Conservative Intellectuals Take Aim at Donald Trump
>It is not simply that Trump lacks consistent conservative principles; rather, he lacks any principles whatsoever. Republicans who argue he has to be elected because the Supreme Court swing seat is at issue need to explain why they have the least bit of confidence in Trump’s pick. If he thought it would be to his advantage to nominate a liberal justice, he surely would. Moreover, he is unlikely to be able to discern the next David Souter from the next Antonin Scalia.
>It may come as a shock to defiant Trumpkins that Republicans have a choice to reject Trump now and in November. They can find a third candidate. They can ticket-split. And they can stay home. Once Republicans decide — as thousands are every day — that Trump is unfit to serve, any compunction to vote for him disappears.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/05/09/trumps-self-destruction-begins-early/
>>73517194
>Conservative Intellectuals
>>73517194
>conservative
>intellectuals
>muh true conservatism
Ben Shapiro go home
>Conservative intellectuals
>>73517194
So cuckservatives want hillary to win.
>>73517194
>Conservative Intellectuals
it's those "republicans" that will soon be on the chopping block and losing their positions in government
no one is falling for your zionist bullshit anymore, neocons
>>73517194
Aren't there a lot of Berniecucks that are refusing to vote for Shillary?
I'd say the disparity is greater on the Democrat side in terms of disgruntled voters. After 8 years of Obumfuck, Republicans are ready to elect anything right of center.
>>73517194
>mexican int-
I mean
>conservative intellectuals
>conservative intellectuals
>>73517716
I would put a bullet through shillary's reptillian skull if i got the chance
>>73517194
>ad hominem
intellectuals my ass, sellouts.
>>73517194
I don't understand the issue at all.
They say Trump isn't conservative enough, meanwhile they wanted Guac man.
>>73517194
>dude Trump won't pick "conservatives" for the supreme court
>lets vote for Hilary instead
>>73517194
So "conservative intellectuals" meaning "neocons"?
>>73519302
It's all ad hominem. Every single attack on Trump is ad hominem. Remember Sowell's article in NRO? I expected a well reasoned and argued position from a world renowned free trade, global market, supply side economist against Trump's protectionist, demand side, nationalist economic strategy. Instead we got ZOMGLITERALLYHITLER!1!1!!1!!1
>>73519808
Nobody wanted guac man.
>>73517194
>HE'S NOT CONSERVATIVE WHO CARES ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT YOU SILLY GOYIM! JUST LET HILLARY HAVE IT! NEVER TRUMP!
>>73519808
Our foreign policy has been controlled by neocons for the past thirty years. Conservatism has been taken over by them and by anti-border Democrat crony capitalists for almost as long. This is a real revolution.
>>73517194
>consistent conservative principles
as compared to , say, this guy, whose political credentials were never questioned.
>>73517194
How much did Hillary pay you for this post, OP?
>Conservative Intellectuals
>>73517194
>Rubin
>conservative intellectuals
This has been a thread started by the Hillary campaign.
>>73517194
>conservative intellectuals advocate a third candidate.
Either they're not intellectuals or they're not conservative. What they suggest is a surefire way to hand the presidency to Clinton.
>conservative intellectuals
>>73520919
>All those kikes
sasuga jew-chan
>>73517194
The truth is this election cycle both parties have been utterly shattered into 4 seperate entities
Nationalist Neocapitalist Noninterventioniats
Keynesian Global Neocapitalists Interventionists
Globalist Interventionist Progressives
Pure Socialist Globalists Progressivists
>>73524113
It's actually just a list of Jews, but I had to cover it up so people didn't call me antisemi.
>>73524834
this anon knows the score
>>73524834
DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE PARTISAN JEW
There is more to politics than Left/Right or Dem/Rep!
ya! this is right!!! why would ANYONE (IN 2016 MIND YOU) VOTE FOR A RASIST, HITLER, RASIST, MAN!(AND NOT A WOMAN? PPHHT, VERGINS)
ᵀʰᶦˢ ᵗʰʳᵉᵃᵈ ʷᵃˢ ᵖᵃᶦᵈ ᶠᵒʳ ᵇʸ ᴴᶦᶫᶫᵃʳʸ ᶠᵒʳ ᴬᵐᵉʳᶦᶜᵃ, ᵃ ᶜᵃᵐᵖᵃᶦᵍᶰ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉᵈ ᵇʸ ᵐᵒʳᵉ ᵗʰᵃᶰ ᵒᶰᵉ ᵐᶦᶫᶫᶦᵒᶰ ᵍʳᵃˢˢʳᵒᵒᵗˢ ᵈᵒᶰᵒʳˢ⋅
ᵀᵒ ˢᵉᶰᵈ ᵃ ᶜᵒᶰᵗʳᶦᵇᵘᵗᶦᵒᶰ, ᵖᶫᵉᵃˢᵉ ˢᵉᶰᵈ ᵃ ᵖᵉʳˢᵒᶰᵃᶫ ᶜʰᵉᶜᵏ ᵐᵃᵈᵉ ᵖᵃʸᵃᵇᶫᵉ ᵗᵒ “ᴴᶦᶫᶫᵃʳʸ ᶠᵒʳ ᴬᵐᵉʳᶦᶜᵃ” ᵗᵒ:
ᴴᶦᶫᶫᵃʳʸ ᶠᵒʳ ᴬᵐᵉʳᶦᶜᵃ
ᴾᵒˢᵗ ᴼᶠᶠᶦᶜᵉ ᴮᵒˣ 999
ᴺᵉʷ ʸᵒʳᵏ, ᴺʸ 0434-6001
>>73517542
Conservative intellectuals are waiting for a charismatic articulate principled conservative with broad appeal. Their own version of Barak Obama.
>>73517194
Yeah man. Fucking Donald Trump and his no principals what so ever. He needs Real Conservative Principals like the Republicans who begged during 2014 to get elected to the Senate to stop Obama's amnesty and Obamacare funding then rubber stamped both.
That's the kind of men we need. More lying, conniving, bullshit-slinging con artists like "Real Conservatives." :^)
>>73526037
OP's post was sponsored by:
>http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-of-correct-the-record/
>Correct The Record will invest more than $1 million into Barrier Breakers 2016 activities, including the more than tripling of its digital operation to engage in online messaging both for Secretary Clinton and to push back against attackers on social media platforms...
