What did you buy this week /p?
>>2801135
>not a7r ii + mc11
Peak design capture clip pro and Lowepro ProTactic 350 AW backpack
Nice little combo for lightweight day hikes with a decent tripod strap system
>>2801135
who cares
>>2801135
I got a B+W 82mm uv filter for the 90mm Angulon MC.
Bought an a6300. Literally don't know the first thing about photography.
>>2801196
We assumed the second sentence after reading the first sentence. You didn't need to type it.
SMC takumar 28mm f3.5 and a YN560 III + RF603 II bundle thingie. Haven't arrived yet cause of like 2-3 weeks delivery
Mamiya RZ67 PRO II kit - 3 backs, 65, 110, and 150 lenses. Waist level and prism finders.
Gonna take it to a garden next week with some Velvia and see what the Rockwell slide hype is all about.
>>2801135
>he actually bought the meme lens.
You could have just gotten a 24 f/1.4 and cropped it to 35mm f/2 equivalent when needed.
>>2801135
Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5
Domke f2 and a sekonic l-308s light meter.
Last week I bought a 15-30 Tamron, f2. 8... Hadn't used it until last night though.
>>2801175
Rip off
Ebay same stuff for 30 euro.
Peak design even tried to sue the company for copy right shit...
But failed hard because the other company was actually first making these clips .
Hehehe
>>2801238
Which is the other company?
>>2801218
Why not the 10-18?
>>2801264
The only real advantage of the 10-18 is it's like 70% of the performance for much cheaper. The 10-22mm is pretty much a much better lens in every other significant way.
>>2801135
Mailed in some C-41 to dwaynes, does that count?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 375 dpi Vertical Resolution 375 dpi Image Created 2016-01-05T20:09:18-05:00 Image Width 1200 Image Height 813
>>2801265
How is it better? Most reviews and comparisons I read rated the 10-18 as sharper at least.
Camera bag and a set of macro, cpl and nd filters to get started with them.
Macro are just for the fun, nd filters are the ones I was really interested in. Cpl, meh, it came with it so what the hell. Maybe it'll come handy to avoid glass reflections at zoos or shooting the inside of stores from the window.
The bag ssimply was a must have to carry everyday stuff and the camera.
Next month will come the tele lens. 55-200 vr because poorfag.
What is a decent macro lens for an a6300? I am thinking of this: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-SEL90M28G-Standard-Prime-Mirrorless-Cameras/dp/B00U29GNEG/
Peak designs strap.
Nothing because I'm still a poor uni student. But I have a job interview next week so I may be splurging on a new 70-200mm 2.8 and 150-450mm 4.5-5.6 for my K-3 if I get the job.
hopefully here Mon/Tue
I bought a 200mm 2.8 L II used from a friend. Can't wait to use it next week.
>>2801214
damn i cant wait for summer, pic is comfy
>>2801269
how much people here use dwanes? what are the advantages?
i mean other than the fact theyre the last people who could process a discontinued film why would someone want to get their film developed by dwanes rather than their local lab or doing it themselves?
Film. A national park permit. Fuel for road trips.
>>2801361
Not Murrican, so can't speak from direct experience, but I'd imagine that their position as an established mail-in pro lab in a populous country probably gives some assurances as to the quality of their service.
That could come down to the speed of turnaround, the likelihood that they have best practice procedures in place for handling and organising orders, the likelihood that their processing is going to be on the highest quality equipment, with name brand chemicals, and the strictest QC and consistency of results.
If you were a pro still shooting film, I think clients would expect you to justify using anyone else.
>>2801135
>bought sigma meme lenses WITH filters
topkek, what a waste of money
>>2801361
It's like going to the Kaaba, it needs to be done once in your life if you are a film photographer.
You should really see if they can do a cross process of Kodachrome 64 to b&w.
>>2801238
Seed alright for the price. Ive got plenty of extra cash for fun stuff like this. The clip is built well and took a beating today when i fell down a small cliff face. Tumbled and rolled on my camera (6d with a 16-35Lii) and it stayed tight on my backpack strap. No complaints and comfy to wear. Bought at my local camera store where everything is overpriced anyways. I didnt want to wait for shipping for it or a knockoff. Money well spent in my opinion
>>2801197
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 633
>>2801407
>ipad mini
Unless you got the new ipad pro you got an outdated piece of trash.
>>2801395
What national park in aus makes you fucking pay?
>>2801432
Heaps, in SA. Applied for and was granted a blanket permit. I can basically go anywhere in South Australia, excluding the Woomera restricted zone and certain Aboriginal communities.
>>2801433
In SA you guys have the nuclear test fields and underground community/ex facilities its pretty fucking great need a good car though.
>>2801135
>What did you buy this week /p?
Bread
Eggs
Tuna
Aubergine
Courgettes
Tomatos
Limes
Olive Oil
Cheese
Coffee
>>2801438
Beer
Bourbon
Beer
Pizza and chips
Beer
Bourbon paella
Bourbon
Nandos
And two roles of 120 velvia.
Going also to try IR shots with it.
>>2801439
>And two roles of 120 velvia.
faggot
>>2801438
What do you do with courgettes? I've never really found a use for them where I wouldn't have preferred a different vegetable.
>>2801438
>Aubergine
>Courgettes
Had to look that shit up. British people have some weird name for stuff. If I went to england and asked for eggplant would people know what I mean?
>>2801453
People would know you're a dirty foreign yank and snicker behind your fat arse.
I bet you would ask where the 'soda' and 'potayta cheeps' are.
>>2801451
I think most people mix them into salads.
I sometimes do that but more often add them to the mush I take into work to microwave along with the aubergine and .... oh I forgot to mention peppers. I bought peppers as well. And I just bought apples, bananas and pears since that last post.
/ck/ would no doubt be appalled
>>2801135
A bunch of original Cokin filters, and I learned I don't need to modify my camera for IR so I bought an IR filter.
I don't need new cameras and gear to make photos.
>>2801492
>buys a bunch of gear
>I don't need new gear to make photos
...m8
>>2801442
>zoom lens
>IR photography
Be sure to check it first on Flickr or on some forums, most zoom lens have hotspot problems in the IR band.
Two rolls of 35mm film
>>2801494
It's a filter set worth $50 or less, not a whole camera body and L lenses.
And to add I bought the filter set because I actually needed a filter set for long exposure.
Twat.
>>2801483
But would they know what an eggplant is?
>>2801497
So you DO need new gear to make photos.
>>2801497
So you're a poorfag gearfag.
Gear is gear. Doesn't matter if you're wanking over $4 goodwill compacts, $4000 flagship bodies, pieces of colored glass, bags, cleaning swabs or whatever. Being cheap doesn't magically make it not gear nor does it make you any less of a gearfag, just a gearfag who feels superior to other gearfags because you buy cheap shit instead of because you buy expensive shit.
>>2801500
Some would, others would be intrigued and try burying and egg in the ground to see if it will grow
>>2801490
>often add them to the mush I take into work to microwave
>microwave
disgusting pleb
These. And they are TERRIBLE.
They've actually ruined lenspens.
>>2801490
In salads? That's interesting. I find the taste to be too 'green' for me. Cucumbers are a nicer alternative for salad but of course they should never be cooked. Guess I'll just avoid zucchini for now
>>2801540
Pan fried zucchini on either olive oil or sesame oil is awesome, put a bit of black pepper on it and some pumpkin seed oil if you have any.
>>2801543
>zucchini
Didn't he play for Juventus about 10 years ago?
That recipe would work well with courgettes though
>>2801312
About $1k shipped for errythang
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:03:26 11:53:22 Image Height 1195 Image Width 1196
>>2801590
Load of shite
bought a sigma dp2 merrill, every shitty thing a person has ever said about this camera is true
sigma software is shit, camera takes 20 seconds to save a photo, iso above 100 is terrible, has a particular ability to capture the color 'puke yellow'
b-but at least it's really sharp, right guys?
I bought a Minolta AF 75-300 f/4.5-5.6 and a Zenit EM with a 50mm f/1.8 and a 35mm f/2.8
Looks like /p/ bought a lot of nice new gear this week!
I'm sure that means we'll be seeing some photos soon, yes?
>>2801631
What are we, lovers? Fuck off
>>2801631
well memed, my friend :^)
€250
R8
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model SM-N900W8 Equipment Make SAMSUNG Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:03:26 11:20:48 Flash No Flash ISO Speed Rating 250 F-Number f/2.2 Focal Length 4.13 mm Exposure Bias 0 EV White Balance Auto Exposure Time 1/15 sec
>>2801500
IF THEYRE HEATHENS
FUCK YOU CPATCHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS
>>2801674
>NEX-6
>not an a6000
It's shit m8
>>2801674
you can get a nex 7 for that much ;-;
My F100 has been sitting unused for like 2 years after I sold off my last AF Nikon glass. Convince me not to get a 50mm f/1.8G or maybe a 28mm f/1.8G. I've owned both lenses before and liked both a lot. I'll probably start selling my Leica gear and going full Nikon.
>>2801431
why would i want a tablet bigger than my laptop?
the 9 inch has much more appeal
>>2801728
>convince me to buy one of two lenses I've already owned
What?
>>2801590
Seems like a fair price. I hope you got the good version of the 65mm.
Just bought a Zeiss Planar 50mm f2. I was gonna get a summicron but I got a better deal on this.
>>2801766
>the 9 inch has much more appeal
The new pro is 9.7 inches lol.
>>2801779
so jelly
>>2801779
my bentax is f1.4
haha cuck.
>>2801354
Great lens. What are you going to shoot with it?
>>2801803
Shoot?
>>2801778
I'm new to Mamiya - which one is good and what's the diff?
>>2801592
Thanks cock!
>>2801981
There is a floating system version. I don't have an RZ67, I just want one but don't like certain aspects of it. The floating element one should perform better across different distances. Their probably both fine though.
>>2801804
Shooooooooooot.
I bought an X Pro 2
>>2801779
pig disgusting
>>2802088
yeah, if he's not going to mount it on a patrician Ikon, what's the point
>>2801135
Red Weapon 6k
Couple of Zeiss Ultraprimes.
>>2802123
>Except for the kit lens desu
Please find me a better kit with the same range and size
>inb4 samsung
Samsung doesn't count
initiate hipster faggot mode
This.
Going to pad out the lenses with a 40/50 and a 150 next week. Maybe a prism finder too.
After filing a 135 back for the Mamiya, I don't think I can justify the price of the 135w just for ease of use though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 84 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:27 14:31:06 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/6.4 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/6.4 Brightness 4.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 56.00 mm Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2801495
I checked flickr, there was some images with Tokina in infrared.
Just tested it, works great.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Photographer unknown Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:03:27 16:28:24 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 1.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 10.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Bought this qt for $60, a little high, but definitely worth it, going to develop the pics today.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot A50 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop 7.0 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 90 dpi Vertical Resolution 90 dpi Image Created 2004:09:17 09:45:46 Shutter Speed 1/60 sec Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.15 m Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 4.31 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 450 Image Height 341
>>2801135
Yooo let me know how that 24-35 is. I've been missing the gap between 24 and 50 for ages but I don't know what to pull the trigger on
>>2802272
YESS
BLESS THE BRONICA MASTER RACE! BEST CAMERA EVERERREREREER
>>2801766
10 inches then? Doesn't matter to me, still smaller than my laptop and isn't 12 inch fuckhuge
about to order a 50 1.2 canon.
i bought a 5d mark iii when it first came out, but it's still sitting in the box, might take it out this week .
>>2801135
85mm 1.8
Should arrive this week. Pretty excited. I rented both this one and the 1.4 (nikon) for a day to compare. Expected the 1.4 to be better, and it was marginally so, but not triple the price better.
A6000 lens turbo and canon fd 50 1.4. Trying to get some astro panoramas on a budget.
>>2801794
>pentax
>calling a leica user a cuck
lel
>>2801532
I just bought one yesterday. Do yours also have a bunch of greyish powder on the pen-tip? I assumed it was some sort of fluid but it took me using my old lens pen to get all the fucking grey dust off. I bought on last year of the same line and it didn't have this shit on it.
Bought an OM-Zuiko 35mm 2.8 to match my 21mm and my 50mm when i work on films. Love the 50 and 21 (the 21, especially, is one of my favorite lenses) so, I imagine the 35 is also swell. Haven't tested it out yet. Told the owner of the shop I was a fan of OM mount stuff and he tossed in a 2x Converter for free. Not bad. Messed around with it today. Not great results, but it's a fun toy.
>>2801794
so fucking ignorant lol
picked up an a7s ii, rokinon 35 and 85mm T1.5, Benro monopod, pelican 1510. a6000 is relegated to b-roll.
>>2801446
LOL
>>2802839
Yes, same issue.
It's their new "invisible carbon"... Which is now more visible than ever. Idiots.
Just bought one of these.
>>2802842
films as in movies? why do you use zuikos? way to small and impossible to use w follow focus in my experience
>>2802287
You don't like any of the 28mm or 35mm?
>>2802287
Well everything I'm going to say is subjective but just consider what youll be mainly shooting. I picked the 24-35mm, despite the 11mm difference, because I enjoy shooting with my X100T at f2 - enough to sacrifice shooting up to 70mm. 24 for those big wide shots, 35 in case a person is involved. I dont believe 24mm is good enough for someones profile, even with crop; and I didn't want to carry two lenses - so I opted out of those primes. If I really wanted a nice portrait shots I would just use the 50mm or 85mm prime; on the other end if I really wanted nice events shots I would buy the 24mm.
Read up on Shotkit for some insight on why some photographer prefer a certain focal length on their niche.
Should be here any day now
>inb4 angry comments seething with jealousy
>>2802957
What sort of faggot doesn't have a built in spirit level on their camera?
And if's for a tripod- that's even worse
>>2802957
jelly as fuck desu. shame my camera doesn't have a hotshoe/coldshoe.
>>2802994
dude free toffifee AND riesen?
>>2802959
What sort of faggot doesn't realize that not everyone shoots digital?
>>2802994
Is that for a single roll of film or am I missing something...
>>2803002
I reckon it's $100 worth of film. a roll of those is about $3
>>2803002
100 rolls. £1 each or for murricans. $1.41 each.
and some "free" sweets :3c
>>2803001
Poorfags shooting film
>>2803001
>mfw someone shoots film near me
>>2803053
>using a gif to represent how much dick you choke on
It's okay anon, we all know you're a faggot
>>2803012
That's a bloody bargain m8.
>>2802902
No I'm just not sure what I want. I already have a 14-24 and a 50 but sometimes the 24 is too wide and the 50 is too long. Stepping forward or back isn't always an option either. I have heard great things about the 28 1.8 optically but am a bit concerned with the build quality.
>>2802912
Yeah I thought it would make a nice walk around lens. And a great compromise between zooming flexibility and optical quality. If I had that and pocketed a small 50 I would be in good shape probably; but I wasn't sure how the 24-35 faired in reviews yet.
I bought a roll of Cinestill 800T last week.
A nikkor AF 24mm 2.8 and thinking about a Nikkor AF 28-85mm 3.5-4.5
Nooby here, spent spring break fucking around with a friends camera, realized I love taking photos. Bought a nikon d3300 starter bundle for slightly over 500, should be here tomorrow, I'm pretty hype
>>2803247
Good luck, have fun. Get a cheap Cokin filter set from china to start with long exposure.
Also read Understanding Exposure by Bryan Peterson first.
>>2803247
You've started all wrong, Nikon are dog turd. You'll only realise when you're too far in, and spent too much on shitty Nikon optics to turn around and choose again.
>>2803247
buy a pentax k1000 in any condition and go from there
I bought some bubble teas.
Tasted delicious. Very rich and sweetened only slightly.
>>2803253
Somehow I think it'll be alright in the end. I only plan to get into it as a hobby and my career path is gonna set me up with a decent income, if I really did make a mistake I'm sure switching won't be so godawful.
>>2803250
Thank you bro, I'll def check out that book. The bundle I got comes with these
http://www.adorama.com/PRO52KIT.html?utm_source=EMW&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=AdoramaOrderConfirmation&hotlink=t&svfor=5m
I'm assuming I can learn with them just as well?
>>2803256
Seriously tho, Nikon have made zero good optics in over 15 years. Even Tamron are groundbreaking compared to Nikon.
Not too late, cancel that order.
>>2803261
Can any other anons weigh in on this? When I was researching beginner cameras 5+ sites said that nikon d3300 was a great choice.
I really don't plan on going pro, it can't be that bad can it? If it is what would you recommend around the 500 dollar range instead?
>>2803270
That guy is a fucking idiot. Seriously. That camera and Nikon's lenses will serve you just fine.
>>2803273
I thought so, thank you for the input
>>2803256
The UV filter is garbage. The most usable is the circular polarizer, the ND2 might work in some lower lighting settings, but to make a dramatic sky with blurred clouds or smooth water surface you will need at least ND6 with around 2 minutes of exposure.
>>2803279
Depending on your usage there is only one other serious contender with the Pentax K-50, but its strengths come out when you want to use it a lot outdoors in not so ideal weather or worse.
For generic shooting everything the D3300 will serve you well.
>>2802994
Where did you buy this!?
>>2803448
Poundland sell C41, 135x24 for £1 in the UK. I only popped online because my local store was out of stock, but they started selling online last year. If it's out of stock, just check back every few days.
Also: Beware of drama over "discontinuing" AGFA, someone spreads the rumour after talking to someone in store every few months.
>>2802994
>200/24
>24
>>2803456
Great, thanks! Bummer they don't ship to the rest of Europe though...
>>2801174
fucking trash
Lowepro Fastpack BP 250 AW II
Ordered last Friday, arrived today. I really needed a good, real camera bag. Been using a small lunchbox sized bag which was fine for a body and two lens but I've got more gear and I hike and travel way more often so this bag seemed like this perfect fit.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
>>2802889
nice
>>2803287
Yeah I honestly would rather have a well rounded generic camera to start out. I don't really know what I want my niche to be so I'm really just gonna be getting snap shits of everything and anything I can.
>>2803270
D3300 are nice, but with a little more you could afford a D5200 and it would be nicer, tho
D3300 + 35mm dx + 50mm G and you will be fine and will be taking better pictures than those guys who don't even know what optics is.
>>2803189
You don't have to worry about anything 24mm or wider, you're covered. You'll be better off with a 24-70mm. If you have a good reason not to go for that then you really should find something between 24mm and 50mm. Leave the 12-24mm for all your wide shots, usually with a tripod. You need something to go along with your 50mm and a 28mm might be just the thing. You could get a 35mm if you want to stick with just one lens instead of the 28mm and 50mm. Try out all your options before you buy.
I just bought pic related, same lens too. Did I do good?
I'm tired of having different camera systems, I'm going all F mount and that's it.
>>2803689
Couldn't do better.
About go get a Fuji XT1 with the 12mm F2.0, 35mm F1.4 and 18mm pancake F2.0
Will be my pleasure camera for travel etc going to keep my 5Diii for work.
>>2803689
nice. D700 is one of the best cameras ever made!
>>2802898
Yeah, as in movies. I like their look. I shoot mostly in black and white, but i do like their color quite a bit. People say they 'lack character.' I think that can;t be further frolm the truth. The images are plainly stated but the detail and contrast is nice, especially for the price. I started out using the 21mm just because its one of the first lenses I got and I have gotten really accustom to it. The zuiko's are part of how I get my 'look' so to speak and, for cinema, its better to have a set that goes together than a random selection of different lenses at random focal lengths.
As for follow focus, I have had the opposite experience. It works just fine for me. Most of my shots are stable tripod shots anyway. Its not the gear, necessarily, but what you make of it. I would love to have a number of other prime lenses to pick from but, for now, the G.Zuikos seemed to be my best bet and I've come to really like them. I use them for mostly documentary but they work nicely for narrative films too. They have this kind of 'art-filmy' look about them I like. A lot of filmmakers have come into their own by creatively using whatever was at their disposal at the time. One day, I'll be using a set of some crazy expensive lenses, but, for now, I'm perfectly happy with the Zuikos.
Just tested out the 35 today alongside the 50 and 21 and they all match up pretty well. Gonna start a documentary project in the next few days so I'm anxious to bust them out.
>>2803689
As an ex Nikon photographer I can confirm that this is sexy as fuck.
>>2803692
If you don't need the 18mm to be a pancake it may be cheaper and better for you to by the 18-55 f2.8-4.
Optically it's better than the 18mm which is probably the worst XF lens produced so far.
f2-f2.8 isn't that huge when you consider the IS that you gain.
>>2803751
I was thinking that and had a look at the prices the cheapest I could find the 18-55 was £230 used or the 18mm new for 230. I just read today, they are working on a 23mm RW I think I will hold off on the mid range and just get the wide and the 35 for now.
Thanks for the advise doe anon!
>>2803689
BEAST MODE
>>2803270
I just bought a D5300 kit for $500.
sold my ef-s 24mm 2.8 for 100 yuros (got it for 100 quid a while back)
sold my EF 28-80 USM for 60 yuros (got it for 20 quid a while back)
i guess i'll get a 24-105 or something like that next, after I move back to the UK, or I'll maybe upgrade my glorious indestructible 40D to a 60D or a 7D
or maybe a tamron 17-50 f2.8 non VC, they say that one is great
actually I would upgrade to the 7D straight away but all the batteries and the grip and all that shit :(
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
just bought my 2nd blackrapid strap and will be teathering it too with strong as fuck accessary code like so:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-R5CvP87m4
feelsincredibleman, don't ever really have to worry about dropping ever again
>>2803925
dis 1
>>2801322
:'(
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Sean Image-Specific Properties:
Nice i love my d5100
>>2803918
Why? The iso on the 7D is not much better than the 40D and the dynamic range on both is shit.
A real upgrade would be full frame or nikon/fuji/sony APSC.
Canon sensor tec is stale as fuck and I've saying that as someone with a 50D 7DII and 5Diii
>>2803918
>7D
pls don't, cropped sensors canon are shit, pick a 5D Mk II or even an old 5D.
I was going to upgrade from my old 1D Mk II to a 7D. Has it really aged that badly?
>>2804215
IMO, the only old canon that's still worth it is a 5D MK II, but I guess the price is closer to a 6D, depends where you live.
>>2804220
Well I already have a 6D and wanted something with a crop sensor and good burst to use as my tele body when shooting press stuff. The 1D works well but weighs a tonne and the high ISO performance is non existent
>>2804211
what if some people just prefer crop cause they are lighter, have a tighter FOV, can use crop lenses and make full frame lenses not vignette like a motherfucker?
>>2804222
Oh... so if you just take photos in daylight with the tele, 7D will do just fine.
>>2804193
>>2804211
Really? I wanted to try my friends 7D but every time I had the chance I was drunk so I preferred not to put anything expensive on my hands that wasn't mine.
To be honest I do not have the slightest issue with my 40D. If anything, the fact that I can't really go past ISO 400 withouth preparing my mind to do some PS magic to remove the noise (or just VSCO the shit out of the photos because noise anyway lmao).
Also 10.1MP is not a lot to play with but I can live with that since I never print, all I do is digital.
Most of what I do is either studio stuff (fashion/portraits/products) or architectural/real estate so I was a little hesitant to change to FF.
It sounds stupid not wanting to go FF doing what I do, but if I want to keep doing all of that after switching I would have to sell my 40D, all my EF-S glass: My EF-S 55-250, my EF-S 10-18 and my 50 1.8, and buy their full frame equivalents (70-200 f4, 17-40 I guess, and 85 1.2) which are much more expensive.
If I ever start making money with this then yeah, I will probs get a 5D3 or even a 5Ds and get some EF L glass but as a hobby right now I think my setup works just fine, again, my only complaints are 40D's high ISO performance and that I only have 10MP with it.
I though about selling my beloved 40D and getting a 50D so that I can keep both my EF-S glass and all my 40D batteries and grip since they work with the 50D too, and that way I would get 15MP and a slight improvement on high ISO.
I don't know. At the moment I'm just happpy I sold that shitty 28-80 for more than what I got it for.
>>2804264
just buy a 650D
>>2804266
>650D
I can't stand DSLR cameras without top LCD, I use it all the time.
Also I guess the viewfinder is ultra tiny. The one in the 40D feels tiny already compared to my old EOS film cameras. And I have very big hands and tiny cameras don't feel very good on my hands.
>>2804271
the 5d2/3 has a tiny viewfinder compared to my AE1 but that never detered anyone from shooting good pictures
Looking at the top lcd takes about the same time as looking at the lcd and you can buy a 20 dollar battery grip if it is too small
considering your needs getting a newer sensor 3 digit rebel which supports for your ef-s glass just seemed a better idea than buying another 50D which is 2 whooping generations behind
>>2804281
Fuck it I think I'm good with gear for now.
I'll keep the 40D and just wait until I have an actual issue with it. Again the resolution is not the end of the world and I don't do much high ISO stuff anyway...
Getting another camera would be GAS at this moment I think, and we all hate gearfaggotry don't we?
![61iZsJI11SL._SL1001_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/swiicZd.jpg "61iZsJI11SL._SL1001_[1].jpg")
>>2801135
This shit.
It's aight.
>>2804293
nah upgrading from a 9 year old digital camera can barely be called GAS desu
>>2804309
Does he come with all the gear and accessories?
>>2804556
>mfw just realized it's 9 years old
Should be coming on Friday
>>2804556
It is if you don't need to upgrade for any reason. If a camera suits your needs, keep it until it breaks.
>>2804649
sorry
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 683 Scene Capture Type Standard
I bought a pentacon 29 2.8 for $50.
Did I get ripped off?
>>2804730
is??
>>2804818
You will die in 10 days.
>>2804831
Soligor 35mm 3.5 I think
>>2801490
I just did a courgette, tomato and fetta tart tonight, twas noice.
What about courgette and potatoe fritters?
>>2801508
By this logic, everyone is a gearfag. So calling anyone a gearfag carries absolutely zero significance.
Thanks for making gearfag a useless term, gearfag.
Didn't want to leave Budapest without at least something from the local shops. Should help with 2/45 Rokkor's crappy minimum focus range at least.
>>2802041
actually first valid post, congrats.
I got a x100t as a birthday present from my wife and its exactly what i needed, not more not less. once i have some spare cash lying around i will buy the x pro 2 as well...
>>2804884
Everybody wanks over gear?
I assumed that some people actually just used it.
Nothing as of yet, though I did see an Om-4t out a few days ago and may swipe it if the seller can come down on the price. Either that or a Maxxus to fit 2-3 lenses that have been serving me no purpose.
Bought 4 packs of Fuji fp100c while it was still at a reasonable price.
Pentax k30 + kit lens, mint condition. On its way as we speak. What am I in for?
Bought it today at a best buy, open box deal, for $420. I took it out of the box and it literally looks brand spanking new. No cosmetic flaws at all and no internal hiccups so far. Happy af senpai. I'll check the shutter count when i get home, i'm at school right now.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 750 Image Height 1334
>>2804998
Some serious photography with a weather sealed body and non sealed lens. If you want a 50-200 WR kit telezoom just let me know, I sell ot for cheap.
>>2804818
I have one. If an ass had an ass, that would be that lens.
>>2804937
From what the anon was saying in their previous posts, anyone who buys any kind of gear, for any reason, is a gearfag.
Doesn't matter if we actually use it or not.
>>2805094
No, that's not even close to what anon was saying.
Go read it again. Anon says "wanking over".
Sandectomy your vag and read before you go full retard next time.
>>2805015
>I have one. If an ass had an ass, that would be that lens.
wait why?
>>2805010
Lucky just got the body for 380, best buy had na open box for 440 which would be a deal on the kit lens but I rather put it directly towards the 16mm or the 20mm if I can scrounge up the cash
>>2805010
>buys brand new camera
>it literally looks brand spanking new
Holy shit batman, that's awesome.
Should we have a gay snowballing orgy to celebrate?
I just started getting into photography did i fuck up /p/?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D80 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 1094 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 157 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3872 Image Height 2592 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:10:17 14:05:34 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.79 m Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Auto, Return Not Detected Focal Length 105.00 mm Comment http://Radojuva.com.ua Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 720 Image Height 479 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation High Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2805828
Nah you did good m8, now go out and take pics
My fridge was looking a little empty desu. I was down to one box of Portra 400, 3 rolls of HP5, 1 roll of tri-x and two rolls of tri-x.
This should keep me stocked for a little while :3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:01 12:36:26 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 0.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2801135
A GoPro
nothing because i am poor :(
>>2805931
>open here
#rekt
>>2806003
My stupid friend did that. I'm also triggered by it.
>>2803689
Well look what came in the mail today. It's a bit bigger and heavier than the F100 unfortunately, but it feels just as solid and I can't wait to try it out as soon as the battery charges up.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4928 Image Height 3264 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:01 13:04:12 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 0.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 994 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
Arrived today.
>>2806183
I don't know why but I can't stand HP5, it always looks like shit to me when I try it. I always get big clumpy nasty grain.
Satin Ilford paper is great though, good choice. I didn't know they made sheets smaller than 8x10, where did you find that?
>>2806192
Use T-Max Dev, anon.
Also, it comes as a liquid concentrate so you mix it at room temp, you get 16 or so rolls out of a litre of 1:4 solution, and it keeps for as long as you should ever need it to.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:12:30 07:54:45 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 532 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
Anyone here decent with fomapan? I've used it before but recently switched to Delta and... well... Delta does what it's told. Foma seems incredibly inconsistent and temperamental.
It's sheet film. Mostly Foma 100. I shoot it at 50ISO, expose for shadows, agitate in deep tanks for 15s per minute and add an extra minute to whatever the appropriate time:temp reading is. Normally they're at least ok, but is there a better developer? Better technique to use?
On another note, is this ADOX 20 stuff as ridiculously high quality as they claim? The whole "mega-megapickels" schtick they're claiming?
>>2806294
I use HC-110 and it's so convenient that I don't feel like trying anything else. Isn't HP5 traditional grain anyway, why would it require T-Max developer? I even do Fuji Acros in HC-110 despite it being T-grain and it turns out fine, HP5 is the only film that hasn't behaved properly.
what a shitty consumer whore thread.
>>2806295
I developed fomapan 100 for the first time yesterday and used 25% xtol for 10 minutes as per the massive dev chart and they came out seriously underdeveloped
>>2806300
sounds about right. I only know so much but as a general rule
- the ISO is half what is on the box
- it needs aggressive agitation (I practically shake the stuff in dev tanks)
- it needs longer development
i think the MDC takes its pointers from the official dev times and FOMA are lying bastards
fwiw my usual setup is stock ID-11. If the dev time is 7min I push it to 8-8:30 and agitate for an extra 5s per minute. They usually come out a lot denser then, but the downside is the lovely midtones foma has can sometimes get lost.
don't have any scans of the stuff on my laptop but it's worth finding out "your method" and then sticking with it. it can be good film
>>2806296
Tmax Dev doesn't really have much to do with the films of the same name, it's pretty strange.
Although I have souped some TMY in it, and it was fine.
The flipside is that I really don't like its results with finer grained films.
Makes Retro 80s look like garbage. But I use it with Tri-X and HP5 quite happily.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.6 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:06:27 09:53:18 Exposure Time 1/90 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/11.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 533 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Center-Weighted Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 100 dpi Vertical Resolution 100 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 679 Image Height 390 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2806432
>vomits internally
>>2806192
>>Satin Ilford paper is great though, good choice. I didn't know they made sheets smaller than 8x10, where did you find that?
Some completely random e-shop that does not even specialize in photography, but they had the cheapest bulk HP5 and also a large selection of Ilford photographic paper.
>>2801182
OP... and me.
Thanks for asking.
My first non-disposable/iphone camera! Next week I'm going out to the mountains to take pictures.
>>2804649
You fucked up bad
An Olympus OM-D E-M5 with a Panasonic 25mm, should be getting it around Thursday.
I'll probably get an adapter next week to use some of my Dad's old OM lenses.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model SLT-A77V Camera Software Aperture 3.2.3 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 45 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2012:05:07 15:49:31 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Brightness 4.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 768 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal GPS Status Measurement Interoperability Geodetic Survey Data WGS-84 GPS Differential Correction No Correction
>>2807437
Have fun. You have a nice little camera there.
>>2804649
Ouch...
>>2807461
new version should be coming sooner to compete against nikon d500..... Tough you know you can still use it and take great pictures with it anyway
Got bored, bought this for $15 Canucklestan bucks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:03 17:38:43 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 665 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2802889
now way
![Tamron-272E-SP-AF-90-1201348-2-c3251[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/JVoSiOp.jpg "Tamron-272E-SP-AF-90-1201348-2-c3251[1].jpg")
got myself an A7 on the Craigslist
did i do good /p/
>>2807597
how do i fix the errors of my ways
>>2807594
It's a nice catch, anon. Don't listen to that fool.
You're gonna love the 14+ stops of dynamic range for sure. Now go out and take some pictures!
>>2807601
By buying a second one.
>>2801135
A bunch of shit I'm going to flip for 50% profit next week.
>>2807601
you overpaid
>>2807634
...but i got it for $500
>>2807637
You underpaid, give the seller the extra money that you owe him.
picked up a nex c3 for a small everyday carry. Can anyone recommend a good prime for it?
Had a good morning and won a bucket list camera on ebay.
>>2807444
Nice, how much did it cost you ?
Bought my first mirorless, the Fuji xa1
In b4 customs rips me a new asshole because it's coming from Moscow. But it's going to look comically cute on my huge boxy Praktica.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH Camera Model CaplioG3 modelS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2010:03:06 22:17:05 Exposure Time 1/48 sec F-Number f/3.6 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 154 Lens Aperture f/3.7 Brightness 3.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 10.70 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1284 Image Height 1428 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>2807857
YOU GOOFED
>>2807792
£360
>>2807444
that is one sexy looking camera. Too bad about the sensor though, I've been warned to stay away from micro 4/3. Is it any good? Can you post samples?
![v3[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/tYjXXTI.jpg "v3[1].jpg")
