Should a fighting to the death between two legal consenting adults be legalized again?
>>73982838
No, you shoot who is wrong and unwilling to change
>>73982838
If
>they're both consenting
>sign a contract agreeing to it
>always come to the duel with a witness
>only get one shot
I don't see the problem. It wouldn't even have a big impact ; behaving like a pussy isn't ostracized anymore, so lots of people would refuse to participate.
No there is a too great chance that we might loose yet another great mathematician before he reaches his 20s
Yep.
>>73982838
>opponent draws early
>you die
Sword duels are where it's at.
>>73983291
>opponent has bigger reach
>you die
Gun duels are where it's at.
>>73982838
No, it would be a tax burden on society.
Who would pay for the medical bills? Insurance wouldn't and letting people die in the street is idiotic as well
>>73982913
well it look like on that logic we have to kill everyone
>>73983366
>his gun has a higher velocity round
>you die
SLAM-poetry battles is where it's at
>>73983291
>>73983366
>not having a tool that can stab and shoot
ISHYGDDT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyrE3FSU01w
>>73983390
Just kill all the the people who want to kill people
Only between non-whites.
>>73982838
No that is some nigger shit, WE are not islam
https://soundcloud.com/couchtruthing/lets-make-america-great-again
>>73983092
Eliot Rodger here
>>73983366
>implying that's how sword fighting works
Yes but only swords.
>>73983503
> his pentameter is more iambic than yours
> thou die
Knifey-spoonie is where it's at
>dueling pistols
>not good old fashioned southern gouging
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gouging_%28fighting_style%29
>>73983291
We'd allow for all kinds, obviously. And they'd be heavily regulated, so that if you drew early (you have the wrong idea of duels) or did anything wrong, they'd be penalised.
>>73983378
>Who would pay for the medical bills?
The loser?
>>73984197
what if the loser cannot pay? Most "duellers" would be gangbangers
>>73983957
why is South so savage
>>73984264
Why would you bother to challenge a gangbanger? How could they ever effect you, or anyone willing to duel?
>>73984339
they do it every day already, now you're just giving them legal platform
>>73982838
>Should a fighting to the death between two legal consenting adults be legalized again?
Hell yeah!
>>73982838
yes
>>73982838
>guy rapes underaged girl
>gets 4
>guy kills wife
>gets 6 years
>guy steals money
>gets 16 years (lifetime in Denmark)
The justice system is completely faulty and old and it no longer dispense justice. At least in the hood and particularly in India, the people can call down justice on rapists.
>Indian dad cut off hands of rapist and tied him to a tree. Left him for dead.
>>73982838
Why?
The betas would never accept the challenge.
>>73984512
True. It might actually help. You could add a level of bureaucracy which would reduce criminal violence. Not eliminate, but reduce.
Anyway, you'd obviously waive medical support in taking part.
>>73983643
lol that comic
Duelling should be allowed but it shouldn't end with death unless the two participants have an extremely serious feud.
The American two guns duel over any little insult was cancer and needed to die.
Maiming on the other hand is perfectly acceptable.
>Guy bumps into you on the street.
>Challenge him to duel.
>Cut his legs off.
It's my human right to maim those who both disagree with me and are weaker than me.
>>73984950
>Maiming on the other hand is perfectly acceptable.
To first or third blood was the most common. Any maiming which might happen was part and parcel, rather than the goal.
>>73984594
>Confusing revenge with justice
>Not totally keked
>>73982838
Oh god yes. Id have killed so many people by now
>>73983688
Crazy
>>73984950
You know duels was way more common in europe then in america right?
>>73985480
They were but two guys facing off and shooting each other was a very American way to duel.
In Europe if guns were involved it was more likely to turn into a shootout rather than a duel to the death.
>>73985595
In europe most duels was done with swords, and this up to the 1910's.
And swords are by no means less lethal then guns
>>73985341
It's not revenge? Do you even know what justice is? Revenge is when you want to harm someone to get back at them. Justice is when you want to see them pay for their wrongdoing. Was it revenge when thieves had their backs stripped in the old days? No. The father dispensed justice for his daughters suffering, not revenge. Revenge would probably result in the rapists death.
>>73985663
Sword wounds were much easier to treat than gun wounds. Most sword wounds impact the flesh while gun wounds often pierce an organ. The former will heal while the latter tends to mean death.
Also when fighting with swords both parties move with the intention of not getting hit while in an American style gun duel they would both stand still allowing a quick aim to deliver a fatal blow with some certainty.
Sure there were duels where some guy with a well forged rapier would kill their opponent in a single blow but ultimately the fatality rates for European style duels was extremely low when compared to American style duels.
>>73984594
The same India where rape rates have exploded because women no longer have to prove they've been raped they just need to make a baseless claim and receive compensation before anyone has even stood trial? What a great country. Maybe we should follow them further and have designated streets.
>>73982838
No. There are no Honorable men worthy of my sword.
Viking method is best method...
>>73986035
You realize that in order to kill someone as quickly as possible with a sword is to rush them and start wildly hacking them to death right?
Your little fantasy "on guard" bullshit is simply not realistic
>>73985800
>>Indian dad cut off hands of rapist and tied him to a tree. Left him for dead.
This is what I reacted too. You gave the impression you liked poo in the loo "justice".
>>73986251
Have you ever used a sword in a civilized environment?
When you are fighting on the stairs because some idiot charged at you while flailing his sword around then a simple pierce is going to save the day.
Seriously man did you even think about it? Randomly hacking at someone is a terrible tactic because they are likely to be equipped with armour that doesn't get damaged easily by a blade.
When using a mace then wildly flailing can be an effective strategy but the sword is a finesse weapon even when wielded by people that only vaguely understand how to use them.
>Man wildly hammers nail.
>Man gives an accurate and strong blow to the nail in an appropriate location.
Guess which is more likely to have the nail pierce into the wood.
>>73986251
Confirmed never been in a sword fight, or even seen one.
>>73983957
holy shit thats brutal
>>73986044
That wasn't what I was trying to say you cunt. I was just saying that the entire system is fucked up. Money is more important than lives. In Denmark you can get away with rape and murder but God forbid you steal or abuse the welfare system. The same system that deported 2 teens who wanted to stay and work here, they actually wanted to become a part of the country; that very same system that sent them away, just let off the most criminal family of our country. 23 charges, rape, extortion and other illegal shit. The entire family are criminals and none of them have held a job. They've solely been living off benefits and criminal activity - but they get to stay. 10 years, less for good behaviour. But they get to stay. That's the fucked up system we have.
Victims are punished while the most vile people are let off with a couple of years.
That's not justice.
>>73982913
>implement this law
>everyone on /pol/ dies
>mfw
Were duellists cucks ? A lot of them fought for a woman, how can you risk your life for a woman that cucked you ? Just kill her desu.
