>>2865819
then wait you stupid fuck

If they were really important to you you would have made a backup.

File: Snapchat-1553025395676617740.jpg (305 KB, 720x1280) Image search: [Google]

305 KB, 720x1280

>>2865819
recuva is amateur shitware

folklore has it that the ultimate solution is this little in house software called "Get Data Back" is miles ahead of the other stuff

>>2865892
Does the exact same shit as Recuva's deep scan (the one that takes hours). This is the brute-force method, that goes through each bit in the card, one by one, looking for a file. This is a complete algorithm, which means that it will successfully recover your data if it's still accessible by software.

Which means any other software can be faster, but not better (i.e. it recovers something Recuva can't).

Testdisk has saved me multiple times when I've deleted something I shouldn't have.

http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk

corrupted, lost all of a well filled 64g sd card from asia trip. pretty sad tbhfamily

>>2866158
>corrupted, lost all of a well filled 64g sd card from asia trip. pretty sad tbhfamily

digitally cucked, senpai.

>>2865892
OP here

Recuva ran for an hour but it got all the photos back.

Really glad about it.

>>2866164
inb4 filmfag cucked by the airport scanners

>>2866413

these dont do shit. dont spread myths, silly anon.

>>2865819
You need a comma in there, mate.

Did you "Mistakenly delete photos that I had taken"? or "Delete photos that I had taken by mistake?"

>>2866158
>>2866164
That shit makes me nervous. Sometimes I can avoid thinking about it but ither time traveling means I take some time out and immediately makena backup when I get back to my hotel or copy to phone then send to cloud

Also hate when I slightly miss focused because I was in a rush and didn't double take. Go away thinking the image preview was fine then see it at full res and realize I messed up. Blame myself yes I know