The following sources have confirmed Trump's claims about Muslims celebrating in the US on 9/11:
> CBS's Dan Rather (skip to 12:33)
http://www.visibility911.org/video-dan-rather-on-david-letterman-1-week-after-911/
> Mayor Rudi Giuliani
https://youtu.be/hdk7snHe0kM
> NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik
First the NYPost deleted it's article, then the Washington Post tried to write a "lying fact check" article calling it a lie.
> Neither the Washington Post nor the NYPost have retaracted their articles from 2001 reporting Muslim celebrations.
NYPost has deleted the original:
> http://nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/32549.htm
But it's still available on WaybackMachine:
> https://archive.is/s3oio
Washington Post article reporting the same subject is still available:
> https://archive.is/D8TAM
But Glen Kesler apparently doesn't know what his own bosses have printed in the past 15 years:
> https://archive.is/F2O2I
CBS has also tried to claim it has no stories in it's archives verifying Trump's statements, but the following clip was found in a private VHS collection recorded off TV broadcasts that week:
https://youtu.be/3auKMHkZJnQ
> Is the media really this controlled, this Orwellian?
>>57244264
they edited that rudy giulliani interview down to 10 seconds when i saw it
Make sure we have a backup saved of that CBS video.
Make sure we have a backup saved of that CBS video.
Make sure we have a backup saved of that CBS video.
>>57244264
delete this right now goyim
You are looking at the outcome of the 2016 election, in favor of Donald J. Trump.
The red is all the states that opposed Syrian refugees. Because I feel that this is the issue that the election is centered around.
A state that denies refugees will never in a million years go blue.
Now, while you may claim "hurr durr states don't represent the opinion of the citizens," in most cases you will find that the citizens are even more extreme than the polticians.
Keep in mind, this map isn't even taking into consideration the states that are on the fence about refugees, so more might even deny them.
tl;dr:
Embrace Trump as your next President.
Why isn't Kentucky red?
>>57244137
They must be on the fence.
Sorry to disappoint.
>>57244137
Because OP is a faggot.
Why is Australia so anti-immigrant?
I don't know, but I hope it stays that way
>>57243899
>>57243899
Because we are a historically small wealthy population surrounded by overwhelmingly populated poorer countries with different social values and culture.
We are realistic and make our choices thusly, recent events only vindicate us further.
We have no need for immigrants, our ageing population had its retirement age pushed back so our youth have less jobs. Retards think that we need to import people to keep afloat when really we are just riding a mining boom that is unsustainable, inflating it with immigrants only makes things worse as they won't support the ageing population when they retire but typically end up on the dole making further stress on the economy.
>>57243899
FUCK
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/613337/Bionic-bonking-with-robots-will-become-more-common-than-normal-sex-claims-doctor
Scientists say that we will be having sex with robots by 2025. Win?
>we
speak for yourself. i can actually get pussy
>>57243917
Same but im still interested in this. Maybe as a toy and hopefully it will drive stupid women to be more than a walking vagina.
http://www.ijreview.com/2015/10/434513-sex-industry-grown-much-researchers-believe-people-will-sex-robots-2050/
>the Bolshevik leadership was most Jewish because an infograph says so
>>57243436
why would an info graph say that?
>>57243492
infographic
Legal theorizing thread.
Moral hazard is an economic concept where one party is allowed to make decisions while another party bares the risks of those decisions. In the case of abortion, it is clear that a male bares all the risks while the female gets to make all the decisions.
If a man and woman have consensual sex and the woman gets pregnant, the man has no say in whether that woman may have an abortion or not. This is current law. If the man wanted to take the care of the child on his own and the woman aborts, he is deprived of that right. If the man wants the woman to abort the child and she elects not to do so, he is stuck with having to pay for child support.
The 14th Amendment allows for equal protection under the law. The Supreme Court has held that sex is a protected class under the 14th Amendment. In the case of abortion, the male clearly does not get equal treatment of the law.
If a man wants to keep the child, but the woman aborts anyways, the man should arguably receive damages for the loss of enjoyment with a child he helped in creating. It was his blood child. The woman still has her constitutional right to abort, but the sex that conceived the child should have been considered an implied agreement that the father would have to be paid if he wished to keep his child while the mother did not.
This would obviously be different in the case of rape. Voluntary unprotected sex, however, should clearly be seen as an implied agreement. Contraceptives are easily acquired.
The only argument against this is that it "punishes" a girl for not carrying a child. That brings me to my next point.
Alternatively, if the father wants the mother to abort the child, he should be allowed to get an injunction against her to do so. In this situation, the mother is not forced to carry, but instead, she is forced to abort the child. The father has an interest in having the child aborted because if the woman decides to have the child, he is stuck paying child support.
>>57243198
I should've used a catchy picture. :/
>>57243198
No man you're right its just that pol is too busy not discussing policy to fix america and is instead jerking off to other retarded issues. Next time use a picture of a giant black dick fucking a white woman and posters from all over the globe will appear.
I think woman alone holds the decision since it's about woman's body. Payment of damages is a stupid concept, because our general ethic rules can't put a price on human life. Pricing would be especially difficult because not all women are equally wealthy either.
>inb4 man has to pay for the woman if she decides to keep the baby and he doesn't have a chance to say no
You gotta remember that child support is directed to the child, you aren't sponsoring the woman. It's about the child and what's best for him. By sticking your dick inside a woman you agree that there's always the risk and as an adult man you will have to live with the possible consequenses. If you are not okay with it, just simply do not put your dick inside a woman's vag and you won't end up to a situation like that.
Who are the most arrogant people on /pol, the people who are least aware of their countrie's specific weaknesses, kekoldry and degeneracies?
I pick:
USA
>>57243163
The arrogant fucks who inhabit Germanistan
Aussies
Canadians
Brits
Europeans in general.
>>57243163
>I pick:
>USA
You jelly Hans?
does it mean I am white?
http://www.foodbeast.com/news/map-of-milk-consumption-lactose-intolerance-around-the-world/
>>57243106
can you though nigger?
>>57243182
I drank most of it. Now my tummy hurts
:(
>>57243106
bull fucking shit, no lactose intolerant people here
“In full coordination with the Government of Iraq, we’re deploying a specialized expeditionary targeting force to assist Iraqi and Kurdish Peshmerga forces and put even more pressure on [ISIS],” Defense Secretary Ash Carter told the House Armed Services Committee in announcing the new deployment on Tuesday.
Carter got a hint of just how difficult it may be to sell Congress on such legislation when Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii) suggested that Obama’s decision to place American fighter jets equipped “to target Russian planes” on the border between Turkey and Syria, and his stated opposition to Russian-backed Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, could lead the U.S. into a nuclear war with Vladimir Putin’s regime.
“Russia’s installation of their anti-aircraft missile-defense system increases that possibility of — whether it’s intentional or even an accidental event — where one side may shoot down the other side’s plane,” Gabbard told Carter. “And that’s really where the potential is for this devastating nuclear war.”
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427839/tulsi-gabbard-obama-risks-nuclear-war-russia
Rip in peace I guess. You used to be our honorable competitor.
Someone go check skyking
BLACK LIVES MATTER
ITS THE JEWSS!!!!
MY FEELINGS!
*nuclear explosion*
None of this American bullshit will matter.
I know some of you fags still have the macros showing /pol/ approved books laying around somewhere. Here's some literature in the mean time. Please don't fail me, anons.
pol books 4 - dec 2015
https://mega.nz/#!RklnCKKA!W64_BkiyRVxeGA8XCdeMWjXL_8dzGinuyT2AaSHPfH8
>128 MB
pol books 3 - nov 2015
https://mega.nz/#!UwlSgYaA!2BR-lem-3BMO5HSpuZb4_LzN0yS1NPjng3ErMaNDDUY
>158 MB
pol books 2 - oct 2015
https://mega.nz/#!EplSGRYT!XPOK4RSIqLOx2CXRBUEcip-EYiAlTn0ZEDb6D2ufA9g
>158 MB
pol books 1 - sept 2015
https://mega.nz/#!IklXUIbR!26A2JdrqP_XP5WgWQK6zvBA1x3PHu7jQsS7Bw5X2Tc0
>180 MB
US embassies imply that. Almost every US embassy decorates their embassies with faggot flags, rainbow lights, organize and fund pride parades and foreign lgbt movements, etc etc.
your flag looks like a fucking rainbow
USA is for real what Sweden is in memes.
>>57242124
pay debts
Your u.s. citizenship should be revoked and given to a true American patriot like me.
>>57241907
More brits need to be like you and the founders.
>>57241907
The only reason i would vote for trump is so that he will fight against Liberal agendas on a high level.
>>57241907
I don't understand how people can vote for a man who wouldn't think them worthy to lick the dirt from his boots.
I understand if your a filthy monarchist who wants to believe that someone is better than them but we fought a war to get rid of those people.
How to unkuck Germany?
Realistic solutions only pls. For individuals not on government scale obv
Sell Mein Kampf copies.
>>57241760
Judging from the fact that you can go to prison for speaking out and being labeled a "racist," I would say try to redpill shitskins that have already assimilated. They can talk as much trash as they want and it's ok since they can't be racist apparently. Then regular Germans will think it's ok. Also try to redpill people you're close to, since it's unlikely they'll turn you in. And by redpill, I mean tell them that mass immigration is bad and the reasons why. Don't sperg out and go full stormfag about race and "da joos." Most of that is bullshit and it won't get you anywhere. In fact, it's a very good way to make people even more c.ucked.
>>57241831
Mein kampf is really boring to read
Is religion dangerous?
Only radicalised groups within religions.
>>57241614
>not sabotaging the rockets in the avail of the end of religion
Fucking pleb irradiate yourself.
>>57241654
Every religious person is fundamentalist
>>57241614
only Islam
> Hitler is able to take Moscow in the Winter.
> Russia surrenders
> Eastern Front moves to Western Front
> Allies Over whelmed by Germans
> Nazi invade US main land
> USA surrenders
> America is now a Nazi State
Fast Forward to 2015. How is life better in 2015 Nazi America?
>>57241564
You wouldn't exist
>>57241564
>How is life better in 2015 Nazi America?
They wouldn't have spent 50 years letting a zillion Mexicans sneak in.
>>57241564
>Allies Over whelmed by Germans
>Nazi invade US main land
I think you missed a few things in the middle
