Why do we allow welfare/benefits collectors etc to even vote? Voting is about how we're spending our money and they didn't even contribute to that amount, rather, they drained it.
Some people do need help. But it is such a flawed system that niggers even figured out how to abuse it.
>>72273068
Honestly, I'm all for barring people on welfare from voting. Maybe even required sterilization to to receive support from the government. I'm tired of these fucks getting paid fuckloads of money because "OH NO TYRONE CUMM IN DA PUSSI"
ONE
MAN
ONE
VOTE
>>72273250
Sure they do, still doesn't mean they should be allowed to vote. Besides, if you're on welfare for say over 2 years (and I'm being royal here), you're probably not in need but just lazy.
>>72273352
Sterilization sounds good on paper, but where do you draw the line between people who just need a push in the back to get back on track and who is just profiting from the system.
(we both know you could probably come very far by sorting them on skin colour, but still. Dats raycis.)
>>72273777
THREE
SEVENS
ONE
SHITPOST
If people are not allowed to vote, you should not expect them to respect the laws of the state
>>72273068
Taxation for representation is a reasonable concept. It's the corner stone of democracy, but many countries have tried it before and it usually leads to an increase of unemployment. Without someone to represent the poor there's never a means to lower unemployment or to fix the problem. It also gives politicians incentive to increase unemployment so the vote of the upper class will have greater impact. Likewise the current work programs have been tried before, it was called the workhouse ethic. The problem however was that it lead to a reduced quality of living for the working class as they became an exploitable asset for employers. The best thing you can do is to try and reduce exploitation of the system as much as possible.
>>72273068
because you are cucked by socialists
>>72273068
no, the real reason you work so hard is so that the rich get more than 2/3s of it, directly
the "freeloaders" dont account for 1 percent
>>72273978
Wouldn't keeping people unemployed only be worth it if your vote power was based on how much you pay, but not if it's both on whether you pay? In my system paying 100$ in taxes would be enough to be voting material so to say.
>>72274027
Bulgaria is a shithole though.
>>72273068
It is illegal to pay for votes
Welfare recipients are being paid by democrats
Ergo their votes are paid for and therefore illegal
>>72274346
not really
>>72274346
That really depends on how each country distributes wealth. Any country that has 10% of its citizens own 50% of it's wealth, will see 50% of representation go to a minority of people. Which is the same system as a lords/monarchy were the lords that contributed more to the treasury would be granted greater favor to the monarch. Which hasn't really worked out well it the past either.
>>72274932
Well, the government IS the aristocracy, and they control 100% of the wealth, they can, just like the king, take what they want and punish or kill resistors. All that we have done is change the name of the monarchs and his supporters to politicians and public servants.
>>72276026
politicians dont really make that much
>>72276026
Maybe, that would be a matter of perception/opinion. Although an important difference would be accountability. Monarchs are only accountable to themselves, politicians are accountable to the people.
>>72276196
YEah, they do. They do zero work, and yet get paid a salary, a pension, and somehow always wind up with a lot more money than they were officially paid. They get payoffs, favors from others, do nothing jobs, etc. They control all of it by use of their gunmen.
