Friendly reminder, Globalism is profitable for all of us.
>people don't even know comparative advantage
No wonder they lose their jobs.
>not knowing that protectionism is actually more beneficial for developing countries
>not knowing that protectionism is sometimes necessary even in developed economies
>>73311207
If by all of us you nean Globalist Elites
>>73311640
>for developing countries
do you have any proofs?
hint: third world country lose its economical power after they adapt "protectionism" a.k.a socialism. (Look at india and some african countries)
and Let's see what happend after they adapt globalism.(90s~today)
their growth rate is over 5% annualy. wow so globalism is bad and protectionism great.
also Have you ever heard comparative advantage? my moronic friend
>>73312000
Everyone but a small number of elite should work for about as much as the average shoemaker makes in Thailand at a Nike factory.
This is efficiency.
>>73312095
basically 90% of the people are stupid retards like you.
there is no difference between average american and average thailand ladyboy whore
>>73312355
>basically 90% of the people are stupid retards like you.
No, it's 99.5%
We only need a .5% elite to manage everyone, especially with artificial intelligence like Watson 2.0 and robotics
the rest of us, you included, will be laborers who are happy to mortgage your retire-at-80-receive-no-pension futures to be able to afford big televisions at Wal-Mart so you can watch re-runs of Star Trek The Next Generation on the cable you're paying $300 a month for
>>73313406
savage beast
>>73312000
>do you have any proofs?
Sure. Korea and Taiwan, for starters. Under a protectionist economy, they both were able to develop their industrial capacity.
>>73311207
A FUCKING DOT
>>73313642
in a savage land
>>73313855
Not forgetting the USA in the 19th century
>>73311207
I'm all for globalism. In fact, globalism is inevitable. Those of you reacting so poorly are honestly regressive. We are not going back to pre-WWII era. That period is over. We're moving toward building back up that tower of babel and you can get fucked.
TPP is shit though.
>>73316020
>inevitable
Why?
>>73311207
Of course globalism is good for third world countries, that benefit from developed countries. It is terrible for already developed countries, because all of their shit leaves (see: the effects of NAFTA on US manufacturing)
>>73316315
it's good for the rich elite
>>73312095
Not even that, the most efficient system would take us back to feudalism. Of course, there is only so many shoes you can manufacture before the world decides they don't don't want anymore.
>>73318585
nothing that planned obsolescence can't fix
and fashion trends
>>73311207
Comparative advantage. Comparing the first world and bringing the advantages of the third world to the first world
>>73311207
Nice proxy ahmed, want to take it to the white house?
>>73319273
>and fashion trends
those are planned obsolescence, of course, though
>>73311786
I don't think it's even that alone, just as much the multinational corps and big governments, all the lawyers - modern global fascism. Taken all together a psychopathic entity that is driven to acquire more power and wealth and cares not for any one, least of all individuals.
>>73311207
TPP = Trans Agenda
>>73320013
>not for any one
it's worse than that
destroying the environment is not a meme
it's a huge fucking problem and it's going to get a lot worse in America
>>73320237
>it's going to get a lot worse in America
and everyone will chirp and bark about "teh economy!" while they feed our future to the lions
3RD NUKE NOW
>>73319273
>planned obsolescence
>a term coined by socialist as a petty insult that people would rather not pay obscene amounts of money for goods that are built to last forever which are extremely inefficient and wasteful of resources
Pick both
>>73311207
Fuck globalism and neoliberalism. Better dead than red.
>>73320237
The environment has been getting steadily better in America faggot
>>73311207
The problem with economists is that they ignore biology and evolutionary psychology.
>>73311207
Japan will get fucked so hard by TPP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0sxoQBUFz0
>>73320503
>ignores all the farmland and forest disappearing in favor of strip malls, cities growing together, and Wal-Mart supercenters
thinks clearer air in congested suburban/urban sprawl means an improved environment
>>73320440
>wants to buy low-grade crap that pollutes a lot more and breaks a lot more often, leading to irritation, inefficiency, and more profit for scammy companies employing shit-tier workers paid shit-tier salaries
>>73311207
Friendly reminder, Globalism would profitable for all of us if not for muslims .
people don't even know comparative disadvantage
>No wonder they lose their lived.
F T F Y
T
F
Y
>>73311640
fpbp
I will never surrender the economic sovereignty of my country to foreign influence.
The jews may think we only care about money but they are dead wrong like the last 17 times.
>>73312000
>do you have any proofs?
wtf? how about japan dumbass?
korea, taiwan, singapore, china, even USA
for starters it does not oppose to globalism in that it should be oriented to international markets for it to work, but these cunts still were protectionist in their development
>>73321796
all markets are globalized
>>73311207
TPP give too much power to corporations. Literally the only winning party
>>73320237
Meh, truth be told that will happen with almost 8 billion monkeys on the big banana hunt no matter what the political structure or ideology. That was only possible with big oil. Give it a century, mother nature is gonna slap the monkeys shit around hard this century. Might be a billion or two left after that, there are no replacements for fossil fuels no matter what fantasies the greenies propagate. In fact we are witnessing Jevons paradox right now.
I was all green as a young boy, but when it all sinks in, without population control, we're fucked. Mother nature will fix it though, always does.
>>73311207
comparative advantages work without globalization moron. we're not saying importing and exporting is bad.
>>73312000
>protectionism
>socialism
You're taking too much radiation there nip
>>73311207
>the end of human existence is profit
>>73316020
Regressives always make the mistake in thinking that things are different because of the current year and technology. The truth is that the only thing thats changed is technology. Everything else is exactly the same.
>globalism is profitable
>this makes it good in general
Killing people and taking their money is profitable too. So is prostitution and heroin trading.
>>73324071
>being against prostitution
>>73311207
Globalism is not a synonym for globalization.
Globalism = centralizing political power on a global/supranational scale
Globalization = The effects of decreasing barriers to trade on an international scale, not political integration required
>>73323417
>Mother nature will fix it though, always does.
that's not a fix
evolution takes much too much time for it to be relevant to us
the time it will take for natural selection to replenish the species and soil we're destroying is way beyond our normal sense of time
>>73311640
protectionism is only necessary when OTHER COUNTRIES are protectionist themselves, thus sparking a vicious cycle of trade wars
free trade is always better for the vast majority of people
>>73323820
>>73324071
>hurr durr i am retarded
>>73321122
>wants to buy high grade crap that he will have to commit to for a long time while leading to less profits workers.
I thought you were a friend to the workers.
>>73323008
Doesnt matter with technological unemployement plus tpp our people will rise again like they did in 1973 but this time will be civil war, Multinational like Kingross that take our natural resources and we will fusilate traitors once again. our motto is for reason or force and we all take it very seriously when shit hits the fan.
>>73324294
Look protectionism is essentially global communism. It doesn't work. First world countries are going to be dragged down for third world countries to be slightly propped up.
>>73311786
>If by all of us you nean Globalist Elites
T H I S
smalls business cant into TPP
On the contrary, small businesses can lose everything having to compete against multinational corporations
>>73324552
Koch brothers are defined as a small business
Bechtel, too
50% of "small business" profits go to big billionaires
>>73311207
>>73311207
nice try shekelstein.
you're not going to keep your chinks working at 50 cents an hour.
