Somebody please tell me this is fake
>>73571711
this is fake
>>73571711
It's true.
All of it.
>>73571711
this is real, unfortunately.
swedes who wanna give it a try:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3420881/Swedish-social-worker-stabbed-thigh-tried-break-fight-two-teenage-migrants-Police-officer-reveals-shocking-new-details-killing.html
>>73571711
also, welcome newfag. yes its real, and its not even CLOSE to the worst thing you'll ever see.
It's racist to report reality.
>>73571711
She was hot.
Shame she killed herself.
>>73571711
That is some Chinese government tier shit right there.
>>73572249
Nothing.
tried sweden, germany, canada and hongkong. its showing everywhere. this is bullshit.
>>73572579
>Pakistan
Sure shitskin, we believe you
>>73571711
sweden really is a full blown police state
>>73572579
ALOHA SNACKBAR
>>73572579
Covering for the rape of your brothers, I see
>>73572048
https://whoer.net/webproxy
>>73571711
Look at TIME magazine and see what issues they release for the US and compare them to the rest of the world.
>>73572874
I tried on zendmate and hotspot shield.
i can access it with a Swede proxy.
Any Swede google Alexandra Mezher and say what comes up?
>>73572987
>>73572818
>>73572661
>>73572565
of all the media outlets in the world why the fuck would the dailymail give a shit about how muslims are portrayed?
>>73573053
>why would a united khanate source care about portrayal of muslims
I think you can figure that one out
>>73572955
They probably use encryption or spoofing, I guess the URL needs to be in plain text in order for the swedish ISP to block it.
Is this working for you Swedes?
http://95.101.114.97:80/news/article-3420881/Swedish-social-worker-stabbed-thigh-tried-break-fight-two-teenage-migrants-Police-officer-reveals-shocking-new-details-killing.html
That proxy doesn't seem able to compute this URL.
>>73573217
but you can access the article from the UK. how dense are you?
>>73573053
First page is a big left leaning tabloid newspaper that says she was stabbed at a migrant home, so it's not really being covered up in Sweden. Why the hell would the dailymail do it then?
>>73573225
yeah that what I though so.
I cannot access it using with https://whoer.net/webproxy
But other articles are loading.
>>73573334
Oh well that URL with the IP doesn't work for me either kek I guess they're force-redirecting to the DNS. This trick used to work in the past because ISPs always overlook the IP, though if the IP is forcing you to use the domain name then there's o point.
>>73573316
Its very well known that the dailymail tries to exaggerate bullshit and a lot of the times they do that by portraying muslims as the bad guys. then why would they try to cover up a story about muslims being the bad guys?
>>73573483
I dont know what most of those words mean but it sounds good.
>>73571711
SWEDEN YES.
Seriously it has to be fake right? I mean they couldn't get away with this could they?
>>73573856
It's not DailyMail's fault, it's the Swedish ISPs who are hijacking the URL.
Try and see: >>73572874
Calm down boys , that was months ago.
Yes it was real . They blocked that but only that
I am awe and shocked, that being said can someone with better knowledge of internets explain the censoring mechanism to me? All I could come up with is filter setup from dailymail side working like: on I see your IP is from Sweden my friend, have a 404 then.
>>73573856
I remember that thread. Its true. Swedecucks were freaking out. I think it was blocked for the duration of the trial so it doesn't influence them or some cuck reason
>>73574143
You post from all europe at the same time?
>>73572953
Thats actually pretty alarming and saddening.
They really don't want to burst the american "Everything is fine" bubble.
>>73574112
That's how it starts, allow it once, twice and thrice then one day you'll find yourself living in a Caliphate, with censorship level on pair with Turkey, or even worse just like North Korea.
Not being tolerant of stabbing Swedes to death is islamophobic and racist.
>>73572953
this is rather funny.
>>73571711
>>73572579
It's true but afaik it's because the article violates Sweden's privacy laws by naming the victim and the offender or smth, not because muslim.
>>73573488
nice try sand nigger
every extra lie you tell us is going to result in another 10k dead muslims.
go ahead, we all tried the proxy and we know you're lying. go ahead and lie again. you think we're going to feel sorry for you subhmans when this is over?
>>73572048
no its real
>>73574005
>It's not DailyMail's fault, it's the Swedish ISPs who are hijacking the URL.
That 404 page is server-side content. It is 100% Daily Mail shenanagans
>>73571711
This is old news senpai. It was happening, but I'm pretty sure we came to the conclusion that it was DM being cunts
>>73574296
addendum: most likely because the named offender is """"""""""""underage""""""""""""
>>73574143
>I see your IP is from Sweden my friend, have a 404 then.
Nope it's not a thing that happens on DailyMail, most likely (I don't see why they would ban Swedes from articles like these).
It works like this (sort of):
>You --- Original URL Request --- > ISP ---> URL is Blacklisted --- Different URL Request ---> Gatways ---> DailyMail Server
>DailyMail Server --- Requested URL Response ---> Gateways ---> ISP ---> Replaced URL Response --- You
>>73574346
Never hear of packet spoofing? it's very similar, it happens in China all the time.
>>73573282
have you poms changed the flag already?
>>73574598
Thanks for the info.
>>73574724
chinese censorship isn't even that bad, m8ey. lived there for 4 years.
the basic situation is that they ban subversive content, and they only issue license to publish to sources that are likely to contribute to education, etc.
in the end, you end up with a LOT less nonsense and entertainment, which means that most peple use the net for utilitarian purposes, and they don't have a very large platform by which they can influence mass opinion.
people can say WHATEVER they want in a private conversation. which is all they should be able to say, because the only way to publish a mainstream opinion on the internet is to be a celebrity, and the chinese don't want to cede control of that to idiots.
>>73575079
oh well it's doesn't need to be the government, their infrastructure is just not very good, even hackers can hijack their backbone.
Last year something like this happened:
http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/03/massive-denial-of-service-attack-on-github-tied-to-chinese-government/
Though in this case the suspect was the government, this method is common among le cyber criminals also.
>all that anglo-saxon hypocrisy
It's not it all because of your actions, right?
>>73574184
Yep
>>73572134
She looked like a bimbo covered in makeup, get some taste you bogan
just tried it myself and it was real
