What does your average Hillary supporter look like?
>>71094129
nigga so black he looks like he just came out of the oven
maybe they should put him back, he doesn't look done lol
>>71094129
pic related
>>71094129
What? It doesn't even look like it's black, just a white baby photoshopped to have darker skin.
>>71094129
I look at this man and it's like he's not the same species as me. I cannot comprehend how cucked he is in his head. How can you... How can you breathe being this cucked? How can you hold a disgusting niglet in your hands and put a smile?
This, 2bh.
>>71094129
Am I the only one who thought that was a pepperoni pizza at first?
It would actually be really funny to photoshop these kind of pictures and make all the white babies black.
>>71094512
please
Why does that bowel movement have a face?
>>71094129
black people, corporate interests and old (46 and over) women
those are her core demographics
>>71094253
kek
>>71094129
I think you mean Bernie
according to you, this.
>>71094421
this
kid looks like a raisin tb h
>>71094129
vomiting intensifies
>>71094717
>>71094129
Forgot pic
>>71094129
>>71094129
why would someone photoshop this
>>71094253
idk he looks burnt. left him in too long if you ask me.
Isn't that Ryan Bader from the UFC? Not only did he just get knocked out by a black guy, it looks like the black dude knocked up his wife. Awesome!
>>71094792
What does that flag mean?
I've talked to a few, fucking mindless blue pills that genuinely know nothing and are only voting for her because she has a vagina. At least Bernie supporters are dimly aware of larger social issues, even if they're completely wrong. Hillary voters are cognitively barely above animals.
>>71094129
This is shopped.
I can tell from the pixels, and from having seen a lot of shops in my time.
you guys check OPs file name
thats why
>>71094129
!!!!! KIKE ALERT !!!!!
KIKES HAVE BEEN DETECTED NEAR THE START OF THIS THEAD
!!!!! KIKE ALERT !!!!!
>>71094792
FTFY
>>71094129
I've never met one. Not sure where her support comes from.
>>71094792
>stickers
why do people do this to their car?
>>71094129
Like this
>>71095090
Thank you, Canada. You're not a giant faggot for once.
>>71095095
subtle
9/10
>>71095035
>>71095035
Thats the funny thing about politics - everyone's wrong
>>71094680
KEK.
>>71094745
I have the same bone structure desu
>>71094129
Why did you photoshop Ryan Bader's kid? Like...what's to gain?
>>71095304
the image name "my wifes son"
cuck meme
>>71095304
>>71095279
Their still using the same ideas. There are no new ideas.
>>71095090
>>71094129
So why make these threads? Seriously? You are a sad, sad, lonely piece of shit. I come here to laugh and hopefully get a bit of new (and hopefully accurate) information. You come here to post retarded shit like this? Photo shop pictures of some families new born kid? What if that baby was actually black? What if they adopted it? Who gives a fuck. My white brother (who cannot have children due to germinoma - a type of brain cancer) adopted a kid last year and he happened to be mexican. Fuck you and all.
Trump 2016
>>71095546
this isn't reddit
don't make dumb posts like that
>>71095090
>best guess for this image: food
must be cuz pizza blanket
>>71094421
Because it IS.
>>71095279
The founding fathers themselves actually agreed with that sentiment. They would be the first ones to tell you that people in the year 2016 would be better suited to solving the problems of 2016 than they would be. It's why they allowed for multiple ways to amend the constitution as would be necessary through time to ensure that it properly reflected the values of that society. If the founding fathers thought their say was the "last say", then we wouldn't have the ability to introduce amendments to the constitution. The constitution would instead be some kind of religious dogma that could never be added to or expanded.
This is a very weird misunderstanding of the founding fathers. They weren't despots/ideologues who demanded that their vision for America was the only valid one and one to never be changed. They knew the world would be vastly different in 200 years time. They fucking gave us the tools to adapt and to meet those challenges head on.
>>71094614
no. no you are not.
>>71095854
The problem is that they also knew America should never become like the rest of the world and that's a recurring theme in a their writings
>>71095095
exactly what i was expecting
old people who are going to die before hillary would even finish her 4 year term
>>71094512
That man is Ryan Bader a top 10 pro mma fighter
It's a photoshop
>>71095830
>>71094802
Mma forums are notorious for trolling fighters
>>71094129
You'd think a board obsessed with blacks would know they're born white for the first few hours.
>>71094129
That poor guy you can see the scorn in his eyes
>>71094792
>hybrid
Spend all the money you save on gas replacing that $10,000 battery after 80k miles
>>71096003
This and the key is the amendment process. You can't just subvert it because it is 2016. The social contract has to be clear and not interpreted on the fly. What they wrote stands as they wrote it until changed as has been done 27 times since the constitution was first written.
>>71094129
>ryan bader cucked
WHAT??
>>71097715
photoshop
JIYW
>>71095279
what's this faggot's excuse for using the wheel, and other technology invented by people who had "backwards" beliefs when they were alive?
>>71095304
It's fucking hilarious
>>71095854
>le breathing constitution meme
Where's Carl's, "ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?!" when you need him?
The whole idea was to establish natural rights, individual liberty, private property, and, above all, LIMITED FUCKING GOVERNMENT.
There is a reason they made it the most ridiculous process in the world to amend the Constitution.
>... that it properly reflected the values of that society
Social justice faggot loser. I don't give a fuck if the "values of society" are to prop Aryan, white, blue-eyed men up on a pedestal and subsidize their children. The whole idea is INDEED values and the idea of "social justice" changes as well. This is why we need something to protect AGAINST these changed by protecting everyone's individual rights no matter how minority or disenfranchised.
>who demanded that their vision for America was the only valid one and one to never be changed...
That's right they put the Bill of Rights in there, right? To protect against such things. Not to meme but does, "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" sound familiar? They did not want this to be changed. Also, don't use the faggot ignorant "lel they didn't know technology would happen". Literally every day new things were being invented. In fact, Ben Franklin, one of those founding fathers, was on of those innovators and inventors!
>They fucking gave us the tools to adapt and to meet those challenges head on.
"Socialism is okay as long as it's democratic and we have the tools to change it! xD"
Please, just stop. I know your senior high school government class might have been "enlightening for you" but stop pushing your government subsidized public school understanding of what history is and what the Constitution means.
>>71094129
Is that woman's vagina a coal mine?
>>71099904
You wrote a really long strawman about socialism, social justice and a bunch of other random dumb shit I never talked about/argued for. Congrats on getting yourself worked up over an imaginary boogeyman.
I'll respond by simply restating my point: multiple ways exist to amend the constitution for a reason. Madison and the other founding fathers did not think the constitution as it was would be the "final say" on civil society for millennia or eons to come. The founding fathers were not dogmatic ideologues.
>>71094792
Good American
>>71099904
Here's where you went wrong.
You're trying to talk some sense into someone that basically told you through their comment that their a giant faggot that doesn't understand the constitution.
What you should do instead is ignore his post and instead follow up with a bullet in his brain for trying to subvert the constitution because lel 2016
>>71094129
If you rub out their face with Photoshop they look exactly like big turds.
>>71100587
>If I just restate my point and completely ignore any points put forward by the opposing side, I WIN! xD
Just because they put provisions in to amend the Constitution doesn't mean they didn't have a collective of shared beliefs (natural rights, private property, individual liberty, etc.) None would ever trade in any of those for something as stupid as a gibsmedat program.
>inb4 general welfare clause
>>71101250
savage!
>>71101446
>doesn't mean they didn't have a collective of shared beliefs (natural rights, private property, individual liberty, etc.)
I agree, and I never said anything to the contrary. What I'm saying is that they were not dogmatic in their approach to governance. The founding fathers were very practical men and knew that future generations would have to respond to the issues of their time. That doesn't mean abandoning the principles they laid out. That just means that you allow for a process to exist, like the amendment process, which gives civil society a tool to ensure that the constitution remained a just and relevant "covenant" between the people and their government, so to speak.
When I said changing values, it triggered you because you visit /pol/ and think when I say the words "values" I mean social justice. But these words had actual meaning before this hyperbolic political discourse perverted them. So as an example of the changing values that needed to be reflected in our constitution, let's look at the following:
In James Madison's time,
1. Slavery was legal.
2. Women were not given the right vote.
These were not objectionable at the time, but obviously became severely out of line with the values of our society as time went on. And this is just a natural process. So the 13th and 19th amendments came about.
Particularly noteworthy is that these new amendments aren't in contradiction of the principles laid out in the constitution. It's not like we were completely abandoning our principles by adopting them. We decided that liberty applied to ALL people, even blacks, and that voting rights applied to ALL people, even women. If James Madison had been around for those two amendments, I can almost guarantee you he would have thought that that was the right course of action to take.
Because a constitution that did not have the ability to respond to and address the issues of the day would quickly become irrelevant and, quite frankly, unjust.
