Let's say a Disney Cruise ship is torpedoed and sunk in international waters by ISIS or Boko Haram, who managed to independently acquire either torpedo boat or a Cold War-era conventional submarine (let's say one of the Syrian Navy's Romeo-class vessels). Massive loss of life ensues at the ship goes down in minutes, killing several thousand people, with a few hundred rescued from the freezing water. The disaster is broadcast all over the world via livestreams of people on board and terrorist propaganda.
What are the social and political effects of such a tragedy?
>>73456040
It would be considered an act of war against the US. Granted, our politicians are just as likely to blame some other country with natural resources we want.
>>73456040
The public would of course demand the heads of everyone responsible. The navy of every nato country would swarm to sink the sub.
No one would ask how they ever got the sub in the first place.
Are you planning something new,CIA?
>>73456040
Nothing. Especially if the action was propagated by Muslims.
If it's a European or Canadian ship obviously the answer would be more diversity.
>>73456040
>Russia shoots down Dutch airliner killing 220
>dutch cucks shrug
>EU cucks shrug
sad
>>73456040
By European countries doubling their intake of refugees
>>73456040
#notallmuslims
More immigration and the start of aid to isis because if we kill them they win
I feel honored knowing that the CIA asks for our opinions on the outcome of false flags.
>>73456040
You would not need a torpedo to sink a modern cruise ship, they are all singe hull cheap shits. I don't think anything different would happen honestly.
>>73456040
America would be shamed into apologizing and take in more niggers.
>>73456040
"Not ALL Muslims..."
