I'll be breaking my NDA but I'm about to quit my "Job". I am what you guys call a "Hillary Shill". I post scripted messages to try to sway the vote for Hillary Clinton on this website aswell with facebook, and reddit. HOWEVER you guys seem to support Trump more than any others so this sight became MUCH more of a target. Ask me anything. (FYI there are bots that "shill" as well)
>>79964572
Site my bad
How does it feel to be a traitor to your country? No shame, moderate shame or lots of shame?
>>79964572
will you post any proof at all
This is primarily a meta-argument about how the email scandal accusations are framed.
When Colin Powell stepped up in 2004 the state department didn't have email at all. He used a private mail account through dial up on his personal laptop in his office to do all his emailing in part to show other people how awesome email is and make the case for adopting it.
In his autobiography he talks with pride about successfully making the case to get funding that allowed him to purchase 44,000 internet capable computers so that every person at state could have one:
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/03...il-scandal.html
It's a rather important bit of perspective to realize that when Clinton stepped up in 2008 email was still a rather new thing at State ( it takes awhile to get funding and install 44,000 computers ) and that prior to its adoption all the business done on email was done on private accounts out of band. For example, Powell's demo email account only connected with staff who also had private email accounts since the .gov email system didn't exist yet. People who frame this as if the state department IT was run like a James Bond movie are misinformed. Deliberately so since talking up the maturity/security of their IT allows detractors to make Clinton's actions look more significant/subversive.
Another bit of misleading framing is the implication or claim that Clintons' server was set up after she was appointed SoS. In reality the Clinton family server was set up by Bill after he stepped down around 2001ish. Hillary had her blackberry hooked up to it all during the primary. Setting up a secure email server is a significant endeavor for the layman. By claiming it was done after she stepped up you make listeners suspicious and prime them to accept a devious motive. The truth that she just kept on using the setup she'd been using, otoh, flows much more naturally into Hillary's stated reason, convenience. All her shit was there and why mess with what works? You can juggle two mail boxes ok but juggling two calendars completely defeats the purpose of a calendar. Again, she used it in place of a non-classified .gov email. When she had to use the secure system she went to the secure building and handed over her wireless devices to security to get in and sit at a special secure terminal like everyone else. She hated it just like everyone else. Lastly, her own emails show her asking IT to hook up her blackberry to a .gov account and them saying they couldn't do it.. ( http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-...ure-smartphone/ ). This information is also left out or actively lied about by people pushing a nefarious motives narrative since attempt to use the State system while maintaining the functionality of her system undermines their entire premise.
The last major false frame of the email scandal is the idea that criminal prosecution is something that routinely happens when people mess up with secure material. You get a lot of hyperbolic claims about how much trouble a regular Joe would be if they'd done that. Also a shit ton of quoting snippets of legal statutes and torturing the definition of the word "deliberately". If security agencies criminally prosecuted people for honest mistakes then people would never self report or cooperate with security audits for fear of jail. It is more important that breaches be promptly and honestly reported than to jail people for mistakes. They will fuck you up if you deliberately sell data or deliberately post it to wiki leaks sure. But if you are operating in good faith then jail isn't a realistic outcome even if you "deliberately" took some work home with you the night you got mugged and someone stole your backpack. You didn't intend for the data to get away so that's not the right kind of "deliberately" to get anti-espionage statutes thrown at you.
A minor frame used in all three major frames is trying to make this an elitist thing. Asserting that nobody else uses personal emails when it was actually a common practice or that she is avoiding punishment others would face when in reality punishment would be the exception rather than the rule.
What the fuck are you all thinking.
I know that /pol/ is all NEET degenerates overcompensating for your failures in life.
But this is something you can do today. Stop dressing like a degenerate.
1. Iron a shirt
2. Burn your blue jeans
3. Burn your T-shirts
4. Burn your hoodies
5. Burn your cargo shorts
6. Polish your shoes
7. Get a fucking haircut
>tfw dirty shirt
>tfw smelling smegma through my dirty shorts
>tfw piss-stained shorts
>>79961508
>tfw £3 polo t-shirt
>tfw tracksuit trousers
>tfw cheap no brand trainers
>tfw cut hair and beard once every 3 months down to 3mm
>tfw don't give a fuck
>>79961685
You could at least pretend that my theory that you are all degenerates is incorrect
Vote and discuss:
www.strawpoll.me/10681044
>>79964528
No, they prevent the spread of disease.
How is this anti-science bullshit even a question?
>>79964712
I actually used to think so because I was a huge conspiracytard (still am to some extent) but the more you look into it the more retarded you feel.
Basically some jew lawyers wanted to sue the people making the measels vax, and so they paid some jewdoc to fake some results, which later got his medical license revoked.
>Donald Trump is the first national politician since World War Two who speaks to people with IQs of less than 100
How true is this?
I didn't know Trump talked a lot to black and hispanic people
That was Obama
>>79964456
To appeal to the masses you have to speak to the lowest common demonator. It's actually a smart move. Even the "high class" newspapers don't go past a 12th grade reading level.
If Trump picks an establishment vice president.
Fat fucks and Canadians get out of here, the stakes are too high.
Who does that leave? Rand and Webb are popular choices here, Newt is nominally "outside" but unpalatable to independents.
>>79964053
Is that JFK?
>>79964136
It's Bill. You can tell from the red color, that's his kaposi sarcoma
>>79964136
Yes, after they changed the entrance and exit wounds to match their story
Why does Mike Brown's photo mean he should have been killed, yet this cop isn't defined by his autistic photos?
You guys don't even try to hide your baseless ignorance/racism anymore. Hypocrites.
a literal fucking leaf
>>79963997
Leaf fucks do not even hide that they are enemies now.
I think I have figured out a way to end the cancer known as feminism. The method might even be used to end SJWism. The method you might ask? Well, it's quite simple. We must convince the strong womyn in feminism and sjwism that men cannot be allowed to participate. This because men have been the oppressors for generations, and thus they cannot be trusted. We need to convince them to get rid of every male in a leader role. If we're able to do this, the movements will wither and die. Women simply do not have the ability to organize and co-operate. The movements would die due to infighting. What do you think of my idea /pol/? Is it feasible? How would we go about making this a reality?
>>79963810
Feminism is a symptom, the cause is the jew.
To stop feminism the jews must die, including yourself.
>inb4 1 post by op
>inb4 no replies to this post
>>79963965
I am happy to say that I am no jew. As you should know, there are only two cities in Norway with a jewish population, while this is very sad; there should be none. I am happy to say that I've never met a jew in my life. I do not know the horrors of the Jew
>>79963810
If you want to end feminism, just let them win. Let them take over and remake society in their retarded vision. Within a few years whatever Feminist Utopia they build will fall apart and western civilization will be forced to rebuild. Whatever rises up to replace it I guarantee you that it will learn from the mistakes of the past and be a full on patriarchy, and would remain so for many centuries.
I'm so tired to have to fight an uphill battle everytime I discuss topics like immigration, Islam or feminism.
I am an honest guy, I'm in med school, I do my best to help and love my family and my friends, I help in a dog shelter, I've never hurt/harassed anybody, stolen anything or been cruel toward people (I don't say I have never had the tentation when the opportunity presented itelf though).
And still, everytime I talk about political subject with someone outside my closest sphere I almost always end up being treated or receiving allusion of being an heartless monster despite staying civil and not even going 20% /pol/.
It's like fighting an hydra between the MSM, the government, the educationnal system, the various institutions, the entertainment, the celebrities, etc... All these things condition people to be very emotionnal on these topics, like if it is a manichean issue on which you are either good or evil, so people who are not interested by politics will just drink the kool aid.
And I don't even speak about the social medias that begin to create censorship and controlling the pipes.
I think you can in general more easily go away with telling people that you have a criminal case than telling them you voted FN in the last election.
We saw the same shaming tactics on Trump supporters or Brexiters recently.
So how can we reverse the steam ? How can we could ever destroy the moral high ground of liberals when they have such a psychologic power on culture and public infrastructures ?
Video related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn1VxaMEjRU
if we want to start anything we have to have a clearer ways communicating than posting on /pol/
rally people to the cause maybe set some kind of donation system to help fund projects to further gather support and go from there
>>79963646
We aren't the bad guys, we just need to pick our battles better and stop being cunts.
>>79963646
At an individual level, don't bother. Living a productive life, loving your own kind, contributing to your community, sticking to traditional values, having kids and raising them well is good enough. You're already doing better than most people.
The left has been culturally dominant for so long is has gone full retard. Leftist literally can't handle a peaceful argument or debate ideas, the spreg out when their narrative is challenged. They're losing ground really because their shitty life choices makes them miserable and everyone with half a brain can see that even if they can't talk about it.
What does /pol/ think of Swiss gun culture?
k31 is cool
>>79963571
They're white. Like if you threw in nigger culture to Switzerland that figure would be ALOT different.
How are those guns not becoming sentient and killing everyone in sight by themselves?
>no criminal charges will be pressed against hillary
>no
>criminal
>charges
DRUMPBOTS BTFO
>>79963339
>*DRUMPF
If you're going to reuse a stupid meme made by one of your inbred anglo cousins, you may as well do it right.
>Comey literally admitting that anyone else would have been indicted in that situation.
You realize this only makes her look worse, right?
>>79963412
He got underneath your skin so nah, He did it right.
Really makes you think...
>>79963269
>this man is Americans president
عيد مبارك
Not even an exclamation mark
Why does /pol/ like this chap so much?
He killed communist and looked stylish while doing so
>>79963192
because he still had the best economy in all of South America
Because he triggers edgy left-wing teenagers with severe feelings of inadequacy.
What is the counter to being called a "racist"?
It is used to discredit people and end the argument instantly because it is very difficult to come back from. It is the "u mad?" of real world politics.
Even responding to "u mad?" makes you look mad. Same with "racist". Aside from not giving a single fuck but that means you effectively bow out of the debate and they claim victory.
Just say you identify as a black transwoman and it's raco-homo-islamo-vegano-deutero-quantumphobic to say anything negative to you.
>>79963008
"Yes now back to the argument"
"That's not an argument"
"You're a pedophile." (then make the proove a negative routine on him being a pedo rather than you being a racist)
THE MANTRA
Well /pol/, it finally happened. I didnt even expose my power level. My black british english professor has been trying to attack America/Americans all semester. I've always risen to the defense of my great nation, but always fairly and never bombastic or rude.
Today she was going on about soccer and I asked who was playing. "Wales and portugal"
Jokingly, blatantly JOKINGLY i say "oh two third world countries then?"
>TRIGGERED
Suddenly she goes off in front of the class saying im being "legitimately racist and xenophobic."
She said that like three times, and tried to get me to apologize but I held my ground.
Hold me /pol/ i dont even know how to feel. Didnt think these people actually existed sometimes.
Pic not related, i just like prairie dogs.
hahaha you're such a jokester anon
omg i'm dying with laughter
you're fucking amazing
she probably had the last straw with your racist ass and your BLATANTLY JOKINGLY jokes today
>>79960662
>showing an interest in soccer
I was called racist in 7th grade by my English teacher for suggesting we not give aid to Haiti after the earthquakes.
