do you like my photo
>stretch mark
>arm shadow
>awkward body positioning (belly button shows it)
Needs work to do what you want it to, photoshop or a change of lighting will hide the stretch mark. If it doesn't set a high expectation its not art.
>>2812408
i would like to be a underwear model,not photographer
>>2812402
Your bra doesn't fit.
>>2812416
>>/fit/
I need an underwear model.
I need a model's underwear
>>2812402
I can like the subject, meaning I like your tits and I'm assuming these are the subject
the pose (you holding your shirt with your mouth) is provocative enough too
I can't really see much of your legs and ass so I can't comment on how good you would be as an underwear model
the picture is good in that it makes you look attractive and audacious and stuff, but it's not a good picture if you look at the rest
as mentioned already, check >>>/fit/
>that arm shadow
>>2812493
Please don't get me wrong, but.. Yum.
If we were on /b/ right now I'd definitely ask you to take off your pants so we can see those nice round and juicy cheeks.
>>2812507
This has been posted like 100 times across 4chan man
>>2812408
>not liking stretchmarks
>>2812402
Shirts need to come down about an inch and a half the show your pelvic lines.
Pull bra down a bit to have it fit with the added benefit of popping your tits up another quarter inch.
Arch your back a bit to unfuck your stomach.
>>2812450
kek
what lens did you use?
>>2813229
leica 50/2 apo
got a pic without the bra?
can I get some critique?
>>2814108
Whay apreatue you use, the focus and bokeh look really nice. The colors seem real. The picture isn't that interesting or creative in my opinion. It looks like a generic shot for some social awareness campaign or something. Depending on your motives it ranges from tack on to way off the mark.
>>2814145
I like how you took the high road and didn't even mention her ass, good job.
>>2814108
Looks like a photo a creep would take.
>>2814108
How a girl so hot have such a shitty phone, is this brazil or romania or somewjere like that
>>2814173
Too much behind subject. More than about 60 degress of front is usually where i start to call it 'peoples backs' unless I expect them to turn.
I'd have shot a lot closer on the obvious pocket vajazzle, and framed for a subtle featuring of her curve.
... or y'know.. just waited till she turned and tried to get her to smile back at me.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software darktable 1.4 Photographer Andrew Wade Eglington oh-hi.info Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 147 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:10:10 21:45:47 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 6400 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 98.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 480 Image Height 720 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Low Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Distant View
