>2015
>not investing in monsanto to piss libtards off
>>41677319
>investing
defense contracters like Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics and Boeing are better investments and still piss libtards off.
>invest in one of the most jewish companies in the world in order to piss liberals (TM) off
oy gevalt, I almost got a boner over this goyim.
Ok can someone explain the difference here - I have no clue, they are BOTH islamic and love pedo Muhomid, but get upset when you call one the other. They both hate pork and dogs, pray daily and cover their women up. So what is the differance?
Sunnis do the suicide bombing and preach genocide, Shias have an insane underdog/protecting the underdog complex
>>41661072
It has to do with the succession after Mohammed's death, I mean umm after he rode into the sky or some shit.
And they've hated one another ever since
>>41661072
The Sunnis are heretics who do not follow Muhammad's chosen successor.
Or something like that.
Either way, 95% of the terrorist groups are Sunni. Shiites tend to not be as enthusiastic about terrorism, because they're more likely to be on the receiving end of it.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0LK1QV20150216?irpc=932
>SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The U.S. National Security Agency has figured out how to hide spying software deep within hard drives made by Western Digital, Seagate, Toshiba and other top manufacturers, giving the agency the means to eavesdrop on the majority of the world's computers, according to cyber researchers and former operatives.
>>41637215
>America spying on Americans
>again/still
What else is new?
>>41637215
Orwell, grave spinning, you know the drill.
>>41637215
america please stop
What kind of justice system would even consider sending two 12 year-olds to prison for 65 years?
no jail time for cuties
>>41628259
I don' t know, the same kind of justice system that would allow an "Asian" pedophile ring in Rotherham to sexually assault children with impunity.
>>41628259
The same justice system the frowns on killing in the name of a fictional internet character.
Here are some arguments/issues for theists/deists (inb4 ebin fedora meme).
Epicuris originally pointed out the logical issue with evil, in terms of theism (from Wikipedia):
1. If an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent god exists, then evil does not.
2. There is evil in the world.
3. Therefore, an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God does not exist.
This brings to mind the "Atheist's Wager." One formulation which is often erroneously attributed to Marcus Aurelius, again from Wikipedia: "Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones." Basically, if you're a good person, faith is neither necessary nor sufficient for salvation- so why bother (assuming God exists)? On the other hand, if God doesn't exist, it's profoundly asinine to attend a service to worship Him weekly. This is obviously poor risk assessment on the part of theists.
Now, I will readily admit that the problem of evil is more of an attack against theism and less so against deism, for example:
1. Gratuitous evils exist.
2. The hypothesis of indifference, i.e., that if there are supernatural beings they are indifferent to gratuitous evils, is a better explanation for (1) than theism.
3. Therefore, evidence prefers that no god, as commonly understood by theists, exists
>>41605713
As an atheist I would raise a few objections against (some) deists. First of all, the logical consistency of an omniscient/omnipotent being: if you know what you're going to do (omniscient) then you can't change what you're going to do (omnipotent). Essentially, an omniscient being has no free will, meaning it is can not logically be considered omnipotent and omniscient. Another issue with an omnipotent being is it can't create an object too large to move: If it can't create an object too large to move, that goal is outside of its power, and if it can, then that object is now outside of its power; a minor objection, but I'd thought I'd mention it.
Another issue for deists is how could God actually exercise any power. I'm sure there's people who would retort that their concept of God is that he is unknowable (simply, we can only know what he is not, as opposed to what he actually is). We can't measure God scientifically, he has no matter and energy (that I know of). If a being has no matter and energy, it does not exist, and if it "exists outside this universe" that is the very definition of not existing in this one (also, how the hell would anyone know about anything outside the universe, and why would it matter if it doesn't even exist in this one?) My intention is not to strawman all deists, but I'm pretty sure that argument has actually been presented on their behalf (that God exists "outside" of time/the universe or some bullshit). Back to the issue of God exercising any power/existing, if God is all powerful, He should be able to make my pinky turn into a carrot, but since he has no matter and energy and we have no proof that he is capable of altering the laws of physics/universal constants (e.g. pi=3.14...) He has no known means of actually doing this ("He" as in some all powerful being who can't be measured or conceived of.)
>>41605725
Also, people do realize that their consciousness is the result of physical processes, right? Your brain is you. Heard about that guy (Phineas Gage) who had that railroad spike go through his eye and fucked up his amygdala? If I recall correctly, he was a total fucking asshole AFTER being injured (his consciousness, the result of the physical processes in his brain, was altered); if who you are is clearly affected by damage to your brain, I don't see how theists expect their consciousness to be perfectly retained via their soul (probably outside the universe, right?) If you DO expect to retain some sort of consciousness after death, here's a question: say you got into an accident similar to the aforementioned one, when you died would you continue to have the consciousness you had just before death (after you became an asshole due to an injury) or would you have the consciousness of your pre-injury state? If the latter, why would that logically follow?
>>41605713
I didn't read what you wrote, just came to tell you that Taoism immediately opposes the first postulation brought forward by Epicuris and this dissolves the basis of his reasoning and collapsing his argument.
Greetings gentlemen. Today, i am going to pass down to you, knowledge that my father's father passed down to him.
You all talk about the "jews" being the enemy, when it's far more complicated than that. If you look to the right, you will see this infographic. While crude, it explains it quite well.
Let's start with facts.
>All 3 abrahamic religions originate from the middle east
>All 3 are the same cancer, just in a different form. Christianity is just as bad as judaism and both promote the exact same tenets as islam.
At this point, you will say
>b..but muh christianity, we're peaceful unlike those sandnigger muslims
>b...but muh judaism, we just want to do our own thing and not be persecuted
WRONG. Your book promotes the same kind of violence. You are just as bad as the Muslims who lie about their religion being peaceful.
We all know it's a lie, but you see the exact same lie reflected in the other 2 and ignore it?
Now, following this, we can easily establish that the desert religions are a cancer to be avoided. But, why is Christianity pushed so avidly as "white man's religion"?
It's easy.
The lie that Christianity is a white man's religion is a simple subversion by foreign invaders. They tell us to accept their hordes, with loving arms.
It, along with the other 2 books of the desert trilogy, have stolen pagan traditions and buddhist tenets in order to create a sado-masochistic relationship with god.
This is all in order to destabilize white men (and women) and make them conform to the enemy's ideals.
I come from a land of driving snow, howling sleet, in the far north and my ancestors fought. They fought for what they wanted and won it with honor. They built with pride.
>>41607813
Yet, christianity portrays pagans as uneducated savages. Vikings as simple marauders? Nothing could be further from the truth.
Our celtic, anglo, germanic, scandanavian brothers, we are all white at heart and have something to be proud of. Gentlemen, you have thousands of brave warriors behind you, who fought for you. They fought to bring you into this world and they would be ashamed to hear that the bards have stopped singing of their tales.
They would be ashamed to see that a cult from a far-away land has subverted the pride of their ancestry. Fed you all lies like sheep.
Christianity talks about how it built europe and uses that to convince you that it is white man's religion. Paganism and HONOR are our true religions, my brothers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prose_Edda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse_mythology
Please, take the time to educate yourself and take a look. We had poets, warriors, we built castles and great mead halls to celebrate our victories. We understood and respected science instead of fearing it, researching astrology while the christians hung galileio hundreds of years later for "heresay".
All of this has been forgotten, due to an extensive propaganda regimen. But now, we live in a beautiful information age. Where we can learn about anything just by googling it. Please, learn about your ancestors. Shake off the lies. You have ancestors to be proud of. Ancestors that the middle eastern hordes would need ten men just to fight one of our own.
Pagan gods were not some fairy tale, they were a symbolic gesture of respect for the natural forces of the world we live in. And that's a hell of a lot more tangible than some sky-man.
I mean no offense to christians, but your religion is not the true religion for us of the cold north.
We should not be welcoming your kind with open arms. I only pray that a few of my brothers will listen to my words and learn about their true history.
>>41607813
>inb4 le reddit fedora may may
If you truly consider yourself white, take heed of my words.
We are not as numerous as the foreign hordes, but we are just as smart if not ten times smarter. We are ten times more valiant and ten times more cunning.
We need to band together and instead of fighting eachother, or simply saying it's the jews and then taking the side of the muslims (or the other way around) we need to simply accept that all foreign peoples are the enemy, should they choose to invade us.
This does not mean to fill yourself with hate, just to know thy enemy.
>>41607870
If anything, paganism is closer to agnostic beliefs.
The worship and respect of freja for example.
Paganism did not fear science, however.
This is the biggest red flag of the desert cult's evil.
And like a hydra, it takes many forms.
WHO AMONGST ME WILL STAND AND FIGHT THE HYDRA ALONGSIDE YOUR BROTHERS?
WE SHALL TRIUMPH AND WE SHALL FEAST IN THE MEAD HALL AFTERWARDS.
Welp, I got kicked out of my last friend circle. Within three weeks - with the help of a 'psychologist' - my best friend of ten years discovered "he was actually a woman." I questioned the validity of this and got immediately disowned. "YOU'RE IGNORING SCIENCE!"
I'm not saying that some legit transgender people exist, but what does /pol/ think about everyone having to forcibly conform/accept transgenderism as a culture? Everyone knows a sex change is biologically impossible, so why does everyone have to be 'sensitive' and change their pronoun usage to avoid getting fired for harassment?
I hope my friend will be the best damn defensive lineman the local all-woman's football team has ever seen.
What are your opinions? Am I just a huge bigot asshole?
You're not a bigot bro, but you have to remember to hide your power level.
I've made alot of people mad by blurting out my edgy opinions, when hindsight makes me kinda regret doing so. It hardly ever changes things and just brings a victim complex to those who you offend.
To me, the best approach is to be silent, listen to their thought process, their arguing points and study the subject. Then when you have a good understanding of the subject, find all the major flaws. Understand both sides of the argument, and then, while still being a friend, place small pieces of doubt. Ask damning questions and control the conversation. Being overtly abrasive just pushes people away.
>>41586839
I was trying :(
I asked for some time away from all of this so I could think, but I was aggressively pressed on it over and over again. I was told how I was unable "to support [them] on just one thing" and how I "abandoned [them] as soon as they told me" - after three weeks of this shit I got pushed too far and told them what I really thought.
Once that was said I was immediately cut off.
I mean, I am not whining about it (anymore), but letting you know how it all went down.
This person was extremely narcissistic and inflexible with opinions any ways, so their response to opposing viewpoints has always been to shut completely down.
...but thanks for the reply. I will take this into account the next time I am forced to be in the company of a transgender person.
>hide your power level
Yes, goy. Just pretend to be a degenerate and degenerates will like you.
All things in the universe have a scientific explanation for their own existences: stars, comets, galaxies, and planets. There are three exceptions: time, matter, and the universe itself. Therefore, somewhere down the line of different realities and dimensions, some intelligent being created the universe. That being is God.
>prove me wrong
That being is not god because time, matter and the universe exist and god doesn't.
>>41579005
What explains their existence then?
>WE CANT KNOWWWWWW
>their existence doesnt NEED to be explained :^)
^These are not answers, so please refrain from using them.
>>41579128
>What explains their existence then?
God is those things.
We are going to get stuck with the quasi-fascist Stephen Harper for another 4 years, and it's all because of Justin Trudeau. The Liberal Party of Canada should fire him and replace him with Marc Garneau, it isn't too late,I think they might actually stand a shot at getting elected if they do that.
>>41570434
He has his fathers name and his mothers brain.
>>41570434
It wouldn't surprise me at all if he won actually. But all these Liberals and NDP'ers who would see him voted in think he is some kind of alternative to the "dictator" Stephen Harper. It's true that Harper might act like a dictator, but this guy won't be any better. He'll promote the left wing social values, but look at how he won't allow his party members to vote against the party line when it comes to abortion. That's not democracy. And he said he admires the Chinese communists because they can push through whatever kind of legislation they want without having to care what the public wants.
He is every bit of a dictator as Harper, and he will keep pushing the Globalist and NAU agendas, just with a gay face is all.
>>41573991
Thinks Harper is a dictator.
Top kek
I think nursing is an easy degree for people who are not smart enough to get a real degree or become a dr.
It's the medical equivalent to a hair dresser..
Yet nurses always rave on, "we're not just doctors assistants, we have our own independent role in the hospital system" blah blah blah
Sure nurses are under appreciated but they are DR's assistants.. Stop putting your average ass job on such a high pedistool.
In some hospitals they even have the nurses mop the floors and take out trash.
Thanks for all the work and care you put into the job however this is just how I see it.
>>41511894
OP, nurses still need to know standard medical proceedure, which is often required when dealing with unstable patients.
>>41511894
>opinion, naive
The first person that will intervene in an emergency will be a nurse.
You shit your pants? Nurse comes and aids you.
Tachycardia? Nurse!
They deal with your bullshit and idiotic patients 24/7.
Typically, medical technicians (which is what they are) are more valuable to a patient than doctors. Doctors don't know anything past their experience and doctors are way more inexperienced than nurses.
Now imagine a hospital without any nurses to do these "low level jobs". It wouldn't survive.
>>41511894
Is the difference perhaps that nursing is something better taught on the job through hands on methods then at uni through books?
Let's talk about the Jewish Rothschilds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxmJUBDgpyQ
a cancer. a cancer on this planet and our people.
>>>/x/
*tips tinfoil*
>>41497211
im amazed the rothschild name still exists
i mean, theyre one of the most hated people ever, should someone at least have 1 assasinated by now?
one of them was talking to a bunch of teenagers in the streets, at midnight
amazing
Fellow Canadians. Why is Quebec such a whiney province. Twice they have stalled constitutional reform with their distinct society bullshit (Meech lake + Charlottetown). Why can't they accept proposals to recognise them as a cultural group in Canada instead of recognising Quebec itself. Selfish baguette eating french faggots.
>>41489111
because "muh heritage!!!!"
>Contributions 0
>We want independence
>>41489111
Quebec is a wonderful place and must never become canadian. It is really the most state to defend the french language, far more than us clearly. And they are strong economically and socially.
Do not bully them for being right about defending their roots. I bet that you live on the West coast. Typical guy praising the americans instead of embracing the better quebec for a better society.
>>41489146
Would it be so bad to reverse their language laws that specify french is to be on everything first and biggest. You also have to speak french at school in Quebec.
In Ottawa the other side of the river there is no such law but the languages coexist side by side and you can choose which school you go to. Thats more like American freedoms.
>Calling all Christians
Text can be interpreted many different ways. Without resorting to "my interpretation of scripture is correct", explain why your denomination is the correct one.
If you can't explain why your denomination interprets scripture correctly, please tell us why we should believe your denomination is right when lines of text can be interpreted any which way.
>>41471353
Good thread
I'm non-denominational, because I don't want to be part of the traditions of men like the whore of Babylon.
>>41471353
>Text can be interpreted many different ways
Interpretation comes from God.
God establishes christians.
An established christian will be approved and he'll be able to perform things such as healing the sick with lay on hands.
Can you do this?
No?
Let me doubt your interpretation
"A documentary about coping with pedophilia called Daniel's world by Veronika Lišková will, after a successful premiere at Ji.Hlava IDFF, where it got the Audience Award, appear in the competition section Panorama at the prestigious Berlinale festival that begins this week. It is a great success, given that the last time a Czech film appeared in a competition at Berlinale was in 2007 (feature film I Served the King of England by Jiří Menzel). The first out of the four planned screenings takes place on February 9, 2015. On February 19, the film supported by Institute of Documentary Film will enter the Czech cinemas oficially.
On this occasion we bring an exclusive interview with the director, Veronika Lišková"
http://www.dokweb.net/en/czech-docs/news/daniel-s-world-competes-at-berlinale-and-enters-czech-cinemas-2640/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbL8vQwMqo8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ5WdCVknJA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqhie_fDz0U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaFEwJCQ0z0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFimZYpCoaA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zec7oZUrGg8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpnFbJcYuqU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgSSjPyFlr0
http://www.cracked.com/article_20981_5-ways-were-making-pedophilia-worse.html
I want off this fucking ride
>2015
>Still believing that Muslims are behind "Islamic" terrorism
Good goy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nEWdyGMzDk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsUtvOW6SR0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU769fPCWSo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRXWmk49vU
Hey, goys, tell me: Osama bin Laden said the 9/11 attacks were because of the US's support for Israel, so why didn't Al-Qaeda or ISIS ever attack Israel itself instead other countries, including Muslim ones?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_al-Qaeda_attacks
Another image.
I have this one, too.
And here's the image I was looking for.
