>Speaking at a summit UN focusing on women, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said he will continue saying he is a feminist "until it is met with a shrug."
>Mr Trudeau's cabinet has an equal number of men and women, and he is calling on world leaders to follow his government's lead.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35836279
American (under Trump), British (under Farage) and Russian liberation of Canada when?
>>67822895
>and he is calling on world leaders to follow his government's lead.
>guys it's TWENTY SIXTEEN you need to stop choosing cabinets based on skills and abilities and start choosing them based on quotas
>>67823253
>conservashits believe this
He did it on both, cuck.
What will the internet be like once Gawker goes out of business? What's stopping the majority of the staffs and writers from starting a new company and picking up where they left off?
>>67822678
gawker is a huge cancer with agendas.
they fuel most of the SJW/pro-tranny websites that people visit, under the guise that they are newswebsites.
if they vanish, it'll be awfully quiet.
>>67822678
Trump is right, we need much stronger liable laws.
>>67822928
Another will rush in to fill the void. My money's on Buzzfeed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8GN5HE-1ZU
http://www.foxsports.com/soccer/story/terrible-psv-fans-throw-coins-at-beggars-in-madrid-031516
Dutch tourists are the best
T O P K E K
O
P
K
E
K
>throwing money to beggars is terrible
Lol those gypos seemed pretty happy about it
>>67822263
BASED as fuck desu.
Much better than our 18-25 year old tourist who would all be there off their heads, the girls without their pants on and the lads fingering them while they are unconscious.
>>67822263
So glad we don't have that human waste in my country
The NYT Editors wil leave! Ayyy
Do these cucks have no shame?
We all know they aren't going to leave. There have to be consequences for these faggots if they don't keep their word.
>>67822594
Why do they always threaten to go to Canada, Why don't they go to Mexico?
>>67822216
It's funny no one ever really talks about moving to Mexico if a politician is elected. As if there is something wrong with that country.
Thoughts /pol/
>>67821750
Hitler did nothing wrong though
>>67821750
one can only hope
>>67821750
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ch7jNAgQbc
Hey guys, I’m the person who originally recorded the video of “Carl”. I have to say, I didn’t expect it to blow up like this. And now that it did, I feel a bit bad about it. let me explain...
Firstly, let me start by saying that when I uploaded the video, I knew it would piss you guys off because it portrayed “Carl” as exactly what so many of you hate: An arrogant, stuck up liberal who thinks his opinion is superior to yours even though he can’t even defend it. A “SJW” who depends on feels and not facts, and will yell whenever his opinion is challenged.
Well, it seems that’s exactly how so many people on 4chan took it. And the meme blew up. But i feel a little bit deceiving for it. The truth is, it wasn’t such a simple interaction. After Carl went “ARE YOU SERIOUS?” He started talking about how Hitler’s rise to power depended on blaming a specific group of people and promising to eliminate them from our society. He talked about the rise of fascism when the establishment fell apart, hitler manipulating, blah blah blah. He even said some stuff about the language they use. It seems like he really did his research honestly.
So, there you have it. I don’t agree with Carl. But he DID explain his reasoning. I figured people would realize this considering the video is only 4 seconds long (not nearly enough time to explain his reasoning). So yeah. Can you please stop bullying this kid? He may not support the same candidate as you do but to harass this kid for being an arrogant liberal is just dishonest. Instead of attacking him with ad hominem, we should actually focus on addressing his arguments. Otherwise we look like a bunch of insecure rednecks who will focus on attacking a person rather than their reasoning (ironically, everything we supposedly stand against)
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Hey guys, I’m the person who originally recorded the video of “Carl”. I have to say, I didn’t expect it to blow up like this. And now that it did, I feel a bit bad about it. let me explain...
Firstly, let me start by saying that when I uploaded the video, I knew it would piss you guys off because it portrayed “Carl” as exactly what so many of you hate: An arrogant, stuck up liberal who thinks his opinion is superior to yours even though he can’t even defend it. A “SJW” who depends on feels and not facts, and will yell whenever his opinion is challenged.
Well, it seems that’s exactly how so many people on 4chan took it. And the meme blew up. But i feel a little bit deceiving for it. The truth is, it wasn’t such a simple interaction. After Carl went “ARE YOU SERIOUS?” He started talking about how Hitler’s rise to power depended on blaming a specific group of people and promising to eliminate them from our society. He talked about the rise of fascism when the establishment fell apart, hitler manipulating, blah blah blah. He even said some stuff about the language they use. It seems like he really did his research honestly.
So, there you have it. I don’t agree with Carl. But he DID explain his reasoning. I figured people would realize this considering the video is only 4 seconds long (not nearly enough time to explain his reasoning). So yeah. Can you please stop bullying this kid? He may not support the same candidate as you do but to harass this kid for being an arrogant liberal is just dishonest. Instead of attacking him with ad hominem, we should actually focus on addressing his arguments. Otherwise we look like a bunch of insecure rednecks who will focus on attacking a person rather than their reasoning (ironically, everything we supposedly stand against)
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I honestly never saw the video and I've only seen the memes. Can anyone fill in for me?
what are the whitest and least white states in america?
White: Alaska
Non: Cali
You could always look it up
>>67821126
>alaska 66% white
MFW
In honor of Italy's unification 145 years ago today, I'm asking you /pol/, where in Italy are the real Italians, as opposed to Austrian/French/Spanish/Greek/Arab rapebabies?
You mean the Nordic Ancient Romans, or the mixed Germanic renaissance Italians?
>>67820641
North of Rome
Stupid fucking question. Totally different cultures in..Sicily and up near Austrian border.
The whole place sucks at this point, it's infested with shitskins.
Why are there so many Donald Trump supporters on /pol/ who basically just want to watch the world burn, and sort of basically admit they just like the controversy he causes? The same type of people that want a race war, ww3, kill all muslims, etc. Are they just immature little kids who have nothing to lose because they don't have wives or kids, and have given up on the world?
Yes.
I doubt any of them actually care about his policies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoTwxckzErI
The country deserves to go down in flames, and Trump is just the man to ignite it.
America said no to income equality. America said no to universal healthcare. America said no to social programs elevating the disenfranchised if they don't disproportionately benefit women and minorities. America said no to taking back the country from the ultra-rich elite.
America could have felt the Bern. Now it will only feel the burn.
Latest polls show Trump with a comfortable lead in Arizona
I havent seen any polls from Utah but my guess is that Cruz will easily win it. So far Mormons in Nevada and Idaho have reliably voted for Cruz. Not to mention Mitts influence in the area.
If Trump could somehow win Utah it would be huge symbolic victory although it doesnt matter much delegate wise and Arizona is worth more
>>67819803
Is it winner take all?
>>67819803
Is Utah winner take all? If not, it doesn't matter. In order to get the remaining delegates, he needs to win a lot of WTA states.
>>67820189
Yes
>>67820210
Winner take most, Trump just needs to close to Cruz
I demand a /pol/ version of this for Trump.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7iVsdRbhnc
>>67819747
>Brazil
>gibs me dat
Ask nicely you fucking ape.
>>67819747
https://youtu.be/ldnH5ms50Jc
>>67821107
10/10, how I missed that.
Did you like Trump before his run for presidency?
>>67819434
I didn't really think about him at all until this moment
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/08/06/trump_i_will_not_pledge_to_endorse_republican_nominee.html
and from then I LOVED him.
He's no party loyalty. He is his own man, not a shill.
>>67819434
No, not at all. I had a time when I watched a few eps of The Apprentice and I thought Trump was the most arrogant, ill mannered, egocentric prick in America.
I have changed my opinion. He would be an excellent president in addition to the above.
>>67819434
Only saw him for the WWE battle of the billionaire and some videos about his feud against Rosie O'Donnell. Seemed like a based guy calling degenerates degenerates. But that was it. I have learn about the Apprentice only after his announcement. Read the Art of the Deal in October and have been a Trump shill doing it for free since then.
Trump isn't particularly well known in France.
What does /pol/ think of Libertarianism? Are you Libertarian?
>>67819064
No, I am kinda sleepy tho
>>67819064
I am, personally.
The real "want government out of my private life" kind, not the "Republicans that started using the word in 09" kind.
>>67819064
Cool in theory, shit in practice.
Sales taxes are fucking stupid.
How much of this is bullshit?
>>67818824
I too would like to know.
I think it's true. The guy lies effortlessly and without shame.
>>67818824
4. Not when you compare it to China's army
5. Obamacare isn't even in full effect yet, lol
6. Same thing
7. It could've been waaay better
Rest are lies indeed
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/11/25/digital-shorts-blackface-dutch-holiday-roger-ross-williams-orig.cnn
> Is Black Pete racist?
Irrelevant. It's part of our culture and anyone who dislikes it can fuck right off.
HOL UP
WHAT U SAYIN IS
WE DUTCH N SHIT?
>>67818744
the real question, are witches anti-semitic?
