I've been thinking about this, why the rich people don't help the poor?.
I mean, they have a ridicoulus amount of money, they could easily solve the world poverty.
But hell no, they preffer to buy a new yacht and shit like that.
They profit from poverty and to be honest most poor people don't deserve to be helped.
>>72018247
In what form do they help the poor? Free food and clothes?
Do you really think if the world's richest gave away all their money it would change anything?
>>72018247
Fuck off, Paco. No one is going to give you free shit.
>>72018326
they don't.
>>72018312
>most poor people don't deserve to be helped
first, who gets to decide who should be helped?, second, what is wrong with you?, unless you are the grandson of warren buffet or bill gates you are as poor as the rest of us, don't defend them.
>>72018247
It's not the money they are after. It's the power that comes with having it.
>>72018442
>>72018439
>they don't.
I mean, in what form SHOULD they help the poor?
>>72020000
3 billion times 0 is still nothing.
>>72018247
Wealth is a lie, it's completely subjective
>>72018247
so you want to give free money and food to people who are poor so they can make a lot of children which will also need free money and food. If they cant make enough to survive on their own by giving them money and food you are just postponing the problem while also making it worse in the future.
Read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" and you'll realize just how naive your question is.
>>72018794
so what's your brilliant solution?, let them starve like they were less than animals?.
because that's what you are implying by just saying "lol they ain't getting nothing".
>>72018247
What's the point of helping the poor? By helping the poor you create more poor people, if we just let them die out then everyone would be happy.
>>72018247
Are you 12 Paquito?
Go to the public library and read something about money, nations wealth and capitalism. Then open a fucking book of history. Finally go and fuck yourself iliterate wannabe commie.
Because this planet has economic system where might makes right. Why dont these poor fucks do anything about their own poverty other than pick up trash and complain? Why dont they pick up books and better themselves? Why do you need someone else to look after you, you lazy bitch?
>>72018247
They do. The rich objectively do the most to help the poor.
>But hell no, they preffer to buy a new yacht and shit like that.
Buying a new yacht helps the poor. Yachts are made by poor people.
The rich, and investment by the rich, are why India, China, and broad swathes of Asia are rising out of poverty into modern industrialized civilization. Capitalism, the investment of wealth by the wealthy into businesses in the hopes of growing still more wealth, is the backbone of all progress.
The richest 300 people in the world have more money than half of humanity, yes, but EVERYONE has more than what they did last year, and EVERYONE last year had more than they had the year before.
Economies aren't zero-sum, we're more like ships of varying size on a great ocean. The smoother the waters, the better we all sail. The Rich want smooth waters as much as we do.
>>72018439
Not that anon, but let me explain...
Niggers for example, they are mostly worthless individuals who contribute with nothing to society, waste our natural resources simply for existning regardless of not contributing with anything, are criminally inclined and most are potential rapists.
Why would you ever help these fucking niggers? No really, they won't even apreciate it if you do, they will problem say it is whitey's responsability due to slavery and shiiiieeeetttt
Face it, most people are horrible human beings who don't eserve to be helped, and since you can't judge who is deserving and who is not it is easier to just not help anyone but yourself and family friends, isn't it?
>>72018247
Why would they? How is it their duty to help other people? Can you tell me what compels anyone to help people they do not know, or those that have not asked for it?
These poor people's people had as much chance as any other to determine the future of those that came after them. If an entire nation of people fail to do anything to change their circumstances, the same circumstances that allow such swathes of people to fall so low, why do they deserve a leg up by not simply their neighbours, but those on the other side of the world?
If they had real determination they could fix it themselves.
>>72018247
Why help the poor when they can be systematically eliminated?
What are you losing as a species? As a society?
>>72018247
theyd go right back to starving shitholes in a few years after they spend all that money
>>72019266
This is the most humane option
>Rich guy safes money in many off-shore banks
>Liberals: WAAAAH STOP HOARDING MONEY YOU SHITLORD
>Rich guy's son is given a unlimited credit card
>He spend up to 1 to 10 Millions a month in thing that are taxes and shit
>Liberals: WAAAAAH STOP TRIGGERING ME WITH YOUR RICHNESS SHITLORD. YOU ARE A FUCKING WHITE MALE WAAAAH
>Rich guy's wife makes donation to different charities
>RIch guy is given tax discounts due to this
>LIberals: WAAAAAH STOP DODGING TAXES WAAAH
>Rich guy then ask what the fuck they want.
>Liberals: gibsmedat
>>72018247
these 300 guys have a lot of money, but when you divide it by 4000000000 it becomse a less than a low monthly wage
so, if these rich people bankrupted themselves, they could hardly feed the world for a month
>help starving african niglets
>africans just make more starving niglets
why even bother
>>72018247
They do help the poor you dumbfuck.
>>72019266
Are you being ironic? If you killed them it would create a new class of poor people out of the people left
>>72019550
Nice try, Shlomo
>>72018970
Only way is to train them by building facilities for those purpose. we can't force them to do something. If they get everything for free they will not bother to work and get it on their own and just breed or pursue other interests whether its a bad or good thing. End of the day they'll be unskilled.
Pretty sure the afrikaners are doing that now with the blacks in south africa. Teaching them so they can better themselves. Look at what africa was when it was under boers to now. But it's slowly coming together.
>>72018247
I'm poor, grew up around poor people. Poor people fucking suck, if you help them out, all the majority of poor people do once helped out is reproduce EVEN MORE. Then the cycle of poverty continues, nobody can or should be forced to help out the poor. Welfare is enough.
>>72018247
>half of humanity
>humanity
>no sub-
kill yourself
>>72018247
>shitlibs keep niggers from dying
>niggers keep breeding
>shitlibs wonder why they are so poor
>>72019625
In the sense that there will always be rich and poor by the degrees of difference between one another you are correct-- but when I say the poor you know what I'm talking about.
You don't have to kill them. Just stop feeding them and providing first world medicine. Most will die of their own accord.
Global overpopulation is a problem anyways, isn't it?
What are you doing in Mexico Bernie, aren't you supposed to be on the campaign trail?
>>72018247
Capitalism is the "civilized" version of survival of the fittest. You don't give sth back to those you want to defeat.
Mr.Dore?
>>72019381
The only problem I have is your second statement. Rich shitlords should be forced to work and understand how valuable money is to some people without their parents support. Ive had plenty of them as roommates and they dont clean or do shit around a house. They had maids do it for them so why should they? It just creates awful humans who don't understand why others are frugal with their cash.
Bill Gates gives away a billion $ a year. Ditto for Warren buffet, Jeff bezos, etc.
Throwing money doesn't fix anything, as Bob Geldoff recently discovered
We've been "helping the poor" by pumping hundreds of billions of dollars in aid, food and infrastructure into Africa since the 1950s, the result is that their population has quintupled and now they're spilling out into neighbouring continents, bringing their civil wars with them as they remain as retarded as ever.
Hopefully this should give you some idea why what we did was wrong.
>>72018247
The money economy is basically fake. Money is not rral. Redistribute that wealth of the top 300 and it would become worthless because the products and services are not there to purchase in sufficient volume. Money is a mind control trick
Throwing money at poor people causes more problems then it solves. In Canada we throw lots on money at natives and it just going right down the hole, we build them nice houses and they just destroy them.
Tough love style education is the best solution for poor people but all the bleeding hearts will never allow it.
>>72018247
Or you could use the money to make production expansion. The lack of money is t the problem, it is the lack of goods. What's the point of having money if you have no goods to buy it with? Gottfried Feder knew this. Taxing the rich is a banking scam. Where does the money come from? The international banks. People who are fixated on taxing the rich don't see that it will bring the ownership of the means of production in fewer hands. You could easily feed the work with low taxation if we do Gottfried's banking plan.
>>72018247
>I've been thinking about this, why the rich people don't help the poor?.
They do. Bill Gates just eliminated polio in every country that doesn't contain ISIS.
The sad fact is that the poor are oppressed by some phenomena called "local maxima" or "coordination failures", where to improve their lives in one way, e.g. building a village grain store and saving two years worth of grain so they can better survive lean years, or buying some chickens to provide better nutrition and supplement their income, they need to make significant sacrifices to their current quality of life. What's more, there's little incentive to improve your village or buy more chickens when the local warlord drops by to take your stuff once a month. Even worse, when the rich just give free shit to the poor, they usually destroy local industries, further disincentivising investment.
You know what worked? Colonialism. Foreign powers set up shop, radically increased the productivity of the natives, and took a generous slice of the pie for themselves. Usually, everyone profited, unless Belgium got involved.
>>72018247
Poor people have terrible impulse control thats why they are poor because they cant save money for shit.
>>72018247
If you took all the wealth in the world and spread it out equally, it would take less than 10 years before the world would look like it does now
Poor people are poor because they piss away money as soon as they get them, i grew up with broke parrents, they spend everything they made as soon at they had it in hand, now im grown up, make half of what they made combined and hold more wealth than they did together, simply because im not a fucking retard when it comes to money
>>72020732
The poor also drag the poor down via social security. If you've ever worked a minimum wage job in the states you'll know that at least 20% of your paycheck goes to a service to support unworking shit skins. Why should I bust my ass to help support them when I'm trying to improve my own money situation?
>>72018247
The nigletts would use it to wipe their asses. Giving money to poor people is a complete waste.
The problem with free shit is that everyone is responsible for her own emancipation.
You can break the chains, but it is the individual who has to step out of the jailhouse.
Of course, no emancipation can be obtained if basic freedoms are inhibited. But that's the negative requirement of freedom: "to be free FROM constraints".
However, there is another kind of "positive" freedom, i.e. the one in which you are unconstrained (negative requirement) AND you are also capable of constructing and pursuing your own goals -- and not just borrow them from whoever tries to sell you "a worthy goal" or from whoever tries to incept you with the idea "freedom is X but not Y".
Look at most American niggers: have they become free? Yes, in most respects. There is still some work to do. A couple of chain to be broken... but overall they enjoy more "freedom from constraints" than many other peoples in the world.
But the question is not "are they free or not", but rather: "once they have been freed, are they finally acting like free people?"
I strongly doubt, mainly because most niggers are the slaves of their own flock mentality, which leads them to value media-induced stereotypes rather than goals: make cash no matter what, fuck the state no matter what, etc. On top of that, white charity (advertised as "welfare" but in fact just charity) is keeping this ethnicity from making its own way once for all.
Again: are they unconstrained? Yes. Are they acting like free people? No.
>>72018247
No government and taxes are the biggest problem if i built apartment buildings to house 1 Million ppl in a single welfare spot for non profit they would make it so hard to accomplish
>>72018247
You are probably still in the top 1% of the world because you make more than 1$ a day. Why don't you donate all your money to poor niggers in godknowswherestan?
>>72020975
But this does not apply only to the American negro. That's just an example that is easy to make. Indeed, most white people (white trash, Yuropoors) are being negrified (a.k.a. enslaved) -- this time not by means of constraints, but by the excess of inputs and inceptions that tie them to media-driven stereotypes... thus creating invisible walls where there is none.
States can help to reach freedom from constraints by means of welfare policies, but it is only by means of education that you obtain a free-thinking people. If you do the former but not the latter, the path to freedom becomes personal and shall be walked in solitude.
Amen.
>>72020855
>If you took all the wealth in the world and spread it out equally, it would take less than 10 years before the world would look like it does now
Not necessarily. Poor people actually deal with cash influxes really well, spending them on necessities, on repaying debts, and on one-off purchases that save money long-term. The problem is the tendency to spend at the same rate you earn, which I think would take more than 10 years to put us back where we are now.
For that reason, I've been wondering what would happen if the government took 10% of wages and paid them back once every three months. It might help the poor budget better.
>>72019746
Poor people who get money, often becomes poor again because they wasted it all.
>>72018247
>why the rich people don't help the poor?.
but they do
Wealthy people donate huge sums of money to charities all the time because of tax benfits or just plain philanthropy.
Poverty will always exist imo, look at lottery winners for example. Random people who suddenly find themselves with more money then they ever would have normally, nearly every single one of them pisses it all away with a few years. Most people are bad with money, they don't practice even the most basic fiscal prudence measures.
>>72018247
The smartest 300 people in the world contribute more to world progress than half of Humanity.
So what? What do we do kill the smartest 300 people, make them work in the fields. It is so unfair that they are so much smarter than the rest.
>>72018247
TEN
>>72018247
>they could easily solve the world poverty
Ha no. Try dividing all the money in the world by the number of people in the world. It comes out to about $10,000 each. How long will that money last and think about what would happen to the economy
>>72018247
Half of humanity are fucking animals. You wouldn't give money to a chimp, in the name of equality, would you?
>>72019174
>isn't zero sum
But it is
Paper money is a stand in for resources
Resources are finate
By extension, money is finate
In order for someone to get, another has to give
This fluctuation of currency makes modern economics
That being said, you need an underclass. There will always be an underclass
Someone in the world will always be poor
>>72018247
>brown
>humanity
>>72018247
You can't begin to imagine the insatiable greed of those who rule the masses. They can never have enough, they will never have enough.
>>72018247
They are kikes
>>72018247
>help african niggers
>they just reproduce more and become dependant
>instead of becoming independent of their own resources they beg and beg
>>72022095
>Implying you can only get resources for money, not labour.
>>72018579
That's like food stamps and welfare to poor people in USA?
>>72018247
On a fundamental, very visceral level, the rich cannot feel the pain or suffering of the poor. They don't feel it.
That's why Kaiji and Kiznaiver are good series. They actually address the disconnect between self and other that leads to a world where we have the technology to provide for most of mankind, providing meaningful labor through farming and localized economies, population control, basic rights, and not fucking the climate/ecosystems of the planet up.
But the oligarchs don't feel the pain of the poor, or the animals, or the planet.
So they won't act to help anybody but themselves and their immediate family/people.
Thus, mankind will be snuffed out in the blink of a cosmic eye, probably like most species that adapt for intelligence in our universe.
>>72022095
Resources are not finite from the perspective of the economy, although they are from the perspective of the universe. When you turn dirt, shit, and sunlight into a carrot, you now have a carrot, and that carrot is worth more than the sum of its parts plus your labour.
>>72021637
Implying the 1% are contributing to world progress and are not the ones fucking up the rest of the world.
>>72018247
>why the rich people don't help the poor?
They do. On a massive scale. The problem is that the world's most poor never learn how to produce anything for themselves no matter how hard the rich try to help and educate them, meaning they are eternally dependent.
If you produce nothing, you will have nothing.
>>72022239
>he's rich must be jewish
fuck off socialist libtard.
>>72018247
>giving money to poor people will end poverty!
You have no idea how large groups of people work, do you
>>72022696
Good goy.
>>72022286
Labour needs resources to create. People need food, which is a resource
People turn that food into energy/labour which gets turned into resources
>>72022895
you're a fucking faggot who wants the government to hand him everything. go suck dick to pay for your crack addiction, nigger
>>72022095
Technologies are what's making the game not zero sum. It all comes down to the knowledge of how to better obtain and manipulate available resources.
>>72018247
>Why don't rich people help the poor
They do you fucking spic.
>>72023105
Food is not finite :o
For all intents and purposes that is, the sun will exists for a few billions of years.
>>72022487
I don't think that I would be technically worth more than its sum plus labour. More like it's exactly worth the sum of its parts plus labour. Sure, sunlight shit and water are cheap on their own, but your labour made that into a carrot which is worth something. And that price difference between shit water and sunlight is the labour and time needed to make it into a carrot
>>72018439
>Who gets to decide?
money owners as its their property
Also, if you feed someone he breeds.If we feed niggers they wont build civilization, even if we give them cities and food they will fail.They will just keep breeding more to the point they are either capable of invading some other countries or we arent capable of feeding them.Hunger is the natural evolution regulator, you shouldnt help the one that can fuck you up for your help.
>>72021354
and im sure you have the broke 90% of the world willing to testify to that
0/10 are you even aussie?
>>72019174
>Yachts are made by poor people.
More like made by slightly less poor people
>broad swathes of Asia are rising out of poverty into modern industrialized civilization.
Not by a significant margin. Not much has changed for them
>>72018247
Most of rich peoples money is invested in various markets. Their money is what keeps most businesses going as they own stocks in them. Not to mention businesses they create outright. How many people do you think Microsoft employs? It's kind of a logical fallacy to say the rich should help the poor because anyone they help by making job opportunities and giving them a chance to earn stop being poor as a result so they no longer count as helping the poor.
>>72023250
But with technology, the time of the professional becomes the resource
But it is an interesting point
>>72023370
Like ausbro said, in human terms, the aun is infinite because the scale of the sun in too big for a single human to grasp, if you catch my meaning. Not saying that people don't understand the sun, but more like it stores such an immense amount of energy that it seems infinite to humans
But on a chosmic scale, everything ends the way it started
Same amount of mass
Same amount of energy
>>72018247
It doesn't work like this, pakito.
>>72018247
>I've been thinking about this, why the rich people don't help the poor?.
They tried
Indians smashed all the toilets that would have prevented open defecation and the disease that follow.
Black schools in the US are the most funded schools in the world ans still fail
Trying to spread human rights in the middle east has given the rise to radical Islam
>>72018247
Only capitalists do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKFiZ1s9kGQ
you can't throw money at a retard and make him self sustaining.
>>72023765
But what is the difference between them and the middle class when the middle class could (or at least used to) do the same at a smaller scale? If it is a matter of scale why not have one person manage almost all the money at one time?
>>72018439
>first, who gets to decide who should be helped?
Who gets to decide that they have to help others? You don't have to be rich in order to help people that are poor so what sre you doing about it? Are you leading by example and helping the poor?
>>72018247
Not including aid besides official development assistance.
>Tfw you're top 1% but not top 0.01%
How can I piss off liberals now?
>>72024280
The middle class are the consumers, the upper class are the providers.
>>72018247
>"money is the root of all evil"
>"GIVE ME MORE MONEY YOU SHABBOS GOY"
>"IF ONLY THE POOR HAD MORE OF THAT EVIL, DISGUSTING MONEY THEY WOULD BE HAPPY"
Leftists are fucking bizarre
Fun fact: america alone produces as much food, that it would be enough for everyone on this planet.
>>72024719
That doesn't answer my question. Both classes produce and consume products as both had a hand in making them. What makes the upper class so special when the middle class does the same on a smaller scale?
>>72024939
That isn't even close to being true
>>72024939
minus americans
Why do people struggle with understanding assets so much? Of course Bill Gates doesn't actually have 80 bill in a bank account.
He can't just give Microsoft shares to a bunch of brown people. Nobody is really going to buy Wal-Mart and just hand someone a check for a few trillion that they can then go and cash and hand out.
These rich fuckers could probably gut the Western world and give about $6 to each reverse-ribbed Ethiopian but it doesn't fix anything.
>>72018247
Because the poor shouldn't breed
If you're poor you shouldn't have kids. You choose to bring another life into your misery, therefore it is your fault another person is poor. Why should I care about some starving dindu nuffin? I don't, and won't.
>>72019239
the vast majority of people of all colors contribute nothing to society
they either work mcjobs or they have meaningless "human resources" jobs with negative marginal utility (IE they subtract productivity from the organization)
niggers still chimp out and burn cities down and kill white people so i don't like or care what happens to them, i'm just saying
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
Reaganomics is the key to economic growth.
>>72024939
Yeah but most of it is corn which is used for
oil shit
corn syrup
and feeding cattle (cows are inefficient as fuck)
>>72018247
Fucking good for them. Hopefully I'll be one someday. Fucking commy socialist faggots complain about wealth disparity. Faggots.
>>72020117
>The only problem I have is your second statement
no there isnt
if you support large accumulations of wealth, then you support rich peoples' kids being handed that wealth
either 1. accept the fact that they earned their wealth due to being born to the right parents, or 2. go vote for bernie, fag
>>72018247
It's pretty simple really.
By helping the poorest people in the world, you're elevating dictatorships, military juntas and the enemies of world peace.
Over 1 billion people live in China. Many of them live in absolute shit conditions.
Should an European or an American help them despite the fact that the very same country they are, not only a rival country, but China's increased influence will be a detriment to the western world and the values that would lead you to help your fellow man.
You see, if you help the poor in currently the poorest countries, you'll end up creating a situation where the countries will decide to cut all programs that would help the people to get back on their feet in order to get more money from abroad and instead spend the tax money on themselves.
Why do they do this? Because you've clearly showed that they can milk your compassion and they'll put their citizens into more trouble in order to both cut expenses from taking care of the citizens and at the same time funnel foreign money into their economy.
This is why all foreign aid should always have strings attached.
When it comes to domestic poverty... Well, most who are in extreme poverty in the countries that these rich folk are from generally do already have access to food and shelter, should they choose to actually go and ask for it.
>>72025288
>accept the fact that they earned their wealth due to being born to the right parents
Whew lad nice name calling. They didn't earn anything, their parents did. Now if they took their parents money and made a successful capitalist venture of their own then I'd say they earned it. Otherwise they're no better than the parasites suckling off the government's gibmedat program.
>>72018247
Hey retard, there's a difference between
>More than X
and
>Enough for X
Example, just did a little math, added up the net worths of the top 40 people on the richest 300 list, then divided by half the world's population, that equals $114. What the fuck is the purpose of completely bankrupting the 40 richest people just to give a one time payment of $114? Do you think it's going to solve the poor people's problems to receive a 1-time payment of $114?
>>72020117
If you're a super rich kid that's born into wealth and your parents didn't teach you how to handle your money and you're literally spending over 100k every month without making any money, then that wealth is going to end up in the hands of others just as it should.
>>72018247
>bill and melinda gates foundation
>$37.8 billion
>not helping
>>72025773
>feeding niggers
>helping
just let them fucking die
that faggot hippie bill gates exacerbates the problem by maintaining that parasite population
>>72018247
maybe half of the world could get a fucking job then
>>72025620
Poor people will literally say anything to get that $114. They're borderline whores.
>>72018247
Why do you think religion is so ingrained in modern societies Mexico?
It so the poor don't get super butthurt and cause problems for rich people due to having "Eternal salvation" awaiting them when actually its nothing. Its a very effective mechanism at retaining societal control and pacifying the poor masses so you can use your limited time to live a better life than otherwise possible.
>>72020896
>20%
Nigga what? Ss tax is like 4 percent unless you're self employed
Economic inequality exists for the same reason academic or athletic inequality exists; because people are unequal. And no one can change that.
Because poor people should help themselves first.
>>72018381
No. "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to catch a fish, feed him for his life."
>>72018247
>why the rich people don't help the poor?.
They do
>>72025250
Triggered
>>72018439
Not really, if you make minimum wage in America you are among the wealthiest 7% of all humans.
>>72027103
>Why do you think religion is so ingrained in modern societies Mexico?
Fucking what? Modern societies are the most atheistic.
More than half of the humans that live like roaches come from Mexico. ...
>>72018970
You were the one who posed the question, retard. He doesn't have to have any brilliant solution, he was simply calling out how stupid yours was. And what do you mean "less than animals"? When animals have a problem of over population and not enough food, they starve to death. This in turn helps the population re-balance to a point of equilibrium.
>>72027103
That's a pretty big cop-out.
Religion appeals to all strata of the economic tiers, because everyone dies and everyone wants a sense of purpose in life. I doubt it's designed specifically to suppress poor people. The current Pope is also a Marxist and a Hispanic nationalist; so it's not like the Mexicans can blame Catholicism.
>>72018247
>give Africa resources
>they use it as an excuse to kill each other.
>try to trach Africa government and agriculture
>the moment you leave they start starving again
Fuck these dirtbags. We should kill every single person on the continent and try again.
>>72024965
The upper class assume all the risks. They start the company with their own money. Should it fail they lose everything. The upper class is managment, they create opportunities for the middle class to create product, they design it and oversee its construction and then move the finished product. The middle class screws the head on the Barbie doll in the factory, the upper class buys the factory, buys the machines, seeks middle class employees willing to work for a wage, then sells the finished doll to the stores and oversees its shipping while putting their name behind it.
It's not the guy screwing on the dolls head who is going to be in hot water if the doll is deemed racist or bad for image, his job is much simpler.
>>72020656
>colonialism worked
I can't tell if you're simply taking the piss, Straya. Colonialism is the reason we have so many poor people.
>>72027267
We tried that shit and it didn't work. Just look at zimbabwe or south africa. There's no saving these niggers
>>72018247
>why the rich people don't help the poor
They already do you fucking idiot. Do you even know what tax is? Where do you think all this money for "Benefits" come from?
Eat a dick paco.
>>72018247
Money is power, it doesnt matter wo is president or whatever their money can chage everything in a way they use it like crash the dollar and raise the yen, thats what´s happening now for examples, manipulating the money to control things that even a president can´t control.
>>72018247
>I mean, they have a ridicoulus amount of money, they could easily solve the world poverty.
>ridicoulus amount of money
No, they have ridiculous amounts of wealth. Money and wealth are not synonymous. and that wealth is already preoccupied as business infrastructure and investment capital. Most of may have a net worth of billions of dollars but that is spread across working capital, stocks, bonds, real estate investments, equity in business, venture capital, hedge funds and corporate infrastructure. In terms of actual cash they have handy, most of them probably have less in their bank account then either you or me
>t. son of a half jewish banker
I'm loathe "the one percent" as much as the rest of us, but if we are going to fight something we should at least try and analyze them. you can't change something that you don't understand
>they could easily solve the world poverty.
How? If there is anything welfare has taught us, it's that you can throw money at poor people all day long and they are still going to be poor because they have no concept of money management. Be they the sub-working class peons of the first world or the typhoid invested subhumans of the third world.
Furthermore, humanitarian aid to the third world, while it may be immediately emotionally gratifying, has caused them to become overpopulated and drastically so at that, which is going to bring a larger and far more serious heap of problems. The first of which being famine and drought, they are going to be consuming resources quicker than they can be replenished. The financially illiterate, poor and third worlders have even less of an understanding of resource management than they do money management.
For more information, please read into economics on your own time
>>72027585
China will do just that after Europe and America commit suicide via importing millions of shitskins.
>>72018247
Not my problem they want to wallow in the garbage while white people,jews,and Asians work their asses off just to become rich.
>>72019174
Nah it's because China and India have always been economic hegemons then the Muslims fucked India and the Mongols fucked China. Then whitey came and fucked them both up under the guise of civilizing them. Like niggas just learned of the number zero in the 1200s and think they're civilizing shit. Like nigga gtfo you guys just managed to be the jewiest fucks alive, ever jewier than the Jews. Thankfully Hitler fucked Europe and all its colonies in the ass.
>>72027899
You realize the person you respond to is incapable of learning and yet you try to teach him anyway. Embarrassing.
>>72027731
Is this a fucking joke? Sub Saharan Africa was a complete shithole. Nothing but mudhuts and hunting for food until the slave trade uplifted the continent. Then when such trade became illegal, the colonies were to only parts of Africa that could even stay afloat. Now that the Africans finally have their land to their own the completly fall apart. Jungles do not grow on infertile land, there's no excuse for these people to be living in such conditions. [spoiler]No excuse except for the fact that they have borderline retarded IQs
>>72018247
Why should anyone be obligated to help someone out? Should it be the job of A-grade students to tutor the F-grade students?
>>72028211
W UZZ KAAANNNGZ N SHYT
>>72020311
This is exactly what our cucked media never mentions, the millions thrown at native band councils.
The horror stories are never explained by the biased media eg, corruption in the reserves responsible for extreme native poverty...
>>72028203
>You realize the person you respond to is incapable of learning and yet you try to teach him anyway.
Nobody can fault me for trying
>>72018247
3rd worlders having children with reckless abandon, who will contribute nothing to society. Asking for money so they can continue the cycle of more children - out-breed people who have gumption, the makers/contributors.
Overpopulation is a greater threat to humanity than 'global warming', if anything overpopulation is the greatest contributor to 'global warming'.
OY VEY
DELETE THIS
>>72018247
You can't solve world problems by just throwing money at it.
>>72018247
Reality isnt fair and it's not supposed to be. Life is about making the best with the hand you're dealt. What's your plan? Throwing money randomly at the poor causes more problems than it solves
>>72029045
I agree. Stop all welfare programs and hand outs. If you're so uneducated and unemployable because you're worthless then our society doesn't need you. I'm not saying you deserve to starve to death, but you don't deserve my money, especially if you live half way around the world and have more children than me (which is 0). I didn't make the mistake of having kids, and I don't plan to pay for yours.
>>72018970
>so what's your brilliant solution?, let them starve like they were less than animals?.
Sounds good to me.
>give free money to the poor masses
>they celebrate and make extra children
>end up having even more poor
sounds like a terrible idea
>>72018439
Hey Pablo, if it makes you feel better not all rich people are bad. I come from a really well off family and I agree with you.
>>72018439
>first, who gets to decide who should be helped?
And this, ladies and gents, is why brown people are poor.
They are literally dumber than a bag of rocks.
The only help you deserve is permanent sterilization. Anything else is just pissing in the wind.
Evolution has left you behind. You can't do anything about it. No amount of "help" (aka gibsmedat) can change mother nature's plan.
>>72018247
Spread this video around.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
>>72020311
Why not just build natives glorified straw huts and nignogs glorified poopshacks, if they can't handle anything more sophisticated?
>>72030046
Gas them all.
>>72018247
>they could easily solve the world poverty
Why is it whenever there's some sort of natural disaster in these third world shitholes and we send them insane amounts of money nothing changes? Those people have no idea how to handle wealth. Leave them alone and let them develop on thier own.
every rich person has done more for the poor than the bottom half of humanity
>>72018247
Throwing oodles of money at a huge problem doesn't solve it; just look at Africa, or Baltimore's public school system.
>>72018247
Actin like all rich people have scrooge mcDuck type money vaults and could just go skipping through town throwing thousands of dollars at all the losers.
Its called wealth. Being wealthy doesnt mean you have a shit ton of money hiding from people. Its the opposite. Most of these fucks money is already out in the world. Invested making shit happen.
Yet those 300 rich people contribute more to the world economy than those two kids in your picture.
>>72018247
>that kid
>humanity
Giving aide to Africa sure has helped them.
>>72018312
Ever been around the world or a country? Stereotypes about poor people being dumb or assholes are bullshit.
>>72019029
Pol Pot logic
>>72019114
>criticism of the status quo is muh communism
ebin
>>72019381
Nice strawman
>>72018247
Consider the redneck who wins the lottery and lives badly for a month, then returns to poverty.
>>72032062
>Stereotypes about poor people being dumb
This is actually true.
>>72032153
That didn't refute his argument at all if that's what you wanted to do
>>72018247
half of humanity: are you even trying?
>>72018247
Because money =/= food.
I could have literally trillions of dollars in my closet and it wouldn't affect anything. The moment i decide the feed all the hungry people is the moment that farmers and big businesses provide and unsustainable excess, which causes the market to crumble. That means starvation afterwards.
>>72022438
If poor people were truly suffering, they would've killed themselves already. Being poor is bearable for the less intelligent of us who deserve it.
>>72018579
>>72022319
Its that and shit llike food aid and free shoes to Africans. They don't need food aid they need sustainable farming practices, running water/sewer, dependable electricity, logistics infrastructure and stable governments/ not suffering tribal warfare.
>>72018247
Money isn't everything.
>>72018247
Matthew 26:11
>>72033873
Matthew 10:21
I did it partly, and it feels so well. You see the reward.
>>72034183
>>72033873
Oh shit, it is Mark 10:21
>>72018247
>why the rich people don't help the poor?.
because mexicans are not human
t. /pol/
>>72034183
>>72034297
>be rich
>give all your shit to the poor
>make the poor rich
>????
>>72018247
>Implying poverty can be solved...
Nice bait.
>>72019381
This. Also mfw top 10% of earners in the US and Canada both contribute 62% and 54% of income tax that funds the gov't in those countries. Nobody ever mentions that, though, and the wealthy pay their dues while going about their business.
>>72020263
Not to forget that "wealth" includes material assets. The bottom line is extreme wealth also comes with responsibility and risk. Investing in a business takes risk as an individual. Most people are not willing to take those risks. This is why so much is "owned" by so few. It makes perfect sense.
>>72020656
Colonialism is based as fuck.
>>72018247
>rich people help the poor
So you want the people who have wealth, which is no more than the ability to make people do work for you through the incentive of payment, to use their wealth to make the lucid, productive and constructive portion of humanity devote their time and effort to serving the lazy and stupid?
Of course you don't. You know there are conditions and contracts that you have to establish to make sure the 'poor' aren't just lazy assholes leeching off the productive class. The rich often do want to help the poor. The problem is how? How can you help people without them being reliant on you or taking advantage of you? Who decides how much reward someone deserves for their action/thoughts/contributions? In the absence of a supreme authority, that must be decided by the free market.
Rich people could be more altruistic, but even if they were, and some are, it's not an easy task. Even if you had a perfect plan, how could you implement it? Organization on that scale is not a one person job. And you have to realize they're human: why should they help? They might have other things they want to do with their power. Expecting them to help for nothing is just unrealistic.
If you think the yacht construction business is an unnecessary drain of labour and capital that only benefits the rich, you should probably compare its market value to the value of more plebeian benefiting industry. Plutocrats tend to own an inconceivable fuck ton of assets, but they can't actually spend most of it on themselves because its value is tied up in the value of industry. Rich assholes on a yacht might piss you off, but we're far from the slaves of Egypt being forced to labour for the Pharaoh.
