Building codes distort the free market. If you're so afraid of a Chinese quality building do your research on the construction company you hire instead of relying on Big Daddy Government to think for you. Take responsibility for your choices in life, especially when they are between life and death.
>>73916515
Never go full retard
That's amazing. A whole building on its side. Impressive.
>>73916515
No shit sherlock
We have building codes for the express purpose of preventing Uncle Bob from fucking up the beamwork and killing you in your sleep
or build 1 level house
collapsing buildings could cause damage to third parties
But without government what will replace my brain?
I'm surprised how much /pol/ changed.
RIP Liberty /pol/
2011-2012
>>73916895
1. Move to an area who knows how to build buildings
2. Buy insurance
3. Sue the owners for damages
4. Take responsibility for yourself and your family
Having someone from the council/local government have a quick look at the building plans to make sure they're not pants-on-head retarded is more sensible than every potential tenant of the property learning about construction in order to verify the building's structural integrity.
or have companies who are specialised in assessing buildings to the same standard the government do and let them compete with each other.
>>73916515
>building codes are a related to a democratic co-op of the means of production or social ownership of public goods
Okay family, maybe for public work buildings, but hey socialism sounds scary and is bad so anything you don't like can just be called socialism without thought eh?
>>73919297
>democratic co-op
>social ownership
>>73916515
Look retard...
There is little debate that regulations under certain circumstances makes sense.
One or several facets of socialism being "good" does not make socialism "good".
I know that is slightly complex for the average simpleton to understand.
I wish you luck.
>>73919297
>I love sucking government BBC the post.
>>73919652
Socialism is never good.
This country lived without building codes and regulations for half of its life and it prospered.
We don't need socialism.
>>73920271
It also prospered during a period of time when it was sensibly regulated and controlled and the quality of life went up astromically.
Every regulation ever is not bad. Every gubment project ever is not evil.
But the day has long since passed when regulations were sensible and the us government functioned in a way remotely acceptable.
>>73917359
It's just an election year. Wait until it's over and half of the cucks will leave, just like last time.
>>73916515
this is the strangest bait ive seen in a while
>If you're so afraid of food poisoning why don't you just do your research on every single food company you hire instead of relying on laws to keep you from being poisoned
fuck off
>>73920616
I agree that regulations, specially on housing should be removed in the countryside since in cities would be really dangerous to allow shity bulding like your pic related to be build.
>Every regulation ever is not bad.
We dont need regulations, we need standarts, just like the free market organitzes bonds, not everyone is a architect or a civ eng.
