>>2837644
Pentax K-1

>>2837644
>on those 2

every morning i get up and want to rub my parts on my d750 sensor

however i am too cucked to dirty my sensor

>>2837644
For what.
With what lenses.

>>2837644
If you're wondering, you probably don't need it.

>>2837644

my feelings say d750 all the way, but my mind says "what are you using it for?" because if you don't have fx glass the d7200 and d500 are great cameras. if you are going fx you should have nice glass, though the 50/1.8 is a great deal.

>>2837680
>want to rub my parts on my d750 sensor
to get the oil off?

>>2837741
How does the D7200 compare to the D7100? I've read reviews, and it looks like the D7200 isn't worth the extra $ unless you need the wifi stuff.

>>2837656
This unless you already have nikon FF glass.

>>2838009
I have the D7200. The Wifi stuff is pretty superb. In terms of performance there really isn't that much difference between it and the D7100.

its like fucking gear threads dont exist anymore

The differences to me are negligible in terms of image quality. Extra cross focus points and boost Iso, size, etc don't affect my shooting much. I LOVED the flip out screen for really low/ high shots because getting down on the ground or on a ladder is a pain sometimes.

They're both shit, get a Df. Not even memeing.

D750 is laggy and has no AF-ON button i.e. Its fucking shit

D610 is just shitty in general.

>inb4 D610 and Df have the same af system

It's true, you know what else it shares with another camera? The sensor in the 6.5k flagship D4