Pretty much all the ones I've reviewed have been detached from reality. It's difficult to imagine them being the best logical choice for anything ideological, although I'll admit to voting for one before because the alternatives in that particular situation were even worse.

>>75006866

>although I'll admit to voting for one before because the alternatives in that particular situation were even worse.

what were the alternatives?

>>75007128
A Democrat, a Republican, a Constitutional, and a Libertarian. My primary interest was to try to kick out the incumbent, and it was not actually an easy decision to pick among the rest. I forget what tipped me Green, but I think it might have been this particular candidate's strong anti-War posture.

>>75006737
delet this

>>75007424

>Democrat, a Republican

really voting for the system here

>Constitutional

I like them. As long as they arent too far to the right they usually have my vote.

>Libertarian

Highly detached from reality. Too liberal or just stupid either way.

>>75007700

how about you leave instead?

>>75007973
Yeah, I almost went Constitutional instead. I was really excited at first to see so many options because there usually aren't so many, but disappointed on further review that the individual candidates were all pretty mixed bags.

As nutty as many hardline Libertarians are, I often wind up using them as a protest vote due to relative strength as a party and that I do actually think having more of them then we do (within reason) would tend to push things in a net healthy direction.

>>75006737
Will never vote greens or labour ever again

>>75008155
Get fucked, cunt. Enjoy your flood of rapefugees and mexicans.

>>75006737
>Are Greens best logical choise for a post industrialized society?
By which you mean to lead to a post industrialised society through their policies?

Then, yes.

>>75008762

fuckoff were full in this thread/

>>75008555

nice trips.

>As nutty as many hardline Libertarians are, I often wind up using them as a protest vote due to relative strength as a party and that I do actually think having more of them then we do (within reason) would tend to push things in a net healthy direction.

this is a good idea. although their party is flawed a counterbalance is always a necessity

>>75009040

indeed most of the highest rated nations have moved into the post industrial age rather well in the past 40 years. todays age is about commodities and not goods.

>>75006737

Greens are just environmental muh feelz socialists

Nothing more

They're not even "good" environmentalists

>>75010481

>They're not even "good" environmentalists

explain

>>75010593

>muh feelz

There you go.

They'll do something based on whether it feels like a good idea or not without thinking it through with logic and caution.

>>75010721

quite a broad analogy there