explain to me /pol/ why the "socialism" in "national socialism" is a good thing
>>74031677
It isn't
We need another strong monarch, like Henry VIII
>>74031677
Look at Scandinavia before we had an influx of non-whites. Literally the best countries on the planet.
>>74031844
britland plz
>>74031677
its not, NatSoc was so shit Hitler had to go and rob the poles to pay hans
>>74031677
It's the kind that creates Israel. Regular socialism goes to shitty white people
>>74031844
>The man who brought so much ridiculous trouble to this country just so he could divorce a bitch after he'd already set precedent that he'd behead the cunts if he wanted to
No thanks he'd convert the CofE to Islam in order to have multiple wives.
The old systems fucking sucked. Most people were miserable. It's why the left got popular in the first place.
>inb4 MUH JOOWIS CONSPIRASY
>>74032207
well that does make sense, personally i believe socialism used be used under extreme circumstances because government intervention can be used to temporarily pull a country out of economic troubles.
Ex: 1930s USA, 1920s Germany, late 1980s europe
>>74032725
*should
>>74031677
>explain to me /pol/ why the "socialism" in "national socialism" is a good thing
It's not and most of /pol/ agrees that it's not.
www.strawpoll.me/10095732/
>>74031677
It's not
Should be national capitalism to be (anne) frank
>>74033651
Yeah I guess you would prefer communism, you russian fuck.
>>74031677
Socialism is good in homogenous, white societies compromised only of Germanic and Nordic stock. It only works there. We Anglo and Celtics can't nail it. No idea why.
>>74033651
Socialism is a continuum. The only ones who can say they are entirely non-Socialist are anacap retards.
If your country does nothing for you, then why be nationalistic or give a single fuck about your country? So Socialism to one degree or another is necessary for Nationalism.
>>74033851
No it doesn't.
Socialism promotes dysgenic behaviour where the unproductive leech of the successful.
Countries like Norway and Switzerland are doing well because they are more economically free.
ITT: Not one person knows that national socialism is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX-h71SLkvs&bpctr=1463279292
>>74033851
>We Anglo
>USA
>anglo
pick one bruder
>>74034624
>10:00
jesus aussie I am drunk off my ass right now, I don't have the patience for that. I'll flag to watch later and see it tomorrow. In the mean time sit tight and wait for my rebutel
>>74034974
>putting American as a category of ancestry
What the fuck even
>>74035270
I assume it is because that area of the country has been inbreeding for so long they don't know who fucked who and where they came from
>>74035392
More likely they're race mixed to hell.
Race mixing can be good, it depends on the race and the genetics of the person you're mixing with.
Just most of the time, like this, it probably isn't.
>>74035500
>Just most of the time, like this, it probably isn't.
there is a reason why americans don't brag about visiting "the deep south"
>>74031677
>why the "socialism" in "national socialism" is a good thing
Because the only way to defeat the Marxist jew, and to save a society pozzed up by the leftist AIDS, is to redefine socialism to be SOCIAL not ECONOMIC. The way you do that is by appropriating the term, and redefining it as something antithetical to Marxism and it's goals.
>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.
>Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”
-Adolf Hitler
High finance and Left Communism are both philosophies of the Hew to destroy society from either end. European culture always sought personal advancement, wealth and success, while looking out for each other as an extended family. Since the ultimate aim of the Jew is to dismantle goy societies it sees as a threat, it deforms and twists both natural impulses:
>defense of the group/tribe
>individualism
And perverts them both into abstract extremes that become too toxic to survie. So it's socialism in the Marxist sense; it's socialism defined as dedication to the health and integrity of the nation & people, culturally. Germans as one people, rather than Germany as a bunch of economic classes in a class war for the destruction of the State and the victory of International proletariat (jewish rule)
>>74036187
thanks senpai
>>74036187
>So it's NOT socialism in the Marxist sense
fixed
>>74036278
>http://townhall.com/columnists/brucebartlett/2004/01/16/hitler_and_keynes
>http://www.jstor.org/stable/4401913?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
>https://mises.org/library/three-new-deals-why-nazis-and-fascists-loved-fdr
>Rodney Martin - The Economic Plan of the NSDAP
https://youtu.be/pKnFN8P21-0
>German Economic Miracle of the 1930's
https://youtu.be/YkenkfRTn4c
>Hitler's Economic Reform:
https://youtu.be/_r9Z-hTn1r4
>Social and Cultural Policies of NS Germany
https://youtu.be/bAmgGmxHOMY
>Ernst Zundel - National socialism explained
https://youtu.be/FXmIbx01-3o
https://youtu.be/YthyzrulbXw
