well /pol/?
Twat
You're not a MRA? so do you hate men?
>>73631420
The correct question should be "do you love men" not "do you hate women". How much of a brick can this thing be? Jesus Christ
>>73631420
yeah
>>73631943
came in thread to post this
No, I just hate women like her.
>>73631420
well what?
>>73631941
they will say "yes"
or "thats not fair"
or "i never said that"
or "im a woman, i cant hate men"
I do hate women, but this question is irrelevant as I don't talk to obvious feminists. The problem hair and glasses are a dead giveaway
>>73631420
I love women, that's why I want to take their right to vote away. They don't vote according to their interests.
>>73631420
Well, yes...
>>73631943
it is a psycho-wave rad-neofem
which calling a brick, is an insult to bricks
>>73631420
Well what? By the time she has got to the t in feminist. I am already walking away.
being a feminist means standing up for women's rights
not being a feminist is not the same as being against women's rights
False dichotomy and typical feminist logic.
>>73631420
What?
>>73632354
>being a feminist means standing up for women's rights
subjective
>not being a feminist is not the same as being against women's rights
subjective
>False dichotomy and typical feminist logic.
you just put forth 2 false dichotomies yourself, then call out op's cunt for one?
oh, the ironing
>>73631420
suck a dick
>>73631420
Not being a feminist means treating women and men equal instead of giving women special treatment.
But the left is to retarded to understand this concept. Trump treats women equal to men and suddenly they cry sexism because they don't want top be treated as rough as men LOL libtards
Filename: bait thread number 21.png
First of all, by asking someone if "they hate women" because they're not in a group, you unjustifiably make an assumption. It's the same as asking non-vegan, if they hate vegetables.
Also, We all know the conversation never goes like she framed it... No one ever asks the question in that manner where the person both knows she's a feminist and bring it up without cause and also makes an assumption.
It's more she proclaims she's a feminists, and since modern, third-wave feminism and more specifically intersectional feminism is more about man-hating, spreading myths about patriarchy, telling girls that all men are rapists, etc. instead of egalitarianism, it's reasonable to ask someone if they hate men, when they say they're feminists.
You can't even make the argument that the man-hating feminists are so few that they don't matter, because that's untrue. They get all the media coverage. They're the loudest and most active, and they're the most that people fall into because they feed of grievance and victim-hood culture.
>>73631420
damn.......
>>73631420
Yes
>>73632463
>>being a feminist means standing up for women's rights
>subjective
Not really, that's pretty much the standard definition of feminism. look it up.
>>not being a feminist is not the same as being against women's rights
>subjective
No, you can be neither for or against feminism, just neutral on the matter
>>False dichotomy and typical feminist logic.
>you just put forth 2 false dichotomies yourself, then call out op's cunt for one?
I think you need to look up the difference between definition and dichotomy.
>snarky imaginary retort
>>73631420
Yes. Women fucking suck. My dick. Daily.
>>73631420
>So do you hate women?
Yes.
>>73631420
>Answering a question with a question
Do people genuinely think this makes them appear witty and smart?
>>73631420
the answer to both is "yes" or "I have no opinions either way, I'm just want to fit in"
>>73631420
Yes I do.
>>73631420
The logic is so flawed here it's ridiculous
Condition 1: Feminist, hate men
The opposite condition would be to not be a feminist and not hate men.
>>73631420
>criticizes someone for generalizing her view of a group of people
>generalizes a group of people
>>73631420
Damn really makes me think
