Is it true that the pendulum swings in favour of men when they reach their late 20s/30s? Ie you have the upper hand on girls, easier to fuck young sluts, you become more attractive, more respect.
Or is this something bitter manchild who were unsuccessful when they were young hold on to?
>>73028321
O shit waddup‼️‼️
>>73028321
It's true, largely because you start thinking a bit more clearly about what's important in life (it ultimately isn't sleeping with that hottie over at the bar), which gives you more confidence, and makes them more interested in you because you're slightly less obtainable.
Additionally, you progress further in your career and acquire more wealth and prestige, which are natural aphrodisiacs and make you more attractive.
Physically, provided he keeps himself in shape, a man's looks peak around 35 too.
>>73028321
What comes around, goes around
Lefties know their time is up and their round has come and gone, We are living in the rise of the right wing nationalists in most Western Countries
Never forget when /pol/ got BTFO http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_h9qx8CLc3Q
I remember this. Did the sheboon ever get arrested?
I know she started a gofundme that /pol/ got shut down.
>>73028164
>Jew girl beat by black girl
>Somehow pol is btfo
Never understood this logic. Thought /pol was mostly antijew.
ITT: Say one nice thing about the country above you, and follow it up with one thing to trigger them.
Greatest country god gave man on earth
President Hillary Clinton
>>73028177
Amazing burgers
>>73028177
fuck you, that was my idea
>>73028043
He was okay. Not really good or great.
Some would even call him bad for his strengthening of the government.
>>73028043
Do you like the massive welfare state? Do you enjoy your money going to support single nigger mothers having 8 kids? If so then he is the man for you
>>73028043
He was a great wartime president
Put him a decade before, or later and it would be a different story
Soooo Reddit on suicide watch or ?
It is litetally not impossible for him to get the nomination.
>>73028026
you illiterate kek?
>>73027937
Nah. They're just as hopeful as the rest of us to see Shillary is running her campaign from a jail cell. They've got the razor against their wrist, but none of them are giving up until the FBI announces they've been cucked hard.
I think I've proven racism as an idea using formal logic. I want /pol/'s opinion and critique.
First I should define what I mean by racism. What I mean by "racism" in the context of this post is that some races are inherently less capable than others.
Now I will begin my argument.
1. The races have different physical characteristics.
This is obvious. We have different skin colors, facial features, hair, skull structure, etc.
2. The races share common physical traits.
We know this also. Black people generally have dark brown skin, and their tightly curled, fuzzy afro hair. White people share white skin, facial shape, etc.
3. The brain is a physical part of the body
We accept that the brain is a physical object. We can hold it.
4. The brain's capableness is a product of its physical structure.
We know this because we can see the effects of brain damage. The brains ability to perform is obviously related to its physical form.
5. Since (1. and 2.) the races have different shared physical characteristics; and (3.) the brain is a physical part of the body, it is reasonable to assume that the different races brains have different physical
structure.
6. Since we know that the brain's capableness is a product of its physical structure (4.), and we assume the races have physically different brains; it is reasonable to assume that the races have varying mental capabilities.
Help me refine this /pol/ Thanks fellas.
reposting with better formatting.
Bump for interest
>>73027934
I think I've proven racism as an idea using formal logic. I want /pol/'s opinion and critique.
First I should define what I mean by racism. What I mean by "racism" in the context of this post is that some races are inherently less capable than others.
Now I will begin my argument.
>1. The races have different physical characteristics.
This is obvious. We have different skin colors, facial features, hair, skull structure, etc.
>2. The races share common physical traits.
We know this also. Black people generally have dark brown skin, and their tightly curled, fuzzy afro hair. White people share white skin, facial shape, etc.
>3. The brain is a physical part of the body
We accept that the brain is a physical object. We can hold it.
>4. The brain's capableness is a product of its physical structure.
We know this because we can see the effects of brain damage. The brains ability to perform is obviously related to its physical form.
>5. Since (1. and 2.) the races have different shared physical characteristics; and (3.) the brain is a physical part of the body, it is reasonable to assume that the different races brains have different physical
structure.
>6. Since we know that the brain's capableness is a product of its physical structure (4.), and we assume the races have physically different brains; it is reasonable to assume that the races have varying mental capabilities.
If anyone fires off a nuke in this day and age it WILL be the end. It'll start a The Road(2009) type apocalypse.
>>73027847
Do they even still work?
>>73027847
I fired off a nuke in ur mum last night.
>>73027847
slide thread but ill bite
what do you mean in this day and age?
its been like this for 65years
Got into a facebook fight about lord trump. Can you help me refute his arguments? Please /pol/ please. I've got ideas but these are common leftyfag arguments to defeat
>Firstly, I'm not defending Hillary, so stuff your strawman back in the closet, and secondly, of course Trump hasn't done any of those things. And neither have I, or any of the other hundreds of millions of Americans who haven't been involved in making those decisions. "Not Hillary Clinton" is not a distinguishing qualification because it applies to literally everyone who is not Hillary Clinton. Vote for any one of those people instead of the demonstrably racist xenophobic misogynist.
>Note that I'm asserting in firm terms that being a racist, misogynistic xenophobe is bad for our Nation. These are most definitely attacks on the man's character. I will state unequivocally that a man of such character is not who I want commanding the armed forces (which, I'll remind you, I have a vested interest in having *fought* in one of the establishment's bullshit wars); a man of such poor character is not who I want nominating Supreme Court justices. A man lacking in moral character is not who I want owning the Bully Pulpit of the presidency, and a man who is demonstrably hotheaded and reactionary is not who I want commanding our nuclear arsenal.
>What's his plan for ISIS? "I will bomb the shot out of them." (His words, not mine).
>His plan for bringing back American jobs from China (because for some reason we want the low-level manufacturing jobs that we've been shipping overseas for decades) is to increase Chinese import tariffs from 1.4% to 45% -- what'll that do? Depress the world economy, depress the U.S. Economy (which depends heavily on cheap imports), and which would reverse the necessary trend of international cooperation in trade.
>cont
>His immigration policy? No Muslims, let's build a border wall (and somehow make Mexico pay for it). Again, actually things he has said, and not inferences.
>On education? He wants the federal government to get rid of the common core (not realizing that it's a state run standard apparently); let schools compete for students (reversing the century-long standard of educating all of our children, instead of just the ones schools want). Cut "tremendous" amounts of money from the department of education -- "but I won't be cutting services!" (Somehow).
>On the environment? Wants to eliminate the EPA.
>General science understanding? Again, He proposes cutting the EPA. "The concept of global warming was invented by the Chinese
>in order to make U.S. Manufacturing non-competitive." He's an anti-vaxxer. He says "It's very sad to see what Barrack Obama has done with NASA," (again missing critical information: that Congress sets the NASA budget).
>Health care? Abolish the ACA. Why? "It's terrible." His replacement? He'll keep the good parts, like prohibition on insurers denying coverage, but get rid of those mean 'ole parts that make that possible, like requiring everyone to buy insurance. He'd defund planned parenthood (a key component of any GOP platform), ignorant (or dismissive) of the fact that most of what planned parenthood does is reproductive health.
>On Supreme Court justices? Well, I’d probably appoint people that would look very seriously at her [Clinton's] email disaster" ... Apparently Ignorant (again) of the fact that Supreme Court justices don't investigate crimes.
>He's an ignorant blowhard. His only appealing characteristic is that he's a Washington outsider -- but that alone isn't enough.
>I honestly don't understand how you can come back to support the guy so frequently and so forcefully.
>Are you so busy looking at shitty leftist arguments that you're blind to the shit pouring out of the man's own mouth?
shameless bump
>first point
Not being Hillary isn't the qualification, not being corrupt is the qualification. A choice between a corrupt politician and a non corrupt one is an easy choice. Also all those buzzwords at the end
>second point
Opinion on a person's character is subjective. Again, buzzwords.
>Third point
What else are you going to do with Isis? They want dominance, not negotiations. So bomb them to the table.
Former Cruz supporters flocking to the Libertarian Party in droves.
Libertarian Party applications double overnight.
Austin Petersen experiences huge spike in web traffic and social media counts
Its happening.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/4/libertarian-party-woos-aghast-republicans-seeking-/
Finally!
>>73028001
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2016/05/libertarians-hope-that-nevertrump-and-neverhillary-give-them-a-boost.html/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/3/gary-johnson-targets-nevertrump-voters-after-ted-c/
http://wate.com/2016/05/04/libertarian-candidate-gary-johnson-tries-to-attract-republican-voters/
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/05/04/google-searches-libertarian-party-surge-following-trump-win/
http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/04/google-searches-for-libertarian-party-su
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robin-koerner/the-gop-goes-full-authori_b_9840686.html
Polls still open till 10
Make sure to vote either conservative or UKIP
If its a list vote, be sure to give one the first preference and the other the second preference
>Labour's private polling shows them on course for around 100 losses, source says.
>Source adds that losses will be in marginals like Nuneaton and Dudley, with wasted votes in strongholds.
>London Mayoral voting intention: Khan: 57% (-3) Goldsmith: 43% (+3) Incl. second prefs. (via YouGov / 02 - 04 May)
>>73083003
Voted Green
>>73083088
get in here you cucks
>muh bill of writes
I must have missed the part where having gigantic guns made solely for killing and shooting up churches is a """""right"""""
It's in the second amendment breh. You should read it.
>>73027324
Friendly reminder that the second amendment protected the right of traders to defend their cargo with cannons. If you'd like to argue that a gun is more dangerous than a broadside barrage of cannon fire be my guest
SHALL
This is deep
>>73027249
I agree, their head is deep up their ass.
Deep as the shallow end of the pool.
Nig nog thread
We don't have enough of these threads lately.
Why does every Trump supporter, and honestly all of his family, look like total fascists?
For example, policy advisor Stephen Miller speaks and looks like a fucking SS commander with his sharp and squinty eyes and his hardcore, borderline violent nationalism.
Campaign chief Paul Manafort looks like a godless mob boss and mass killer and frankly, a sociopath who takes pleasure in destroying people. He also has a history in extremely shady dealings.
Corey Lewandowski, Michelle Field's abuser, looks like a thug in a suit, someone who wouldn't be out of place as Adolf Hitler's aide de camp and personal hitman.
The list goes on and on. They all look and talk like a bunch of absolute nazis.
Keep in mind that after every rally, Trump poses with police officers for pictures and was even seen with SWAT teams. He has gone to great lengths to get the police on his side, as every fascist does. I wonder why he would love a police state... hmmmm...
Is this the kind of nasty people we want running our great country? How can libertarian conservative /pol/ support such an authoritarian, violent, fascist candidate?
Be careful!
>>73027159
Why does _______
Look like _________?
I mean cmon they're all _______
> liberal shill script
>>73027159
It's real in your mind, friend.
How do you feel that your "populist" candidate sold out. Not only that but he plans on vetting "Cruz" for VP as well. So much for being an "outsider." What a joke I knew it was too good to be true. Only a matter of time before Sanders sells out as well
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/breaking-donald-trump-just-named-his-running-mate
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/05/04/ted-cruz-donor-toby-neugebauer-backs-donald-trump/83937626/
>>73027113
How do you feel about working for Crooked Hillary?
Sanders has been in Washington for 40 years, he's been a sellout for a long time.
>>73027113
Trump knows he doesn't need the money they know he doesn't need the money. Trump doesn't have to make promises or keep any. But anyways I thought this was for the party or something? I don't feel like reading it because the point is moot but you sound like a faggot shill.
