Isn't conscription fundamentally unconstitutional?
Nope. Any other questions?
>>74071139
Not in Finland.
???
>2016
>constitution
K
>>74071139
Which part of it is it against?
>>74071227
How do they get the caramel into a Mars bar?
America was never supposed to have a standing national army
>>74071139
Yes it is.
Scotus would never rule that way though because politics, but anyone with a basic reading comprehension can see otherwise.
>>74071393
They don't put the outer chocolate layer on until the caramel is in place. Therefore there is no need to put it "into" the bar, as it were.
In fact, the caramel is put in place before it becomes a bar. They lay out sheets of nougat, place the caramel layer on top, and then cut it into bars.
>>74071139
Why does that penis have legs?
>>74071412
>the congress shall have power ... to raise and support Armies
>To provide and maintain a Navy
Hell at most you could argue that it was never supposed to have an air force
>>74072060
Except you cut off the rest of that one line...
>... but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years
Either way, though, conscription is definitely allowed by it.
>>74072398
which is why we have yearly appropriations
in either case it's a stretch to argue that implies the founders intended to not have an army for longer than two years, revolutionary war alone took 8 years, and even with the britcucks gone you still had to deal with indians
