[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Old one is about to reach limit. Starting the thread with something
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography

Thread replies: 81
Thread images: 24
Old one is about to reach limit.
Starting the thread with something I have tried over the last week. Lots of us own the x100//S// but want to use Classic Chrome as a starting point for our RAWs. By using an EXIF editor I have been able to gain CC on my X100S. It seems very stable and super easy to use. Can this be done with the XPRO1/X100??
Results below.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:09 19:07:44
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width884
Image Height684
>>
>>2859791
By no means not using this images to showcase my work, just giving an idea of what Classic Chrome looks like on the x100S.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:09 19:15:39
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1863
Image Height541
>>
>>2859794

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:09 19:15:50
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1859
Image Height614
>>
>>2859794
>>2859806
So it shifts blues to cyan? Wow, Fuji is really genius.
>>
>>2859791
How does this work? What program do you use for applying the Classic Chrome filter?
>>
>>2859924
I'm changing the EXIF data before I import the files into Lightroom using exif editor, an app in the app store for macs. As far as Lightroom is aware I have imported files from an X100T
>>
File: Xpro1_classic_chrome.jpg (516 KB, 1086x869) Image search: [Google]
Xpro1_classic_chrome.jpg
516 KB, 1086x869
>>2859791
HOLY FUCK

I swear to god, I just managed to activate clasic chrome for the X-Pro1!

We did it!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:10 00:36:37
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1086
Image Height869
>>
>>2859970
Glad I could help breh!
So getting an xpro1 as back up to my xt1 now!
>>
>>2859970
for comparison: a non-converted file from the X-pro1. No CC in the filter menu.
>>
File: Xpro1_non_converted.jpg (536 KB, 1085x868) Image search: [Google]
Xpro1_non_converted.jpg
536 KB, 1085x868
>>2859975
welp, heres the image

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:10 00:42:24
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1085
Image Height868
>>
File: comp.jpg (729 KB, 1000x1334) Image search: [Google]
comp.jpg
729 KB, 1000x1334
Who the fuck needs an X-pro2 anymore :^)
/p/ just found a way to use Classic Chrome on older Fujis

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:06:10 01:07:18
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height1334
>>
File: DSCF0094s.jpg (342 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [Google]
DSCF0094s.jpg
342 KB, 1000x667
>>2859991
>exif related

never knew my X-Pro1 was an X100T in disguise :^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX100T
Camera SoftwareRAW FILE CONVERTER EX 2.0 powered by SILKYPIX 4.1.3.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016-06-10T01:10:12-22:00
Exposure Time1/6 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness-2.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length24.00 mm
Image Width1000
Image Height667
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: ClassicChrome.jpg (182 KB, 640x301) Image search: [Google]
ClassicChrome.jpg
182 KB, 640x301
So this is how I did it:

1: pic related- the exif mod using exiftool and cmd.
2: open the .RAF using Fujis own RAW converter (you can dl it from Fuji)
3: choose Classic Chrome in the Film Simulation profile box and save the whole thing as a 16-bit .tiff file (do not choose to delete the exif)
4: open the .tiff in Photoshop, LR.. whatever. It'll show the embedded profile in the settings - which is Classic Chrome.

Have fun!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:10 00:55:12
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width640
Image Height301
>>
File: classicchrome.jpg (78 KB, 425x615) Image search: [Google]
classicchrome.jpg
78 KB, 425x615
>>2859991
>>2859976
>>2859970
>HOLY FUCK YOU GUIZE I ACTIVATED CLASSIC CHROME WITH EVERY DIGITAL IMAGE SINCE THE DAWN OF TIMEEEE!!! XXXDDDD

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width425
Image Height615
>>
>>2860001
>curves

nigga please. I want the real deal™
>>
>>2860001
>Gimp
>photo editing
Terminate yourself instantaneously.

>>2859991
Wow! It's fucking nothing.
>>
What a great time to be alive.
Classic Chrome XPRO1 ftw.
>>
>>2860017
Yeaaah I know it's a rather bad example. I'll be uploading a few better comparisons tomorrow as it's kinda late over here right now.

But still - We finally have a way to use Classic Chrome on the X-Pro 1 and other Fujis using the first gen X-Trans sensor.
>>
>>2860022
Also worked for my Fuji x10 with its much smaller sensor I'll post some shots tomorrow.
Going to test my 5Diii next for banter.
>>
>>2860023
I told the EXIF it was the x30 that has it and it worked!
>>
File: X100SCHROME.jpg (459 KB, 1840x1145) Image search: [Google]
X100SCHROME.jpg
459 KB, 1840x1145
Great starting point. I am enjoying it on my X100S. I have no reason to update my x100S for a long time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:10 02:58:27
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1840
Image Height1145
>>
So sexy!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:10 03:11:41
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1207
Image Height591
>>
oh my god fuji is the greatest.
>>
>>2860018
hell yea dude! Fuji absolutely does everything right.
>>
>>2860080
>>2860072
My god fuji does colors better than any company. Other companies playing catch up at this point.
>>
>>2859794
>>2859806

Colors on fuji are better than leica and sony, so film like.
>>
come on, why are you guys doesn't using AdobeRGB?

This is how you really get some colors
>>
>>2859791

Is it possible to do with x10's RAF?
>>
>>2860116
Yes edit them to x30.
>>
>>2860116
Yes, it does work.
>>
>>2860017
>Terminate yourself instantaneously.

It's free.
It works.
It teaches me to edit, rather than encouraging me to be a slider monkey.
It doesn't require an internet connection.
It doesn't require constant updating.
It doesn't backdoor tracking software or adware onto my computer.
It doesn't run constantly in the background.
It doesn't shit up my computer with proprietary directories and sidecar files.

>what was your better alternative again?
>>
>>2860233
Not the anon you were responding to but,

Photoshop CS2. It's free now.
>>
>>2860000
I wish I wasn't so dense. I really can't get my head around exiftool. I tried downloading the GUI for it too but to no avail and other exif editors don't seem to let you edit the camera name.
>>
How is this any different to VSCO?
>>
>>2860380
Behind the scenes, it's the difference between putting salt and pepper on top of your food after it's been served, and changing the ingredients before putting it in the oven.

To and end user, no real difference, other than the specific look you get in the end.
>>
>>2860381
????

No it's not, they're both just LUT filters that are applied to your shot.
>>
>>2860383
VSCO moves your sliders and adjusts your levels, and plots your curves, on top of a base image that isn't changed.
Setting a VSCO preset, and then going back and zeroing all your settings takes you back to neutral.

Camera Calibration settings adjust how the raw data is interpreted, leaving all your sliders and curves at 0.

Meaning that if you set a high contrast calibration, you have less available contrast to pull back on with your contrast slider, for instance, whereas with a vsco filter, it doesn't adjust what's available to you in processing, and you can just pull back the slider from where VSCO put it.
>>
>>2860385
Which makes VSCO better, really.
>>
>>2860144
>>2860229


just change x10 to x30 in exif?
>>
all this false flag fujishill bullshit itt

op you are retarded

people have been fiddling with exif for ages
you didn't discover shit
you're just slow

or you're just another retarded sony troll
>>
>>2860388
Why do you say that?
>>
>>2860394
I've clearly helped a few people out here. Sorry I don't spend all my time fiddling with Tec I enjoy taking photos.

>>2860105
Well they did make film for years.
>>
edit exif on windows: impossible task...
>>
>>2860391
Only editing the camera model name doesn't do it. You also have to change the 'UniqueCameraModel", which is a bit more difficult. The UCM is the indicator Photoshop/Lightroom etc uses to understand what camera the image is coming from and what exact sort of camera profile will be needed.
>>
>>2860391
Yes.
>>
FUJI for the win!!!!
>>
>>2860385
All VSCO presets include calibration profiles which work the same was as the Fuji ones, only it also has adjustments on top of that.
>>
>>2860659
>All VSCO presets include calibration profiles which work the same was as the Fuji ones, only it also has adjustments on top of that.
No, they don't. If you apply a VSCO preset, all that happens is your sliders move, and your tone curve is adjusted. You're welcome to try it on your own to see.
>>
>>2860612
Ok,I will try it
>>
>>2860663
>I didn't install VSCO correctly
Let me take a screenshot from my comp
>>
File: vsco-profiles.jpg (214 KB, 321x1080) Image search: [Google]
vsco-profiles.jpg
214 KB, 321x1080
>>2860680
>>2860663
You don't know what you've been missing out on, fiend. I'd be happy to help you install the software the right way. (But google should help)
>>
>>2860688
Huh. I will admit I straight up forgot that was part of it. I got so tired of trying to scroll through them all that I uninstalled them. I was merely talking about the presets, and I was mistaken.

Do they do anything differently than the presets you get on the left? Should a user be doing both, in order to get the "total look" of the film they're emulating? For instance, will the TriX preset look more like TriX film if you also use the TriX calibration?
>>
>>2860696
When you select a preset, lightroom automatically selects the matching profile. It's an under the hood thing that you never have to touch if you don't want.

And the answer is yes - and no. Each set of profiles is made for one specific camera, which is why there's a limited number of "supported" cameras. Using the profile will bring you 99% closer to VSCO's intended image, but whether or not that actually looks like Tri-X is a different story, and one I don't care to delve into on the internet - just try them yourself.
>>
>>2860627
subtle
>>
Another x100s classic chrome.
Colour balance does not seem to work as well with the camera's auto once you use the side loaded profiles. I am finding I need to either set it myself or use the auto on the computer.

Very happy with the images.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:11 16:15:04
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1865
Image Height625
>>
Anyone know of an easy way to edit exif data? I'm stupid and can't do it.

I was hoping there was a way to use CC on the x100. Halp
>>
>>2861151
What OS do you run? I can only help on OSX.
>>
>>2861152
Vista on a shitty laptop, I sort of glaze over when it comes to comand line stuff.
>>2860376
This was also me, tried watching videos and tutorials on exiftool but still couldn't get it even running.

If exiftool is the only way then so be it but all I want to do is add a t.
>>
File: untitled-1-4.jpg (395 KB, 1280x853) Image search: [Google]
untitled-1-4.jpg
395 KB, 1280x853
Using manual lenses on the XT1 has been a dream, this made a great A4 print even at ISO 6400 and it is very sharp!
Pentax SMC 50MM F1.7 @ 1.7

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:06:13 03:48:38
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating6400
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness-8.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeAverage
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
To the anon who was saying you're hearing a noise on your XPro2 and 90mm:

I can't find your comment anymore, but the 90mm's focus system makes a bit of noise at all times when the camera is on. I remember you saying it only happened with the OVF and in bright light, and I don't know that that would be the case for the AF sound, but it's a possibility that that's what it is. Most of the more recent lenses they've come out with have the noise.
>>
File: untitled-1.jpg (545 KB, 1280x853) Image search: [Google]
untitled-1.jpg
545 KB, 1280x853
>>2862490
Another test shot of the XT1 + Pentax SMC 50MM F1.7 @ 1.7

I'm very happy with the sharpness of this lens for portraits. I really like its rendering too.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:06:14 17:05:31
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness-0.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
XT1+Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm 2.4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1920
Image Height1280
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:06:15 03:44:33
Exposure Time1/180 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness-7.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1920
Image Height1280
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2859942
>>2859924
>>2859970
There were a couple of batch converters going around to achieve this a while back; I don't think I have it anymore since I got an X100T and XP-2 but if I find them I'll put them on mega or something if people want.
>>
>>2860233
>what was your better alternative again?
Photoshop CC
>>
File: untitled-1-7.jpg (290 KB, 1280x853) Image search: [Google]
untitled-1-7.jpg
290 KB, 1280x853
XT1 + Helios 44m 2/58 @f2
Fucking love this lens, came today.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)87 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:06:15 17:51:21
Exposure Time1/6400 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness7.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length58.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: untitled-1-9.jpg (505 KB, 1280x960) Image search: [Google]
untitled-1-9.jpg
505 KB, 1280x960
>>2863890
XT1 + Helios 44m 2/58 @f2
I kinda both love and hate the Bokeh at the same time. I enjoy using this lens, It's pretty much a 90mm f2.8 in fullframe terms. Really light too, like 250g.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)87 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:06:15 19:35:00
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness5.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length58.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: untitled-1-11.jpg (329 KB, 1280x853) Image search: [Google]
untitled-1-11.jpg
329 KB, 1280x853
>>2863891
>>2863890
XT1 + Helios 44m 2/58 @f2
On the XT1 it can focus really closely too.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)87 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:06:15 19:49:29
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness4.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length58.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: untitled-1-10.jpg (288 KB, 1280x853) Image search: [Google]
untitled-1-10.jpg
288 KB, 1280x853
>>2863893
XT1 + Helios 44m 2/58 @f2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:06:15 19:49:14
Exposure Time1/180 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness1.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2863890
Which adapter do you use?
>>
>>2863895
would this lens on a full frame allow for a more intense swirl effect cuz your bokeh is not that swirly (no offense)
>>
File: DSCF0332s.jpg (313 KB, 930x630) Image search: [Google]
DSCF0332s.jpg
313 KB, 930x630
>>2861155
you have to remove the '(-k)' from the exiftool name to make it run-able. Once you have done that, open CMD and use this line:

>C:\Users\YOUR PC\WHATEVER FOLDER EXIFTOOL LIES IN\exiftool-10.19\exiftool.exe -exif:UniqueCameraModel="FujifilmX100T" -model="X100T" \Users\YOUR PC\WHATEVER FOLDER YOUR IMAGE LIES IN\YOURFILE.RAF

Feel free to ask if you need more help.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-Pro1
Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-Pro1 Ver3.30
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016-06-16T00:15:59-22:00
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness-3.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width930
Image Height630
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2864013
Cheap M42 to Fuji X on Amazon was like £12.

>>2864015
Yes it would have more Bokeh, also to get max swirl you put the subject dead middle, something I did not do. Also some copies have more swirl than others I have read. Not sure how accurate that is.
>>
>>2864019
Thanks, I'll give it a try. Got a week off work so got more time now.

When I was a kid computers looked like pic related and our school didn't have one (or if it did I never saw it).

>10 PRINT "i am a retard"
>20 GOTO 10
>RUN
>>
File: ibm.jpg (120 KB, 667x482) Image search: [Google]
ibm.jpg
120 KB, 667x482
>>2864333
Did I mention I'm a retard?
Forgot pic
>>
Newfag here, why should I buy the fuji x70 over the ricoh GR (I)? I'm leaning towards the fuji for the tilting screen, as I don't really see that big of a difference between image quality.

Any crucial differences I should keep in mind?
>>
>>2864334
Both are great.
Are you sure you you can deal with not having a view finder? X100 used on ebey is cheap as fuck now days.
>>
File: 20160619_163224-1.jpg (481 KB, 2360x2119) Image search: [Google]
20160619_163224-1.jpg
481 KB, 2360x2119
My Fuji set up

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelLG-H815
Equipment MakeLG Electronics
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2360
White BalanceAuto
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.42 mm
Light SourceUnknown
Image OrientationUnknown
Metering ModeUnknown
Image Height2119
Image Created2016:06:19 16:32:24
Altitude0.00 m
>>
When Fuji lists the angle of view for the 27m f/2.8 as 55.5 degrees, are they referring to the diagonal, vertical, or horizontal?
>>
>>2864359
Late now, so you've probably already made a decision.
But fuji has no built in nd filter, gr does.
Fuji isn't as fast (to turn on etc.) to be ready to shoot as the gr. It doesn't have the capability to be as fast in shooting too as the gr has the snap focus ability if you think this ability might be useful.

Depends on how you want to use the camera. Discrete, quick ninja-like shots vs general point a a shoot snapshots etc. Gr is the former, x70 the later.

GR has the dust issue (not a meme), but the fuji isn't as pocket able with that fumbling lens cap etc.

Shoot raw only? Love monochrome? gr. Colors and jpg and general conveniences? (Wifi touch install printer etc), the fuji.
>>
Got my xt10 today!

Looking for a grip, but the Fuji one is like £90 fucking pounds. I would like something cheaper, but everything on amazon looks awful.

Also, need to get a decent lens, I missed out on the 23mm 1.4 by 15 quid on ebay.
>>
"I switched to mirrorless because it's a lot more compact and can fit in my pocket."
But srsly tho it's a great camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G850W
Camera SoftwareG850WVLU1BOD7
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4608
Image Height2592
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:25 18:06:23
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating40
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness4.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4608
Image Height2592
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDG16QLHF01SM
Thread replies: 81
Thread images: 24

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.