I say Webb for Vice President and Mattis as his Secretary of Defense. I am unsure of the rest to be honest
>>72250337
Ron Paul
>>72250562
Too many shortcomings.
>>72250337
If he announces Webb after he gets the nomination he will shit on Hillary even harder in the GE
Mods, I know it is not typical of 4chan to ban words. But there is one slur that has caused so much damage that we believe it should finally be banned. I'm talking, of course, about the term "potato nigger". Two words which by themselves can be harmless but which together form a verbal missile of hate. I propose that we finally put an end to this by taking action and banning those who use it. If this seems rash then the alternative would be perhaps to filter it out like has been done previously with "cuck", "nigger", etc.
>>72250306
>implying words get filtered on 4chan because of offensiveness
HAH.
HAHAH. Fucking potato nigger doesn't know how this shit works.
>>72250306
Go away snake nigger
>>72250649
You tell him, burger nigger.
Where were you when you realized women in the Western world are utterly useless subhumans?
http://simplyoloni.com/the-hoe-stories-everyone-on-twitter-was-talking-about/
>Flag
>thinks women are useless subhumans
I agree brother!
>>72250228
>bandwidth limit exceeded
What is it
What's the best way to argue against transgender """people"""?
>>>/fa/11221848
>>>/fa/11222304
I keep getting the same shitty argument.
Just admit that you're wrong.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754583/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7477289 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21618223 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10843193
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11826131
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15724806
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16140461
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870186
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765230
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18056697
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18980961
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18962445
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19341803
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20562024
http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/8/1900.abstract http://www.eje-online.org/content/155/suppl_1/S107
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v378/n6552/abs/378068a0.html http://press.endocrine.org/doi/full/10.1210/jcem.85.5.6564
>>72250363
>first article I look at
>Sexual differentiation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in humans may extend into adulthood.
Wow it's literally nothing. Nice copy and paste moron
>>72250212
>doesn't know why he is right
>can't use arguments
>still thinks he is correct because that's what pol told him
>ask them to argue for him
sheeplet like you are more disgusting than trannies
LMFAO - Official Brexit campaign is using Ted Cruz on their adverts.
KEK
Based Cruz.
Make Britain Christian again!
I don't understand the obsession with trade deals
Is your trade goods deficit not high enough already?
>>72251051
being able to *potentially* make our own trade deals is LITERALLY the only argument brexiters have
>Thoughts sweet /pol/
>>72249914
When we elect Trump and become bros with Russia again.
>>72249914
>HERO
>When will this CIA asset return to the US?
FTFY
>>72249914
Never the NSA wouldn't like it.
>YOU MAY ONLY POST IN THIS THREAD IF YOUR COUNTRY DOES NOT ALLOW TWO MEN TO MARRY EACH OTHER
That's what I thought so too
What a backwards way of thinking. I hope Sweden invades you soon.
>>72250117
t. rainbow whitehouse
Should white Africans leave their homes and go back to Europe?
The same question applies to everyone whose ancestors immigrated to a new country.
No, of course not.
>>72249087
just the pretty ones
Of course
Dismiss this faggot >>72249204
90% of terrible posts are made by leafcucks
What is the final solution to the leafcuck problem?
>>72248976
Surround Alberta and Saskatchewan with a wall.
Burn the rest.
>>72249129
Fuck you, you god dam prairie dog fucker.
Ban all non Canadian IPs
What is going on with him lately?
>Last month, the Republican presidential front-runner made news when he told the Washington Post that he'd push to “get rid of the $19 trillion” national debt “fairly quickly,” estimating the effort could be completed “over a period of eight years.”
>But in an interview with Fortune published April 21, Trump seemed to walk it back, rejecting the idea of eliminating the national debt within 10 years.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-04-22/trump-makes-dramatic-turnaround-on-eliminating-national-debt
Has he been baiting all this time? He seems to backtrack on a lot of things lately.
>>72249617
I agree! I was on board with Trump since day one, but after seeing this Bloomberg article, I'm afraid I just cannot stay with Trump any longer.
I'm now a #cruzmissile, and if you were smart, you'd be, too!
Anders missed you unfortunately.
Breifist.
Republicans screw up everything and the subsequent democratic president has to clean up the mess. They have 1 motive: low tax for the rich.
Prove me wrong, /pol. Protip: you can't.
>>72248499
Sounds about right. All they care about is starve the beast and getting the rich richer.
>>72248499
Presidents don't do shit. It's all Congress.
You can vote for the red authoritarian or the blue authoritarian.
Us bongs are more fortunate. We can vote for the orange authoritarians instead.
>There is a large percentage of Americans, of all ages, who cannot run a mile without stopping, even at a light jog pace.
I come from a background of competitive track and cross country running, so maybe my views about this are a little skewed, but does anyone else find this sad?
>>72248215
>The population works sedintary jobs.
>Everyone owns a car.
>Public transit is deemed for poorfags and a part of the socialist revolution.
>Burger is #1 diet
Hardly surprising.
I'd say so, but it's not just in America, but they're probably the worst off.
>>72248430
Not surprising, sure, but still saddening.
Should vaping be banned? Regulated? Encouraged?
Banned. It is degenerate.
Tobacco and alcohol should be banned as well.
Any kind of drug should be banned.
Homosexuality and sex for the explicit purpose of pleasure should be banned.
Pornography should be banned.
>>72248312
This
>>72248312
Because banning substances works so well, right?
Where there is demand there will be supply. This is factual.
Aussies, what do you think of this?
>Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth told ABC's Lateline the closure of the Manus Island facility was the "beginning of the end" of Australia's policy on asylum seekers.
>"Australian policy has basically been to make life so miserable for the asylum seekers in Manus and Nauru that they ultimately just go back home," he said.
>"Ostensibly there is a right to asylum, ostensibly they can seek refuge in these islands."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-27/png-pm-oneill-to-shut-manus-island-detention-centre/7364414
>>72248165
no no no NO NO NO
>Australian policy has basically been to make life so miserable for the asylum seekers in Manus and Nauru that they ultimately just go back home
GOOD
>>72248165
It's about time. The detention centers are inhumane and a legacy of that fuckturd Philip Ruddock and his desire to torture little kids in order to get votes in the west of Sydney.
Australia helps to fuck up other parts of the world and has an obligation to take care of some of those people. This has been basic Liberal party policy since Fraser decided Australia was obliged to take in plenty of Vietnamese boatpeople.
I mean I just don't get it, haven't they learned from our mistakes? We opened immigration for shitskins in the 1960s and 50 years later we've gone from 85% white to 63%.
"Academics" from an EU-funded (see funding: http://globalgovernanceprogramme.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/factsheet_GGP2016.pdf) organisation admit that the breakdown on the nuclear family (aka feminism) is the reason we "need" mass immigration:
>We need to acknowledge that there is a structural demand for migrant workers in certain occupations that is related to factors such as long-term demographic changes (the ageing of European societies), the configuration of nuclear families without extended support networks to cover for the care of children and elderly/disabled people, and the participation of women in paid work outside the home
I hate how they're just like: "Yep, we fucked up, and Europe is dying, so now we need mass immigration to cure our fuck up. Oh, and if you're against mass immigration, you're an evil racist. It's happening, whether you like it or not."
Scumpigs.
AND THESE PEOPLE ARE FUNDED BY YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY, EUROPOORS. YOU GIVE THESE SOCIOLOGIST LEFTY TWATS THEIR WAGE, SO THAT THEY CAN ARGUE THAT YOU NEED TO BE MADE A MINORITY.
http://www.euractiv.com/section/social-europe-jobs/opinion/europe-needs-low-skilled-migrant-workers-too/
>>72247647
And the old fuckers will get abused and or killed in their nursing homes happens everytime.
all it really means is they want lower wages for the current low skilled workers
More demand would just mean that the low skilled workers would get paid more. And we can't possibly have higher wages now can we goy?
Brown people do not have the empathy required to care for the elderly.
