Like posts on soctal media about how much they hate men please. Dealing g with someone who actually thinks feminists only want equality. Only proper non satire posts pls
>>71994441
www.liveleak.com/view?i=ad8_1386106938
>>71994441
Gimme a minute or three bonger, I can find you a few good ones. Or bad, depending on how much you rage.
Lemme see what I can find in here...
>>71995485
Okay idk why that one isn't playing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOCD_T9Qqpc
/thread
The Hillary one really gets me
I'll post anything SJW/feminism related I can find for you OP. Too hard to sort through everything.
>Dealing with someone who actually thinks feminists only want equality.
Evidence won't help you when arguing against dogma. In this specific case, casual feminists will dismiss misandrists as not being real feminists and you'll be at an intellectual dead end.
If you really insist on going down this road, I recommend that you avoid arguing about labels. Do you really give a shit about what her personal definition of "feminism" or "sexism" or whatever else?
This one is technically a direct result of feminism. Feminists overhype rape statistics to the point where one accusation turns you into literally Hitler, even if it was actually a lie. More often than not, it is all lies now too, because stupid girls go slutting about and then panic when they think about possible consequences after the fact.
>>71996039
It sounds like you've had that discussion on more than one occasion. Pretty solid advice, though. I would probably have taken that route as well.
>>71995773
got a raging boner from this
alright 4chan someone needs to "red pill" you or whatever the fuck it's called on cuckolding and why this is the new fight for social justice advocacy.
1. Women, not men, have full control over their own bodies, full stop. It's their choice if they choose to have another man fulfill their needs, even if they've made verbal agreements with white men. Women should NEVER be pressured into force monogamy by a man. This is a form of passive rape by men that will be illegal someday soon.
2. White men have for centuries fought to keep black men outside the bedrooms of white couples. If we want to undo these years of racism we need to step aside and not try and control men of color from enjoying the same things that white men enjoy. If a man of color wants to be involved with a white couple that is entirely his choice and to fight it is racism, period.
3. While women should always be allowed to engage in multiple partners without her boyfriend/husband's consent, this is unacceptable for men. White men are in a position of power via the patriarchy, and if a man were to do the same, he could use this as a form of emotional withholding/manipulation of his significant other. This is another form of passive rape that is commonly allowed in society.
I know a lot of you dipshits won't get it but maybe 10% will, and will hopefully understand your responsibility in opening up the bedroom to men of color.
>>71996310
Nice Copypasta
>>71996254
surely that's a joke
>>71996352
I don't care much for SJW antics or the whole PC blitzkrieg far left liberals are impacting against the far right conservatives, but in all honesty, "white posters" have made it very clear that they are the enemy of "nonwhite posters", and I can't help but enjoy you're suffering, even in ignorance of the suffering of the nonwhite userbase, just because misery loves company.
Only posting in this thread because I can see your comment scrolling down.
Pissed af because I want to see some good black on black, without it being derailed into bm/wf to "troll" /pol/, and then have /pol/ come in with wm/bm, which triggers the fuck out of me knowing that white men don't care for my women's characters, unless they're completely white washed and hate their own heritage, and only want to fuck them then cast them aside, the same can be said for bm/wf porn as well, so I usually just hang around white on white threads where you incorrigible shit heads don't get your autism triggered and can talk about porn without getting /pol/itics involved.
>>71996310
this was an OP earlier today. Is this stale or fresh pasta?
>hurr cuckolding is gud
Fuck off proxy. You don't even deserve another (You).
>>71996436
Odds are it's still buried in a subreddit somewhere. I don't feel like digging there.
>dem white rayciss males be disliking this progressive movie trailer
>let's talk like special adults and try to convey our opinions through short sentences
All this cuck shilling.
>>71996254
kek nu-males are so fucking pathetic
>>71994441
dawww what a little sweetheart
>>71996039
>>71996163
I tend to divert the point of contention from quibbling over labels to plain old snide remarks. Like if someone is talking about how the #womenagainstfeminism "just don't understand what feminism is" I'll post something like >>71995773 along with "I for one can't imagine why any woman wouldn't want to be associated with these eloquent, progressive heroes" and a winking smiley.
Alright, back to it.
>this is what tumblr-tier femshits believe
>>71995773
GOD BLESS MEN. I swear to god if women ruled the world, humanity would go straight back to the stone age.
>feminists
>deciding on something
>ever
This one is a good read, nice to see a guy not get shit on for once. And is anyone still in here?
>>71997840
Damn
>>71997717
hory shet
>>71997717
Good on him. Also contribootin.
>>71997717
Fucking godspeed to the man.
>>71998377
fuck that girl
Test post, 4chan is throwing connection errors.
Just as how all of you hate all women, you don't actually hate all women. This is the same for feminists but feel free to be sheeple and believe otherwise. Gender war like all of the other nu-lib agenda is merely a distraction like 99% of politics. If you want to make your life better then promote free thinking, don't be a peasant that gets caught up in kike marionette.
>>71995760
That doesnt work, at least not over the internet.
They dont even read what you write, they just call you a machista
if you write well constructed arguments, backed with sources they call you a tryhard, then they use pleads of emotion
Back, I guess. Don't know what happened.
>>71999436
>That doesnt work, at least not over the internet.
If you mean the responses, yeah. But actually knowing that someone is spouting buzzwords in that situation helps for those who aren't used to the vitriol.
Bout to call it a night. This thread will probably die, but hey. Plenty of time to make a full dump sometime, when I can bother sorting my shit out.
Alright, I'm calling it. Have one last post from a former OWS participant.
Back when I still watched the news on TV, I saw the OWS protests. Saw the crowds, their expressions. Then the news stories just stopped. A few tidbits, but they were basically gone. Wondered it about it for a while, until I came to /pol/. Looking at this stuff now, and how far they've gone? It makes me wonder just how far the left will acually go on their crusade for "equality". Everything being rationalized as "for the right people".
