How do libertarians deal with pollution?
>>74937104
They don't
>>74937166
fpbp
Well, the magic of the marketplace takes over. Consumers see which companies pollute and then choose not to patron those companies, and then the companies lose to their more environmentally-friendly competitors.
Don't believe me? Well, that's why they call it magic my friend!
http://www.strawpoll.me/10297515
.
Burn coal.
Carbon is a gift to life.
>>74937250
Are you saying we could incentivize the pollution of India?
>>74937323
Is Canada still on fire?
>>74937104
they don't, they hope that gas masks would be sold at ridicuously low prices in the future
>>74937104
tort law
and it isn't anarchy anyway you dumb cunts, if there's a need for it, there can be an argument made for preventing pollution of other's equal right to clean air
>>74937291
>libertarian and nationalist are mutually exclusive
>again
what is with you faggots and this stupid meme
>>74937104
with my dick
>>74937104
tax on emissions
>the current regulatory system just sets a cap to stay under.
replacing this with a tax per ton causes companies to continuously improve
Yes, tax is allowed in this specific Libertarian scenario since any pollution emitted automatically imposes a cost on everyone in the area.
>>74937104
Coase theorem.
>http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/coase-theorem.asp
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coase_theorem
>>74937291
I'm a nationalist libertarian.
Go fuck yourself.
