Is racism a bad thing /pol/? Should we discriminate against someone because of their race of culture?
Yes, discrimination based on characteristics a person cannot change (ie race and gender) is wrong
![rF1cpJ6[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/qmpHcXH.png "rF1cpJ6[1].png")
>>73621992
Racism is defined by the liberal as the ability to recognize patterns among any given set of data.
>>73622160
What about xenophobia
>>73621992
>redpill me on X
Lurk more, reddit
>>73622211
The healthy approach to any irrational fear is to recognize the cause of it and work towards fixing it
>>73622211
Xenophobia is sometimes justified. Judging by what culture someone is from, it's rational to expect certain traits from that person.
>>73622417
Off on a tangent, do you believe that Muslims should be banned from coming into the United States temporarily?
>>73622593
Islam is an ideology, people can choose whether or not to follow it and therefore discriminating against it is not inherently wrong if it's shown to be regressive to western values
>>73622760
But do you believe all muslims should be banned temporarily because of this?
Why do you fucks insist on replying to b8? OP, kill yourself.
>>73621992
There's a difference between hanging blacks purely because of their skin color and not letting Muslims in your country because of their barbaric culture.
>>73622865
No. Freedom of religion is in your constitution
>>73622417
>work towards fixing it
Pic related is the only way to fix the Muslim insurgency and you know it.
>>73621992
*smooch*
What? Of course not! We don't discriminate against anyone...
Ever :)
>>73623033
But what about the First Amendment, which constitutes the freedom of religion? Doesn't banning all muslims go against freedom of religion?
>inb4 They bring up Obama's 2011 ban on Iraqis
>>73622884
>Replying on this "b8" Thread
You're just bumping the thread, kiddo
>>73623058
christianity = islam < judaism
>>73623058
Fear of jihadis is not irrational and therefore not xenophobic
>>73621992
Racism is natural and useful. Problem is that it is meant to work in the background and not be a countries preoccupation line it is for most these days.
>>73623395
>Racism is natural and useful
In what way? For example, should a black person be prevented from going to a store because the white manager says he should not because of his skin color?
>implying this happens
>>73623193
:) Exactly. Why can't we live in peace? After all, not all people are like this :)
>>73622865
No, I believe they should be banned permanently. This pic is a little out of date, but is basically true. If you don't think so, you need to crack a history book sometime.
>>73624016
>B-b-but muh First Amendment
So I guess you're saying screw the First Amendment, screw the rights to practice Islam because muslims are hateful human beings. So how do you propose this?
>>73623037
But foreigners aren't citizens.
>>73624571
What about Muslims currently living in the United States? Should they be allowed to practice their religion without getting discriminated against?
>>73624016
I'm sure a scientific process established that muslims behave in this manner, can you link to the source where they established these percentages?
>>73624571
If banning foreigners from entering based on ideology is not breaking your constitution then it is more up for discussion
Black people claim they cannot be racist, and that only whites are racist, but lump all different white races (such as slavs and europeans) together. I bet you if they were shown a picture of a russian and a brit side by side they eould think of them as just white. They also group asians in with whites purely because they arent brown.
>>73624988
it's from the cia factbook, can't remember year, look up pewpoll statistics for some solid stats
>>73625543
That's not what I'm getting at. What I'm saying is should a person PURPOSELY discriminate against someone else because of their race or culture or religion?
>>73624228
Our constitution has nothing to do with immigration, because it only applies to our country and our citizens. It does not apply to the rest of the world, or anyone who is not an American citizen yet. The only thing it says in our constitution about immigration is that the federal government will regulate it. To me, at least, this implies that the federal government will regulate it to the advantage of our people and our country. There is nothing in there that says we can't exclude anyone for ANY reason.
>>73624988
Sure, here's your link:
Google.com
As I said, the pic is probably a little out of date, meaning the percentages, but the current ones would be easy enough to find.
>>73624016
That's ridiculous. It's crazy how americans value muh freedoms, but you defend taking people's right away to believe in god the way they want to.
That would be unnecessary, immoral, and only cause more separation between the muslim world and the west. Which will likely lead to more extrimism.
>>73621992
Racism is nothing but an opinion. It is a buzzword for something which was created to grant political power to the accusing party.
Bigotry at its core is nothing in itself. You can call any number of ideas bigoted, and it does not rob them of legitimacy. Manipulation of words and phrases to achieve subversive political ends is absolutely a tool of the Frankfurt School's Critical Theory.
Proudly call yourself a racist. Rob the Jews of their every weapon. Grasp hold of your freedom and never let go save to strangle those who dare to take it from you.
>>73621992
Why aren't there any cigarettes in his ears and tear ducts
Racism is bad, yes. Racialism is not, racialism is natural.
>>73621992
racism is natural
>>73626265
>proudly be intolerant of different ideas
>Grasp hold of your freedom
The double-think is real
>>73623231
Muslims immigrants aren't citizens, and therefore are not offered the protection of the constitution
>>73626356
Aren't those the same?
>>73622160
We discriminate based upon intellect and age all the time.
They also can not be changed .
>>73625956
What about the Muslims currently living in the United States as citizens then?
Also, how practical is it to ban Muslims? Unlike race, it is a choice.
>>73621992
>Islam wants to destroy the west
>Criticize them
>Be called a racist
>Jews want to destroy the west
>Criticize them
>be called an anti semite
So then I got a base ball bat, a knife, 2 handguns, a shotgun and 8 automatic assault rifles.
why?
because nobody is on my side
>>73626264
Like I said, crack a history book sometime. Then tell me, specifically where and when Muslims, in any significant numbers, have ever assimilated into another culture, practiced their religion peacefully, respected everyone else's religion, got along as productive members of that society, and did not try to violently take over as soon as the had the numbers to do so.
I'll save you some reading here. The answer is: NEVER has that ever happened in the entire history of the world. The picture in my post explains it perfectly.
Next question: Why on earth would anyone think that it will magically start happening now?
>>73625237
Banning foreigners for any reason that the President deems worthy is constitutional.
>Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate
>>73626916
Stand strong. Every man is an island, and there comes a time in every man's life where he must weather a terrible storm.
>>73627029
But what about the practicality of banning Muslims? How is the Donald able to ban all Muslims from entering the United States?
>>73626844
Personally I would like to see them go, too, although I concede that it would be a lot trickier to do legally.
As I said in another post, when it comes to immigration, we can ban anyone we want to ban, for ANY reason.
>>73627360
What about the practicality behind banning Muslims as a process? Isn't it tricky enough to ban Muslims, when for all we know there is no proof of their religion and therefore can go pass this?
>>73626645
>this
Non citizens don't have any rights under another country's constitution they can choose to treat me well if they want when I'm visiting or even to treat me the same under their law as a citizen but are not obliged to
When I visit the US I have no rights at all likewise if this American visits here he also has no rights. We just choose to be nice to guests but we could lock eachother up on our respective non countries and there would be nothing g in our constitutions saying otherwise
>>73621992
>Should you discriminate someone because you think you are superior to someone just because you are a different color?
No, you're stupid if you think that. Just the way it is.
>Should you discriminate someone because they have a different culture and values?
If the people in question have ideals and values fundamentally different from the original populace, of course. The incoming people should either conform or stay where they were.
Also I see a lot of people not seeming to understand the word discriminate is not a "bad" word. Just because it's been bastardized the real meaning remains the same, just google it.
All in all, a sovereign state reserves the right to allow, or not allow immigrants, and by definition this is not racist or xenophobic, just cautious.
>tfw everyone can perfectly answer why Donald Trump's ban on Muslims isn't discriminatory
>tfw those same people can't tell me how banning Muslims is possible
>tfw I still didn't get my OP answered
>>73627204
>>73627484
If anyone arrives in an American airport that was born in a Muslim country, send them packing and make the country of origin pay for it if they can't pay for it themselves. Accept zero rapeugees. Make weeding out Muslims an extensive process of the immigration screening program that is punishable by law for lying during.
>>73621992
>culture
yes, that should be a source of discrimination
>race
often is indicative of culture, so yeah, it's a pretty decent metric
>>73627484
America need not be a nation with open borders. No nation need lay open to welcome foreigners into their ranks.
We're a developed country with stagnating monetary growth, over inflated economy, and abysmal private debt. We do not need an influx of outsiders.
America should by policy have closed borders to all except those of exceptional worth such as noted scientists, engineers, Olympic athletes, renown surgeons, mathematicians. Were Islam rightfully classified as a cult, as proofed by their own doctrine, and 1400 years of constant violent conquest, public support for a ban on all middle eastern immigration would be immense.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant. The truth by nature destroys lies. Islam cannot stand mass scrutiny in a free nation where media propaganda campaigns are ground to a halt.
>>73628252
Ban on muslims does not mean ban on people from islamist countries
>>73627514
>>73626645
But they do have constitutional rights.
Not saying this is good or bad, but they do.
"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>>73627005
Muslims won't come to your country in any significant numbers, you're barely even taking any refugees in right now. Those who have the money to come to US are likely just the productive members. If you think banning them is a way to fight terrorism, you're also wrong. Muslims could still come to your country claiming to be christians or non-religious, and you already have loads of them as american citizens (which is another problem you didn't offer a solution).
The reason that never happened in the history is because there hasn't been any sudden mass immigration of muslims, before recently. And we're yet to see any efforts by muslims to take over any of the western countries.
>>73628331
Too bad for them.
>>73628120
You're never going to completely stop illegal immigration. It's quite literally impossible to completely stop it, even with a wall 10 million feet high.
What you can do is evolve and actually enforce the processes we have already. If a background check is done and they are indeed Muslim, send them back.
But you're kidding yourself if you think you're going to stop someone who has money from getting in. If a terrorist org REALLY wants in, they will get in.
>>73621992
no but we shouldn't fill our countries with them either.
>>73628331
that is part of the ban on muslims, yes.
it's also a reasonable guess that anyone with a traditionally middle-eastern name is also muslim, so we can ban them too
last part would be a "please self-report faith" question on whatever form they fill out to visit, and deny anyone dumb enough to put down "islam"
>>73628405
>no state
>deliberately mentions citizens
>deliberately does not mention federal government
States such as NY or LA or whatever are unable to ignore laws and rob non-citizens. The federal government is able to deny initial right of entry
>>73622417
How can you figure out the cause if it's irrational?
>>73628464
They don't need to.
They already out breed most whites in European countries. While I doubt there is some secret Muslim agenda run by terrorist to out last Europeans, it is happening.
>>73628739
Not sure what you mean? My argument was that illegals DO have rights, which they do indeed, not that the government has the right to deny them, which they also reserve the right to.
>>73628464
Also remember the expression "safety first"?
The point is to stop the accident before it happens.
>>73629023
Sure, illegals have rights. Unreasonable search+seizure, right to life, etc. People will still get in trouble for gunning down an admitted illegal immigrant in the street That doesn't mean they have a right to be in the country, meaning we can deport them when and where we find them.
>>73621992
Have you ever played chess?
>>73622206
Minorities only commit crimes because white men keep keep fucking them over economically.
If they had equal access to employment and education, every single African-American would rise up and become a wealthy capitalist with a college degree.
>inb4 citation
None needed. It's common fucking sense.
>>73629120
Of course, they are quite literally criminals.
It's kind of discouraging seeing how many people actually support criminals now.
>>73628464
>The reason that never happened in the history is because there hasn't been any sudden mass immigration of muslims, before recently.
Are you kidding me? Like I said, you have some reading to do. Start with the Ottoman Empire, and go back from there. There has been "mass immigration of Muslims" many times, and it has always ended up badly for everyone else around them.
>>73628252
>If anyone arrives in an American airport that was born in a Muslim country, send them packing and make the country of origin pay for it if they can't pay for it themselves
Am I really not going to be allowed to go to America after November?
>>73628464
>Muslims won't come to your country in any significant numbers, you're barely even taking any refugees in right now.
Exactly, and we want to keep it that way.
>>73629023
The number of offspring muslims produce goes down as they move to western countries though. In most white countries the muslim population is quite insignificant anyway.
>>73629108
>Safety first
A lot of people would put human rights first. The premise shouldn't be that a certain human is more dangerous than another based on their race, nationality, or religion. Again, freedom of religion is part of your constitution, and you either follow that value or you do not, there's no middleground.
If you wanted safety first, how about making it a little harder for people to buy automatic weapons for example?
I like this thread.
>>73630112
Do you seriously think you have to ban all of them in order to keep it that way?
> Is racism a bad thing /pol/?
NO
> Should we discriminate against someone because of their race of culture?
YES
>>73631118
>millions of rapefugees is an insignificant number
I personally would be completely okay with a Muslim holocaust, but I guess a ban would be enough for now.
>>73631253
I bet you hate when SJWs discriminate against whites and men though
>>73631308
Am I missing something here, because I'm unaware of USA taking millions of muslim refugees?
>>73623587
no, it means clinging to your handbag and changing road sides when encountering a male nigger in detroit at night in a bad neighborhood.
dark skin colour is, in most countries, an indicator of risk factors, like bad education, bad culture, poverty, etc.
>>73629338
citation needed
>>73631373
we hate that because they're fucking stupid about it and blame everything they possibly can on white males. Noticing patterns in races and discriminating because of it can be a good thing, but crying like a bitch because you get your feelings hurt will never be.
>>73631526
We are not at the moment, but it isn't like people don't want us to. And we have been taking relatively small numbers of Muslim refugees already.
You're not on reddit stop acting contrary as if it gives your opinion anymore validity than mine. Listen we don't want our country going to shit like your neighbors, so just fuck off.
>>73631526
Despite most of the state officials saying they will outright refuse to accept any of the rapeugees, Obama is trying to force them to, has already taken tens of thousands, wants to take even more, and Clinton has said she wants to not only continue to do so but increase the amount.
So no, not "millions", but any more than 1 is an issue.
>>73631373
that's completely different though you retard
>>73621992
Racism isn't bad, and some people deserve to be openly discriminated, such as the Jews because 1). They're easy to defeat in battle and 2). They can't even argue effectively about the subhuman shit they are.
>>73632016
>it's okay when we do it
It's okay to like other races less but bullying people because of their race is nigger tier
This is why skinheads are terrible
>>73632056
That's correct, whites are objectively superior and are allowed to discriminate against inferior subhumans.
>>73632056
>pretending not to acknowledge the differences in these situations just to make a joke about it
listen, if you want to get upvotes you're on the wrong site.
Racism is merely the product of experience.
>>73622160
Racism is not discrimination you dipshit
>>73621992
Not to get off question, but there is an inherent problem with calling it racism as it buys into 1930 nazi ideas of race and human genome.
I'm sure I ain't going to change anyone tonight, but it really is ethnocentrism.
None the less, I'm with the Finn all the way. Though I haven't bothered to read the entire thread. :P
>>73621992
Discrimination based on culture can be rational, although most people don't actually understand many other cultures well enough to do so.
Typically it's just an inchoate feeling that different=bad; a typically human form of stupidity.
'Races' are inventions only stormfags, sjws, and illiterates are stupid enough to talk about like they were real things.
>>73631526
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/15/obama-demands-compassion-for-syrian-refugees-as-he//
Obama wants to take in more. I swear he's willfully ignoring Europe's situation.
>>73632178
Since asians are objectively superior to whites I should treat you like the subhuman burger you are. Also you need to submit when asian SJWs call you white trash, after all they are superior to you
>>73632234
What differences
>>73623587
Yes, a store owner should be able to kick or choose to not do business with whoever he doesn't want. It's his goddamn store.
>>73629338
>it's awl whities fawlt!! Dindu nuffin
>common sense
This meme needs to die
I don't give these dindus guns so they can kill each other at a rate FAR HIGHER than any other minority! No one is forcing them to steal and rape and abort more than anyone else! I'm just your average Joe "privileged" white kid paying taxes off my job at subway so they can GO TO SCHOOL FOR FREE and/or LIVE OFF THE GOVERNMENT DOLE. But their culture pisses and shits all over that and blames ME because my skins not as Brown.
I have no problem so the term nigger because I think there is a distinction to be made between black persons and dindu niggers who CHOOSE that life style and play the victim afterwards.
Reminder: Ben Carson was a nigger before he decided to man up, unfuck his life, and become a world renowned brain surgeon instead
Tl;dr
Nigger is not a racist term as it describes a lifestyle.
>>73632456
Wrong link, soz. On mobile. This one should work.
>>73627089
I want to challenge that.
Any sign or signifier, such as a word - a word is just a sound without any real meaning. What ever meaning comes forth is co-created by those using it.
Which is to say, any island is doomed if they don't work with others.
Of course you can choose to work with a smaller team, but one of the great innovations of genghis khan was to promote people on skill rather than on linage.
Same goes for the innovation of the 1. Amendment. The tools you use to pick your team will over time - like a few generations, will be more defining than any luck in picking those with skills.
>>73632776
washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/15/obama-demands-compassion-for-syrian-refugees-as-he/
>>73621992
It's a meme. While it happens due to other people's retardation, certain people have taken it further and want to ruin everything because it's not fitting to them and they will call it racist first then back it up later.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGC-wr3rd1w
>>73624016
This is bullshit for the most part and the last part about france is false (living in france). They are no ghettos ruled by shariah law and no go zone (lol fox news)
>>73633006
>They are no ghettos ruled by shariah law and no go zone
Considering there are some in the UK I would be very surprised if you had none
>>73621992
I think ethnocentrism is inherent in any team. The question is how large a team you think you'd get the furthest with and how to choose your team.
Choosing people on how their skintone is a bad assessing what skills you are missing out on.
>>73632931
>next episode
>Laura wrote the note and spray painted her own locker to start an "important conversation on race"
>>73622160
>>73633006
Quiet, Mohammed, the Paris attacks have something to say about that.
>>73633006
You are a delusional nigger. But you already knew about the no go zones didn't you Ahmed?
Takbir!
>>73632479
>asians are objectively superior to whites
Oh, so you're a cucked beta not proud of your own whiteness (although it's looking more and more like you're a sand nigger) that believes the asians are smarter meme. Apparently you aren't very well versed in history either where whites completely dominate asians in war like the small dick faggots they are.
>b-but... korea and vietnam...
That doesn't count, those were stupid half-assed interventions that should have never happened. If we sent in a force meant to utterly destroy the enemy, those nations would have become subservient pets on a leash to us just like Japan is. They pretty much already are, we own South Korea and North Korea is terrified of us despite all the empty threats.
>>73621992
>should
subjective
>>73622265
This.
lol ye right
>>73633328
Asians have higher iq than whites. Stormfags often cite whites having higher iq on average than blacks justifying their "race realism". Therefore asians are superior to whites by your own standards
Now kiss my feet you primal nigger, show respect to your superiors
>>73633107
They are areas where France forced muslim to live all together during the first wave of immigration (wave which we were responsible for btw). They are not under any law but french law even some creates a lot of tension and problem (i'll give you that).
>>73633242
Oh look one guys defending muslim in france, he must be muslim himself right ?
>wrong
Paris attacks were awfull but it's no reason to spread fear and bullshit all over the place.
There have been too many isolated cases caused by refugees. Paradoxic, right? In Finland they hay have made a peak to the rape statistics. In Sweden, well, everything is off the charts. I read recently about a case which goes like this
>be a swedish mom
>take an eritrean male refugee in
>kick your very own daughter out of her room to give space to that man
>the male raped that 10-year-old daughter
I dont't know is it their genetics or culture but some refugees are damaged beyond repair, no help would fix them. They have sold their human value and should be treat as germs and pesiticide.
If you are unable to draw conclusions from statistics and cultures, you are naive and dangerous to your surroundings. That's common among the Finnish leftits: if I can't see the problems in my neighbourhood, there can't be problems or they are made up. Infantile and dangerous way to see things. It's easy to shout form the high income white suburb to the people who live near those borderline ghettos we have in Finland.
Not all refugees should be banned, but their mental traits and ambitions should be sorted out more throughoutly. The ones with criminal background and the ones committing crimes here should be cast out. Let them enjoy their culture of misery and chaos among the like-minded.
>>73633593
>People want to kill us, sure, but that's no reason to hate them!
"Xenophobia" is pretty justified when that culture wants to blow you up.
>>73633545
But they have small penis.
>>73633545
Even if they do have "higher iq" it hasn't helped them from getting completely fucking destroyed in their every attempt to fight the west. Other than China, which is only due to their numbers, asians are a joke to us. Not superior at all.
>>73622593
No, I believe they should be banned permanently.
>>73629338
Yeah dude, like I'm Mexican so gib monies because le Trump is Hitler xddd
Minorities should get paid extra to make up for all the times your ancestors hurt our ancestor's feelings
>>73634399
IQ is literally the reason people who are racist here use to justify it. But I guess when it becomes inconvenient when it turns out using that metric shows whites aren't the master race after all something must be done
Is it even possible to be a stormfag and not indulge is vast amounts of doublethink
>>73632456
>>73632008
>>73631915
I'm not saying you should be forced to take them, I'm saying you shouldn't ban the one's who want to come there with their own money.
But If you integrate the muslims properly, and check their background well (which USA seems to be doing) you're not going to have problems with them. I live in a town with 45k people, and we have two refugee centers. There hasn't been any reported crimes, and the refugees seem to be mostly normal families.
For record, I'm not for western countries taking in big amounts of refugees, I'm just saying that the refugees won't automatically form ghettos and bring sharia law when they're integrated properly.
>>73626743
and penis size.
>>73634739
>IQ is literally the reason people who are racist here use to justify it
You keep saying this, but I haven't said it once. You are criticizing what others say and using it against me, which makes no sense and is a shit argument. If you are a chink you aren't doing a very good job of convincing me you are smarter, you are getting increasingly desperate and unable to refute anything I am saying directly.
>>73634845
That's simply because your country and my country aren't making Germany's or Sweden's mistakes of just letting people in with open arms by accepting people solely because of their skin color.
People say the west is entirely cultural marxist, but I digress if we're on /pol/
>>73632479
good job on not reading my previous posts
>>73622206
Black people are more likely to be violent therefore we should mistrust them, treat them as lesser-humans and potentially remove them from America.
Gun-owners are more likely to be murders therefore we should mistrust them, treat them as lesser-humans and potentially remove them from America.
I agree with you that libs should stop deluding themselves into thinking there's no correlation between blackness and chimpness. There clearly is, if your ancestors evolved closer to the equator you're more likely to be stupid and violent. However, I don't see how discrimination follows from that conclusion. There are still black people smarter and more civil than most white people. Also, the dumbest white people are equally shitty as the dumbest black people. Why not just discriminate based on intelligence regardless of race?
>>73636281
>Gun-owners are more likely to be murders
do you have any proof of this?
>Why not just discriminate based on intelligence regardless of race?
because sometimes there isn't enough time to do so, just like there isn't enough time to go through every muslim trying to enter the country to check if they're members of IS
>>73632756
>Nigger is not a racist term as it describes a lifestyle.
>I've made up a definition for the word "nigger" and have concluded that it's not racist
>if someone's offended when I use the word they're an idiot because it's not offensive according to me
That's not how language works
>>73629338
>I can't back up any of my claims so I'll just call it common sense
You forgot to add that it's the current year.
>>73621992
As compared to what? Freedom of thought and word is more important than anything else, so if someone wants to be racist, let them be racist, sexist, mysoginistic, and any other stupid -ist the liberals invent. Just enforce the laws already in place that punish physical assault, theft, etc. etc. so that justice remains blind.
>>73636928
>words have the inherent capability to be offensive by theirselves
go back to tumblr, that's not how language works
>>73636829
>do you have any proof of this?
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8
>because sometimes there isn't enough time to do so
In the case of black people there seems to be plenty of time. Also, considering that the U.S. purports to be a meritocracy, it's in the best of our interests not to discriminate on the basis of anything but merit.
>go through every muslim trying to enter the country to check if they're members of IS
This is stupid for two reasons
1. If IS was trying to pull a coordinated attack in the U.S. they would easily subvert the no muslim policy by sending terrorists claiming to be non-muslims.
2. Terrorists are such a minor threat that sacrificing the foundation of this country in order to prevent it is retarded. This irrational fear of terrorism needs to stop; you're more likely to be killed by lightning.
>>73637144
Nice strawman, faggot. Of course words don't have inherent meaning. They also don't have whatever meaning the speaker applies to them. Consideration of the listener's meaning is as important as the speaker's meaning.
>>73632619
So you wouldn't mind getting kicked out of a store solely because of your race
>inb4 I'm white I can't get kicked out
>>73638167
>https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8
this doesn't prove that gun owners are more likely to be murderers, it just proves that a lot of murderers have access to firearms. I'm curious to see the statistics on murders used with legally purchased guns, by the gun's owners vs guns acquired by other means.
>In the case of black people there seems to be plenty of time
I'm not sure what you mean by this, let's say as a policeman you're in a convenience store and a group of niggers come in, being on edge because of their skin color could help you prevent a possible robbery. In this case discrimination is a good thing.
>considering that the U.S. purports to be a meritocracy, it's in the best of our interests not to discriminate on the basis of anything but merit.
are we talking about political racism or personal racism? Of course our country shouldn't be racist per se, but personally I believe it would help.
>they would easily subvert the no muslim policy by sending terrorists claiming to be non-muslims
yeah a sandnigger with a long greasy beard and a turban tries to gain access to the us from a middle-eastern country, and he claims not to be a muslim. Not going to help.
>Terrorists are such a minor threat that sacrificing the foundation of this country in order to prevent it is retarded
how many fallen empires do you think thought the same thing?
>This irrational fear of terrorism needs to stop; you're more likely to be killed by lightning.
Yes I'm more likely to be killed by lightning if I open a hole in my roof and hold on to a giant metal pole, basically the equivalent of letting mudslimes en masse into our country
>>73638527
>Nice strawman
how is it a strawman? It works against your specific claim.
>They also don't have whatever meaning the speaker applies to them
of course they do, what do you think context is, dumbass?
