What's the most hip looking dslr or mirrorless? I want everyone to know I'm hip af when I walk around the art gallery or sit in a cafe drinking a flat white.
Buy a Lytro Light-field camera. It's obscure, it looks weird, people WILL ask you questions about it, and it will give you whacky looking photos. It's also a nice phallic shaped camera, so it'll feel great when you indefinitely put it inside your asshole.
>>2812095
This actually looks pretty cool. It even has a 16 megaray sensor :^)
>>2812088
X-Pro2 by far.
There's also the new Pen F. It's sole selling point is that it looks old.
Any Leica
>>2812178
What are these?
>>2812180
a couple of dogs, a snake? I dunno
>>2812180
it depends
>>2812191
Left AND right
>>2812180
Nikon DF.
>What's the most hip looking
Probably the Sigma Quattro. It's one of the only cameras not styled after a bar of soap or with a stupid DSLR styled grip.
>>2812116
The X-Pro 2 actually functions and is just styled after a rangefinder. The ISO dial is hipster as fuck.
The Pen F is a dead weight that's supposed to make people go "ooh" and "ahhh". It's just like the Nikon DF.
>>2812182
It says it right there on the camera
>>2812180
Nikon Df.
Legitimately good full frame dslr, but without video.
Expensive.
>>2812180
Crippled D4 cameras
>>2812088
Sony a7 (your hip already)(bonus for SonyFaggotry)(double bonus if you use an old belt as a neck-strap) Digital for a nod to the present and the future
Add a 1880 view camera lens, analog for respect for the history of photography and the original purity
Something Old, Something New
Grow a beard, get the Nazi under/parted/schlitzie haircut, some scuffed brown dress shoes, old indigo jeans with rolled up cuffs, argyle socks, a wife-beater, tucked-in red flannel shirt (with tastefully turned up cuffs), suspenders, heavy black-rimmed glasses, a battered canvas or leather messenger bag, a dozen "cause bracelets" and a 1980 silver Casio digital wristwatch
Tattoo's and gauges are assumed, bonus for holes in the sole of your shoe, extra credit for carrying a copy of "On the Road"
Don't forget a locally crafted artisanal brew in a swing top recycled bottle
You will need security to keep all the SJW "Hip" chicks from raping you right there in the gallery
Do this and you will single yourself out as a man in the know, a mover and a shaker, a trendsetting man among men
Good Luck
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:11 05:59:13 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 640 Image Height 375
>not flaunting your digital mavica fd-91 steadyshot lens barrel as you point it at your latté
>not deafening the entire exhibiton gallery as your step motor records the 1.3mpix image onto one of the several floppies you carry around
>not using literal physical "save icons" to store your precious images
>>2812434
Holy fuck, you are right. Mavica is the ultimate hipster cam.
No one uses it and it's relatively hassle free - perfect for lazy millenials.
>OMG, is it a Polaroid? Wait, what is that? A floppy disk? OMG, you are such a nerd! *sips craft beer*
>>2812434
>>2812434
Hey, I'm hip
I have one of those, still works
That used to be "State of the Art", " Cutting Edge"
Maybe a hipster will desperately offer me $5000 for mine, I will even throw in a case of "Memory"
>>2812180
A mistake
Film is clearly superior to digishit so if you want to be a true hipster you need to be shooting pre-1970
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D300 Camera Software Ver.1.10 Photographer ULF [email protected] Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.9 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 808 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 157 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2009:07:25 22:47:39 Exposure Time 0.4 sec F-Number f/13.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 640 Lens Aperture f/13.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 105.00 mm Comment U.BACKENKOEHLER [email protected] Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2812471
>Not combining both film AND digital
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:09:23 13:36:08 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 630 Image Height 691
>>2812488
>yfw literally buried in Kodak's vaults
>>2812095
>It's also a nice phallic shaped camera, so it'll feel great when you indefinitely put it inside your asshole.
This is pretty much all OP needs.
>>2812488
Did they cut up an A7 and put it in an old body?
>>2812688
Nex 5 actually.
http://petapixel.com/2014/09/12/18-year-old-retrofits-old-konica-rangefinder-sony-nex-aps-c-sensor-works/
>>2812707
It's pretty ingenious how it all works. The digital camera guts are essentially just film replacement. The shutter button triggers the digital sensor bulb mode, and the Konica operates as it does normally. The pictures he got with it are quite excellent, and the rangefinder still works as a rangefinder!
The same guy is working on doing a similar conversion kit for the Leica M3, which could be quite terrific if he can pull it off
>>2812471
no need to cripple yourself with inferior lenses
Get a pentax 6x7, bludgeon the haters and get fit with it
>>2812088
>8x10
>wooden tripod
>flash on a stick
For extra hipster points
News boy flat cap or fedora with press tag
>>2812471
>film better than digital
>implying there aren't cameras that look like this made after the 70s
>a fucking tripfag
>>2816664
>fedora with press tag
I would have to kill myself to deal with the cringe
>>2812713
>$5000 Otus 55
>On an 80-dollar Nikon F
That would legitimately be one of the biggest trolls in /p/ history
Also
>58 1.2 Noct (1977 but whatever)
>Lester-Dine 105 Macro
>Nikkor 105/2.5
>Inferior
See me after class.
>>2812537
Holy hell, this was a thing? I would kill for one of those to put in my Maxxum 70. Kodak are fucking idiots for not pushing that to market, morons deserved bankruptcy.
>>2812178
Something Fuji took a look at and said "lets not do that" when building a throwback camera.
>>2812372
>Legitimately good full frame dslr, but without video.
>Expensive.
Are these two things why /p/ hates it so much? If not, then why?
>>2817386
>then why?
because it fails on its main goal. It doesn't look retro, it doesn't work like modern, it's bigger than it needs to be, it's gaudy, it's chunky, it's ugly, and uncomfortable. It's too modern to be old, and too old to be modern.
>>2812406
>You will need security to keep all the SJW "Hip" chicks from raping you right there in the gallery
>implying men can be raped
Fuji so you can look hip just like all the other people trying to look hip with a Fuji. You'll fit right in by trying to not fit in. Perfect!
>>2817386
My big problem with it is like the other anon said, it's like a late 60 something man trying to squeeze into the moleskins he wore to Woodstock.
Also the fact that it's a D4 sensor in a D800 body, but it fails to bring the pros of either.
It's fated to see the discount axe along with other fads, like Hasselblad's re-badges.
>>2817386
>If not, then why?
Because the controls are retarded.
And proper physical controls was the one thing that would have made using it a nice experience.
>>2817386
actually got one by trading shit + cash for mostly shit...
about the size, its still smallest ff that nikon haves so far, and neat thing about it it takes somewhat all nikon F lenses, exept for the 180 fisheyes that sink. and battery lasts forever since no video. shame menus are quaranteed nikon clusterfuck and mirror cannot be really locked up for using said fisheyes for instance... mirror comes down when shooting anyway, but I like it since oddly fits my pathetic lifestyle
>>2818831
>battery lasts forever since no video
Do you believe that merely having a video feature on a camera drains battery even when you're not using it?
> its still smallest ff that nikon haves so far
Pic related
>>2812406
>Sony A7
I hadn't realized test charts, aspergers, and neck beards were hip these days.
>>2818832
df is smaller, what's your point
>>2818832
Testes
>>2818838
It's 3mm wider, and 3mm less tall. That's not smaller.
Unless you're going full retard, and saying that front to back, 15mm is smaller, when you don't put a lens on the front... is that what you're saying? Because since they take the same lenses, they have the same flange distance, and so the lens will be the same length on the front once you add it, and all you've removed to make it smaller is the comfort of the grip.
>>2818832
overall lighter and smaller than d610 then
as for the batterylife I'm just comparing it to my old dx frame that used the same battery and did not last half as long while shooting this with similar settings... dunno where it comes from then so sorry for framing the video feature for it.
not really biased to talk about the camera and nikon alltogether since i paid about 800'ish for the frame so I'll need to do for me since everything even close to this is about 2k used...
>>2812471
ISO 640
f/13
1/2s shutter speed
wtf
>>2818921
On a tripod, f/13 for DOF, and the rest to get the exposure right. What's the issue?
>>2818922
It's a stationary subject and a stabilized camera. No excuse for ISO 640.
>>2818922
and the lens are kind of out of focus either. man...
>>2818833
>falling for the meme
>>2818832
>100g heavier
How fucking retarded are you? And I know you shouldn't judge a camera based on looks, but God that thing is ugly. It looks like it's been half melted in an oven or something.
Get a Super Graphic rangefinder, with a 6x12 back, only shoot without a tripod, remind everyone it's panoramic constantly. Get a shitty old Kodak 90mm lens whose image circle barely covers 120mm, tell people vignetting makes it authentic.
Vintage? Check.
Obscure? Check.
Unwieldy and useless? Check.
Legitimately a garbage piece of equipment? YES
>>2812088
http://www.gizmag.com/minox-dcc-14/26852/
You literally can't get more hipster than this.
>"cute"
>useless controls on the body there literally just for show
>shitty cell phone/compact sensor
>retro styling
>retardedly overpriced
