https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2015/10/30/former-president-of-greenpeace-scientifically-rips-climate-change-to-shreds/
“Human emissions of carbon dioxide have saved life on Earth from inevitable starvation and extinction due to lack of CO2”
TL;DR
Why does no one care about real science today?
Answer: too many stupids.
"Clinton was strongly criticized in a State Department inspector general report last week about her email use.
The report found repeated warnings about cybersecurity were ignored and staffers who expressed concerns were told “never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again.”
Yet, this seems not to be a big issue among Democrats. The Rasmussen poll released Tuesday found 71 percent of Democratic voters believe she should keep running even if indicted, a view shared by only 30 percent of Republicans and 46 percent of unaffiliated voters. Overall, 50 percent of those polled said she should keep running. "
>>75961083
The post below yours in fucking prophetic.
Mildly ironically, you'll never know.
"If humans had not begun to unlock some of the carbon stored as fossil fuels, all of which had been in the atmosphere as CO2 before sequestration by plants and animals, life on Earth would have soon been starved of this essential nutrient and would begin to die. Given the present trends of glaciations and interglacial periods this would likely have occurred less than 2 million years from today, a blink in nature’s eye, 0.05% of the 3.5 billion-year history of life."
>>75960873
>CO
Isn't the concern about carbon monoxide, not dioxide?
>>75961446
>CO2*
>>75961446
Bruh if we were having monoxide problems entire populations would be decimated.
>>75961534
I never payed close attention to this climate change stuff because I never really believed it but I thought the whole thing was that CO emissions from cars were causing a hole in the ozone layer that would fuck us up, not CO2 doing whatever.
>>75961446
Mate large quantities of carbon monoxide in the atmosphere would be like gassing the human race.
>>75961612
Some gas make holes in the ozone layer. CFC were dangerous, but they got banned and ozone layer is now all good.
CO2 is (allegedly) about climate change.
>ever caring what people from Greenpeace think
>>75962279
Although they are a terrorist organization what he is saying is correct. The Earth is greener than it has ever been after all.
>>75962125
Protip: "holes in the ozone layer" is grade A bullshit. That's like saying you can have a hole in the ocean if you take a scoop out with a bucket.
There is thinning of the ozone layer near the south pole, but you'll see that the size of this problem coincides perfectly with the seasons. It's also still happening. You'll also notice that past references to the "hole" happened every year when the spot was largest, with people falling silent when the spot was shrinking.
Now for the conspiracy theory part: CFCs were being tested to see if it were a neurotoxin a few years before people became aware of the hole.
Disclaimer: CFCs do destroy ozone and can reach the stratosphere despite being heavier than air.
>>75962963
Yeah and CO2 is heavier than Oxygen, which is heavier than Nitrogen, while Steel is also heavier than water.
Yet all these things can be found at different depths and altitudes.
Strange that.
>>75963435
The effects of massive objects are clearly overpowered and need to be toned down.
Save the Earth: Throw mass into space.
