Maybe /pol/ can help me out with this one.
You guys see this shit everywhere and it's a recent phenomenon. Not too recent, but it I believe it started when selfies became more popular.
Is this an evolutionary tactic employed by women to accentuate features like child-rearing hips and lumbar back curves to better chances of reproduction?
Islamic Communism
It's slimming. Turn to the side concealing the lack of shape in your torso. Place hand on hip high up to suggest an inward curve. The arm going out creates the illusion of a larger gap between arms and sides.
Women are in a constant state of image management. Look up double chin hiding techniques or "how to look good in pictures".
They're obsessed.
>>80615436
Care to elaborate, britbong?
![102774263-pope-francis.530x298[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/xoQMbhy.jpg "102774263-pope-francis.530x298[1]")
Is he also a globalist plant?
Did Soros pay the papacy to force Benedict to resign?
Last true pope...
They're trying to raise the anti Christ.
>>80614741
>Did Soros pay the papacy to force Benedict to resign?
what the fuck would some jew have that the papacy would need? money? no, lol.
>>80614741
The media has shown all sort of weird shit about this pope, things that don't make sense and no one can explain
and a lot of criminal shit
one can only wonder
what the fuck
Am I the only one who completely loses it when I realize we dug up a thousand year-old Egyptian god of Darkness as some sort of supernatural Internet deity? I mean, imagine future humans in the 23rd Century studying ancient Egypt—with collections of every reference ever written about Egyptian deities—and stumbling upon this unholy website. I mean, the guy will have to browse through all these Kek threads, endless banter and memes, trying to decipher what "OP", "newfag", "boipucci", "kek wills it", "rare pepe" or "4u" means, all hosted on a Mongolian death worm sightings website.
To think about the terabytes of information and data allocated to the existence of this unholy monstrosity, forever floating on the chans and darkest corners of the Internet until the Universe dies.
Fucking hell.
>>80614714
Mooslems will blow up everything before the 22th century
>>80614714
He is a God of chaos, he literally does it for the lulz.
>>80615305
kek > allah
Question time /pol/
When you guys saw Natalya Poklonskaya, you fell in love with her because
a) She's pretty and
b) She's right wing
So I ask you now, why is nobody on here worshipping Marion Maréchal LePen as you damn well should?
She's young, beautiful and the embodiment of what /pol believes in for France.
>>80614022
>b) She's right wing
She's better than that.
>>80614022
We do though you dumb roach
>>80614022
agree she should be the Queen of /pol/
So my ex just posted an atricle titled: ''what sharia law means to me''. Its propoganda about a muslim refugee woman who supposidly returned 150 k euros she found because of sharia.
http://m.dailylife.com.au/news-and-views/dl-culture/i-follow-shariah-this-is-what-it-really-means-to-me-20160707-gq143i.html
I need repdpil material about sharia law for normies. Especially the video of kids getting hands choped of. Also, when leftists say that every thing that they dont like about islam is not real islam how do i prove to them that yes, this is actually real islam? Considering they cant into logic or facts.
>>80613768
this picture is all she needs to know about islam
>>80613768
ask her why you need a legal system to enforce good behavior. If Islam is the religion of peace shouldn't people voluntarily want to return the money vs being legally obligated?
Don't even try to give them facts, they'll just put up the usual mental blockade to things that go against their tolerant world delusion.
Who to blame for the end and the wars as a result?
>>80613761
The Jews
>>80613761
AJBAP И ЋEBAПИ!
>>80613761
What painting is that? Looks pretty fucking rad
Are chinks even human at all?
>>80605546
I just wish they would slaughter them first. The consumption of any animal does not upset me as long as they don't suffer
I just wonder why do some people have the energy to browse subhuman clips and pics from China to post them on /pol/ so often
Should use it on something more productive.
It isn't just the Chinese, Vietnam and South Korea are shitpits when it comes to animal rights as well.
NEVER cave into curiosity and look to see how depraved east Asian slaughterhouses are... They're worse than anything you could ever imagine.
does anyone have the original?
Why? Soros is right there.
>>80613665
When exactly did Garrison go full /pol/ like this?
Bump for original.
Why niggers are fucking dirty niggers?
At least nigger stand together.
That whiteboi get had amazing friends, not a single one even moved. By the time a black guy hit the ground the friends would be pounding that guy blue black.
Menwhile that white numale fuckboy had a NEON GREEN GIRL DEFEND HIM
>>80613709
These friends.
Just a heads up, he's getting tried as an adult
http://thecabin.net/news/2016-06-27/conway-teen-charged-battery#.V3UFnbgrKUl
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-racist-examples_us_56d47177e4b03260bf777e83
So, any thoughts on this?
>>80613508
>pic not related
>>80613508
>No Archive
>Feeding the (((Buzz)))
No.
>>80613508
>huffpo
So this old witch is due to become the PM. Doesn't it bother anyone that in her role as Home Secretary she refused to join investigations on child abuse rings, especially those relating to Prince Andrew, and that thousands of documents containing info of witnesses was 'accidentally' deleted?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/356693/Fears-of-child-sex-abuse-cover-up-as-Theresa-May-rejects-calls-for-super-inquiry
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/government-investigators-apologize-deleting-evidence-paedophile-ring/
Also, does anyone have the Pedowood info and links? Seen it posted a lot.
>>80613486
SHARIA
Two steps forward, one step back.
>>80613486
What do you think you fucking faggot?!
What concerns me more is that there will still be cucked Whites who allow it.
>>80613486
>4chan and anime are about to be illegal in the UK
lel
good riddance
Justify nationalism to me.
Nationalism is the epitome of diversity.
Multiculturalism/Globalization is going to led to a world where there is no longer any diversity whatsoever.
If things keep going the way they're going now, within a few hundred years there wont be much difference between any races, diversity will be destroyed.
Ironic huh?
>>80613453
Fuck you leaf.
people are hard wired to be tribal
WWIII when?
LE SOON LE MY LE BROTHER
>Ireland
>participating in a world war
LMAO100%LOLLOLOLOLOLOL100%100%EMOJI
>>80613441
OP, thank you for not including Vietnam on red like 90% of these threads.
However, Vietnam will be blue, they hate China and allow the US Navy to use their ports.
4chan
>this kills the poo w/o loo
>>80613275
invading germany
The measure of anyone claiming intellectual superiority is having an ability to weigh and evaluate all sides of an issue without bias. Hence, you cannot claim intellectual superiority and thereby racial superiority if you do not at least adequately consider an opposing view.
EVEN WHEN FACTS ARE PLAINLY EVIDENT, one must consider the view of the common layperson who may be ill-informed. That is, you cannot argue that the speed of light is constant to a person who is lacking in the subject matter by no fault of their own. Left only to their own intuition, the average person might incorrectly assume that the light emitting from a car's headlamps must also sum the velocity of said car. It's easy for a person learned in basic science to smugly berate a person for this false assumption. But where lies the responsibility of the learned if only to disparage others for their lacking? Unless you are contented in your blatant and utter hypocrisy.
That said, consider the following video
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUr3ZBeosx4
Are you, with your vastly superior intellect, able to REASON what the man in the video is saying? Or DO YOU LACK in your aptitude for reason? It doesn't matter if you disagree with this man or think he's wrong: You must at least have the intellectual capacity to understand his position. Even researchers are able to communicate effectively with dolphins and monkeys.
If not, you are not as intellectually superior as you might believe yourself.
>A further test of reason
Why meet views that oppose yours with vitriol and venom? Are you so unsure of yourself that you must take arms against anything that doesn't agree with you?
Let's say you use FACTS--statistical and scientific--to back your views. Facts, my friend, do not require your passionate discourse to be any less true. Your anger towards those who are lacking in facts is more a reflection of your inept reasoning than their ignorance. Ignorance is easy. Being able to be non-selfish and non self-serving with information while maintaining poise and character is what separates the noble from the savage.
For example, Bill Nye was able to debate Ken Ham without disparaging him for his differences of views. There is nothing to gain for someone of scientific merit such as Nye to do so, and in many cases, might cause the opposing view to gain favor for your lack of calm and diction.
>>80613238
>>80613803
>Your use of facts in arguments doesn't make your point true. Just because someone is ignorant of the true facts doesn't make them any less wrong. It is your responsibility to understand and credit the idiot you are arguing withs ad hominems and half truths. You must accept them as fact because they're real in their mind.
Blm plz go.
>>80614194
This was not test of "right" verses "wrong".
Nor was it even a call for compassion.
It was a test to challenge your aptitude for reason; i.e., do you at least even comprehend the position of the author of the video.
I even gave Bill Nye's historical debate with Ken Ham as an example. I didn't even suggest if either side was "right" or "wrong".
So I will ask you again and give you this chance to either accept or deny my test for reason: Do you at least understand this man's position. It is a simple "yes" or "no" question, if that helps; although an elaboration is implied and would be most appreciated.
