Hey /p/ is there any better way to align a wide angle shot other than rule of thirds? I'm not quite satisfied with this shot I took in National Cathedral it seems off somehow...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T3i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3456 Image Height 5184 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:22 20:42:04 Exposure Time 1 sec Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1500 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Its off because the perspective isn't symmetrical. You should have took the photo in the center of the aisle.
>>2822646
It costed $11 just to walk around a boring cathedral so I def also got pic in center of aisle.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T3i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 8532 Image Height 3252 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:23 20:06:47 Comment -&\#xd;&\#xa;Projection Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1500
>>2822644
Just wish you never cut the seats off at the bottom. Other than that good work anonster
>>2822644
wide angle is tricky, like >>2823397 said, the seats are kind of a leading line and cutting it off is a little disappointing.
for me rule of thirds was just a guideline for [ dont line photos up in the middle].
wide angle is meant to get up close, really close. but this photo was shot in 50mm, not too wide, thats more of a close up portrate lens, wide imo would be 35mm and smaller. since you are just trying to get everything inand document your visit with no real subject, this photo is just fine...
>pic related, wider angle, this picture is of a bonanza tree, was only a few inches away from the tree. singular small subject, unique angle, wide angle. like or hate the photo this is just imo how wide angles should be used, unless like i said, you are just trying to get everything in for documentation reasons...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7000 Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 40896 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:01:27 17:30:27 Exposure Time 1/4000 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1632 Image Height 2464 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Hard Saturation High Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 800 Image Quality FINE White Balance AUTO1 Focus Mode AF-S Flash Setting NORMAL Flash Compensation 42.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 800 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Lens Type Nikon D Series Lens Range 35.0 mm; f/1.8 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 39403
>>2823433
First pic was Canon FD 50mm and the second is a view from a spherical panorama. I love that bonanza pic it is tack sharp.
>>2823476
I did take 9 shots on my 50mm and then photomerged it for higher resolution tho so its technically a wider angle shot.
>>2822644
Sounds like you need a Tilt Shift Lens anon. I hope you've got a fuckton of savings.
>>2823915
nah all i need is some kinda manfrotto tripod thingy. Indoor panos are too hard to take a good nadir shot by eye but sometimes it works.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T3i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 8662 Image Height 3244 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:24 21:10:17 Comment -&\#xd;&\#xa;Projection Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000
>>2823356
>It costed $11 just to walk around a boring cathedral
isn't the church supposed to be a service for th people
the fuckkk - pic looks good though
>>2823433
allen gardens?
