I don't know if I'm alone in this viewpoint, but I find the cloths women wore in the past to be much more attractive than the cloths of today.
Today women show much more of their bodies and at least partly due to this I think I've become desensitized to it.
Why have political activists, the media, and the government been pushing this?
They say stuff like "women weren't free to dress as men were free". But even if that's the case, you never saw men in the past walking around scantily clad.
>why is our government and its politics pushing for less cloths and More sexualization, when it does not make women as attractive as they could be?
They want to attract Ahmeds like me to take your women.
Naturally a woman is shy and wants to conceal her body. Flaunting skin is mentally ill for a woman.
clothes.
>>73700828
Why do Jews push degeneracy?
Why is the sky blue?
>>73701421
Yes what do they gain
How do they make as much money when the cloths women wear is less than they used to?
>>73701607
>the cloths women wear
clothes you fucking idiot
>>73701952
Cloths
>>73700828
I agree with you.
I will also say there are females who still dress this way in NC.
In fact pic in first post reminds me of a classmate in her style.
Hang in there, fetishist.
They still all look the same naked and upside down.
Kikes.
>>73700828
all generations go through a period of rejecting what came before.
fashion is very cyclical and this style will come again. Muslim women are incredibly fashion conscious and you will see as Islam rises women dressing in exquisite and elaborate ways which shows some curves but very little skin come back.
>>73702203
or as OP would say, Kiks.
>>73702348
Kiks lik when you don't wear cloths
>>73700828
Have you seen the miniskirts young women put on in the 60s?
And showing the navel is hardly a modern invention as well
>>73700828
Black cock. No, seriously, white women wanted to attract black cock so they started to dress sluttier.
>>73700828
Same thing that happened to Life magazine.
>>73700828
it's not just the clothes. Young Western women just don't have that easy grace and femininity that women in the 60s and prior seemed to have if photos and videos are anything to go buy. Even if they're objectively good-looking with all the goods in their places, they just aren't as attractive.
>>73702444
Well I guess you're right. There's no noticeable difference from now and then.
Threads over guys. The mystery has been solved. Women aren't actually dressing slutier
>>73702721
Showing skin is just a crutch for a lack of style sense and refinement.
>>73702721
I think this is true as well. Everyone in a while I'll come across a really feminine acting girl. But it's rare. And it's not that they act shy or don't talk, I've seen people accuse others of implying that.
But that's not really what I mean.
>>73701607
When it comes to making money, women pay for the brand logo. I know if girls who pay up to $3000 for a stupid leather purse. or upwards of $300 for a two piece bathing suite. So thats a non issue.
Jews push degeneracy to further destroy the family unit and weaken the western people/ culture. This makes us weak and easier to control
>>73702918
Today I talked to a really femine woman, it was golden and it was the first time in a very long time in Germany... she was Eastern European... It's sad where the nature of men and women has went, such aberrations, such degeneracy, such a waste.
>>73700828
Faggots design women's clothes to make them less appealing to men.
>>73703404
>she was Eastern European
There's your reason. It's like walking into a different universe to be around Eastern European women, and I'm not just talking about Slavs. I meet a lot of Poles, Russians, Romanians, Armenians, etc. in NYC, and their movements, mannerisms, and general demeanor are noticeably different--like a force in the room that isn't there with many western women now.
It's probably something people who are always around it could take for granted, but when you usually don't see it, it stands out.
>>73703497
>>73700828
I disagree. Tight, high waist pant or leggings are pretty sexy. Also the new ass mania is awesome too. Only thing I hate about woman fashion these days is fucking muscular/gym girls.
>>73703825
Leggings and a t-shirt isn't sexy. That's like saying a swimsuit is sexy. It has nothing to do with the swimsuit. Women's bodies are sexy, and you can basically see all of it when they're wearing leggings or bikinis.
Clothes create something else, otherwise we might as well just walk around naked or thermal spandex suits when it's cold. By your logic, that would be the sexiest possible thing.
>>73703825
your taste is trash
>>73700828
Hypersexualization is a form of political control OP.
When Isreal invaded Gaza, the first thing they did was take over the TV station and broadcast porn.
People who are oversexualized cannot control themselves-- and are therefore easier to govern.
The sexualization of childhood is especially effective in this area, while keeping the taboo against pedophilia. This is the reason why pedophilia will not be "mainstreamed" like gays-- it creates too effective a weapon against enemies of the program.
>>73703975
Of course it's the womens body what is sexy. But most of the times women look way hotter with clothes than fully naked. Especially leggings and tight pants makes the ass and legs look way better. I don't know... Women with hot clothes look way hotter than fully naked generally. Maybe I'm just a creep.
>>73703975
this
On rare occasions, I see these conservative Christian girls who always wear dresses that go to their ankles and blouses that do not reveal their figure. These women catch my attention more than women that wear tights or booty shorts in public.
>>73703809
He's not wrong. Even most porn photographers are fags. Compare porn from the 80s to porn now. Most porn pics have that bitch face look.
>>73703404
That's really nice to hear.
They are so very rare. And like you said most of them do have Eastern European roots. I've only met one in America that was some mix of Germanic/Anglo.
>>73700828
It's not the government/politics pushing for it, it's competition between women.
The primary value women have in the sexual market place and an important secondary characteristic in the work place, is how attractive they are. so they use makeup and clothes that show skin and accentuate sexually attractive features in order to compete against other women.
>>73702313
Cover of vogue in 2025
>>73704698
Yep it's only attractive because they might as well be naked. And of course any strait guy is going to automatically be atracted to a "naked", very outlined female form.
But I don't know what it is I really like older, more modest cloths. I don't know if it's Just the fact it's rare or what it is. But I know I like it.
Also I say "modest" but I don't like the way that word might sound. You wouldn't call a man modest for wearing a nice dress shirt or tuxedo.
>>73705268
burkas wearing running shoes make me laugh
>>73704909
But I'd argue that some of those older styles ARE more atractive than what women wear today. And it would make a woman stand out if she was the only one wearing somthing different.
Instead of just being number 6 out of the 15 identical looking women, she could be unique and get attention through that.
Or they could be like men and actually be judged by their quality of work.
western women just don't care about being or dressing feminine and I'd say most guys don't care too much either
what happened to men's fashion/appearance?
>>73705684
women want attention but they are very afraid to stand out and always conform to the group. That's why they make such poor leaders and cannot fight. They want to fit in and feel safe and follow and be told what to do. Currently they are being told to be sluts, but it's killed 2 or 3 generations of women now, depression, anxiety, blaming society etc.
It's funny feminism won all of its battles, then destroyed women with the freedom and power it gained. It's growing pains, maybe 2-3000 years from now women will manage their emotions better and be capable of ruling as equals, until they are biologically different from men, they will always be better suited for: totalitarian systems which offer security at the cost of freedom.
Think of all the girls youve been around, have any of them ever expressed the desire for freedom? A curiosity in the unknown? Most are obsessed with themselves and how they fit into whatever group they are part of, the social dynamics, relationships, emotional impulses. Women waste all of their time on feeling good, men waste all of their time on getting women. It's a very useful relationship. and not completely parasitic as the NEET virgins would have you believe. Without a gentle woman a man ends up being very violent and brutal.
A family both strengthens a man by giving him something greater than himself to protect, and it softens him, by allowing him to be gentle and loving with his children and the woman who bore them.
>>73705962
Compare the "idols" of masculinity from the past and the ones now and you'll find they've changed as well
>>73705962
The faggots have taken it over.
>>73700828
sexy lady. before dykes, coal burning, and forever 21.
>>73706349
>>73706695
james dean was gay, fellas.
>>73706306
Screencapped
Good theory
>>73706349
>>73706349
>>73706807
>a hollywood actor
>masculine
>>73706306
Would an accurate description of what you're saying be:
its in men's nature to question first and accept second. Or to say it differently, men are more comfortable with questioning somthing rather than just accepting they don't know it or can't control it.
And with women it's kind of the opposite. Their first "instinct" or "natural" behavior is to accept, and then questioning somthing is more foreign to them?
And if that's the case I'd say liberal men are very accepting men. They accept almost everything and don't question it. This could be why so many modern liberal men act so feminine. And why modern liberal women seem so masculine, because they ask questions and don't accept anything. It's not enough it's never enough no one is good enough for me. Their "natural" roles have been reversed.
>>73706349
the irony of the whole "tips fedora" archetype is that it's an attempt to stigmatize proper male fashion as being for losers, meanwhile wigger fashion is acceptable
>>73700828
>>73705281
>>73707139
Agree that clothing in these pics looks more "feminine" and elegant, some are still kinda tight but less whorish looking compared to the clothing they wear today. Every single pants women wear today are skin tight, look everywhere whether they are skinny women or fat women there pants are tight as fuck and don't get me started on those above tight length short shorts, especially on fat women jesus.
>>73706306
>, and it softens him,
People have done tests to see why this is. And it turns out being around children and a woman makes men's natural level of testosterone drop a bit.
At least I think I remeber seeing that somewhere.
And the part about maybe one day women will be equal to men. I doubt it. The worlds getting dumber. The smarter and smartest people aren't having kids and the dumbest are breeding like animals.
If somthing doesn't change soon, humanity is going to keep getting dumber in this artificially propped up environment
>>73707016
This too.
celebrities of the past were more conformed to gender roles, but really you have to remember the very concept of celebrity is degenerate and pushed by kikes, hell most ARE kikes. Even the more "Conservative" ones of the past were still degenerate false idols.
>>73706306
This is why arranged marriage was accepted as normal for most of human history. Then the fucking eternal anglo had to fuck it up in the Victorian era with the concept of "Romance"
>>73701952
Cloths
>>73707470
Exactly. I never said he was some great guy. In fact he might've been a shit guy. What he stands for today and the people who like him today are usually pretty shit.
But the point was that he's more masculine than a lot of the Hollywood males today that would be his equivalents. I'm not saying all, but a lot.
>>73700828
WE STARTED ACCEPTING FAGS AND THEY RUINED EVERYTHING!!
IT'S TIME TO STOP ACCEPTING GAYS!!!
>>73707579
It's funny to see how far they've advanced it. Hollywood 40 years ago seems so tame today. But imagine if you brought today's Hollywood back 40,50,or 60 years and showed everyone.
I wonder what it will look like in 40 years.
>>73707472
Pretty much all the girls I used to go to highschool with wore stuff like this. Or super tight jeans or Nike short shorts.
>>73706306
Depends on the woman. I'm not like that & I'm raising my children red pilled. I wear long skirts, don't show clevage, and drag my family out for long walks & visits to castles etc etc.
Just don't pick up tarty girls in bars & wonder why it all went wrong.
>head to subway to return home from job
>8/10 qt wearing a tight fit sweater and knee long fitness tights
>goddamn that ass
>goes tight up her ass can pretty much imagine how it'd look like if she was wearing noting
walk behind her all way to subway
shit's nice yeah
>>73708610
Good for you, sperg
Try losing your virginity before being let loose on the public next time.
>>73708610
Rapefugee detected. Had a sexual emergency?
>>73708991
>>73709450
you seem upset
>>73700828
Not being a pretend moral dimwit, idgaf what anyone else wears -- why do you?
>>73700977
It's mentally ill to think there's something wrong with your own skin. Wearing a nice light summer dress is not 'flaunting,' you savage animal. God save Europe from islam.
>>73709761
And you seem like a pathetic subhuman virgin.
>>73709780
>I don't care what other people do
I suppose you wouldn't care if your fellow Canadians were pooing in the street, either. It matters because society and culture is important, you can't pretend that it doesn't affect every aspect of your daily life.
>>73709780
>I DONT CARE BOUT NUFFIN IM SO ABOVE ALL THAT BTW STOP BODYSHAMING WOMEN
Fuck off leaf
>>73709807
Kek
>>73710017
Obviously a faggot.
>>73709990
Not caring what people wear ain't the same as someone taking a shit in the streets, burger. You must be genuinely retarded.
>>73709990
>you can't pretend
That's where you're wrong. These people pride themselves on it
>>73709807
May Allah save Europe from its degeneracy.
>>73708575
honey ur the 1% of women.
>>73705268
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSixNyQFhpM
>>73703809
tis true my most excellent anon
it is also why they keep pushing for more boyish figures and skeletor-looking women
>>73700828
Trump, please.. MAGA soon.. I'm too close to doing this after reading this thread about how great the world was :'(
>>73700828
>cloths
>>73700828
feel the same breh, fashion was better then
>>73700828
>Start dressing like a slut + open borders inviting "people" who are living in the 12th century to enter the 21st century x cultural marxism รท Jews3 - whites having any control = Rape on an industrial scale
>Cause: White people
>>73700828
women grow up
for example my mother was a total slut in the 60s and did drugs/burned coal/etc but by the 90s she was just your average middle class homeowner
>>73708575
Same here, always been into long skirts and dresses; I go for the librarian/farm-girl look (like pic related... kinda). Noticed in places like Zara and Topshop long skirts and dresses are recently being sold, so hopefully it will become more of a thing. Popular fashion at the moment is disgusting, especially when there are so many cute options out there and everyone is wearing skanky crop tops and leggings.
female and male mainstream fashion is seriously garbage today. it's all just bitches in leggings and the guys they typically go for are just bro tier swag faggots
my biggest turn on is a woman who actually dresses well.
>>73700828
im more attracted to women at least moderately covered up, it leaves more to the imagination
>>73712321
same
>>73700828
>Tfw you absolutely adore wearing lolita fashion but you're 20 and it seems "childish" to other people
>Tfw you have to settle for the 1950's 'mom' upper middle class look.
I'm too reserved when it's nice weather, I'll only look like a slut in my own home when I don't have to impress anybody..
>>73700828
I've always thought that modern women look objectively better than women from like old movies and shit
>>73714443
marilyn monroe Was ugly.
>>73714443
>>73714764
Like not even just clothes, but just in general.
They're putting shit in the water or something.
>>73714957
yeah, it's called estrogen
>>73715168
It's causing women to be more beautiful, and men to all be pacified pussies with manboobs who play videogames and jack off all day.
>>73714443
I hate that fucking Zooey slag. I don't know why but I want to punch her until she is permanently incontinent.
![aubrilee2[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/JOmcoZf.gif "aubrilee2[1].gif")
>>73715681
I was gonna use Mila Kunis or that chick from Inception but I couldn't find any good pictures.
Women are more attractive physically than they were 10 or 20 years ago. FACT
>>73705281
>bare ankles
fucking whore.
>>73700828
>a large number of faggot millennials on /pol/ unironically endorse yoga pants as appropriate womens fashion
Women ALWAYS confirm on average to reflect male values and expectations. They always pander to the lowest the democracy of in-group.
Most men are degenerate nigger-tier orbiters or Chad's who want women to dress like sluts.
