>>74409260
until siesta time
>>74409260
An armed conflict requires something of value to be gained out of victory. There is nothing of value in Mexico.
It would be a few hours until the mexican propaganda could no longer hide the massive amounts of casualties
Probably 1-2 days, depending on the people's will to launch a coup during the invasion
Depends how much civilian lives and infrastructure you want to save. Most of the complexity of the invasion would probably come from attempting to minimize damages.
The United States could take Canada AND Mexico in about a week
God willing
>>74409260
It wouldn't even be a war. Don't forget that we have an entire fleet of semi-autonomous flying death machines (drones) that won't be stuck in the middle east forever.
>>74409585
If Le Weed Man doesn't let Canada burn to ashes before that...
>>74409260
Just as long as it takes for mexico to realize they are being attacked, and then they'll surrender because they hate themselves
Theyd probably give up and surrender as fast as the Iraqi military did if I had to guess. We'd have to carve through the cartels first though, and them boys might actually have some fight in em
>""""""""conflict""""""""
Less than 30 minutes
>>74409773
There is almost no chance that we'd even bother to engage in a ground war against the cartels. Unless the cartels gain access to the mexican air force (I assume they have at least a few jets... ) they would have no way to defend themselves let alone mount any sort of counter attack.
>>74409908
This.
>>74409260
I fucking love how full of itself this country is. No sarcasm, it makes me proud to know there are people who believe in the U.S.
>>74409773
Also this is most accurate. The actual Mexican Armed Forces wouldn't engage if they were smart. But the law breakers with the illegal guns might be fun.
>>74409486
Considering the number of US military bases in the border states, yes.
What if all the cartels and gang bangers got patriotic, those guys can bankroll some serious shit and they're no strangers to brutality...If they followed a strategy and worked together they could at least draw it out a bit. Source of my knowledge , I watched sicario.
>>74410067
They could. The IRA fucked you cunts up.
>>74410148
And who are you behind that union jack?
>>74410067
You can't take a machete to a drone.
Also, Mexican "strategy" kek.
>>74410241
I think you know who I am.
>>74409260
>murica zergrushes mexico
>takes everything in 36 hours
>guerilla warfare for years
>vids of cartels skinning and beheading murican soldiers
>us keep killing them
>they post more
>us kills them
>they post more
>etc
the U.S. can probably take on the entire EU in an armed conflict
>>74410487
In the current state. If given the time to arm the EU would decimate the american military.
>>74410487
Take them on is the best wording. We sure as hell could make it last a long time, and drag out their patience to the point of them wanting to give up, but even if we won, we'd be real fucked up for a long ass time.
>>74410427
Holy shit it is actually fucking creepy how much you look like me, not even joking. Think my great great great grandfather was iris. ..maybe were related...Fuck me....I genuinely spooped
>>74409260
Not long was curious to see what type of armor and vehicles they have. They have no battle tanks or any heavily armored vehicles. and their anti armor capabilities are practically nonexistent. Their current fighter aircraft is a F-5 a fighter which hasn't been used since the 60's it is comical how far behind they are.
>>74410754
The more you know, you want to go further down the rabbit hole anon?
>>74410548
>invades the Midwest
>gets ambushed by 12 year old minute men
>entire company killed by our children
>>74409260
22 days. Don't ask how I know.
Given how big our military dick is, and how god damn patriotic Texas is, I wager it would be over before it started.
Literally, Texans would get word of a ""conflict"" and end it themselves within the hour.
>>74410754
It's a scary thought that somewhere is a person who looks just like you
Till January 20th 2017
>>74410548
Kek, I could use their blue helmets as soup bowls.
>>74410257
They once destroyed a military helicopter like it was nothing. Also is well know they have modified anti personnel vehicles (trucks with antibullet plates and heavy weaponry). Crime Pays I guess. It would be glorious if someone purged those bastards tho.
>>74410856
if that what you callin u mom pussy now then sure
>>74411066
>>74410861
>Literally, Texans would get word of a ""conflict"" and end it themselves within the hour.
We Shouldn't Have Invaded America: The Story
>>74409678
He is already blazing us pretty hard. Please help.
>>74409486
It would be a Lebanon v Israel style border skirmish. Couple of weeks shelling back and forth until peace talks. POW captures on both sides. Higher Mexican casualties than American ones.
>>74411069
He stole my faaaaaaace....well at least I got my trademark British teeth to dstinguish me....and I don't quite have the jew nose.
>>74410861
>Red Dawn
Good movie(The original not the remake)
>>74411196
Sure sure
>>74410979
When you put it that way I just gotta ask now. How do you know anon?
>>74410548
>EU
>Attacking the U.S.
Top, fucking Kek.
We will slaughter your men and rape your women, faggot. Please, come over and give us a reason.
>>74410548
>does not understand decimate means every 10th man killed
must be a paki
>>74410428
difference is, we wouldn't leave Mexico. It's a drive away, not on the other side of the gay earth like the Muslims.
New Texas when?
>>74411401
>raping snagle tooth whores
Anon, pls. Don't put your dick near those chav holes. Kill, rinse, and repeat.
>>74409357
first post worst post :/
48-72 hours
>>74409260
Four days bombing every bridge, water treatment plant, coms dish, air strip, and military base while marching to the capital.
15 years of reconstruction while fighting a guerilla war against the cartels.
The eternal American war script.
>>74411401
I wouldn't worry about the Mainland, they will be lucky enough to get through our Navy first. That is the biggest obstacle to invading our country, got to do something about our Navy before you even think about what beach you want to land on first.
>>74410979
The bean counters at the pentagon tell you that?
It wouldn't even take a real conflict. One threat of USA dropping a MOAB on Mexico City and they surrender.
>>74411282
we tried, but he refused our aid
>>74411668
Don't fix what ain't broken is what I say
>>74411464
>thinking the origin of "decimate" supersedes how it has been used and understood for the past few hundred years.
>>74409260
Approximately 1 week. The cartels would do most of the fighting.
>>74409260
Not long.
>>74412030
Good job, pupper
It would turn into an american civilwar
>>74412030
I'm so happy the little fella got away
>>74412030
>""""mans best friend""""
>runs away like a french
>>74412604
What was it supposed to do? Run into the gunfire and get wienerschnitzel'd?
>>74412604
Are you kidding they where probably planing to rape the dog.
Probably about a week or two. The Iraqi invasion took 21 days, and that was halfway across the world. The US has easy access to Mexico's borders, and has complete and utter naval control in the area.
That said, there'd obviously be an insurgency that would require an occupation for some time. And there'd be issues at home with the large Mexican population.
>>74409260
If Mexico could hold for a decade i believe most Americans could not leave their houses because of the overgrowth of their lawns and shrubbery.
>>74412604
Mehmet pls go.
>>74411282
If you burn a blunt it wins.
Like one minute, however long it takes for the Mexican president to dial Obama and say "ok we gringo clay nao", at which point 80 million new democrats are registered just in time to vote.
>>74409723
Hopefully their Mexican pride would overcome them and they would fight to the death
If usa invade mexico , will that trigger a South American federation?
>>74409260
Smedley Butler investigated Mexico before WWI with a view to invading and occupying it. His conclusion was that it would be impossible. Mexico is actually like Russia in many respects.
>Huge territory
>No infrastructure outside metropoli
>Disposable people
>The one time anybody feels any pride or does a good job is repulsing invaders
>>74412604
>Mudslimes inject dogs with acid and hang them
friendship is a give and take Muha-mad
>>74409260
Assuming you are being serious, it depends on what is the goal of the war. Remember, the definition of war is "the enforcement of politics through force" (with competition, ofc).
>>74409260
IT'S ALREADY OVER.
>>74409260
>Mexican armed """""forces"""""
It'd be much worse then Iraq due to the amount of Mexicans already here and the proximity between us. Really would be another vietnam.
About the length of one taquito
>>74409260
we would fucking destroy them kek
>>74409585
also this
>>74413884
You'd get fighters flooding in from South and central America.and Cuba, would probably be funded by Russia and would cause some cartel unification, the amount of fighting in our country based on how many of all the above would be insane
>>74409260
Forever with our government.
>>74409471
We'd have to invade California too tho
>>74412604
>Muslims
>"""""man"""""
>>74412882
Were those killed white?
>>74413884
>>74414086
The real military conflict happens after we would crush their conventional military, it'd be either scorched earth or just the amount of guerrilla warfare would collapse our nation, even with scorched earth it could collapse us
Even the Mexicans or those who look Mexican would be pushed into conflict due to the mass hysteria, it's a nightmare scenario
>>74409471
we gain land and a wall across the southern border
>>74409260
Probably a week. The United States is very skilled at steamrolling armies, yet fucking awful at holding territory and fighting guerillas. The public doesn't have a stomach for an extended war and the news loves showing each and every American soldier killed in combat.
So the United States could storm in and disrupt the country of Mexico in about a week, and hopefully they just fucking leave lol.
Are we allowing a week or two for the US military to gather as much of It's forces on the border and in the Gulf of Mexico?
If so I'd say about a month for the US to completely invade and cause the Government in Mexico City to collapse.
No doubt It'd be a white wash but people saying less than a week vastly overestimate the ability for armies to invade somewhere. Larger, stronger military doesn't necessarily change the time it takes for certain logistical things, sort of like the fixed cost of an invasion If you will, but in time.
It took the US/UK/Aus/Poland (But mostly US) 6 weeks to Invade and conquer Iraq
Mexico is closer and US could send more people to an invasion of Mexico and the Iraqi military was bigger than the Mexican military but Mexico as a country is larger and has more people.
>>74410428
>>vids of cartels skinning and beheading murican soldiers
wouldnt happen
>>74411298
I think that the superiority of the US Air Force would mean that any artillery the Mexicans could set up would get taken out pretty quickly. The shelling would end up being pretty one-sided.
Otherwise I think you're about right.
>>74414808
considering these guys are just across the border that just makes the importance of eliminating them that much greater
It would never happen. It would piss everyone off.
>>74414922
the cartel would be the first to go I imagine, they don't have the military might we have so I doubt they'd really do any damage
we could also drone them
>>74414621
Mexico is not as foresty as Vietnam and not even close to being as mountainous as Afghanistan.
>>74414689
A month? I don't even think the United States would have to gather their strength. There's probably three Nimitz Class carriers sitting in San Diego port right now, and that's a 15 minute drive from the border of Mexico. Give it about three days for the carriers to arrive on Mexico's east coast from Norfolk and another five to six days for even another carrier to arrive from Hawaii.
It would seriously be as easy as a decapitation attack on the government and strikes against power-plants and other critical infrastructure. You could have about six Super Carriers bombing the shit out of defensless Mexico within the time-span of a week. That's not even counting all the military bases along the border.
It would be fucking retarded, and the only way we could fuck it up is trying to police Mexico after we totally crushed their country.
>>74415166
cartels survival rate depends on their ability and willingness to do guerilla warfare
>>74409260
considering how mexico gets most of its military supplies from us, not long at all
a month tops
>>74409471
>repayment for violation of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
>land for the wall
>>74409260
About a day, give or take
I mean, the gulf war was about a week
Why is my country so shit at fighting guerillas? They go full fucking retard Everytime the enemy starts getting a little unconventional
>>74415309
I would imagine some would defect if they weren't getting paid well
if I was in the cartel and I wasn't getting paid a lot to fight off the fucking US military I'd GTFO
>>74409471
They have oil
Lots of oil actually
mexico just has to get ONE mosquito man through to release his mosquitos and infect the whole US with zika
>>74415449
here's what it takes to make a guerilla fighter
1 automatic weapon
2 explosives
3 a purpose
>>74415449
fighting guerillas ain't easy considering any civilian can be one
the only really effective way I can think of is genocide and just killing everything
>>74409260
mean while in the south china sea thread >>74412870
>>74409471
Beachfront property?
>>74412604
your fucking retarded
tfw no mexicans in this thread
>>74415192
With this in mind, I think a far more interesting question would be how long would it take for the United States to completely wreck all of North and South America? Including Central America and the Caribbean Islands.
>>74412030
Wew, glad the little pup ran away in time.
>>74415747
damnit *you're
and meant
>>74412882
>>74415449
1) asymmetric warfare is a real bitch to fight
2) we'd be a lot better at it if congress and the president weren't so damned hell bent on tying the military's hands behind its back.
same shitty mistake they made in vietnam.
>>74410548
>he fell for the "We're gonna invade the country with the most well funded military and most armed populace across an entire ocean and win" meme
Our nation would be fucking echoing with the sound of guffawing and clapping for years to come. I bet you're that guy who bet on China invading America via shipping containers, like no one would know.
>>74415309
cartels make assloads of money with little risk to themselves, when nobody is getting paid and everyone they know is dying they are going to do whatever they can to get out
>>74409260
>America couldn't take on a bunch of jungle monkey rice farmers and lost an entire country to the towelheads after years of fighting on the other side of the world
>Americucks think they can take on a group of even more violent and intelligent people, knowing fully well that half of Mexicos population is already in the united states illegally anyways.
The illegals here as everyone knows are heavily patriotic AND many who are not illegal are still close to Mexico and their race, including those in the army.
Everyone knows America can't into guerilla warfare.
It's too late, America has already been infiltrated from the inside.
Waging war on Mexico means waging war on yourself.
It's a scary thing but you know that in the very back of your mind it's true.
Besides, Russia would jump in and join Mexico, probably China too.
Things aren't so simple anymore.
>>74416194
>equating mexico to an extremist movement that was funded by OUR fucking government years ago
>mexico's """army""" could into guerilla warfare
tbqh desu the only thing really standing in our way would be the cartels
>>74416194
a war against mexico would be to kill all mexicans from tanking american property values, illegals and plenty of legal immigrants would be killed on the US side.
>>74409471
Crude oil, gold, beach front property.
Lot's of fun under the sun...
What's not to love.
>>74416194
Just use m1a2 abrams tanks, problem solved , use armor piercing rounds against infantry for maximum humiliation
>>74415590
And I imagine that a Mexican guerrilla army would be made easy work of. The Vietnamese had experience on their side. They'd been fighting there pretty much since the Japanese invaded. They had a lot of veteran soldiers, and time-tested doctrine.
The Hajis don't fear death but embrace it. They're fanatical in fighting us because they see it as God's mission for them. They also have experience on their side. Chechnya, Palestine, Afghanistan in the 80's.
Once Mexico's ground army is destroyed, the people probably won't even want to fight. They don't have much to fight for in the grand scheme of things. A lot of them would probably just head north for the gibsmedats and not even want to fight. The cartels would probably just back out and wait until the smoke cleared. Neither side would accept them as allies because doing so automatically makes you the world's bad guy for allying with a drug cartel.
Nope. Once the army's done there would be maybe a week or two if an insurgency and then maybe higher crime and frequent chimpouts.
>>74409260
Until we get a wall built.
>>74415192
Oh, no obviously within a week Mexico would start to crumble hard
I just say a Month before the Mexican Government completely collapses and can't up a fight any longer and US forces are occupying the country
>>74412030
run away pupper
>>74412030
Godspeed dogo
>>74415834
Well, that's complicated, isn't it?
We attack Canada, and England most likely gets involved.
If we are talking no outside involvement, I'd say a few years, considering the amount of space we'd have to cover.
Probably little resistance tho.
Those countries have baby armies.
>>74416194
>>America couldn't take on a bunch of jungle monkey rice farmers
we won every battle and technically won the war.
we would have done it a lot sooner if johnson wasn't such a retard
>never sent the navy
>limited the airforce
>refused to invade north vietnam
>gave the army and marine corp crippling RoE
bureaucrats shouldn't be in charge of wars.
the same mostly happened with afghanistan as well
>mexicans blah blah guerillas in the US
easily dealt with by the NRA.
>Besides, Russia would jump in and join Mexico, probably China too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FopyRHHlt3M
they wouldn't do shit. they couldn't even supply them directly since we'd have their ports blockaded. not that either would matter since both russian and chink equipment is shit tier compared to US equipment
>>74416382
>>74416502
Again, you couldn't win against the vietnamese or middle east insurgents.
The only problem is that unlike those two scenarios, mexicans (and probably their hispanic allies), they are not on another continent where they can do no harm against the American population.
The enemy would literally be amongst us, causing chaos in our own streets, which is something that Americans have never truly experienced.
Look at the LA riots, look at Baltimore.
All of that destruction being caused by low IQ monkeys WITHOUT a plan or purpose, other than to loot. Those cities were powerless for days against your own citizens.
Compare that to this potential scenerio: A heavily unified race, with a clear purpose and INTENT of causing DIRECT harm to a very specific group of people.
Oh, and by the way, they invaded your country decades ago and there are literally millions of them EVERYWHERE. IN. YOUR. BACKYARD. (Just mowing for the moment, kek)
Yes, MEXICO as a country and governemt would lose in a matter of weeks.
But the guerilla warfare would be ongoing both in Mexico AND America, and that would probably last decades.
You can carpetbomb your own homes, but it's the same as shooting yourself in the foot.
>>74409260
1 nuke in some Mexican desert as a deterrent and ultimatum for surrender is all it would take
>>74417024
Considering Trudeau just cut a load of his countries military spending? They'd surrender once we declared, they're probably expecting us to shield them from the world.
>>74417261
>Comparing Baltimore chimp outs protected by SJWs and shit to an armed fucking army
>Our police force is our military
>we wouldn't have shoot to kill on any potential insurgents and the rest of their army
t. military expert
what fucking country are you REALLY?
Also, Russia would most likely help the US crush the EU in exchange for clay, and China doesn't have the resources or probably the fucking want to transport hundreds of thousands of troops across a fucking Ocean, again, likely into a large navy. They'll probably keep expanding into the sea like they have been.
>>74409260
Does it really matter? For all I know they (the Mexicans) will be nothing but a badly burned, crispy, carne asada by the time the war has ended. Mmmm... Mexican Burrito = Best Burrito
>>74417261
america has been working towards police state control for a long time, in that scenario mexican attacks against a significant target would be easily surpressed and other non strategic attacks would be allowed to happened to scare the population into giving up more rights and freedom.
>>74415449
>Why is my country so shit at fighting guerillas?
Because everybody who isn't willing to commit genocide is bad at it. The whole point of insurgency is that you aren't wearing a uniform and they can't tell soldier from civilian. Other people have dealt with the problem by just murdering everyone.
>>74417261
>Again, you couldn't win against the vietnamese or middle east insurgents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slg6KSUGw_I
go be retarded somewhere else
>their hispanic allies
>he doesn't realize that spics all hate eachother
>>74410548
Nigger, a war is pretty much won by military equipment, they have more.
Also, how do you propose the EU attacks a country over the fucking sea that is not 3rd world? Fuck up jet carriers and no sides advance ever.
Tho they convenietly have NATO bases laying around every fucking where.
This ain't your usual squabble with France.
>>74415449
You either genocide everyone and get cucked by future jews and everyone willing with muh 6 zillion or be bad it. No other choice really.
It would last as long as the US wanted - eh: Long enough to take apart their infrastructure, secure it's resources, and put in place contracts for US firms to re-build said infrastructure that was destroyed
>>74409471
Most avocados come from Mexico.
>>74420513
We are gonna build a guac wall and make Mexico pay for it.
>>74409471
Eh, to be fair that's what people originally said about Texas and look how that turned out.
>>74420513
>Not California
kek
putting all hispanics in internment camps for the duration of the conflict might prove expensive.
>>74415449
because we're not allowed to practice air superiority any more
>>74409471
Women? /pol/ loves Latinas.
>>74409260
Basically the US would have to go to war with Southern California too
>>74421846
But is that a bad thing though?
>>74409471
Mexico is literally more valuable to the world than GB though lmao
>>74410548
Some of our children are literally trained as well as any EU fukboiiii with firearms. GOOD LUCK CHAP
>>74409471
Mexico exports oil. What does Bongistan export? Cucks?
>>74409471
Shit ton of drugs.
>america can barely sustain itself
>crippled with debt
>people here unironically want the US to go on more armed adventures
yes... yes. Good goy. Expand America's borders. Glory to the US
>>74409260
well you gotta understand that USA only mess with us when we are in civil war ,USA-MEX war was supposed to be easy and fast,instead it was costly and long, they needed almost 2 years to end the war against a shitty country with outdated weapons and untrained soldiers.
In the revolution they invaded and took veracruz port to help the rebels in mexico, preventing a huge cargo of weapons to get into the legit army soldier hands
pic related ,last LEGIT battle we had
>>74409471
Voters for the Democratic Party are surely of value to Democrats.
Hillary and her handlers would annex Mexico in a heartbeat if they thought it would keep them in power.
>>74409585
Canada bro is right. Why don't you do it already?? Imagine the possibilities. The NAFTA region has virtually unlimited natural resources. With the military power of the US, the good government and little corruption of Canada and the working power of Mexico we would be an Uberpower.
>>74410067
the CIA runs the cartels...
>>74424651
>The first battle between USA-MEX war was a Mexican victory
>The last battle between USA-MEX war was a Mexican victory
Are we cucks?
>>74425996
this was faked by Polk
>>74409471
Spic free land is somthing of Value
>>74426105
What about this
>>74425039
>No.
mexicans aren't good workers. they are low skilled, and low value.
Also us canadians will go ISIS on america. You guys can't invade canada and hope we won't get you guys trapped in a quagmire. for fuck sakes, we moved our capital to ottawa so it could be in the literal middle of nowhere.
>>74426539
LMAO NO
more like "if we fight back, they win"
>>74425996
with a black president for 8 years after more than 100 years of nigger slavery ?
its safe to say that fucking big yes
days, but a civil war would come after.
>>74426844
>>74426539
Don't be such a cunt m8. Believe it or not we have skilled workers. Just give the people proper education and they will be skilled and hardworking. People here stand 12+ hour shifts. Unlike eurofags who complain about working 7 hours.
>>74409471
Mexico has a lot of oil.
If they were Muslim the US would have invaded them by now.
>>74409260
about three fiddy
>>74426997
ID: f4G
>>74426539
It would just take a nuke or two for your people to fall in line. Why do people forget we have thousands of nuclear warheads?
>>74426706
We secretly mean just non-whites. We hate americans up here.
>>74426991
You guys aren't productive workers. A friend of mine is a QA engineer and is working on automating testing procedures for a canadian company that outsourced their manufacturing to mexico. With canadian employees, they are able to trouble shoot what goes wrong, reading from diagnostic information. There was an element of skill But because of the fact that illiteracy is a huge problem, a lot of Mexicans drop out of grade 8, this isn't possible. Managers have to step in. The day of automation will put to an end of the need of cheap mexican labour. A machine can work 12+ hour shifts with higher accuracy.
>>74409260
how long does it take to get to mexico city at the average speed of an M1 Abrams?
>>74427750
with or without any resistance?
>>74427480
Do you not get how big canada is? We won't fall in line. One of the national past times in canada, besides embracing multi-culturalism, is trying our damn hardest to not be american-like.
>>74426991
>>74427699
I cannot believe I just wrote this. The biggest difficult in providing feedback to mexican labour is their inability to read. WTF sort of nation is that, and why does canada have a free trade nation that isn't equal to our labour market? I'll tell you why: america pressured us.
As a canadian, I am tired of us getting cucked by america. At a time, in the 80s, we wanted our own nuclear subs so we can patrol and enforce our sovereignty in the north. You americans abused treaty obligations (especially a heinous one that you and England signed on our behalf which let you veto our options) and said we can't have nuclear subs. And now, you bugerfaggots want to pretend our internal arctic isn't ours, but rather an international straight. fuck that shit america.
Mexicans are so corrupt we'd just have to give every soldier 20 pesos and they'd all surrender.
>>74409260
about as long as it takes a Naco to finish his bag of hot cheatos
>>74428032
Your country is a bunch of pussies. You elected Trudeau. Once we get rid of the problem areas, almost all your fellow citizens grudgingly accept us after seeing their families and countrymen in the aftermath of a nuclear attack. You have nowhere near the resolve of the Japanese, and they held out for two days
>>74409260
As long as the military-industrial complex provides a consistent return for their shareholders? In perpetuity.
>>74409260
massive hispanic fifth column within US would make the southwest into a vietnam situation with gureilla warfare and turn LA into fucking mogadishu
>>74428383
we move away from cities. the winds are such that you guys will enjoy the beautiful fallout. A lot of us have cottages. There are just 3 big cities. You gotta nuke every square meter of canada and somehow like not let the fallout fuck u up.
>>74427480
>nuking your supply of fresh water
do you fucks realize how much of that shit you buy from us?
>>74426222
those were 2 different wars seperated by 70 years
>>74429243
>>74417261
Until 1 month into continued bullshit guerilla warfare from spice when the government sets up concentration camps and interns any shitskin Mexican like what happened with the nips in ww2.
>>74428794
H-bomb everything that's at a safe distance from U.S. soil. Fuel-air bombs and napalm for everything else.
>>74429326
>>74429826
>>74409260
What's the goal? I mean...if there is actually a goal like say, capture Mexico City or something then it would be over very quickly. If it was like our recent wars where there are no real goals or abstract goals like SPREAD MUH DEMOCRACY then it would never end.
>>74409773
The cartels wouldn't fight dumb cunt they only care about making money and drugs
>>74424651
LMAO how about Texas? 200 riflemen in the Alamo against thousands of trained Mexican army and it took you days and suffered heavy losses AND lost to a bunch of milita basically. TOP KEK even the mexicans in texas acknowledge this and know Mexico is a bitch country rekt by every problem known to man except for a war with the US
In a no holds barred, scorched earth scenario?
The US will take Mexico within a month.
Realistically, there would be no conflict at all.
The US and Mexican economies are too intertwined.
No real incentive for war.
>>74411080
I know what you did there...
>>74409260
america officially already lost territory to them with california and doesn't even believe the obvious mexican flag waving in public since there is so much denial and doublethink even at above the top level shadow government levels even a baby would know this.
>>74415449
America's always had to pick between training soldiers to fight its general army and even some low tier special forces between conventional and unconventional warfare. So (and most of NATO as well) go somewhere in between.
You forget that not every soldier are top tier operators and can just fuck anyone with a knife doesn't matter what they're doing.
NATO needs to stay prepped for any real military threat, as well as being able to deploy against sand niggs with AK's.
>>74412967
underrated post
>>74412030
whats that dog? timmy got blown up?
>>74413318
The US did it ezpz in the Mexican-American war. To conquer the country to annex it would be fucking moronic though. So may fucking hills up north, jungles down south, and an already anti-US population would aid a guerilla war unlike anything ever seen. Plus all of South America would give the Mexican guerillas supplies.
>>74425039
>Justin Current Year Trudeau
>good government
pick one
>>74409260
1 month maybe 2 tops. about as long as it took to take down iraq the first time (not the more recent one)
long range bombardment plus a blitz to follow equals win. cartel left homeless and fleeing the mortars and rockets with limited ammo and no way to make more money only spend it
yea murica wins that by a landslide
>>74409260
10 seconds
>>74409471
10th place in oil
Not very long, we only have enough armament to last for 1 week of intense combat.
>>74409471
Baja.
>>74409260
Mexico would surrender before fighting even starts. You know why? Because they wouldnt only be fighting us, they would be fighting their own citizens that would take the opportunity to stand up to their shit government as well.
>>74415449
in the last 3 engagements we've had our hands tied our backs in regards to exactly how much force we can use.
That does make a difference. Insurgents aren't afraid of us
>>74433673
look at him try to convince america to invade
>>74425039
>Canada
>good government
>little corruption
Do you even know where Canada is on a map Pedro? Because you just described the exact fucking opposite of Canada
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/first-openly-gay-army-secretary-confirmed-n575661
So you basically have a fag in charge of your army now. I doubt you're getting anywhere
>>74426222
>All three commanders named Jose
lol
>>74409260
as long as lasted the war against a bunch of vietcong
