Is this natural selection?
>>73167477
yes
No, that's literal selection.
I suppose
>>73167477
no that would be rape
>>73167477
It's fiction.
No, because there isn't any breeding going on there, just recreational intercourse. And that picture is an exaggeration of people in their teens and early twenties. The discrepancy is never that large, and disappears or reverses as you get older.
Most people still have kids in monogamous families, and I'd be surprised if only 30% of males produced offspring compared to 80% of females.
>not posting the forecasted version
>>73167477
The sexual revolution had nothing to do with this my Taiwanese friend, it's always been that way. It's just in the information age we have a greatest insight to it's workings and existence. 80% of the women are chasing 20% of the men. Pareto Principle in full effect. Forgive me if I'm wrong but wasn't there some article or study that said over the course of history if you put 10 men in a room then 4 of them would never sire offspring? Something along those lines.
>>73167477
Before the "sexual revolution" there was competition too.
This has literally always been the case in human history. Why would women pick the faggot overweight mommas boy, when they could have better offspring with others.
>>73168377
Because the faggot overweight mommas boys will provide loyalty and resources, whereas the Chads will provide only dick and semen.
>>73168377
Watch some nat geo. The faggot strikes while Chad is busy fighting Chad for them bragging rights.
these cucks so salty they cant get a shag spent to much time on R9K senpai
>>73167542
Underrated
>>73167477
Women were always like this, it's just that traditional patriarchal societies ensured that they gave beta and omega males a chance.
Now, since all those restraints are gone, you see women embracing their natural slut/whore nature. Don't believe the lies people tell you about how women are so much more pure than men, about how women are these moral, perfect angels. They are not. Those ideas are just, ironically, remnants of old patriarchal ideas that now exist in an age where people need to desperately believe women are nice and pure, when all evidence shows they are not.
I'm one of those 20% (6'4", 230lbs, good looking) and I can say it's absolutely true. Most of my friends are in awe of the pussy I get while many of them get nothing.
Sluts and philanderers are two sides of the same Feminist coin desu desu
>>73168590
This is what fat betas actually belive
Implying the guys wouldn't be going for the prettiest slut around
>>73168095
>The sexual revolution had nothing to do with this
You're full of shit, my penal colony yuropoor not-friend.
>>73167477
>before sexual revolution
Sexual revolution just restores the state of pre-agrarian man. It's not progressive, it's the ultimate in regressiveness.
>>73169380
Yeah but apes aren't autistic therefore they are superior.
