They're catching on, guys.
Can she hold out long enough to get the nomination?
Who cares?
Both are going to get disemboweled by Trump and will win any way.
>>75104648
>Sanders beating Trump handily in the polls
>Hillary losing slightly to Trump in the polls
>Hillary beating Sanders in votes
I dun geddit.
>The guy with millions of less votes than Clinton can beat Trump while Clinton can't
>>75104648
OUT OF FUCKING NOWHERE
>>75104942
Rock, paper, scissors.
>>75104648
>Can she hold out long enough to get the nomination?
I hope so. This will be a lot of fun.
>>75104991
I hope this happens.
>>75104942
I feel like a retard but I really don't feel like investing so much time trying to figure out what this "meme" is talking about
OP's pic isn't even a meme, it's a fucking picture with a paragraph on it
>paragraph picture
>>75104991
I don't think that's going to happen at all, but I do hope Trump has a contingency plan just in case.
>>75104942
Many democratic pramaries are closed to independent voters (voters unaffiliated with the Democratic Party). Sanders overwhelmingly wins support from Independents. This would be a UUUGE asset in the general, but actually hurts him in primaries
>>75104942
Beating somebody in a primary isn't the same thing as winning in the general. There is a larger voter pool. So it is possible, theoretically anyway, that Sanders could be losing amongst Democrats but would win in the general if it was him vs Trump.
holy shit hillary has tits?
>>75104648
>>75104648
>>75104648
I made this thread yesterday, the plan worked really well untill it came to the point where /pol/ needed to spread it around on twitter and stuff. It's designed to split the bernie voters away from hillary
Heres the imgur where you can get the thread and original image to spread
http://imgur.com/a/1M1iB
>Doesn't know the difference between worse and worst
>Doesn't realize that Clinton is still leading in crucial swing states and that a national polling average is irrelevant
Whoever made this is a dumbass
Clinton's already got the nomination, retard. She'll blow past 2,383 on June 7.
>inb4 hurr durr, superdelegates that have said numerous times they are backing Clinton will all dump her in mass numbers for Sanders at the convention, despite Clinton winning millions more popular votes than Sanders
No self respecting Bernie voter is going to jump sides to Clinton.
She's rigged the vote against him. Her agents have tampered with votes in Ohio and Nevada.
Her super delegate supporters are all puppets of the banks that sponsor her campaign.
>>75104991
To go from rapist to pedophile I guess is par for the course in America.
>>75105445
>Trump depends a lot on independents
>Sanders does amazing with independents, wins every primary ind. are allowed to vote in
>Swing states are largely decided by independents
Wrong, Sanders is clearly the better choice against Trump. Clinton is a weak, flawed, and otherwise shit candidate
>>75105445
A bernout made it. So yes.
>>75105534
Self respecting Bernie voter here.
There is no "jumping sides". Bernie and Hillary are, and have been, on the same side. Furthermore, the claim that there was foul play in Nevada has already been debunked.
Finally, superdelegates are irrelevant for a few reasons. First, they don't even come into play until the day of the convention. Second, they never come into play at all if Hillary manages to break the magic number, which she is projected to accomplish by the convention. Lastly, superdelegates have never determined the nominee, and they won't do it this year.
>>75105675
>America would rather have a borderline communist than Trump
My, my, that Soviet infiltration is finally bearing fruit.
>>75105461
>superdelegates that have said numerous times they are backing Clinton will all dump her in mass numbers
That's exactly what happened in 2008 when they dumped her ass in mass numbers for Obama.
>>75105675
Winning independents =/= winning the election. Ask Romney how far that got him.
Clinton is on track to defeat Trump in the electoral college, which is what matters.
>>75105752
Painfully obvious Hill Shill.
Get fucked Clinton Cunt.
>>75105822
she dropped from +84(ish) to +37 in the last week
>>75105752
>superdelegates are irrelevant
wew
>>75105822
She's fallen behind Trump in all recent polls, and will lose in the electoral college by a mile.
She's going to get raped in the election.
>>75105868
>Hill shill
Not at all, you retard. I'm a progressive Democrat who supports Bernie, but who is educated and informed enough to realize that Clinton is a perfectly fine option for people who care about progressive values. Certainly, she's a huge improvement over Trump.
>>75105752
>Sanders and Hillary are on the same side
Wrong, retard. Sanders and his supporters represent actual liberals. Clinton is a corprate establishment shill who will only serve the 20% of professionals and leave the poor and working class to starve. Her husband did it, Obama did it, and god forbid she'll do it
>>75106004
>Painfully obvious Hill Shill pretends to be a Bernie supporter
KEK
>>75105729
>bernout
At this point I'm calling them bernvictims because he's just fleecing them for shekels. He's already lost. Poor bastards.
>>75104991
>music starts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8VZS61fAYM
>BAH GOD JR, THAT'S BIG BEAST BIDEN'S MUSIC. HE SAID HE'D RETIRED!
>There he is! Rushing out to the nominating stage! He's got a chair!
>For god sakes where's the ref? He's breaking Hillary and Sanders in half!
>>75106076
>>75106143
>Poor bastards.
Don't feel bad, think of it as the Idiot Tax.
>>75105977
>She's fallen behind Trump in all recent polls
She fell behind in a national polling average, which is completely irrelevant. She still leads in key swing states, of which she really only needs 1 to win in the electoral college. And that doesn't even take into consideration the fact that Trump's bump is only a temporary one, and that Hillary will be seeing improved numbers once she wraps up the nomination.
>>75105967
Superdelegates are absolutely irrelevant. She is going to win the nomination fair and square by reaching the magic delegate number before the convention. This is almost guaranteed at this point.
>>75105881
Trump has seen a bump in recent days, sure, but that is temporary. She will see a bump as well, not that it matters since she has an advantage in the electoral college and is leading in key swing states despite Trump's bump.
/pol/ is doing wishful thinking again. Can't wait to see your tears in November.
>>75105816
>"I don't like him so no one does!! >:("
I don't know if you've looked at polling data, but more people like him than Trump
>>75105822
>Clinton is on track to defeat Trump in the electoral college
Lol typical Shillary: "Plz establishment overlords, win the election for me! I don't need people to actually vote for me!"
She's already blown like a 40% lead, what more has to happen until you realize this candidate is shit
>>75105752
how much did they pay you Juan?
>>75106004
Progressive values such as:
>Protecting the interests of massive global banks
>Protecting the interests of international corporations
>TPP
>Opening all borders to the advance of globalism
>Representing the best interests of her ultra wealthy backers
>Ignoring the cries of people raped and sexually assaulted by her husband
>Defending a man who raped a 12 year old girl
>Jeopardizing national security through her pure incompetence.
>Taking huge donations from Muslim countries that rape women and murder gays
And so much more!
Reminder that Hillary is our only hope to defeat Adolf Trump
>>75105191
>OP's pic isn't even a meme, it's a fucking picture with a paragraph on it
The term you're looking for is "macro".
When you're talking about an image with words on them (typically in impact font), they're referred to as macros. Macros can be memes, but not all memes are macros.
To be a meme, a macro needs to be widespread and have variants. This is just widespread with no variants, thus, it's simply a macro.
>>75106240
>Buh buh buh it's only temporary!!
Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!
>>75106004
>educated and informed enough to realize that Clinton is a perfectly fine option for people
"Well I waaaanted a liberal, but I'll take a neolib in a pinch :^)"
Fuck off
>>75105433
Fact, all women do.
>>75106008
>Wrong, retard
Bernie and Clinton vote together the vast majority of the time.
Anyone who cares about Bernie's issues should be fine with voting Clinton. Unlike Trump, Clinton would potentially ensure a liberal Supreme Court majority, which is necessary to get real campaign finance reform through. Unlike Trump, Clinton would protect women's reproductive rights and fight for a minimum wage increase. Unlike Trump, Clinton would fight for improving our healthcare system. Trump would take us backward on all of those issues when we need to be moving forward.
You may be able to fool low information college kiddos, but you won't fool me. Politics is what I do.
>>75106306
"Liberal"
>>75106342
>caring enough to use proper terminology on a norwegian knot tying forum
>>75106244
>I don't know if you've looked at polling data, but more people like him than Trump
That was exactly my point, you dumb, smelly pinko faggot. KGB agents did quite a number on American people. You're just another victim.
>>75104648
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obcFKXYSPFY
Are there actually people out there who can look into Hillary's dead cold eyes and the most exaggerated and ungenuine smile and demeanor and think "yep, this is a trustworthy person. I should vote for her".
>>75106417
Don't defy God Nigger Obama
>>75106531
I've been here a long time. I die a little inside when people get those two confused, especially when people tell me about "memes" that they've made (i.e., "Check out this text I slapped across a picture of my face!")
>>75106244
Winning in the electoral college isn't "plz establishment overlords, win the election for me". Winning in the electoral college is how you win Presidential elections. Hillary winning in the electoral college requires winning the electors in the blue states and at least 1 or 2 key swing states, which requires winning the popular vote in those states. That is how our system works. Anyone who wants to be President has to win in the electoral college.
>>75106468
>which is necessary to get real campaign finance reform through
If you think Clinton is actually going to try campaign finance reform, you're a fucking retard. Why would she destroy a system that put her in power? She's already beholden to corporate interests. She's not going to do that, and you know it.
>>75105818
it was a much tighter race
>>75106076
>>75106327
Am I the only one that wants to fuck the shit out of her?
>>75106696
understandable
I've heard of macros just never felt confident enough to talk about them on 4chan
>>75106615
No. She is running on the lesser of two evils platform. "Sure I suck but not as much as Trump".
John Kerry ran on this platform and lost.
John McCain ran on this platform and lost.
Mitt Romney ran on this platform and lost.
Trump is the star of the show. You vote for or against Trump. Nobody is voting *for* Hillary.
>(The star of the show always win)
>>75104942
It's the Kasich effect.
>>75106861
Yes.
What the fuck is wrong with you?
>>75106570
>KGB agents
Stopped reading there
>>75106703
Well good luck winning the general with no support from Sanders supporters (ie actual liberals). I don't want Trump, but I refuse to vote for her bullshit. Enjoy Lord Emperor President Trump, I hope your shit neolib candidate was worth the L
>>75105752
Hill shill alert!
>>75106861
>implying she socializes with hetero scum
>>75106715
>If you think Clinton is actually going to try campaign finance reform
First of all, Clinton herself doesn't have to "try" anything. All she has to do is put a liberal justice or two on the Supreme Court, and we won't have to worry about them knocking any campaign finance law down that gets through Congress.
>Why would she destroy a system that put her in power?
It is absolutely in Clinton's best interest to pick a justice who will vote to overturn Citizens United. The case was about Republicans attacking her, after all.
>She's already beholden to corporate interests
Not any more than Trump would be. You may prefer to live in a fantasy world where Trump isn't gearing up to take money from the same big donors as every other Republican, but in the real world, he is.
>She's not going to do that, and you know it.
Only one of the two major parties has gone on the record as officially attempting to do something about campaign finance reform by trying to push through a constitutional amendment authorizing Congress to regulate campaign finance. That party is the Democratic party, and they tried it in 2014. Hillary is part of that party and supports the same principles.
Is she a perfect candidate? Of course not. But the evidence clearly shows that she is vastly superior to Trump for liberal-minded folks like myself. Unlike you, I am not the type to suck up all the anti-Clinton propaganda we've seen over the last 20 years.
>>75106940
>Stopped reading there
'Course you did. As Yuri himself said: "They are brainwashed so thoroughly, their perception of reality is so warped, that I could shower them with authentic evidence, take them in front of the gulags their policies bring, and they would still not believe me."
>>75106940
Okay, kiddo. You have fun with your little 'protest vote' or whatever. We will be just fine without you.
>>75104942
Sanders is popular among some republishits, lolbertarians and Alex Jones fans but profoundly despised by all Democrats.
>>75106240
It's only temporary like all his leads have always been right? Just like his popularity would plummet when the primary race fell to only a handful of delegates? Just like Cruz was going to surge ahead of him once the others dropped out?
>>75107413
This must be your first Presidential election, huh kiddo?
>>75107226
This is indicitive of the entire Clinton campaign. "We don't need half of Democrats to vote for us!" Saving this post and will repost it on election night
>>75104648
I keep reading this. How the fuck does this even work? Why would Bernvictims vote for the Donald?
>>75107331
>profoundly despised by all Democrats.
ITT: we teach teach the Cucknadian the English language.
>profoundly despised by everybody than old Jewesses 10 steps from their deathbed and their circumcised sons.
>>75107496
>this election is the same as all the others before it
>>75107496
Great counter, you sure btfo me.
>>75104648
We have to be careful that we don't destroy her too fast, otherwise the democrats might come to their senses before they lock in their nominee
>>75104942
>Bernie constantly goes full BUT MUH GE POLLS
I wish there was one more democrat debate so Bernie could pull out the GE polls then Hillary could pull a Trump and say, "Hey, if I can't beat him, then you're REALLY gonna killed, aren't you?"
>>75107569
Whatever you say buddy.
>>75106468
>$0.05 has been deposited to your Chase bank account by Correct the Record
>>75107568
>Why would Bernvictims vote for the Donald?
A lot of bernouts are either planning on not voting or outright voting for Trump on the grounds that they're both fighting against their respective establishments.
I've seen a lot of my friends that are bernie supporters say that they're going to vote for trump if hillary loses.
Hell, the niggest nog sjwboon outright announced that she'd vote for trump if the bernie lost.
>>75107568
People on /pol/ meme him a lot dismissively, but Sanders is essentially the leftist version of Trump. Without getting into policy specifics, I generally think that Trump is a reaction to Republican establishment neglecting the needs of their base. Sanders is similar in this regard; he provides an actual liberal candidacy to an increasingly conservative Democratic party.
Now that Sanders seems out, they gravitate to the next most left candidate. This happens to be Trump
>>75105438
Saved thanks for the heads up. Fuck pol fuck trump.
>>75107997
>Hell, the niggest nog sjwboon in one of my courses outright announced that she'd vote for trump if the bernie lost.
fix'd.
CAPITALIST ARMY BABY, WOOOOO HA HA HA HAAAA
>>75108010
>This happens to be Trump
Have you even seen Trump's list of SCOTUS candidates? Do you even know a single one of his stated policy positions? My god you are one low-information, delusional little fuck. You are seriously an enemy of progressive values if you would support Trump over Clinton.
>>75108151
Good luck faggot, all you've got there is an anonymous operation image and a 4chan thread screenshot
>>75105818
She quit though. Obama won unanimously at the 2008 Democratic Party convention because Clinton made a deal to be his Secretary of State in exchange for exiting the race.
>>75108328
>Voting against Hillary
>Enemy of progressive values
Whatever you say, shill. All I know is that's it's much more progressive to care about 80% of american workers than to focus all policies on serving 20% of professionals (as Clinton will inevitably do)
A few months ago:
>How dare you tell us to vote for Clinton because she's more electable! No one should surrender their ideals like that!
Now:
>Sanders is winning in polls! You better vote for him because that means he's more electable!
>>75105438
>There's are conditions
0/10
>>75108558
>All I know is
Oh, so you know nothing then. I see.
Fuck off.
>>75105818
They're not going to dump her retard. Especially since it's a woman candidate running immediately after the first foreign born muslim piece of shit president.
>>75104991
literally who?
>>75105438
>imgur
>>75104991
>Creepy Joe
And that will be done.
>>75108638
Why are you so butthurt? So I think Trump is more of a liberal than Hillary. Does it not speak to her record that I think that? Even if I'm wrong (which I'm not), the fact that so many liberals feel that way should be a red flag
>>75108565
>Clinton
>More electable
>Ever
Kek
>>75106240
>And that doesn't even take into consideration the fact that Trump's bump is only a temporary one
>Temporary
Are you from the future? Her numbers have been steadily decreasing over the last month whilst Trumps rises, how can you call that temporary?
If the polls continue in this 'temporary' way, Trump wins in a landslide. Luckily they are only temporary though, right?
Bernie's shills were more fun than Hillary's
>>75108330
And this screenshot of your comment...
>>75108940
It matters because you're wrong. Trump would not advance progressive values as President. Trump would not push progressive policy as President. What would happen is that Obama's SCOTUS pick would be replaced by a conservative, who would emulate Scalia (if you even know who Scalia was). He would then sit back while our radical right-wing Congress passes radical right-wing legislation, then sign the ones he likes and veto and ones he doesn't. None of the bills he signs would be progressive bills. Not only would he not sign them, but they wouldn't get through Congress, because a Trump victory in November would ensure the GOP maintains control over both houses of Congress.
So we would have a radical right-wing Congress, a conservative majority Supreme Court, and a President with a questionable foreign policy, an unpredictable and dangerous personality, and a tendency to sign into law bills passed by that radical right-wing Congress.
And you think he's a LIBERAL? What a joke!
>>75109266
So? What are you going to do? Go ahead and post the screenshots, people will get confused anyways and not understand what's going on.
>>75104942
It's made by democrats to get their per niggers to vote for Sanders.
>>75104648
How would Trump actually do against Sanders if he became the nominee?
Clinton he has loads of ammunition and he's probably been prepping for it for years, but Sanders would be someone from far left-field who has a solid base and little unfavorability.
I don't doubt Sanders would make conservatives come out in droves in support of Trump but what about independents? This year its going to be a battle for independents and it could be a fair match between the two of them. The only other thing I could see happening is some moderate/conservative Dems switch to the Republican party, but would it be enough to hold back against Sanders?
>>75109227
That's because Sanders shills (weather you agree with them or not) stood on principal
Hillary shills have, since literally day 1, been in complete denial about every aspect of this election year
>She's not under investigation
>Trump will never poll even close to her
>Polls mean nothing
>Trumps statistical tie is "temporary"
Etc.
>>75109266
>And this screenshot of your comment...
Kek a screenshot of an anonymous message board, you got some Undeniable proof m80, our master plan is ruined
>>75109285
I do think he's liberal. More liberal than Clinton. He'll protect workers (which Democrats haven't done in 3 decades), he'll back away from overseas conflicts (which Clinton had a hand in starting/exacerbating), and he'll put an end to these nonsense trade agreements that only exist to benefit the top 20%.
If you're this upset, why didn't your party run an actual liberal instead of a neolib?
>>75104942
Sanders' main base is independents that vote Democrat every time, and those guys rarely show up for primary elections if they even can.
>>75105438
This is the dumbest honeypot I have seen.
>>75109285
>radical right-wing
What makes you think they're radical? All the violent protests they keep staging.
Liberals have gone insane, if the right Wing is so 'radical' why weren't they violently protesting all of Obama's Rallies? Trying to storm the stage to attack him? Where were the hundreds of death threats on social media?
Radical right wing, fucking KEK
>>75109959
Trump won't do any of that shit.
>He'll protect workers
Trump is an enemy of workers. He's a union-busting, worker-firing piece of shit.
http://www.thenation.com/article/no-surprise-trump-is-a-union-buster-at-his-own-hotel/
>He'll back away from overseas conflict
Do you just take every single word he says and believe it without a second thought?
Let me tell you something. As President, Trump would rely on the same advisors and appoint a cabinet very similar to the ones we see in any other Republican administration. What he says during the campaign is irrelevant. What matters i what he would do.
Tell me something. When the next terrorist attack happens somewhere, and the media is out for blood, what do you think he's gonna do? When the Republican Congress is banging down his door demanding military action, what do you think he's gonna do? He's not going to be measured and responsible about it. He's going to make a giant fucking mistake, and it's going to cost us the lives of U.S. servicemembers.
Kid, you need to learn something. A political campaign is not the same as actually being President. He's going to have pressure from all sides to do stupid shit with the military just like Obama did. He's going to have pressure from the media. He's going to have pressure from the right-wing Congress. He's even going to have pressure from many Conservative American citizens. Believe me, kid. Trump is not going to "back away from overseas conflict." Not even CLOSE.
>he'll put an end to these nonsense trade agreements
First of all, that's highly unlikely. Between now and November, he is going to be told in no uncertain terms to tow the party line. And, as President, he will happily oblige. How do I know? Simply put, everything he's saying now is for campaigning, not for governing. There's a huge difference between the two. Thinking that he will govern the way he campaigns is so naive that it makes me laugh. Grow up, kid!
(cont)
>>75104648
Bernie would get absolutely RUINED by Trump. Either way, the insanity of radical leftism or leftism in general gets exposed on the world stage, hopefully the Democrat party will die when half of them get arrested on corruption charges. It will be amazing what kind of shit surfaces when we have an AG that isn't an accomplice to the gangster in Chief.
>>75110784
Now, as for the merits of the trade deals themselves, I've got some news for you. Every economist agrees that the trade deals are generally good for the country. So what's the problem with them, exactly? Simply put, these trade deals need to be put into place IN CONJUNCTION WITH TRAINING/JOBS PROGRAMS. We need to make sure displaced workers are trained and found new jobs, but we haven't been doing that. That's how you take advantage of trade deals. But we haven't been doing that, and the reason why is because conservatives don't want to spend the money.
Trump will be no different in that regard. If you want the best situation, then you don't just toss out the trade deals. You do the trade deals and then invest money to train displaced workers for new jobs. Someone like Clinton is far more likely, given a liberal Congress anyways, to do just that. Trump won't give a fuck.
>>75106940
Not literal KGB agents you fucking moron, he's talking about the lingering effects of Soviet subversion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obr1XqUPEII
You probably won't even watch the video though.
>>75107331
> and Alex Jones fans
What? Alex Jones is consistently talking about Bernie being a Communist and how his policies can't be enacted without removing rights (which is true).
>>75111281
what white people are telling them to vote Hillary? Black people voted Hillary all on their own. Then they bitched at white people for telling them to vote for Sanders.
>>75111281
>Rate of increase nearly identical before, during and after Clinton
>But its somehow Clinton's fault.
>>75106342
His point is that the imagine macro is really fucking wordy and hard to read. It does not do the job of an image macro because by the time you've finished reading, you no longer care what it means.
>>75109285
"Progressive policy" entails radical economic reforms and the removal of rights. You're right, those are things both Hillary and Bernie want.
Trump has a few classical liberal (like the Founding fathers) policies, not your regressive communist ideology which will inevitably remove people's rights. Both Bernie and Hillary have shown a complete disregard for the 2nd amendment, for example.
Progressives are not liberal, you are totalitarian statists.
>>75111451
>Clinton incarcerated at the same rate as Reagan and Bush
So progressive
>>75106342
True but either way, its shit. Clinton should have never tried to fuck around with the internet in the first place. This is Trump territory.
>>75107496
Not an argument
>>75107568
Both share similar positions such as being against the TPP
>>75106882
Almost all images posted in order to "say" something are image macros. Their message is the image.
"Meme" refers to an idea that is exchanged between people. Particularly those which are widely-propagated already. A meme does not have to be an image, but it can be.
All of the Pepe images are not "Pepe memes," but they are expressions of the Pepe meme (singular). There are many ways to communicate the idea of Pepe, in his case they are largely visual but sometimes auditory.
>>75111451
>nearly
Yeah, then you realise the chart is in millions and an imperceptible increase is probably 100k
>>75111281
Uhhh... To be fair it looks like the trend is already established in the 20 years before the first red line. Since effects from things like this are delayed, the 2nd red line seems to mark the start of a decrease.
Probably not the best argument, my scientifically illiterate negro friend.
>>75112016
Hi Dan, I loved your book Military Incompetence. It is honestly one of my absolute favorite military books.
>>75110784
Yeah, I'm sure that Trump is going to do exactly what the republican establishment tells him to do after they did everything they possibly could to ensure he didn't get the nomination (including eliminate the effect of voting in multiple state primaries). Surely he will act exactly like the stereotypical republican boogeyman once he comes into office. I know this because reasons.
also,
>The next terrorist attack
>After muslims have been deported
>>75112309
I'm afraid I don't understand.
>>75108774
Couldn't think of another way to publicly post a high res image without having to create an account somewhere
>>75108581
Did you refer to the imgur?
That image is just supporting proof of the 4chan thread
>>75110478
How is this a honeypot in an form?
>>75112287
Listen buddy and bear with me now, the chart clearly shows a stabilization and subsequent decrease during the Obama (the Great) administration naking your little argument a tad too white apologist for my tastes.
>>75104942
It's called rigging the DNC primaries, friend.
>>75112262
>100k
>imperceptible
>When the chart is marked at 250K intervals
>>75112765
sure thing buddy keep being in denial of your scientific illiterament
>>75110784
>Do you just take every single word he says and believe it without a second thought?
you do the same with hillary? faggot. trump doesn't have a pile of bodies behind him.
justify this.
>>75106861
Not even her husband wants to fuck her.
>>75104942
Sanders isnt actually winning against either of them.
>>75105816
You have ten hours to describe how Bernie's policies make him a communist.
>>75115443
I don't think that is enough time, the amount of material will take days to properly sort and quote
>>75105975
Kefka
>>75105438
Anonymous hates pol. God you hillary faggots are either pathetically bad or she is so insufferable that you are scuttling your efforts intentionally.
>>75117106
You have no fucking clue what happened. Normies don't know the difference between pol and anonymous. Yesterday all of us on pol yesterday made the thread on this imgur link
http://imgur.com/a/1M1iB
And that second image was a fake image posted to go along with the thread. Spread that shit everywhere
>>75110822
What jobs, precisely, are you going to train them to do? Most of the displaced workers are high school educated at best. What possible job could you train them at that would pay them a wage that is high enough to sustain a family, since most of them are also the sole breadwinners? Every country must have a manufacturing base in order to have a stable economy. It HAS to. Even now a significant portion of the US GDP is from manufacturing.
Also, what precisely would pay for those retraining programs? We could use tariffs for that, but we don't charge tariffs currently.
The best way to fix the entire american economy is to convince companies to put high paying low education jobs (read: manufacturing) back in the country. This gives low education workers a chance to earn a living, fewer people will feel the need to attend college (right now I'd say a good 1/4 to 1/2 are only in college for the government assistance) and the bottom will drop out of the college industry, so those who want to attend will be able to afford to do so. Low paying jobs right now (things like retail clerks and fast food workers) will have to raise wages or risk having their best workers move to higher paying manufacturing jobs. And the effects keep on going. A surge in manufacturing in the US would give our economy a huge boost, and that's exactly what would happen if we got rid of the NAFTA (fuck you Mexico) and the TPP (fuck you again mexico, and you japan, and you singapore). Imposing tariffs would seal the deal since china would have to raise wages (good for the entire world economy, desu) to continue importing everything ever into the US, or manufacturing jobs would move back from China to the US, or we would have the money to pay for all the social programs the average citizen is depending on to survive right now.
>>75111045
Yuri is a fucking excellent watch. It's amazing how he basically tells us what is going to happen.
>>75113220
Why isn't Waco also on this list? or any of the other disasters she was in charge of stateside?
TRUMP TRUMP
>>75105752
Actual bernie supporter here, not some hillary shill.
I and many of the supporters I have talked to will not vote hillary. I'll vote democrat for house/senate/local seats but I'll either write in sanders if he runs or vote Jill stein. I'd never vote for hillary, ever.
>>75118095
This.
People who unironically say that we need to fund education so former assembly line people can magick themselves a corner office should be beaten in public.
>>75104991
Mr Biden will save the Democratic Party!
>>75105752
>Finally, superdelegates are irrelevant for a few reasons.
Were they irrelevant the hundreds of times they were reported as part of Clinton's overall total in the headlines to create the constant impression she was miles ahead of Sanders?
>>75109540
He would call him a KEKOLD on national TV, bernie would never recover.
>>75106468
>Trump would take us backward on all of those issues when we need to be moving forward.
Implying Obamacare is a step forward. The shit you care about is 100% irrelevant too.
>Muh right to abort a child because I make the consensual decision to fuck but I don't want the responsibility now that I'm pregnant.
Poor you. This is why the vast majority of liberals are living trash. How much do you get every month from that welfare check?
>>75108010
it's not over until it's over
>>75111420
The "tough on crime" mandatory minimum sentencing push so hard by the right for decades can't be undone by any president. It's going to take a miracle from congress to end this massive waste of taxpayer money.
But the conservatives won't let it.
>>75111565
>Both Bernie and Hillary have shown a complete disregard for the 2nd amendment, for example.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-nra-helped-put-bernie-sanders-in-congress/2015/07/19/ed1be26c-2bfe-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html
>>75104648
Bernie is trying to prove whether or not it is too late for an average citizen to run for presidency without greedy corporations aid.
>>75104648
THIRD PARTY!
>>75105438
I've already done my part. What is key is that you give the Bernie supporters hard truths about Trump. It takes very long posts, research, and extrapolation of data, but you can do it.
>>75121707
Wait...
You won an argument on the internet?
PRAISE KEK!
>>75121707
Man, I try, I really do. But I always run into walls, because the first thing they say is "HES A RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, ISLAMAPHOBIC, DEMAGAOGUE". I won't even be a dick. I just say the typical "Can you show me where he said something like you're claiming? I just haven't seen that before"
Then I get blocked. It's very rare someone will engage. Even if they do, they're so stuck on Bernie, just like it would literally be impossible for me to go go from Trump to Bernie
>>75122082
I ask for proof to the claims, and, if provided, dismantle it. If they don't, then I say that without proof, the argument is without fact. Burden of proof is on the claimant. Then I give an absurd claim to show what I mean, like, "Bernie is a pedophile. Don't believe me? Look it up!"
It's pretty easy. The toughest argument to fight was the argument against bankruptcies, which I have defeated, as well. That took a LONG time, though (to research, not to refute).
Image related is an example. The link that facebook condensed is here:
http://www.skadden.com/insights/trends-chapter-11-filings-venue-and-proposed-reforms.
I can also include the graph that I mentioned in the facebook post if you like.
>>75122082
>>75122483
Here's the bankruptcies graph that I mentioned in the post.
>>75119392
She always was miles ahead of Sanders.
>>75122483
I was talking to a bernout friend (irl) and refuted all of his arguments to the point that he actually admitted that the only reason he would not vote for Trump is because "he's too aggressive".
women be shopin, cucks be cuckin
>>75122815
This person is your friend?
>>75122815
The person who's mind I changed was a lesbian that worships Japan.
It's not important to take Bernie Sanders down, though if it gets brought up (usually because of talking about things like fairness), I will stick strictly to philosophy, saying things like:
>(They say: [insert thing] isn't fair!)
> Such is the curse of living in an admittedly imperfect meritocracy (although society as a whole is constantly making efforts to reduce the imperfections).
>That said, I will take the freedoms that "equal opportunity" bestows upon society over the cage that "equal outcome" wishes for (which is admittedly the single biggest reason that I don't like Bernie).
Bernie isn't going to win the primary, and the vast majority of states have already voted for their primary. It's pointless to argue for the vast majority of people. Instead, you do nothing more than defend Trump, which is easy to do. If they can't provide evidence for their claims, you tell them their claim is baseless, and give an absurd counter-example. If they base their claims, you dismantle it.
If they say, "Trump says he wants to take out the families of terrorists," respond with, "If someone talks to their parents for months about killing someone, the parents are accomplices for not reporting it if the guy goes and kills someone. This is why the San Bernadino shooter's family has been arrested. Are you against that? Because Trump has never stated that he wants to break US law, even on an international level. In fact, he's stated the opposite."
>>75106468
>Politics is what I do.
Being a shill makes you a political expert now? I miss bernie shills, they did it for free and at least had some enthusiasm. You are trying too hard to sound professional on this taiwanese wood whittling board.
>>75106468
>Politics is what I do
Holy shit my sides are in orbit.
Why don't you take a break from "what you do" and try to learn about economics works then jump into the political ring.
If economics is too hard for you try history anywhere in the world really, socialism and liberalism fail outside of homogenous communities.
t. high information college educated
