Do you honestly think a fascist party has any change of winning in the western world? Especially in countries that had such regimes in the past.
The only way I can see this happening is if we get a far left authoritarian regime that murders a lot of people. If that happens I can see a swing to the right at some point after that
A fascist party had no chance of winning in Germany until the great depression
When the next market crash comes around It'll be a doozy, maybe as bad as the Great Depression. The West never recovered from 08', Europe is circling the drain and America is on life support, Australia is sitting a gigantic housing bubble with zero industry outside of mining with isn't profitable anymore
Look toward the east when the first banks start failing
>>75237927
Also I forgot to mention that a lot of the electorate in the West is still struggling and feels like we're still in a recession despite the fact that we're supposedly at the peak of the business cycle at the moment. What are going to people be like when things actually turn to shit?
>>75237927
China is sitting on even greater housing bubble,
also Japan is going to hell, so I would be worried about them too in your place
They might get more militaristic if their economies fail hard
>>75237629
Wait a few years
Western Europa goes to hell
SJWs still push their agendas, but this doesn't work
Being too much open will cause overreaction and people will flock to nazism etc
then:
After war, people will be ashamed of crimes commited and start to think that you were all evil
Start again to push SJWs thought
Considering Trump has secured the nomination, there's a pretty real chance
>>75238376
>>75238366
read up on what's going on in America. There's a lot of leftist stuff going on. Some of it successful
>gay marriage nationally
>recreational pot in some states, medical in most
>school/etc. bathroom equality for trannies (currently being disputed in court)
and there's a whole lot of other stuff brewing - viz. the Sanders campaign
People like Trump are the reaction to that. "Being too much open" has led to his popularity. People like authoritarian responses to social change. The US election is going to be an important referendum on the social change. The US President, the US Congress, and (by extension) the swing Supreme Court Justice (with the Supreme Court having a lot of power in the US) will all be decided by this election. If Trump wis - who's been ostracized by a large part of the Republican Party - he could reshape it into a much more authoritarian party that moves the country towards a fascist type of government. then pandora's box is open
>>75237629
Yeah.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/05/06/croatias-far-right-weaponizes-the-past-ustase-hasanbegovic/
>>75238621
>>75238366
>Western Europa goes to hell
IF
Europe could achieve its goal of a multi-culti continent.
>>75237629
>The only way I can see this happening is if we get a far left authoritarian regime that murders a lot of people
Fascism regimees have a very defined pattern. They're temporary and only seem feasible in times of chaos and need, when people is desperate for a swift solution. At least in the west.
Primo's regimee was supposed to be temporary but people were so happy with his regimee that they decided to give him an extension. So he created the soft fascism and fucked up (mostly because he fell for the sephardi tricks of usury).
When the Second Republic killed hundreds of thousands of spaniards and destroyed the country with poberty and famine then a violent fascist regimee came to the rescue. Problem was they had no good plans to govern after their victory and gave us some really bad years. This changed when they gave up on autarchy and we had some of the best years of our recent history. Then people decided that we needed democracy and here we are, choking in other people's vomit.
You can't beat "democracy" democraticaly and nobody is going to accept a fascist regimee so the only option is to revolt and take the nation by force. This will never happen unless it feels like the last resort. Considering the assimilation of invaders that is occurring it may be too late.
So no. There won't be any revolution. There might be a war with the uncucked countries but those who are cucked will never recover.
>>75240698
oo shit!
>>75241856
>They're temporary
>Franco ruled in Spain for forty years
>You can't beat "democracy" democraticaly and nobody is going to accept a fascist regimee so the only option is to revolt and take the nation by force
>Hitler failed trying to take Germany by force
>Hitler succeeded by using the democratic process
Really, people just want a quick, easy solution to their problems. I'll agree with you on that. Fascism often uses social upheaval to come to power. But I do disagree that you can't get people to willingly give up power. People will rationally turn over their safety and well-being to someone they feel can do a better job than they can. It's why so many people turn to religion in times of crisis - they're just weak and want an easy answer, even if it's a pretty terrible one.
>>75242405
>>Franco ruled in Spain for forty years
And as soon as he died people forfeited fascism. Fascism remains for as long as you can defend it. If the "great leader" is defeated/dead people won't replace it with a different fascism. They'll plot to get back democracy. Unless you have some short of monarchy fascism will never last for as long. Hitler asked for 4 years in power too, knowing this.
>>Hitler succeeded by using the democratic process
Those were different times and Hitler was one in a million. If another Hitler appeared then sure, fascism would have another go but people is terrified by the words "authority" and "resposability". Most right wing parties are pro-democracy so it'd be rare that one fascist party managed to make their way in.
>>75238116
Or more civil disobedience. We can already see that in Hong Kong and other major Chinese cities
