Post your flickr here and get shit on by people who only shoot once every other month. Fuck the other threads.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/cantbecool
https://www.flickr.com/photos/panzergrenadierphotography/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D80 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 930 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:05 14:19:43 Exposure Time 1/1600 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
https://www.flickr.com/photos/omitten/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:02:26 23:00:42
https://www.flickr.com/photos/trimorv/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:05 21:41:13 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
www.flickr.com/photos/theunkool/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
https://www.flickr.com/photos/chang502/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/burtgummer/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/92036053@N06/ why is he so popular?
>>2808962
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/92036053@N06/
No idea because based on what they post their photos range from forgettable to downright thoughtless. Must be very good at networking or something, which admittedly is more important than the photograph for something like flickr popularity.
>>2808954
Really nice shot, but also a sense so it's good.
>>2808922
I only like the colours, try another subject or composition
>>2808905
I understand what you intend to do but the way you realized it it's not like I would like to see it :(
But great intention
>>2808896
Wow what's this ?
>>2808893
Perfect shot, but the pp suck, why f2.8 ? Vignette is not appreciated here, also a bit faded
But it's only a question of taste, the shot is great
I'll not check these flickr because kek
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jorge-martorell/
>>2808880
Already following it seems, you have a very good eye for subjects, the constructive critic i give you is to improve a little bit your composition, center horizons and so. Keep it up bro
>>2808893
All of your photos seem really cold, obviously that is because of the location, but you can still play a little bit with white balance to give a warmer look on some shots
>>2808896
Mah nigga, keep up the trippy shit, loving them
>>2808905
The mixture between really cool and instresting shots and plain out-of-photog-school shots bothers me a little bit. Following for more of the insteresting ones
>>2808922
Already following too, keep improving as allways buddy
>>2808954
Keep it up with those landscapes fella, really love them
>>2808926
Some interesting shots some boring ones, the landscapes are on point tho
>>2809106
You have some damn good shots Jorgito, following for some more
https://www.flickr.com/photos/valejacobo/ Didn't took pics in a while, just uploaded a bunch, roast me up senpai
https://www.flickr.com/photos/132240540@N02/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/zencaptures/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5MarkII Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Color Filter Array Pattern 770 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 80 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:05 22:50:03 Exposure Time 1/1000 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 40.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
https://www.flickr.com/photos/140588468@N02/
flickr.com/avpiccoli c:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/deathiscertainitshouruncertain/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/100501641@N08/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 40D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:04 21:14:56 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/9.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 200.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lorgoj/
please destroy me so I could be born again
https://www.flickr.com/j-st
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-014 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2011:06:12 18:06:57
>>2809417
I like your shit.
I hate your fucking retarded looking dog though.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/130497979@N02/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 736 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:06 14:16:51 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
https://www.flickr.com/photos/139831730@N04/
hello im 11 very suicidal pls be my friendo thx
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dark_indigo/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dipluridae/
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/njhaupt
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 300 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:22 05:28:39 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 200.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
R8 & MASTERB8
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/99289898@N08/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:13 10:16:11 Exposure Time 10 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness -6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 663 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
https://www.flickr.com/photos/yyod/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 45 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:26 13:05:41 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 8.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
https://www.flickr.com/photos/yeshivadee
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/107020333@N04/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.5 (Windows) Photographer Nicolas Boschel Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:05 20:40:01 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 8000 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 1.7 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Soft Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Close View
>>2809439
you angered doggo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 700D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:07 20:08:19 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2810997
Is this seriously on North Rd? Is it that distinctive a colour that I picked it from the thumbnail?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/100712373@N05/
>>2811622
a lot of melb bros in this thread
i dont know the area i just tooked the photo ya know
https://www.flickr.com/photos/btkoch/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/95975093@N03
I've only just started really working on my skills, so critique would be very nice. Most of my newer pictures haven't been edited, though i try to do some adjustments before uploading.
>>2808880
your pictures have a lot of different aesthetic - they aren't much consistent stylistically
the first picture looks like a test shot/snapshit, and while I can find a couple more like that (belgian flag, tree branch) they don't seem to have any meaning
then there are the very bokeh-y ones which are there for the appeal of the small circles
the rest is somewhat consistent, but most of these are too saturated for my taste
>>2808893
that grey/dark/nordic look is neat
some pictures seem out of place, like they're there to show interesting stuff but the pictures aren't interesting themselves imo, like the B-17 nose, and the lot of pictures of the hockey game look like you might have just chosen one or two that were significantly better than the others
I dig overall, but I would throw away some half of the pictures
>>2808896
a e s t h e t i c
some really cool ideas there, I like the neon rose in particular
really well done stuff
>>2808905
cool stuff you do with shadows
the b/w I really dislike on everything but the prints in the snow pic
some stuff looks very pretentious, like the all white pic
>>2808922
already commented on more than one occasion and following you
do keep it up
>>2808926
why do you often post at least a couple pictures of the same thing?
it's distracting
the pictures I don't particularly like, they only interesting thing in them is the subject, in the sense that what you're picturing is nice to look at but you're not framing it in any interesting/particular way
like, whatever picture I could find of the same thing would look the same as yours
>>2808954
the way the pictures in your profile are arranged is beyond interesting
not a fan of the panoramas, but the rest is pretty good
>>2809106
the surreal/dreamy/trippy stuff I like a lot
the perspective stuff is interesting
the landscapes and city scenery is quite boring if ya ask me
end of part one
>>2812498
and now for part two
>>2809171
is there any reason why you make your pics b/w?
because it seems to me you're doing it for muh art, but that only makes them look more generic than they already are to me
then the colored pic look very out of place, because the only difference they have with the b/w pics is the fact that they're not b/w, like there's no reason why you left these colored
>>2809223
commented on these in the past
still very much like some of the nature pics, like simple cairn and into the wilderness, but most of your photos are generic, over-saturated, over-sharpened snaps of whatever looked somewhat cool to you at the moment
>>2809229
there's times when leaving only a color or two is effective for the image, like in fumigens
then there's times where it's counter-productive and bad looking, like in skater trasher
you could remove half of the pics there and still convey the meaning/image, don't exaggerate with getting the point across
>>2809238
you should try and play more with light and shadows
the close up pictures make no sense to me really
>>2809283
noooice colors, VSCO or zeiss magic or what?
why did you make these pics b/w then?
waves are very good, patterns would be more effective with colors imo
some pics are really messy, like the ones on the beach, and the opera house doesn't have any meaning or purpose, it's just not framed in any interesting way
same thing goes for the cactus
>>2809348
interesting subjects, tho most pictures make them seem static and uninteresting
the blue car labeled 133 is interesting because of the contrast in color and the slightly blurry background, the SLS is interesting because it's clearly being chased but the cars behind are blurred
most of the rest I don't find anything interesting in
>>2809417
some pics look out of place, like the concert one and 5239 and the b/w pics
rest is looking good to me
end of part two
>>2812514
then there's part three
>>2809423
shit's coherent and varied still, good looking, characteristic
I really don't have anything more to say abut your work
>>2809497
musli's pic is hella good, good lightning, good colors, simple subject caught in a beautiful and interesting way
wien and the natural history museum are sub par compared to the other pics - they don't have a well defined subject, especially wien, but the rest is damn good man
>>2810598
stop using so much fucking grain, you ruined avril photos
the pictures of the party are simply bad pictures
they're badly exposed and they don't have interesting subjects and they aren't composed in any way
keep them on the club's facebook page
I get you're having fun at parties and stuff and some girls are really hot imo, but you should work on your pictures
>>2810615
SATURATION
A really man, cut it down a notch
T the hazy look I like and the pictures are quite good
U but I'm unable to take these seriously
R with that kind of post processing
A
T
I
O
N
>>2810628
already commented before
still seems like you took most of these pictures thinking "oh something caught my attention while I'm walking here, let's take a picture and remove colors"
the #6 rome pic looks good for example, try to shoot stuff in a way that it makes it interesting
at night, when a guy's obviously looking in a direction it catches your attention - that's what's happening in that pic, the guy with the cap looks at the chestnuts and it makes me look at them
pay attention to this stuff and use it
>>2810644
different styles, boring subjects, over processed pics
get your stuff together and decide what you want to portray and how exactly
end of part three
>>2812526
fourth and probably last part
>>2810663
the strange lights in the pictures are very interesting for the first minute, then I realize they don't have any particular meaning and there's no correlation between the light and the rest of the picture
the subjects get pretty boring after a bit, nothing stands out much, both between the pics and in the pics
>>2810997
good imo, tho I don't see what the little boy has to do with anything and what the pic means
are you also sure these b/w pictures wouldn't look better if they were colored?
'cause I think they would
if you remove colors you remove an aspect that allows you to make things stand out
if you don't have colors and you don't find anything else to make something stand out and/or to create contrast, directionality and whatnot, your pics will look flat, arguably boring
>>2811046
yes trips in cities are good, but if you can't find anything interesting to photograph and you don't even attempt to find a decent framing the results won't be good
0256, 0238 and 0176 are examples of somewhat interesting subjects, but they still look like muh moralism and muh lolz
0172 is an example of trying to actually compose an image, but then the pic is underexposed and mootly colored
you need to step up your game man
try and take less pictures, but think and work on them more
>>2811139
pretty inconsistent
you have patterns, you have two car pics with a very foggy and hazy look, you have three grey pics of rocks, you have some railways in the sunset with a clear, moot look, you have a couple of swallow DoF machinery pics...
most of these pics won't be very good alone (tho the girl and the cars are good enough), let alone in a group of pics that don't have almost anything to do with each other
>>2811636
I dig the simple look, but 7907 and 7888 for example look out of place because of the amount of details
also your pics are simple already, making them b/w makes them lose the appeal of that simple look if ya ask me
oh fuck me
>>2812531
fifth part 'cause I'm already here anyway
>>2812122
consistent style, I dig that
the single pics need some work imo
the blue car pic seems like you were framing a particular detail, but I don't see anything interesting or peculiar enough to be worth framing
the shallow DoF guitar seems like an attempt to take an artsy picture without knowing what you're doing
I especially like the softball (or whatever sport that is) pics, they are a good expression of my idea of "action shot"
one because there's actually action, one because you know there's been or there's about to be
like, nice show don't tell work
>>2812456
you're taking pictures of nice views but the exposure needs to be worked on
if you wanted a clear look you needed to raise the exposure, while if you wanted a dark look you should remove more highlights and add some haze possibly
that much pictures of the same place seem like you're telling us that you didn't find anything interesting in the place and you're hoping that we find it in your place
composition is absent
think about where string lines go/point/intercept to make stuff stand out, use colors to give different importance to stuff and so on
---
now please be so kind as to comment on my pictures
https://www.flickr.com/photos/elleborgo/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137286183@N03/
>>2809169
didn't catch this, sorry
ojitos verdes makes no sense in the economy of your profile
the out of focus lights are a cheap way of trying to achieving a neat look but they actually only make you look like you're figuratively jerking off with your camera
rest is good and consistent stylistically, but home has nothing to do with the rest, subject-wise
>>2812530
>preciate the cc
no problem
>>2812540
seems like you went from oversaturated pics to undersaturated (I don't mean this in a bad way) pics
with a "4 pointless pics phase" in the middle
you're also taking pics of the same subjects over and over, that's getting boring
Just accepted a sweet job, so when I graduate I'll have some disposable income, and I'll be moving to Cali (kinda desert region, two hours from Joshua Tree National Park, and two and a half hours from Yosemite). Any recs for lenses for landscape and a nicer telephoto? I shoot with a K-3 and have mostly budget gear.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137965655@N06/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.10 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 450 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 600 dpi Vertical Resolution 600 dpi Image Created 2016:03:05 10:51:14 Exposure Time 1/2000 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 300.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>2812514
>commented on these in the past
>still very much like some of the nature pics, like simple cairn and into the wilderness, but most of your photos are generic, over-saturated, over-sharpened snaps of whatever looked somewhat cool to you at the moment
I appreciate you taking the time out to comment.
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ricguch/
Lots of snapshits from Mexico,
>>2812531
>nothing stands out much, both between the pics and in the pics
Thanks for the feed back, ive been trying hard to work on my subjects, and making the photos more worthwhile. Ive been stuck on color priority for the past 4 months now.
>>2812526
I know. I haven't uploaded many photos recently. Just finished the stuff from Rome and haven't uploaded since then. I'm trying to work on what you wrote. I think it worked a little better in >>2811765 and maybe (even if quite boring) in >>2809833
I also shoot a lot less recently and not only because I got little time right now, but also because of what you wrote. So, many thanks for actually helping me think more about when to release the shutter.
>>2812531
>I dig the simple look, but 7907 and 7888 for example look out of place because of the amount of details
also your pics are simple already, making them b/w makes them lose the appeal of that simple look if ya ask me
idk, it just felt right to make them b/w, plus i wanted them to look detailed and sharp. Actually these are taken with helios 44m, tought that this lens is crap, but it turned out good.
https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/125551887@N03/sets/
Normally stick to Motor Madness threads but I'll let you savages rip me a new one.
>mfw I don't cherry pick the best 1% of photos because I don't like critiquing of my lesser images
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nsudrabs/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3326 Image Height 4158 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:11 12:24:33 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 3.74 m Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 1250 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2812531
little boy here. I like his pose/movement and the leading lines. Very basic and meaningless photo I agree.
I have unreasonable expectations for colours in a photo. I like them to have a strict theme, otherwise I resort to black/white. I agree though at one point I looked at my page and said "fuck I need to stop with this black and white".
Here's an example of a coloured version for one of my black/whites that I was considering. Should I keep it this way?
I don't agree that black/white makes pictures boring though. It helps you focus on the lighting and shades.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 45 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 94 dpcm Vertical Resolution 94 dpcm Image Created 2016:04:11 19:49:03 Exposure Time 1/3200 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Brightness 10.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2808962
he's not at all, followers don't mean shit on that stupid website. i sit at around 2.2~k and it took me a couple of weeks to get there from like 16 followers or smth. all you do is quite literally go bananas. favourite everything you see, follow everybody (go to a popular group and spam follow all the members) comment on shit.. around 30-40% of the people will return the favours, depending on how good you are. use a firefox script for greasemonkey addon to see non-reciprocate followers and every 4+ days unfollow the ones that havent followed back since the first 2 days. it's very easy just needs constant maintenance. this is how you get onto explore too.
>>2812536
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/elleborgo/
Most of your stuff has cliffhangers, i dont know what else to say. like "Almost Monochrome" and "Hopefully Good" they feel like they are leading up to more. The photos have pretty good setting, just not really any effective execution, i liked the photos, but i wasnt amazed by any of them. You are really good at teasing the viewer to want and expect more, but you also have to deliver on that too.
>>2812568
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/137965655@N06/
You really like your duckys. Thats cool i guess, i really like the turtle shots, those had the best composition, and processing from the looks of it. All i can really say is tone it down a wee bit on the HDR or faded B&W editing. Your subjects are fun to look at, but the colors are always slightly off, the blues tend to be too light while the yellows/oranges are faded. Id say go for some really punchy color, and go from there, other than that, have fun chasing duckys man.
>>2812725
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/ricguch/
Only one that stood out to me was the "ara8" photo, all the others were really disappointing. Im not trying to bring ya down, just that none of the other photos have any uniqueness to them at all. Most pictures seem to be elbow shots of walls, feet, and merchandise from a festival. Most are too dark to look at, and are either too saturated or weirdly color balanced. The one photo of the model i highlighted is what i think you SHOULD be doing, instead of attempting street photography. So yeah, keep messing around with modeling and lighting?
>>2812964
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/nsudrabs/
I like a man with variety. You seem to hit all the right notes with everything here, some photos are really fucking fantastic, and others are great, but none are bad or boring. You seem to know how to use space and leading lines really well. Keep up the good shit man, cant wait to see what else ya do
>>2812456
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/95975093@N03
Your first page of stuff is really boring, dull, dark and uninteresting. However, your second page, earlier stuff, is really good and shows tons of potential. i can instantly see you have an easier time capturing the views and colors of landscapes than cityscapes or street photography. Id say work on your composition, leveling your horizons, and working more on your landscapes.
>>2813130
>Your subjects are fun to look at, but the colors are always slightly off
I use my thinkpad to edit, so that's probably why. The screen is a horrid 1366x768 TN panel
>>2813081
i got on explore without all of that hassle. just uploaded a picture,got faved by a bot and the clicks started rising
>>2812594
>Can you give me an example of what you mean by my perspective photos though?
photos in which things are presented from a different perspective than the one people usually look at them from
the snap of the high copper colored building, the yellow walls of the corridor, the wooden pier etc
>>2812949
>i wanted them to look detailed and sharp.
I didn't explain myself clearly enough
by detailed I didn't mean fine details, like the ones you capture if you have a sharper lens and sensor, I meant these images have a lot more lines, objects, plains, shapes, colors and so on
sharpness I don't even notice in these kinda pictures, 'cause I don't feel the need of zooming in and nitpicking - the general style is simple, and it seems I could get what I need to get even from a relatively small thumbnail
>>2812974
>I have unreasonable expectations for colours in a photo. I like them to have a strict theme
there are color editors in every RAW converter I've used
I've used only three but I imagine there will be color editors in other software as well
>otherwise I resort to black/white
yeah but it's not like that solves the problem
>Should I keep it this way?
it still doesn't make much sense from the composition point of view, so for purely aesthetic reasons I'd keep it colored
>I don't agree that black/white makes pictures boring though.
neither do I, it depends on the picture and how you process it
your pictures mostly don't use any composition tho, and you don't edit anything, so making them b/w seems like a poor effort to make them better without having a clue as to how and why
>It helps you focus on the lighting and shades.
you sacrifice colors tho
in that pic for example you might have raised the highlights and/or whites luma, reduced the sea's luma and/or contrast, and there you would have had a b/w pictures with a lot more contrast and focus on the boats in the foreground
b/w can make stuff better, but it doesn't do that automatically
>>2813130
>not really any effective execution
>you also have to deliver on that too
ah, thanks for the comments
I don't really understand how I would go about delivering more - 'cause that is what would make the execution more effective if I'm understanding correctly.
would you mid explaining or giving an example or two?
>>2813181
yeah i meant to go into more detail, i dont know how else to put it, just that your photos really make me wasnt.....more? almost like something is missing, but i dont really know. Maybe it could be more human subjects? punchy colors? i left out details on purpose cause i thought it wasnt my job to tell you exactly what to shoot, just to find more things to shoot i guess
sorry i couldnt help ya more man
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gmgandon
Not a big fan of uploading stuff, but I could use some criticism
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T3i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 609 dpi Vertical Resolution 609 dpi Image Created 2016:04:11 12:50:59 Exposure Time 1/3200 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
https://www.flickr.com/photos/53509339@N02/26273411731/in/dateposted-public/
>>2813202
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:10 10:25:35 Exposure Time 1/160 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 4000 Brightness -5.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Other Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information Uncalibrated Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2813173
yeah and you got ranked what on explore, like 500? you can't get into the top 50 without having a pretty popular page, you just wouldn't have enough faves coming in to beat some of the others
>>2813173
yeah dude you've got 1 photo on explore and it has a horrible view-fave ratio and 8 comments. you should be getting 70-100 comments and a few thousand faves
>>2813179
> I meant these images have a lot more lines, objects, plains, shapes, colors and so on
Well, this is me, this is how i like to see cityscapes, lines, shapes n stuff like that.
>>2813171
Thats what i said, snapshits from Mexico, also I forgot to put an album on private, so you are basically looking at my travel pics, Ill gixit when i go home, so there will be a few shitty pics onstrad of a lot
>>2813303
*fix it
*instead
>>2812514
>>2809283 here : first of all thanks for taking all this time for feedback, really appreciated!
I'm using a vsco setting that i adapted a bit to my taste. And yes the 135mm zeiss is truly fantastic.
I try to think BW before shooting but sometimes i make this choice after to make the reading of the picture better. Looks like it doesn't work for 100%.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/huipvdende/
Some critic would be appreciated, trying to git gud.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Macintosh) Photographer Huip van den Ende Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 25 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:11 21:46:28 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
https://www.flickr.com/photos/funkadelicsam/
This is one of my most recent.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5923 Image Height 3948 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:11 17:56:13 Image Created 2016:04:09 21:51:22 Exposure Time 8 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Brightness -9.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2813130
Ricguch her, Thanks for the input as I told the other guy I accidentally left aan album as public, so lot of photos didnt belong to the gallery, not that the rest are good, but it doesnt look as bad. Modelling is what I try to do the most, but is hard for me to find models, wife doesnt like it, so I mainly shoot her, (no nudes)
>>2812536
Thanks a lot. I'll be sure to think about these things, the next time i go out! At least i have some pointers as to where i can improve, now.
I really like most of your photos and especially how you make everyday, otherwise boring things look appeasing to look at.
I've got to admit that the "Graveyard's Pride" picture doesn't say much to me. Apart from that, I really dig the simplicity in your pictures.
>>2813142
Thanks a lot. I enjoy doing landscapes much more thank cityscapes. The first ones are from a trip to Iceland and the ones i'm most proud of. Since then I've just been practicing around home or where ever i bring the camera. I'll be sure to keep your feedback in mind. Do you have any advice as to how i could improve my cityscapes and editing?
I recently bought a cheap Tamron Wide-angle, do You have any recommendations as to what some cool projects could be?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/trentborchard
>>2813759
For cityscapes, its hard to say, since your cityscapes are mostly pictures of buildings and naturally come off as touristy. Id say, while youa re still new to cities, go fucking wild. Try everything that you havent done.
I think you biggest sin is somehow making even pictures of just buildings seem paused, and with no life. I mean this as you should have a lot more action in your photos, a blurry subject, or a jumping child. Work on your timing, and be prepared to take 400 shots with only 2 great ones.
Another id suggest is to work on your coloring and exposing. We already see cities as dull and grey most of the time, so work on making a city look unique to you, to how you see it.
>>2808922
Some shots in there are very nicely lit and composed. Others not so much. But you probably kinda knew that already. Already following though, keep up the good work.
>>2808926
Too many of the same type of shots. Take only the best shot from a set or trip, and only upload stuff you're really proud of.
>>2809106
Your attached image is really nice and clean, especially when expanded. I say you should make a print of it, if you haven't already.
>>2810663
I remember your fog shots. Glad to see you on flickr. I agree that while they are beautifully shot and processed, it'd be worth it to have a subject other than the scene itself. Some of them are very good already though.
>>2813469
Florida? I swear some of these locales are very familiar.
Your processing feels a bit too harsh and contrasty but that's just like, my opinion, man. Some of these feel a bit too busy too, like I'm not sure what to be looking at.
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ianlindo/
Been shooting more just recently. Any feedback is appreciated.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D810 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 850 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:09:29 23:58:39 Exposure Time 4 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 64 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 1/3 EV Metering Mode Other Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 24.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2814237
Pretty fucking slick, ace. You've got a hell of an eye.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131547136@N07/
Still finding my style.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Photos 1.3 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:28 17:56:08 Exposure Time 1/55 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 1.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2814237
It always makes me wonder why some good photographers have so few followers. Like you deserve more than what you have.
>>2814368
There is pretty much zero correlation between quality of photos and number of followers. If you just posts your photos and don't advertise them everywhere and spam them in a million groups and don't go around liking and following other people just so that they will do the same in return then you probably won't ever get followers.
On the other hand there's one guy who posts here and his flickr is full of garbage but he uses scripts to automatically follow a bunch of people so they'll follow him in return and his flickr is very popular as a result.
I'm not him and I don't know about him, but I know that personally I just use flickr as a repository for my photos and ignore the social aspect because it's cancer. You might get some feedback here on /p/ if you post a link to your flickr, but you're never going to get any useful feedback from flickr itself so why bother unless you just want to stroke your ego by amassing likes?
>>2814376
>ignore the social aspect because it's cancer
Yeah it really is. It affects my photography too actually. It's hard to ignore the noise sometimes. Actually to be honest I don't know how to ignore the social aspect. I've always wished to have a flickr/ig skin or addon where you could hide the number of views/faves/likes.
It is cancer.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/yeshivadee
>>2813954
Alright. Thanks for the great advice! I'll definitely keep this in mind for the future!
>>2814246
Thanks!
>>2814368
I actually don't ever post in groups and stuff so like the other guy said, I don't get as much attention. To be honest I never did it because I couldn't be bothered, plus I'd see the way people go crazy with it and it turns me off. I do like to tag some of my shots though.
That said, I have a friend who does the group thing and balances it pretty well. There is a difference between selling your soul for likes and putting yourself out there. When Maroon 5 needed an album cover, they went to Flickr and found it and the photographer got a huge royalty for it and became famous. Has she have not tagged her work and such it would never have been found.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/30789212@N02/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D600 Camera Software GIMP 2.6.10 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 14304 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 300 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:05:26 06:32:34 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 300.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 0 Image Height 0 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 200 Image Quality FINE White Balance AUTO1 Focus Mode AF-A Flash Compensation 0.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 200 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Lens Type Nikon G Series Lens Range 28.0 - 300.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 3706
>>2810628
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/dipluridae/
Your page makes me cringe so fucking hard. First of all, you have 11.8k followers and follow 41. Why? So you used scripts and spam followed, fave'd and commented on thousands of peoples stuff, probably reciprocated at first then decided to delete thousands of followers just to make it look like you have a dead popular page but don't follow back because you're so stubborn and think they're not up to your standard? What a fucking waste of time.
Second of all, your stuff is no more than garbage. I wouldn't have been bothered by your followers/following ratio if your stuff was any good, but it's not - it's 95% cancer and the odd "ok" or average photo.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126721222@N05/
currently uploading my pics from my recent trip to morocco, maybe someone is interested.
Sadly, I can't get out and shoot as much as I would like to.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/promero93/
>>2814591
Your night images are really dark. It's hard to engage with the photo or be drawn in when things are so dark. For example in the pool image everything with lights is really subdued and the rest is just pitch black. I think it's OK to have a pure black night sky, but the highlights could be brought up some more, and really enhance the image. Same goes for just about all of your shots at night.
Your day shots are all shot at high noon it seems. I would shoot at other times of day, when the sun is lower in the sky.
Lastly think about what you're shooting, what you're trying to capture and what you want people to really see. Use lighting, composition, cropping and post production to work out what people should see.
The moods and composition in some images are very nice though. Keep shooting and you'll get there. I was where you were, taking very similar pics, which is why it's easy for me to critique I think. I'm not trying to pick on you or anything.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/73312417@N00/
I've had flickr since may 06 but never got on with it. I don't feel engaged and i don't use it for years at a time, It's just not 4chan.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 144 dpi Vertical Resolution 144 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1030 Image Height 776
https://www.flickr.com/photos/centribo/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model 8400F Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:15 04:29:06 Color Space Information sRGB
>>2806789
i misread topic as
>OFFICIAL FUCKER THREAD
>>2816058
Some nice ones, but you post a lot of Pics of nothing
>>2816052
Plain shit
>>2814235
Yup that's Florida. Thanks for the feedback ill keep it in mind.
be fucking honest https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/114326786@N07/
>>2816061
haha epic bro x)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/134092133@N03/
>>2817460
forgot a pic
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 600D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.2 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:30 23:39:55 Exposure Time 1/1250 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 46.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2812568
you seem to put a lot more effort into finding interesting subjects than to compose the shot
try to make the picture interesting from that point of view instead of capturing the subject in a plain, boring way - you're not shooting for an encyclopedia
>>2812725
judging by the timeline you're getting better
proportions, weight...
you seem to be getting stuff so keep at it, some stuff is pretty good and there's quite some potential
>>2812952
all of your pictures look the same
I would try and isolate the subject more in most snaps
anyway they're all the same and they seem never to end
you should try and pick the best pictures among the ones you take, else the good ones won't get noticed by others, you'll bore them first
>>2812964
I told you last time, some of your snaps' colors are spectacular and even tho not really consistent everything is good enough when taken by itself
do keep it up please
>>2813190
I see some good ideas, like the tree with the sun in the background and the metal stuff hanging from the bar
the tree tho doesn't seem in focus and the rings are "covered" by the fact that there's a darker background behind them
I understand it's a phase some pass through, tho you might wanna go for a different approach than "very low DoF picture of nothing"
I like Kame house and Away, mostly because they suggest there's more behind the pic, they suggest a mood
>>2813202
you don't seem autistic enough to post here since in some snaps you seem to have created some connection with the subject(s), tho the hashtags in the picture titles compensate for it
am seriously a fan of these pics
half of your pics tho don't depict anything interesting and they don't do that in in any interesting way
Sam, Talk to the paw, Frames within frames..., Reach for the sky, Channing Salazar and so on
they look like there was an intention behind them, that wasn't executed properly
end of season 2, episode 1
>>2818764
>>2813465
Rotterdam, De Poel, Schevenigen and pics of the likes look pretty out of place together with the others, tho it's pretty good in general, how you get these "action shots" that are pretty simple but still pretty actioney
>>2813469
most of your snaps are everyday, boring subjects taken from a perspective that doesn't make them any less boring
the buildings under daylight, the highway, the graves, the table in Camping
going back I find more and more intersting/out of the ordinary stuff, like Reflect, Diner and Florida night camping pt.2
composition is not to be found anywhere, apart from maybe pic related in your post, but I'm guessing it wasn't intentional since it's the one in a thousand
>>2813835
same thing as last time, your glitchy stuff and your simpler stuff are nice, respectively because they give a new look to stuff you see everyday and because they aren't depicting stuff in the way you look at it everyday
rest is a mess, no interesting subject imo and no composition to speak of
>>2814237
I can dig the idea of taking pictures of basically the same thing (buildings, high, with the street in the lower part of the frame, long exposure) yet different (different buildings), tho I'd make them more diverse even, imo that would make the set more interesting
you seem to do this anyway (Progression & I-275, the L-4 connector pics, the two port pics & Space Ship) so you might wanna explore and dive deeper into that
>>2814308
there's a lot to like, but you should stop making things b/w just for the sake of it
it makes sense in Gotham, possibly Davie St. and possibly Chinese Architecture, because it adds more contrast there
in Very Vancouver, Stepping Stones and Coffee it lowers the contrast tho, it makes it harder to focus on the subject
I particularly like windowsill
end of the double episode
>>2818805
part two of the double episode, whatever
>>2814400
I already told you, find a subject, snap simpler pics, try and edit your pics a bit to make them look more lively, try to focus on composition - where lines point, where they intersect, what has the most weight (what catches the attention more)
>>2814467
I haven't found a good shot without people in it yet
shooting that construction with a wide angle lens (Untiteled) wasn't a good idea, it fucks up composition a fair bit
the portraits are overall good enough if ya ask me
>>2814572
street photography catching the poor living conditions and the rural atmosphere
in b/w
if you want to do something that's been done to death already you either do it better than anybody else, which I find unrealistic considering how many skilled people have done this before you, or you do this in a different way
stuff like 5038 looses a lot of appeal if you remove colors, and if you were shooting b/w film I'd rather not shoot that sutff
>>2814591
neat beach stuff, do you by any chance use VSCO?
the b/w stuff doesn't seem to have any reason to be b/w
there's some composition going on, tho there's a lot of pics of nothing - flowers, b/w rocks...
>>2816052
there's nothing there really, the only interesting pic is pic related in your post because of the subjects, but in the other snaps there's jack shit
no composition, no interesting subjects
>>2816058
nnneat
I still don't see any purpose in shooting these pics in b/w but the rest is quite diggable all around
>>2816520
I'm getting the feeling that I'm starting to sound boring, but what do these pictures gain by being shot in b/w instead of color?
because your colored pics are quite a e s t e t h i c, but there's still not much composition going on, and by loosing much of that aesthetic going b/w you loose most of the appeal, because I find no composition in most of these pics either
ubtiteled 4 is hella good tho, even with that amount of noise
stuff always takes too much time
>>2818816
k last one
>>2817460
the pics of urban stuff is good enough
the nature pics are bad, they don't have any subject and they aren't shot in any interesting way
ffs everybody try and think of ways of portraying stuff in interesting ways, if we wanted to see pictures of birds that aren't in any way artistic or aesthetic we'd look up birds on google, or we'd open an encyclopedia
---
now please take some time, pretend to be decent people and comment on other people's pictures as well
here's mine again, give me your impressions
https://www.flickr.com/photos/elleborgo/
I always forget I have a flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hoocee/
>>2818816
The moroccan guy here.
Thanks for feedback, I really don't want to photograph poor people as you put it. Just capturing the current state of the people living in the high Atlas because Society there changes insanely fast and in a few years, nothing of this Lifestyle will remain. Could you please point me to photographers who worked in Morocco? Im only aware of mccurry and Watson.
>>2818890
which is a shame, you got some good stuff here
>>2806789
only 35mm and south east part of France.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.11.003 (140225) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3090 Image Height 2048
>>2808880
>The Keeper
>Exploration place
Oh shit it's Wichita! I lived there when I was younger! What brought you to town?
>>2809439
Fuck you man, pugs are great dogs.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gutierrezmaier/
hello I'm a wildlife photographer from Chile
![26185724916_9cb8e3f950_b[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/3vD6XqT.jpg "26185724916_9cb8e3f950_b[1].jpg")
I hope you like car pictures /p/
>>2819076
work. a lot of service companies and was doing an install of the shitty enterprise software there and training. nice town. when I got there, there was a garth brooks concert going on, which was huge for the natives there.
>>2819064
forgot link obviously
https://www.flickr.com/photos/130568212@N07/
>>2819041
>Could you please point me to photographers who worked in Morocco?
by stuff that's been done to death I mean b/w street photos of seemingly poor people in a poor country, not notable people who shot in Morocco
I don't know any of them, sorry
Just started
Currently, my Flickr only contains unedited JPGs fresh off the cam
https://www.flickr.com/photos/142144693@N02/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G70 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 60 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:04:20 23:29:18 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1148 Image Height 862 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Image Quality Fine White Balance Auto Focus Mode Auto Spot Mode Unknown Image Stabilizer Mode 1 Macro Mode Normal Shooting Mode Aperture Priority Audio No Flash Bias 0.00 EV Color Effect Off Contrast Low Noise Reduction Standard
>>2820865
I just noticed: How do you all have these Names in your URLs?
How do I get that, I only have this weird number.
>>2820868
You have the option in your profile to set a url string. Choose wisely, because you can only do it once.
>>2821064
Seeing as using my own username is almost foolproof I think I made up my mind. Where do i do it? I'm currently in settings.
>>2814487
wonder how your stuff can suck so bad while you're so good at making shit up.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/fmilkovic/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model CanoScan 9000F Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 10.0 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Created 2016:04:22 22:32:16 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4752 Image Height 5320
Flickr.com/photos/pollardpolaroids
>>2822506
Https://www.flickr.com/photos/pollardpolaroids
Fixed link for the lazy
Had this account for quite some time.
The most recent shots are actually kinda good imo
www.flickr.com/stockphotographie
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/140538977@N03
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.5 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:25 22:23:27
>>2822483
fucking fantastic shit you got here! i feel like you are qualified enough to tackle trying to recreate some "Scary Stories to Tell int he Dark" scenery
>>2826426
where was this pitcher taken? looks like boston but i can't put my finger on the street. i used to live there and it's still in my DNA and i get whimsy real strong when i see it unexpectedly
daily reminder
>>2826753
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Trevor Image-Specific Properties:
>>2826755
kek, seen that guy before
I think this guy is one of the worst I've seen though, he is autofaving and unfaving 24/7, and has been doing so for ages
why can't we just have a photo sharing community without these people
>>2826757
PeteHuu is muh best m8,he's faving so much
>>2826657
haha nice! You got a good eye. It's newbury street! some time after the bombing... hence the military hummer :( I feel the same, the Boston area is still the best place where to live that I know , altought I was more often on the cambridge/somerville side than the boston side. (sry for the approximative english, I'm a foreigner, back in europe now). What about you, tell me more!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/68585437@N04/
Have been trying to get back at it
>>2826936
No, it's saying that every photo has its audience, and that in a world with 7 billion people on it, any thousand of them will like the same thing that you don't like.
If you showed the worst photo on the planet to 7 billion people, a thousand of them would ACCIDENTALLY hit the "like" button. If you aren't getting likes on your images, it's not because you're bad (though you probably are) it's because your photo isn't being seen by many people.
>>2826938
It's the later. Strangely though sometimes people rave about a photo and it goes over my head. (Pic related) And vice versa.
>It's almost like you're saying we're all individual.
Well you all might be but i'm not.
>>2826940
You can't look at Eggleston with the mindset of a 2016 person. You have to put yourself back in the timeframe, and realize that he was pioneering color film when color film wasn't big. Most photos were black and white at the time, and then boom, you're looking at the most red thing you've ever seen. It's a big deal back them. Or that blue car, or that peaches sign. The color was overwhelming, and beautiful. It's still beautiful color today, but it's not a big deal since we see color all over the place. It's like "Okay, yeah, I see the red, and it's nice, but what else?" Back then, you didn't need the what else.
>>2826941
There is somethings interesting even in this photo and I don't hate his work at all i like some a lot. I hadn't considered it in the context, I'll reconsider, points to you. In the film Annie Hall (1977) Woody Allen character Alvy pretentiously says "Photography's interesting because, you know, it's a new form, and a set of aesthetic criteria have not emerged yet"
It really makes ya think.
>>2826955
Flickr would be nearly no different without them. The difference would be that insecure nobody photographers wouldn't be so threatened by the like count on other people's photos. Flickr is like anything else. Make a product that is well suited to your target audience, and then network to get yourself known. That's all it takes. Take photos that Flickr likes to see, and then go around commenting and conversing with people who take/like similar photos. People who take boring photos of empty streets and garbage cans, post them to Flickr without any post processing, and then sit back and wait for the likes to roll in are the ones who get disappointed.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/toasted-funk/
Please look, or don't. It's your time.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/marantoni1950/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/alidixon
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T10 Camera Software Camera Remote Ver.2.0.1.1 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:30 00:21:39 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.4 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 640 Lens Aperture f/1.4 Brightness 2.8 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1776 Image Height 1184 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown Sharpness Normal White Balance Auto Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Aperture Prior AE Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
https://www.flickr.com/photos/128574066@N06/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 7D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.2 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:24 15:02:09 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 70.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137438893@N04/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 740 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:30 03:51:19 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
https://flickr.com/photos/kidsheart/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/yeshivadee
What you like and what you think I could do better would be much appreciated
>>2826654
Thank you !
Pic related https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/141988525@N08/
>>2808954
this one kinda makes me sad/angry. very nice
https://www.flickr.com/photos/admiral_bone_to_pick/
I'm still trying to learn about composure and not go to wild with lightroom.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 750 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:31 19:57:51 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Landscape Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Snapshits only.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/128295137@N03/
guess I'm uploading a bunch of stuff now
https://www.flickr.com/photos/129140462@N04/?
>>2834016
holy christ dude this one is amazing.
https://www.flickr.com/gp/117462433@N05/014379
![26532730582_50ea8d458d_b[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/FXQgzLX.jpg "26532730582_50ea8d458d_b[1].jpg")
Hope you guys like cars.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/alaskalien/
got my babby's first Explore yesterday.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/masonaldridge/
>>2834906
Oh thanks m8
hay guyz
www.flickr.com/photos/atenhaus
>>2835309
Man I just had to fav some of your pictures. Especially the mountain ones
>>2835634
thanks m8! I really really like your lighthouse photo taken at night
https://www.flickr.com/photos/100937514@N03/
>>2834016
really great
some shots are slightly out of focus tho
>>2836448
Hey thanx m8. Yeah some are probably out of focus, got tips?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/tomdavies23/
sup. i'll follow/spam fave some of u guys now if i like it
>>2835732
not u though.. why are you following 0 people? stubborn af senpai. love and u will be loved in return
https://www.flickr.com/photos/142144693@N02/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G70 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 48 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:05:12 22:02:23 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 24.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1152 Image Height 866 Exposure Mode Auto Image Quality Unknown White Balance Auto Focus Mode Auto Spot Mode Unknown Image Stabilizer Mode 1 Macro Mode Normal Shooting Mode Unknown Audio No Flash Bias 0.00 EV
https://www.flickr.com/photos/altiphote/
>>2837544
Colour is not your enemy!
ITT from now on we post the best Flickr user we know
https://www.flickr.com/photos/esprit-confus/
>>2837550
Digital snapshits => snapshits
Colour film snapshits => snapshits with crappy colours
B&w film, home-processed snapshits => art
>>2837928
that's like saying that cutting your legs off is a better option than walking and sucking at it.
>cutting your legs off is a better option than walking and sucking at it.
p much 4chan
https://www.flickr.com/photos/129445195@N04/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5472 Image Height 3648 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:05:13 22:03:02 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 2.49 m Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2280 Image Height 1520 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2837776
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/esprit-confus/
disgusting. dirty hippies
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mrsteel/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 700D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3314 Image Height 4971 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 93 dpcm Vertical Resolution 93 dpcm Image Created 2016:05:12 17:55:47 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3314 Image Height 4971 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2839704
You really need to focus the work you present. Having sexy shower nudes directly above a photo of your dog directly above a photo of some guy working on a telecoms box just screams that you don't have clue as to what you want to shoot. And while it's okay to be in that spot, you make it really hard to follow you. Anyone who's looking to follow people who shoot street are going to want to un-follow you when they see nudes popping up in their feed. The same goes for people who like nudes. When your dog shows up in between 200 photos of artistic nudes, they're going to say "Why the fuck do I follow this fool?" Worst of all, some mom who likes following dog photographers will be very upset when she sees wet tits in between all her kittens and puppies.
You also need to really work on your lighting and processing consistency. Lots of bad unflattering light, and a lack of processing to make your hard light flattering. Skin tones are all over the place, and most of the skin looks grungy and dirty because you've tried to add contrast (or heaven forbid, clarity) in the wrong way. Lots of eye bags, lots more hard light from under the model.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/norbert-leal/
mostly street
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Windows) Photographer Norberto Leal Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2014:07:27 15:27:52 Exposure Time 1/1000 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 19.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2840511
Yeah, as you can see I am just starting to experiment with proper studio photography, so I will try to pay more attention to the things you listed... thanks for the feedback btw!
about the consistency of my photo feed... yeah, I know, but I can't help it. I am not a professional so I am not really dedicated to either street or budoir or whatever photography, so I just upload to flickr whatever I shoot. I really miss that you can't have multiple photo feeds that people can separately subscribe to... or multiple "aliases"... I guess I could create more accounts and manage them individually, but that seems like a hustle.
What do you people do? Just don't publish anything that doesn't fit the theme?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/individualeleven recently got into film photography
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 96 dpi Vertical Resolution 96 dpi
>>2840511
>When your dog shows up in between 200 photos of artistic nudes, they're going to say "Why the fuck do I follow this fool?"
Or they could say "I like this guys vision, I wonder how he does in other genres." Not everyone wants an artist they follow to be entirely one dimensional.
>Worst of all, some mom who likes following dog photographers will be very upset when she sees wet tits in between all her kittens and puppies.
Not shooting for her. She's under no obligation to follow, at all.
>>2840787
>Just don't publish anything that doesn't fit the theme?
Don't do this. That dude is half full of horseshit. Shoot what you want, there's nothing really all that inconsistent about your feed. Your feed is fine
>>2841255
>nothing really all that inconsistent
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Greenshot Image-Specific Properties:
>>2841261
>implying that's a problem
>>2808954
this makes me feel.
>>2841253
the age of social media photographers
>>2840511
Welcome back ayya now please put your trip on.
>>2841784
Implying it isn't, in terms of followers.
>>2841848
it's really not.
"make your portfolio all one thing" has always been bad advice for general photography. Many amateurs and low-level "pros" do that, zero high level photographers bias their portfolio so, unless its the only thing they do
https://www.flickr.com/photos/alexdmcnally/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
https://www.flickr.com/photos/61220148@N06/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1600 Image Height 1066
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/polyfez/
>>2841963
Yeah, that dude is either having fun giving out bad advice or a stone retard.
Started shooting film recently, so happy I dug out an old Canon A-1 in the basement!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/88192485@N03/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2048 Image Height 3089 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 96 dpi Vertical Resolution 96 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:02:12 13:42:44 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2048 Image Height 3089
>>2844624
>4.71mb of tilted unfocused noise
fuck off
Starting to get paid jobs please give me constructive crit.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/86793193@N08/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1365 Image Height 2048 Scene Capture Type Standard
https://www.flickr.com/photos/madhias/
Almost only abandoned places and decay.
>>2846165
The ISO is too damn high. Otherwise this is a good photo IMO. Maybe the power tower could fill the frame more and the angle could be better.
www.flickr.com/photos/130568541@N06/
mainly nature, astro and city
>>2849791
Went to this city recently but dismissed this place as probably impossible to enter. Did go to the train yard on the other side of the town where it was just about jumping the fence and greeting workers.
Was the entrance to this place hard in any way?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-2000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1818 Image Height 1228 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:01:03 18:10:28 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 700 Image Height 700
>>2852191
Nice! Unfortunately we did not visit the train yard, and were there about 3 or 4 years ago. The powerplant and its art deco control room was actually an official visit - like a museum tour. We were about 7 people, and that was too much for the small control room, but in the end OK since everybody was disciplined enough that everyone has enough time to take some shots. Were are you from BTW?
https://flic.kr/s/aHskofrAp9
>>2849791
Already follow each other, good to see you here.
>>2853430
Great to see you too! Now I saw your post above...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/linebrell/
Quiet shots with nature around and some infrared stuff.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Photographer unknown Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 20:08:54 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 1.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137539656@N07/
>>2806789
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137539656@N07/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software darktable 2.0.0 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 22878 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:01:27 10:58:53 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 6032 Image Height 4012 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 100 Image Quality RAW White Balance SUNNY Focus Mode MANUAL Flash Compensation 0.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 100 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Lens Type Unknown Lens Range 0.0 mm; f/0.0 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 4850
>>2849791
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/madhias/
Really cool shit, how the fuck do you find your locations?
Added a few more photos recently
https://www.flickr.com/photos/142144693@N02/
>>2853502
Nice ones, I like the play with colour
>>2853502
I like the locations and the usage of angles.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G70 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 122 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:06:07 20:10:06 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 61.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1152 Image Height 866 Exposure Mode Manual Image Quality Unknown White Balance Auto Focus Mode Manual Spot Mode Unknown Image Stabilizer Mode 1 Macro Mode Normal Shooting Mode Manual Audio No Flash Bias 0.00 EV
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bymatttaylor/albums/72157669271169545
https://www.flickr.com/photos/140734272@N06/
I like portraits, but shoot pretty much everything I can see
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5500 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 966 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 25 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:08 19:52:46 Exposure Time 1/4000 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
https://www.flickr.com/photos/cakez0r/
Come at me /p/
I'd really appreciate some critique
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D750 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:08 20:55:01 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2858385
Reading news, reading Wikipedia and various boards, shared from friends, and going travelling for a day or up to a week! My dream would be to drive with a big car for a few months.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137039608@N06/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Width 1418 Image Height 975
Just created one now
https://www.flickr.com/photos/knknphotos/
only just bought my first 70-300mm and 35mm prime lenses so I'm pretty stoked to get practising with them
>>2859536
What's with the dead arm?
>>2859536
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/137039608@N06/
I'm not sure if you're making all of your stuff look intentionally shitty (ignoring correct exposure, composition, etc. probably shot with a p&s) or just suck real hard, but if you're going for a Daido vibe, you still got shit to learn. Daido is not THIS random.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/spencer_c/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 7D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Photographer Spencer Clerk Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3456 Image Height 5184 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:30 22:18:13 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/1.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1500 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2834016
great stuff man, just followed
>>2863150
thx m8
MY Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/134276306@N06/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Digital Camera X100T Ver1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:04 14:26:26 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 5.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3800 Image Height 2534 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
