![301[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/7MNntHT.jpg "301[1].jpg")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3-W4-QQ764&feature=youtu.be
This is big guys. I know none of the normies are gonna do anything in response to this but complain here and there but is there anything we can do? Is it innawoods time?
>inb4 meme magick it away
>TLDW?
I'm about to hit the sack what are you talking about OP?
>>75030651
Supreme Court basically just said congress doesn't make laws, courts don't interpret laws, different bureaus operating under the authority of the president can do both. which ultimately means whoever is POTUS is KING OF ALL WESTEROS
OP here goddammit /pol/ i remember when you used to talk about shit like this. now every thread is
>liberal comment: pol btfo!
>why women are evil
>lets get digits for trump and the frog god
when the happening happens you all won't even notice til the firing squad is at your door.
>>75031031
That's fine by me if Trump is president.
>>75031031
absolutely fug.
whelp, its the end of the world, i mad.
>>75031815
dude pol is satire lmao no one fucking cares
>>75031031
damn so the supreme court just invalidated their own self granted powers?
fuck thats messed up.
>>75031815
You do realize that most old-timers have emigrated, right?
>>75030506
Here's the article Ron Paul discussed: http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/3904568-155/sunstein-government-just-got-more-power
>sunstein
The case is an example of how the Supreme Court is theatre, and the federal government does what they can get away with regardless of how the individual judges are supposed to perform based on the pedigree that was paraded before the public prior to their nomination.
Scalia created a legal precedent in the 1970's as a federal judge, Auer principle, which dramatically expanded the power of the federal government.
Then 20 years later, he's on the supreme court now, playing the "arch conservative", and he argues against his own principle, but not surprisingly, he's outvoted, and Auer principle is sustained.
Then another 20 years pass, Scalia is dead, and the sole remaining "arch conservative" cites the dead guy's argument against his own precedent, but is again btfo.
>>75031990
its literally because lolberals are the majority of the court.
this is what happens when our government is run by illiterate fucktards who have not, will not, and will never read the fucking laws of the land.
god i hate this country so fucking much most of the time.
>>75031031
Are they allowed to do this? Just like that?
Won't there be protest? Surely even the libertards must see that this is bullshit
>>75030506
Meem magick it away.
>>75032213
libtards are the 1st world junta that refuse to go against their warlord kangz.
they don't give a singular fuck no matter what happens because they are brainless spineless idiots who refuse to look at the world with their own eyes.
>>75032213
>protests
no. facebook, abundant food, and estrogens in the food have destroyed any possibility for action. most people would just whip out their phones and film someone being stomped into gore by the police. And its more or less the same in all Western countries aside from the slavs.
>SUN(((STEIN)))
>>75032213
Nah, the precedent under consideration is 40 years old, and it has previously held up under review.
It's not what I'd call a dramatic change in the law.
>>75031031
HANG ON, HOW?????
This Doesn't make any sense
>>75032150
>Sunstein
Moonman's greatest nemesis
>>75032590
>his country banned guns because of a literal retard who got framed
that's how. same shit different toilet tyranny doesn't have to play by logical rules when people are willing to accept them
>>75032390
>Aside from the Slavs
Feelsgoodman
>>75032189
This isn't even a liberal thing.
This is the fucking neo-fascist undercurrents puppeteering the Democrats doing whatever they want.
Liberalism is just the means to an end at this point. It would have been conservatism if this were 10 years ago.
>>75031031
Perfect timing for Trump's ascendancy then.
>>75031031
Just in time for God-Emperor TRUMP (pbuh). Maybe he can dissolve the supreme court and stock it with all of the far-right judges on his roster from last week.
>>75032150
Jesus fucking what. The supreme court's whole purpose is to interpret the law. I'd argue that regulations fall under that. This ruling seems as though it makes the supreme court pointless. Why the hell would they try to make themselves obsolete?
>>75032780
it still doesn't change the fact that this was caused by illiterate fuckwaffles who blatantly ignore the law and change it on their current wants illegally, and the worst part is they are backed by actual armies that nobody can deal with, its bullshit and tyranny of the highest order.
>>75030506
So from what I can gather, this is all about the "Auer principle" which basically says, where a government agency is legislatively granted the right to regulate something, that agency is the arbiter of precisely what the regulations it makes, means, should there be ambiguity, in the absence of any other indications in the relevant legislation.
This kinda makes sense. The ones writing the regulations know what they mean, and if Congress disagrees, it can amend the relevant legislation granting the right to regulate to the agency. Either to provide more direction, specifically override the regulation, or define interpretation as falling under the court's purview.
What's the problem with this arrangement?
>>75030506
Do you think Ron Paul reads your autistic comments?
>>75033362
Well they have been accused of legislating from the bench lately - this could be some kind of reputation fix :)
Seriously though, the courts still can get involved where there's a conflict of a regulation with other law, or where congress directs that the courts determine ambiguities.
The principle only applies to situations where there are multiple possible perfectly legal interpretations of a regulation.
F
>>75033606
he does and he always smiles when i get sick repeating digits
>>75033563
The problem is that the regulatory agencies have been given UNLIMITED right to not just regulate but effectively legislate which goes beyond the intention of the agency as well as the law itself - many agencies violate the constitution, for example due process rights, willfully and without rebuke.
While it is possible for the legislature to remove the right, that requires political willpower that is nonexistent, and doesn't solve the issue that agencies will overreach over now meaningless boundaries, especially given that the Supreme Court has signaled that it is unwilling to interfere where the agencies transgress the law and the constitutional boundaries of the country's governance.
This is incredibly dangerous as, while sure, many situations are perfectly legal, the transformation of agencies from regulative to de facto legislative bodies blurs major boundaries between the separation of power of Legislature, Executive and Judiciary, as the Executive assumes the power of the others.
This is bad.
Why?
Well, why should the executive keep the others if it can do their job, protections be damned?
As a pre-9/11 conspiratard, I just want to say, fuck all you normies, we tried to warn you, and you wouldn't listen, and now it's too late, and you fucking fucked us both, stupid.
And you objectively fucking suck.
>>75034398
But in theory the courts still have jurisdiction over agency regulations that directly conflict with either other legislation (where there's not clear direction from Congress on which "wins") or with the Constitution - legislation and the constitution always trump regulation.
In a few cases it appears congress has deliberately created legal grey areas that permit agencies to regulate in a way which can be considered unconstitutional but manage to weasel their way through gaps to be technically legal.
I don't think this latter problem is an issue with the Aeur principle per se though
Bump while I watch
>>75034398
why do you think they did it?
What could the worst thing they can do in the near future?
>>75031815
You're right. /pol/ has really gone to shit.
That's it.
OUT WITH ALL OF THEM.
>>75039475
Let's make Pol great again!
I'm almost 100% sure it's paid shills. I've taken a week off here and there and I rarely would do that before
>>75032189
fuck... just fuck...
>>75038041
>why do you think they did it?
Money of course. One example would be the EPA's fight against fracking
>>75034398
What could be the consequences of this?
Just what can they do with that power?
I like this thread, it is what /pol/ used to feel like a while back, before the pony porn apocalypse.
>>75030506
There are no more barriers to cross.
All I have in common with the uncontrollable and the insane,
the vicious and the evil, all the mayhem I have caused
and my utter indifference toward it I have now surpassed.
My pain is constant and sharp, and I do not hope for a better world for anyone.
In fact, I want my pain to be inflicted on others.
I want no one to escape. But even after admitting this, there is no catharsis;
my punishment continues to elude me, and I gain no deeper knowledge of myself.
No new knowledge can be extracted from my telling.
>>75040979
Was that faggy thing actually in the movie??
