Doesn't /p/ like Fujica?

>>2841817
"P" doesn't like it when new friends make single question threads for pointless questions.
Delete this thread and ask in the film thread or gear thread.

>>2842621

No, I'll just keep posting new threads until someone answers. Thx.

>>2842621

lol, it's more likely that no one has much experience with Fujica. You don't see it recommended as much around here.

whichever one has the best lenses so not fuji

>>2841817
>mfw i thought this was a fuji x-t10

>>2842621
this desu.
>>2842625
You asked a really stupid and kind of pointless gear related question. You'll see why below.
>>2842626
I rarely see them here in the west. Also a bit more of a pain to find camera specs than other brands.
>>2842660
n i c e

So? What is the equivalent of the Pentax K1000? Whatever body has the same shutter speed/sync speed and minimal features you may require like a self timer, shutter release or light meter.
There's very little difference between 35mm SLR's and even rangefinders. If you shoot on manual, there's even less difference between them.
It's especially silly asking about M42 bodies and lens recommendations for a specific camera as you can just mount an M42 lens.

If you asked this in the gear thread, film general or stupid questions thread someone would have answered you. Ask in there and get the detailed answer you want or just fucking do your own research m8.

>>2842755

>imblyign the K1000 isn't known for being indestructible

I want the most robust Fujica funt, as for m42 lenses, I said I want fucking Fujica lens recommendations not m42 recommendations. I am well aware the Fujicas utiluze the m42 mount but I would like to know what good fucking Fujica lenses there are faggot.

>>2842765
Well buddy, you're in luck because >>>/google/ exists.
Get of your arse and do it yourself you fucking urine stenched mouthbreather.