Notable experiments that either failed to demonstrate the earth's motion or are supportive of geocentrism:
1610 Galileo's Phases of Venus
>Tycho Brahe's geocentric model explained this, as well as the retrograde motion of Mars, by having the other planets orbit the sun while Earth remains motionless with the sun orbiting it.
1871 Airy's failure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87M2i61N1cU
>Airy pointed two telescopes side-by-side at the same star. One was filled with air, the other with water. If Earth were moving, the aberration of the starlight was predicted to be exaggerated in the water-filled telescope due to refraction.
This was not observed.
1887 Michelson-Morley
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_the_Relative_Motion_of_the_Earth_and_the_Luminiferous_Ether
>Michelson & Morley tried to find a difference in speed between two light beams, one traveling in the direction of Earth's (alleged) orbit and another perpendicular to it. This difference was predicted to correspond to a 66,000 mph orbital motion of Earth.
This was not observed.
In spite of the fact that Geocentrism would have explained the results perfectly, Michelson completely ignored that when he published several potential explanations for the dumbfounding data.
Incidentally, Einstein rejected Michelson's hypotheses in favor of his own: Relativity. Einstein argued there was no difference in the speeds of the two light beams because lightspeed is constant and unchanging. In spite of the bizarre implications of this theory, such as time-dilation, length-contraction, and relativity of simultaneity, the scientific community came to accept it because the alternative (Geocentrism) was simply unthinkable to them.
1913 Sagnac
http://zelmanov.ptep-online.com/papers/zj-2008-08.pdf
>Sagnac was a Frenchman who refused to accept Einstein's theory of constant lightspeed, and designed an experiment to falsify it by measuring a non-constant lightspeed on a spinning disc.
>He succeeded. Soon after, Einstein revised his original Relativity Theory by declaring it only applied in special cases, like when the observer is not accelerating. That's why it's called Special Relativity.
1925 Michelson-Pearson-Gale
http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/pdf/MichelsonGale1.pdf
http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/pdf/MichelsonGale.pdf
>Despite his failure to prove Earth was orbiting the sun, Michelson set out to prove Earth was spinning on its axis.
>The experiment was considered a success. However, whereas Michelson believed he had proved Earth is rotating within the aether, Geocentrists believe he proved the aether is rotating around Earth.
1942 Dufour-Prunier
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/%7B$cat_name%7D/View/2474
>The French duo, Dufour and Prunier, performed a variety of interesting variations on Sagnac's original experiment. They reported lightspeed is always observed to be c+v (where v is the speed of the rotor in Earth's frame) regardless of whether:
>the observer is co-rotating with the device
>the observer is sitting stationary in the lab (while the optical bench co-rotates with the rotor)
>some of the mirrors comprising the optical circuit are stationary in the lab while others co-rotate on the rotor (the light is diverted from a set of spinning mirrors up to a set of stationary mirrors suspended in the air over the rotor, then diverted back down to the spinning mirrors and observer)
>They concluded that Relativity is 'in complete disagreement' with the results. Amazingly, mainstream science has been ignoring their experiments for over 70 years... and counting.
2004 Wang
http://web.stcloudstate.edu/ruwang/PRL93.pdf
>For almost a century, acceptance of Special Relativity prevailed in spite of the experiments of Sagnac and Michelson-Pearson-Gale (Dufour-Prunier was, and still is, simply ignored) because it was argued that they measured lightspeed in an accelerating frame of reference and Special Relativity doesn't apply in such cases.
>But in 2004, Dr. Wang proved that a non-accelerating observer can also measure a difference in lightspeed, falsifying the commonly accepted explanation for Michelson-Morley (Special Relativity) and proving that Earth is indeed motionless.
>Physicist Dr. Robert Bennett has developed a Geocentric theory to explain all of this data (incidentally, it's the only theory in the world which actually tries to make sense of every single one of these experiments). The theory is called A.L.F.A., Absolute Lab Frame & Flexible Aether.
>Texas education.
>>79658203
Common core is fucking everyone, not just this Texas poster
>>79658203
>>79658845
t. bluepilled sheep
>>79658981
Do you have any practical applications or implications of this theory? How does one take advantage of this? Furthermore how is this related to politics?
No, 'muh secret illuminati lies' doesn't really make this a political topic. Everyone knows elites lie, but what would the purpose of such a large lie serve in their own benefit?
I've seen lots of false flag redpoll shit recently to make us accept dumb shit like.
Anti-vaccination, anti-evolution, smoking isn't harmful, pollution isn't real, flat-eathers, etc. Generally lies and anti-science bullshit used to make troublesome groups dumb and they're trying to force it on us when we know better. Don't fall for the crypto-jew.
>>79659378
Wow I had to fight my phone's autocorrect hard on this and it still spat out errors.
>>79658203
It's not Texas its Chile, I'm Texan and they don't teach shit this retarded here
>>79659276
>Do you have any practical applications or implications of this theory? How does one take advantage of this? Furthermore how is this related to politics?
As Carl Sagan said:
>Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people.
The whole point is making us feel inconsequential, that we are nothing but some backwater planet in the entire universe, even worse than that we orbit around a sun which is also basically nothing. Its the same as taking history away from nations "hehe dirty goyim your people didn't invent anything, it was all the arab books and the Chinese!".
Same purpose.
