they tell you to bin that knife but you're literally a sword.
>>
File: 1463105275722.jpg (275 KB, 2067x1602) Image search: [Google]
1463105275722.jpg
275 KB, 2067x1602
>>75582681

It's not your place to tell others they cannot defend themselves with weapons, libshit.
>>
>>75582966
That sounds racist did you check that post
>>
>>75580457
When will the UK not be the funniest country to laugh at?
>>
>>75581285
this is fine, legal highs are scum tier
>>
>>75583237
Yeah, their new rulers don't give a fuck about that, that's what actual humans do to get results. They're becoming a Muslime state so no more fun allowed.
>>
>>75583501
Its a blanket ban that covers literally any chemical the government wishes to ban
>>
>>75580457
Since when did you need a license for air rifles? I have 5 of them and I've never heard of this. Not had any issues either.
>>
File: 1464222698979.gif (472 KB, 400x265) Image search: [Google]
1464222698979.gif
472 KB, 400x265
>>75580457
BRITAIN, STOP!

PLZ STOP!

STOPPIT!!!
>>
>>75583456
I'm sorry about the state of your country, if it helps we may all be fucked.
>>
File: 3kBBxqC.png (2 MB, 1136x1136) Image search: [Google]
3kBBxqC.png
2 MB, 1136x1136
Why should I spend money on a gun?

Give me a reason.
>>
>>75583441
Yes it is, trailer people do not get to dictate legislation.
>>
>>75581285
No words for you faggot cucks
>>
>>75583575
no, it covers any chemical with psychoactive properties except alcohol and tobacco etc. Not any chemical they arbitrarily want to ban.

It's the only thing left to do since banning individual compounds doesn't work if a chemist can just make them slightly different structurally.
>>
>>75583700

It's a hobby for some,unneccessary like a motorcycle or something.
>>
>>75583700
defense against wogs
fun hobby/sport
uncucking yourself
>>
File: 1464540397886.jpg (62 KB, 582x600) Image search: [Google]
1464540397886.jpg
62 KB, 582x600
>>75580457

JUST
>>
>tfw my 12fl lb weihrauch 97k is still legal in bongistan
>>
>>75583928
Psychoactive is up to their discretion its not defined in the bill
>>
We have control.
We keep you safe.
We are your hope.
>>
>>75580457
Holy shit, UK.
Do you have your butterknife license yet?
>>
>>75584198
If some chemical genuinely is not psychoactive by any realistic definition and the police tried to convict someone of sale or whatever, they wouldn't be able to secure a conviction in court. The court would need to be satisfied that the chemical in question is genuinely psychoactive (satisfying their understanding of the word psychoactive). So they can't ban ANY chemical like you're claiming
>>
is the UK actually real

i'm convinced its actually just a group of robots playing a prank on us
>>
>>75583701
And you do, because you are an enlightened morally superior liberal intellectual
>>
>>75585009
>implying the courts won't rubberstamp anything that the government wants to do
>>
>>75583700
Good money for a good gun. Trading one thing for another.
That and you help the manufacturer pull down 40 k a year and work a 40 hour week
>>
>>75580457
Next up, water guns, no more childhood memories of "gunfights" during summer.
>>
File: 1423023173261.jpg (18 KB, 229x377) Image search: [Google]
1423023173261.jpg
18 KB, 229x377
>>75581285

Literally pic related

I feel so sorry for you bongs, uprising when?
>>
>>75581733
Hands can be used to punch and feet can be used to kick. Please remove them from your body immediately.
>>
>>75585821
If it's impossible to prove that a given chemical is psychoactive then it is impossible to be convicted of the crime of sale/ownership etc. The police don't often waste time with unwinnable prosecutions.
>>
File: guns per capita.jpg (49 KB, 600x413) Image search: [Google]
guns per capita.jpg
49 KB, 600x413
>>75580457
I rather deal with 100k immigrants per year then that bullshit desu.

Thank god i am not living on the eternal anglo islands.

Also GB is a pretty good argument for the slippery slope of gun control.
>>
File: YouAreNotJudgeDredd.jpg (162 KB, 700x515) Image search: [Google]
YouAreNotJudgeDredd.jpg
162 KB, 700x515
>>75586434
>The police don't often waste time with unwinnable prosecutions.
They don't need to prosecute, they just need to persecute in order to fill their quotas. Taunt and intimidate until the person snaps at them and ta-da, a new "criminal" to feed the "crime statistics" beast.
More declining rates of crime can always be made.
>>
>>75583145

Because they aren't citizens in the United Kingdom, they're subjects.
>>
>>75586688
>no Switzerland
?????
>>
>>75581733
you don't need anything but water and calories

glorious communism will take care of your every need

freedom is unnecessary
Thread replies: 53
Thread images: 16

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.