How to turn a shithole country into a developed country in 15-20 years?
Let's say you become dictator/popular leader of a little underdeveloped country. Let's say the biggest problem of that little country is crime. Let's say the silent majority wants the blood of the criminals. Let's say you give them what they want. Crime is gone.
What now /pol/? What would you do to successfully develop the country economically and technologically in a generation time?
>kill all shitskins lulz
I'm afraid that's not possible alternative. Unless you want to get a shitload of economic sanctions and NATO-funded "freedom fighters".
>Bring more whites
Already got this covered: Offering plenty of scholarships and entry level position to recent female graduates from Eastern Europe and Russia in order to "white wash" the population, without losing the national identity. (Also, no russian sounding names = no russian minority that needs to be liberated)
Immigration incentives.
Low tax rate
Encourage growth, would help to have some sort of valuable or semi valuable natural resource.
Promote vast amounts of civil and social Liberty to try and get disheartened immigrants from other countries.
There isn't much you can do if a mainly hands off economic approach doesn't work.
For a small country like in Central America, you need something to "put it on the map" so to speak. That's why Nicaragua was flirting with doing its own canal.
I actually think a solution is having less political fragmentation. Is El Salvador really so different from Panama that one should get to be rich and one poor? I don't think so.
>How to turn a shithole country into a developed country in 15-20 years?
mummy?
>>72254330
Well, I don't know how turn shitholes into western civilised countries.
But I do know how to turn a civilised country into a shithole!
>Islam
>not even once
>>72254964
This.
As much as I abhor communism and socialism, but you can build an industry and a heavy industry quite fast if you ignore everyone's crying.
>>72254330
>How to turn a shithole country into a developed country in 15-20 years?
Mass kill communists, it worked for us.
If you could turn junkies into forced labor concentration camps. Petty and violent crimes would easily diminish. Cartels wouldn't like that because those are their customers so you make a treaty with then to run those labor camps.
>>72254330
You need capital.
You need to give people enough freedom to be industrious, but not too much so that you control them. China is example, how to transform country.
>>72254330
Deregulation where you can. Take some tips from Botswana (https://youtu.be/7071wstBp1k) and don't buy into the debt jew. Make budgeting plans and stick to them, don't overspend so you have to use interest. Slowly grow your country and don't give a fuck about what everyone around you is telling to spend on. If it isn't in your budget plan it doesn't get approval unless its an extraordinary event that directly effects your people.
its only possible if the average IQ of the country approachs 100
Below that and you'll always be shit without trillions in oil money
At least one nice tourist resort
Low taxes
Attractive to foreign investors.
Btw
How did Singapore do it?
>>72254545
>>72254839
>>72254964
>>72255031
>>72255132
>>72255171
>>72255225
>>72255263
>>72255555
>>72255763
>>72255995
>>72256072
I deeply despise communism, but you got a point there. Forcing people to work is a great kick starter. But anyway, we're building castles in the sky.
I've considered that a possible way to develop the entrepreneur spirit would be to focus a percentage of the yearly-national income, into extremelly low-interest loans for small-business. That way they would avoid getting jewed by international banks.
Also, I was thinking that a great way to make the local economy grow, would be paying half of the salaries/government expenditure in something like "national checks". Money that can only be spent on El Salvador-made products. The other half would still be paid in american dollars (normal currency).
Do you think this could work?
>>72256072
singapore was all ethnically chinese, and a trade hub
>>72255225
>Chile
>Developed
kek
>>72254330
>How to turn a shithole country into a developed country in 15-20 years?
I think the best way would to be to encourage a Puritan ideology.
Make education a big issue, make social order a big issue and make industriousness a big issue.
The puritans loved education and were significantly more educated than their neighbours in England. They also saw idleness as a sin and worked as hard as possible. They placed a high value on social conformity and would aggressively shame/force people into toeing the line.
If people are intelligent, work hard and socially cohesive then development will take care of itself.
Pinochet the shit out of it plus heavy industrialisation. Also people have to take pride in it.
>>72254964
>>72255171
Problem with this is how you change the regime for a democracy/republic after those years. As always communism works perfectly, but only in paper.
I believe the solution is to apply stronger laws and enforce them (here for example, max incarceration time is 35 years and only in very well proven killings). After changing those laws you give amnesty to all people, and then start cutting hands, dicks/tits or heads for variated crimes so they will know you're not kidding.
Invest heavily in basic education, first aid teaching and basic health prevention, safe electricity, water and internet access with some kind of course about "how to properly use the internet", obligatory english language learning, and roads. All kind of kind of roads, specially improve already existing trade pathways and create new ones for neighbor countries.
I know next to nothing about economics so this is all coming from a "idea guy".
>>72256525
Most of the 'advances' of communism came from overthrowing the ruling aristocrats though.
>>72254330
wipe out the local population.
import whites
>>72257360
More like industrialization in countries where it would have happened anyways.
>>72254330
1.Eliminate all non-whites
^ IMPORTANT
>>72256525
Well, you really don't need to create such a complex scheme as national checks, to buy El Salvador products. Simply create high import taxes on specific products, where you want your people to favour local products, in addition you might create some legislation, which would make selected non-salvadorean product imports extremely difficult.
>>72254330
Good question, rarefag. By hard work and following the rule of law.
I can also tell you how to turn a developed country into a hellhole. By importing millions of uneducated, violent shitskins.
>>72255171
The problem is it's fake
After russia went communist, peasants were allowed to keep half a hectare only. What happened was the private property had better results than the gargantuan million-hectare superfarms with thousands of people working there, simply because the workers didn't care because it wasn't theirs
>>72257613
The problem is that Free Trade Agreements are pretty much obligatory, in order not to be an enemy of the US. I understand the importance of the american Market, but when the only thing we're exporting is coffee and cheap underwear, this put us on a big disadvantage.
That's why I was thinking that maybe these "national checks" would be a good alternative. We wouldn't be breaking the Free Trade Agreement with the US, but at the same time we would be redirecting %50 of the national purchase power into local products/business.
>>72257351
You should also have corporate tax rates far below the worldwide average so that corporations will base themselves in your country. Puerto Rico had that and they had one of the highest living standards in the Caribbean. Then the us took away their low tax rates and they're a shithole now. Along with that, making business establishing easier and decreasing business taxes, and income taxes would allow the economy to become more and more developed. Also for the corporate tax rates, offer to cut your already low corporate tax rates in half if said companies establish manufactories and industry, not only for multinationals but also offer to cut your people's local taxes too.
Corruption.
>>72254330
Read "From Third World to First" to learn about how Singapore managed it
Idk how
Pretty sure our new president will turn our shithole to something useful with the tons of the projects he makes Every week/month
>>72254330
Embrace free market principles, small government, and personal liberty.
Boom. First world nation in 20 years. The number one problem with most shit hole countries is they are socialist big government nanny states.
>>72254964
The USSR was always a shithole. They had terrible production.
Take Singapore as example, you only need to enforce natural laws and leave markets alone.
>>72256525
I think the less direct involvement the better. Keep your people happy by not taxing them to hell and back, letting them spend the money they make.
If you need to stimulate your local growth further than less regulation and taxation can provide, you can try something like local rebates. Provide a certain amount of dollars actually spent on Salvadorian products back to the buyer through a government program. That way you don't subsidize a product or industry that may actually be a failure, and you're not just handing money over to people and hope they spend it in your country or forcing people to spend on local products, you're incentivizing, yet still leaving choice.
>>72255555
China is a 3rd world shithole outside of the major cities along the coast.
>>72258681
Hmm... National check system is still too complex, how about giving tax benefits to local products, for exmaple lowering tax on domestic products, so that they get competitive advantage over foreign products.
If you are indeed holding power you should thing which international trade agreements you can get rid off, and where to politically build relations. ICSID and alike can be a real pain in the ass. You need to limit amount of those trade treaties, which contain Investment dispute and arbitration panel etc.
>>72259209
>settlers in the US got their Land for free
>tells others they are a nanny state
>>72256072
>How did Singapore do it
>How did Hong Kong do it
They let white people manage their city-states.
>>72257351
>>72258691
Actually that is a great point. Securing access to anything that is considered "normal" in developed countries such as electricity, clean water, internet, etc. Not only in the capital, but spread all around the different municipalities (Not so complicated since it's a little country), in order to make it easy and comfortable to translate a business.
Also, making taxes lower than anywhere else, is another great way to attract international corporations and new jobs.
Not sure how legal tax-heavens are but if it's possible, we should add that to the list too.
I'd like to keep low-wage factories away, since I wouldn't like to turn the country into a mini-china.
>>72257613
Tarifs don't work. Especially for small nations. Tarifs are part of what put America into a depression.
>>72260145
Your factories won't be low wage as long as your country keeps growing. You give the corps a tax haven, but don't get pushed around by them too much. Don't limit your people's growth or ability to bargain wages. If the factories aren't paying competitive wages then too bad they won't have workers.
Manufacturing is a good way to secure long term growth and prosperity. Just make sure that your people grow and are able to specialize and bring even more prosperity as time goes on. The factories can be for your unskilled workers, you'll never get rid of people who can't compete, the key is to make them useful and happy, manufacturing is the perfect spot for them, instead of fast food jobs like the US.
my next step is to befriend russia so the us cant simply invade me when i remove Rothschild control of the central bank. proceed to pay russia in caviar and vodka for protection while building army secretly trained by spetsnaz
>>72258681
Why not just let the free market work? Low taxes for everyone. Very little regulation and less bureaucracy. This type of national centralized planning is why your countries are shitholes.
We're the last euro countries to go 1st world, leaving out ukraine /east slavs they'll never do it.
I can tell you the feeling is fucking amazing, like the transformation you see happen around every day. I could easily move to western europe now and live in a cushy developed country but I feel like I'd miss out.. Those same areas you remember from a few years ago/childhood as dirt shitholes can turn into amazing places and before you know it becomes the norm across your entire city. Then after that you keep bringing in wealth, building, constructing. That's how they did it in Western Europe. Now when you go there it looks fascinating because it's the culminating result of generations of work/dedication. Other good examples are Israel, US, Australia.
All EU-eastern countries know what it's like to see your country transform from 2nd world to 1st world, the money goes a long way. You experience life in the rawest form. If you're born in a rich developed country or hopeless 3rd world you wouldn't know.
Pic related, the city is now renewing pavements that used to be dirt and potholes with new modern looks. Construction work everywhere.
>>72260145
>I'd like to keep low-wage factories away, since I wouldn't like to turn the country into a mini-china.
It's inevitable that you will have to get them in, if you want to develop industry-based economy.
You need to find a specific- niche for you country to specialize on.
My personal favourite is medicine and biotechnology focused industry-economy. Of course, I could probably write pages about how to accomplish that. Have you read about this mad BioViva woman, who claims she managed to extend her telomers, point is that kind of stuff is difficult to research in many countries due to tough regulation, if however regulation would be loose about such things...
>>72254330
>How to turn a shithole country into a developed country in 15-20 years?
Import a bunch of Jews.
>>72259614
No the British fought for the land then we had to fight them for the land. Then when the country moved west land was sold extremely cheaply or was given freely to settlers. Government played an incredibly small role in the lives of people.
>>72260798
>The factories can be for your unskilled workers, you'll never get rid of people who can't compete
> manufacturing is the perfect spot for them, instead of fast food jobs like the US.
Now I see it with brand new eyes, Indeed is better to have this percentage of the population doing factory-work than flipping tortillas and pupusas. Thanks for the great point!
>>72260687
Tariffs work, if they are implemented selectively, and they are not thought to be a pernament solution. i could give you hundreds of examples where tariffs work, and have helped. However, considering El Salvador real issue might be corruption and implementation of such tariffs. Corruption is not necessarily bad, if it speeds up bureaucracy to get things done.
>>72260887
Your country isn't first world lol
>>72260887
Come on that has to be a showpiece, where are all the hovels and horse drawn carts eastern Europe is famous for?
>>72254330
Do a little bit of what Rafael Trujillo and Fidel did in terms of bringing more whites. Rafael toop white skinned Jews and refugees from Spain, Germany, Russia ect.. and gave them jobs in his reconstruction of DR. In the case of Castro, he eliminated young black thugs and anti-communist and brought back Spanish-Cuban heritage into the schools, essentially being White and Cuban was and is a privileged position in Cuba.
>>72260145
You should look up "the miracle on the Han river" pretty much describes how South Korea went from Africa tier to 1st world in less than a century.
>>72260854
>Why not just let the free market work?
Because it would only favour those nations/fiscal entities ahead of the game in comparison to our hypothetical nation.
>>72260887
I'm glad that you're having the joy to see your country flourish in your life time, anon!
Unfortunately not even the "poster streets" we got here, look as good as the street in your photo.
>>72260854
Somehow I feel shits gonna hit the fan sooner or later if it isn't regulated.
The dominant class here, is very "outside" oriented. So you see this kind of colonial mentality, where all they want is cheap labor to export lots of cheap raw-stuff.
This is never going to work in such a little country, since we simply can not compete in price and quantity with the major world exporters like China.
>>72260993
Russian jews, Polish jews, American jews?
Which type of jews would you recommend?
>>72259708
>>72259474
Singapore is actually a great case study. Considering similar conditions (small pop, little to none natural resources, few lands), I think it's possible to also take great example from countries like Israel, Luxembourg, HK, even Monaco, and try to replicate whatever they do.
>>72254330
PUTO CEROTE CHUPA MIS WEBOS
>>72262377
American Jews, they are liberal internationalist retards and can be manipulated while still remaining useful.
Russian Jews on the other hand will turn your country into their private resort and will become the aristocracy who will eventually rule you.
t.Londongrad
>>72262377
In terms of economic and social growth, Fascism like Italy, Japan and Germany would be the best.
>>72254330
Literally the only way is to create a manufacturing base. Light, medium, heavy industry.
Also gas the kikes.
>>72254330
Posting this from a past thread:
I am developing vertical module farms to destroy the communal sense of agriculture in our country which would outdate the socialist/communist ideals that some regions still hold.
If we can make it more efficient and cheaper than natural agriculture, people will have to move out of their lands to engage in the capitalist market.
The catch is that it would be open sourced, you don't need to hold any copyrights, higher competition would benefit newcomers and in the end supress the present system of agriculture.
My main goal for my country is selfsufficiency. For how the world is going I suggest you start doing the same but in your own fields.
>The goal of capitalism should be to develop the country, not profit of external/international parties. Like you say, simple actions can lead to develop collective values.
I was blown away the other week, because I read some statistics from latinamerica that said that in ten years we would have the same problems europe is already facing with the young population and the decline of birth rates.
(because young population distribute themselves unequally all around the globe)
What I fear is that the process of globalization leads to centralization of power, that would be terrible and in the end fuck with every country, but of course it would only benefit companies.
>>72264825
LA MISERIA HUMANA EN SU MAXIMA EXPRESION.........EL AUTOR DE ESTE POST...........UN PERUANO ODIOSO, FRUSTRADO, ENVIDIOSO, CON COMPLEJO DE INFERIORIDAD COMO MUCHOS, QUE NO ENCUENTRA OTRA MANERA DE EXTERIORIZAR Y DESFOGAR LAS MISERIAS PROPIAS DE UN DON NADIE POBRE DIABLO REDUCIDO A DESECHO. !!!!!!!!!!! DAS LASTIMA !!! Ya lo decia Alberto Fujimori, el ex-presidente peruANO
Fujimori: EL PERUANO QUIERE SER RACIALMENTE ARGENTINO Y CULTURALMENTE CHILENO. Con que argumento valido me puede rebatir el pobre y triste autor peruANO de este post. EL QUE DA RISA ERES TU Y TU POBRE VIDA ODIOSA. EL PERU, como lo dijeron muchos famosos, Es UNA MIERDA RECHASADA POR CADA RAZA DEL MUNDO, DESDE INDIGENA, BLANCA , ASIATICA, JUDIA ETC Y POR ESO NO HAY NADA EN PERU DE VALOR NI DE IMPORTANCIA, LA UNICA EXPORTACION QUE PERU LE DA AL MUNDO ES EL PERUANO: UN SER TORPE, HEDIONDO Y FEO. LA GASTRONOMIA PERUANA? UNOS PAJAROS QUE COMEN BASURA!!! UN PERU CONDENADO, POBRE Y ASQUEROSO, ENVIDIA DE NINGUN PAIS !!!
>>72255763
Botswana is interesting. It has sky high AIDS rates, but it still seems to be one of the few countries run by niggers that isn't an absolute hellhole.
