Daily reminder that India is more powerful than half of you shit posters here!
http://www.wonderslist.com/10-most-powerful-militaries/
Rest of the world, are you even trying!?
>India 4th largest because of higher numbers
>Comparing Indian Hawkes to EU Eurofighters and USA F-22 Raptors
>Comparing trained Western Soldiers to Indians who desert at the first sign of combat
>>73416790
Doesn't take into account skill/conflicts won, nor cyber divisions which is a major part of modern conflict.
Dropped.
These numbers are meaningless since they ignore the effectiveness of the units.
>>73416790
>India is more powerful than
An Avrg Indian earns 1600$ per year...military numbers mean shiiiiiiiit...
POO
>>73418260
SHOOT
>>73418339
DESIGNATED SHOOTING STREETS
>>73417072
>USA F-22
USA
are you british or usda certified if bacon/meat isn't haram!
>>73418339
hey man, how many LOOS can you build with 46bn dollaroos
inbf 2 walls.
>>73418199
And the average Bangladeshi earns 900 dollars a year until he gets sliced up for not believing in allah enough.
>>73418199
How does average income per person come into the picture while discussing military strength, you dumb Paki? Go back to making underwear.
>Bangladeshi
>intellectuals
>>73418832
1858.4m toilets to be precise.
>>73416790
damn thats a lot of tanks
>>73419646
it' 1500$ actually and absolutely nothing to shout about to the world my dear 'Indian Diaspora' m8...as in every SAARC country....
why america budget is sooooooo much bigger but the army size isnt that big compared to russia ?
is it because plane cost a fortune or is it because the technology on each unit is much better?
>>73419874
military strength is absolutely nothing when it can't be backed up by economic strength...and econ. strength is absolute must to lay claim on being a Superpower...
>>73416790
I didn't know sunken boats count as submarines, thanks North Korea.
>>73421177
It's Midget Subs only carrying 14 men and 2 torpedo's...even Iran has 22 of those...
>>73416790
>spends a load of money
>military is still shit
Brazil, nooo.
Thank god that ranking only counts quantity, or else we would be much further down the list.
>>73416790
Nope.
Even Canada could roll India.
Shitty conscripts and cold war era vehicles do not a powerful military make.
>>73418199
The average salary of country is not interrelated to the countries GDP, fuckin fag.
>>73420265
Incorrect.
That's a lot of sitting ducks.
>>73416790
>belgium has 52 tank, 166 plane and 33k men > 700k men, 6600tanks and 943 plane
damn NK your technology must be fucking shit
>>73420975
Not an argument. Military strength is dependent upon wealth of the state rather than the poorest individual. You're redundant, and vilifying a much stronger military than your own, a much larger economy than your own, and trying to compensate for the fact that the average Bangladeshi goes through more pairs of underwear than a senile old woman.
The only person making claims of superpowers here is you, not me, and if you'd stop trying to validate your existence by tarnishing other countries, and learn your place as the doormat of the subcontinent, it'll help you.
>>73416790
And the best thing about an Indian invasion is that they don't produce a scorched earth, instead the create highly fertile clay because they shit all over the place
>>73416790
>germany
>7th place
our military is incapable of doing anything sers these days. if anybody attacked us we would be scrued
>>73416790
how can Belgium be in front of N. Korea when they are superior in all categories?
>Canada still solo Iran 1on1
>mudslime think they will rule the world
>>73421829
Shitty technology
>>73421415
your country's economic strength is measured and backed up by your GDP...not the salary of a Infosys exec....!
>>73421726
Your post had the waft of perfume called 'REKT'...is it new on the market...?
>>73422034
You dumb nigger. That's what I'm trying to say. You are the one who brought up average salary of a Indian into the matter to underrate how our military might is shit.
>>73422034
Do you understand English?
GDP is not a complete measure of economic activity. It accounts for final output or value added at each stage of production, but not total output or total sales along the entire production process.
The methodology of calculating GDP is different, it's not possible to infer the average salary from it, or vice versa.
But GDP is the nominal measure of economic growth and we have a high GDP, due to a large population and a low average salary because of that.
Think really hard about it and maybe you'll understand in a week or so.
>>73422334
Just $2.99 m8
>>73422334
Ah, yes the mark of the infantile.
Remember next time you don't have an argument, accept defeat and shut it, because if you claim "I'm winning" without putting out a real argument, you're not only losing, you're losing in the worst way possible.
I'll give you the mercy you don't deserve and just assume you're incompetent because you're stupid, but that seems to be a general trend in your country, so I'm not sure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaK1jFg8JBE
yeah no
>>73422664
we were not talking about GDP(ppp) to begin with...it's the gross output GDP(nominal) that was the topic of my post...
>>73416790
I mean seriously, what's with the retarded silly walks?
>poo
>>73422675
Thanx m8 will look for it , I was thinking about switching my current fev 'Bootyblast' to a new brand...
>>73423209
No, the topic of your post was about assessing the economic strength the country, which you misrepresented by quoting the average annual income, which is objectively wrong and doesn't help your case anyway because India has a high GDP. Also, nominal GDP is GDP not adjusted for inflation, which means it'll only go higher than the value of stated GDP. You're wrong again.
You can't even type properly, it's not a big surprise you can't get into economics. I suggest you not strain your small brain and stick to manual Labour like dog you are.
>>73423277
Lol
I FuCKED UIAPO
>>73416790
damn north korea could fuck the aricraft carriers up
unbless they got missiles on the bottom
