Gear thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
Gear Thread
If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.
Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new.
No pointless (brand) arguments and dickwaving allowed! You have been warned!
I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!
And don't forget, be polite!
Previous:
>>2789182
Which sony is best sony?
>>2791225
what's that accordian he's using
>>2791231
Deardorff. They made beautiful large format camera's.
>>2791231
it's the new Leica SL
![14009872066_56bc106ea2_b[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/s8PKBGM.jpg "14009872066_56bc106ea2_b[1].jpg")
What do you think of the Fuji GW690 series?
I'm looking to buy my first flash. I shoot using an entry level Nikon DSLR, and want to use the flash to fuck around with some low light situations (parties/concerts) as well as maybe some portraiture or studio-ish stuff. Also I'm a poor student. So basically looking for something that:
- Costs less than 100 euros (I don't mind buying used)
- Can be used off-camera (wireless or wired doesn't matter)
- Is intuitive to use for a beginner
- Will work well with my D5100
- BONUS: Has a rechargeable battery so I don't burn my money on buying batteries.
What does /p/ recommend? Used nikon SB-xxx or something cheap and chinese? I'm really lost here so any info is appreciated!
pic unrelated
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi Image Created 2016:03:09 16:33:34
>>2791234
i like how it looks, it reminds me of the ford explorer
>>2791234
You shouldn't buy one
>because you'll drive up the price for the rest of us
If you can deal with a fixed length rangefinder with no meter, go for it.
>>2791242
>flash at concerts.
youre going to take a lil beating there m8, if you dont know the band and has made arrangements.
Alright, I do have a question:
I'm looking for a radio controlled flash kit - that is, a flash + a radio transmitter that connects to the PC socket on my lens.
I have no use for any sort of automatic TTL metering, because I'm gonna be using it on a manual film camera with an external flash meter, but the ability to control flash power from the transmitter module would be nice.
So far I've only found expensive TTL metered system flashes for Canon or Nikon. I'm looking for something simple and cheap - I'm perfectly ok with any noname chinese flash.
>>2791207
You don't have to, but having no monopod or tripod with gimbal will get tiring quite quickly if your huge prime lens weighs a few kg on top of what your camera already weighs.
And on the longer tele range, you might just enjoy the stability, even vs what IS gives you.
>>2791271
> to the PC socket on my lens
Can't you just use the ISO hotshoe instead? In which case, YN560 TX / III / IV.
I think there is a PC hotshoe trigger->ISO socket adapter thingie if you need it, too.
h8 my latest purchase lads
and my shitty instagram filter
>>2791316
>not the 28/2.8AIS
you had one job
Not a fan of F2s personally, but I love the metered prism shutter dials from back then.
>>2791242
>Playing gig at my local club
>See some crop baby with his Nikon in hand
>Giant flashgun
>Playing complex piece with bandmates
>Crowd going wild
>Suddenly 1/1 flash hits my eyes
>Drop my guitar
>I'M FUCKING BLIND
>OH MY FUCKING GOD WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT
>BLIIIIIIIND
>Crowd starts to riot
>Don't get paid for the set
>Have to pay damages to club manager
All because some crop baby wanted to shoot flash at a corcert, with rechargeable batteries no less.
>>2791316
Can't hate on a 28mm f3.5 and that patina. Is the viewfinder bright with that lens? Also what kind of of focusing screen does it have?
>>2791326
Rechargeable batteries? Jesus Fuck!
>>2789182
Gear thread is still going, ignore this one.
>>2791234
I really enjoy using mine.
It's big and clunky and kind of fugly but it's easy to use, no reliance on batteries and if you can get used to the fixed lens then it's a great medium format tool.
I've not yet devved my first rolls though, so no IQ pixel peeping soz.
>mine's name is Benny btw
>>2791269
I know this sounds pretentious but I'm pretty active in my local scene so I reckon I could find myself some events where I can practice. Any flash reccomendations though?
>>2791286
Is it harder, easier, or the same to aim a camera on a tripod for birds
>>2791326
what does 1/1 flash mean
>>2791401
Depends on your setup.
A gimbal head can make a big and heavy telezoom lens with lens collar almost effortless to hold and aim - that wouldn't be the case with handheld shots, obviously.
A decent or better ball head also can make a long telezoom easier to aim at a distant landed bird.
On the other hand, some shitty $30 low-end pan-tilt head garbage bin tripod will basically only get in the way.
>>2791402
It's the full power setting for the unit in question.
>>2791404
... why the fuck don't you just call it 100% then like a normal person
why 1/1
>>2791407
Because that's how it's labelled on that unit. Have you never used a flash that measured its power output in 1/2^x?
>>2791407
Fractional notation is typical for photography.
Probably mostly a relic of the analog age, but it's not like anyone is in a hurry to change that, in most cases there's just no immediate need to.
It's also not like f-stops generally are more practical than AV, but we're still working with f-stops...
I have an old circa 1975 camera lens that sat unused for a long time and the aperture seems to be stuck.
I think a cleaning will fix it, does anyone have a recommendation for places to fix something like this.
>>2791411
i haven't used a flash
What do you guys think of the Sony 18-105mm F/4? Does anyone have one?
>>2791425
> http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Sony/Sony-E-PZ-18-105mm-F4-G-OSS-mounted-on-Sony-A6000---Measurements__942
Not the worst of all ~6x zoom factor lenses, but I'd still not touch it, much less buy it.
I am having fun with my new D750 and have purchased a 50mm f/1.8 to suppliment the 24-120 f/4 that came with it.
For my next lens I am trying to decide between a tele zoom or a wide angle. Nikon 200-500 f/5.6 and the Nikon 14-24 f/2.8 to be precise.
With the tele I would pursue wildlife or sports photography, but honestly I think the wide angle would be much more fun and versatile.
What do?
Also, are there any third part lenses worth considering that would achieve these objectives for less money?
Would also consider a wide angle fast prime for $1,700 or less.
Thanks!
>>2791475
20/2.8 + 70-200, 80-20, 80-400, 200-500
2 primes and a telezoom is my setup.
>>2791230
The D4, 1Dx, D750 of 5D Mk3 if you can afford it.
If your budget is lower I suggest a D7000. Or maybe even a Fuji.
>>2791242
Try looking at Yongnuo. For that price you could get the 530-TX and two 530-III. Really bright at full power and full radio control (and wireless powerlevel and zoom adjustment). Really decent for the money.
>>2791475
Depends what you are shooting. If you are making money off your gear then the 200-500 might be able to pull of some decent portraits.
If you are merely a hobbyist I think you will have MUCH more fun with the 14-24. Wide angle lenses are some of the most fun to use creatively in my opinion.
>>2791475
here
>>2791516
If I get a wide I want it to be much lower than the 24 I already have with my 24-120. I don't really want to consider anything below 18.
>>2791517
I am hobbyist, there are so many shots where I wish I had a wider view. The tele would be nice, but with the wide angle I could just throw it on and go out and get weird.
Now, is there any benefit to just going with a fixed prime close to 14 or 18? The 2.8 on the 14-35 would probably suit my needs just fine.
If I got the wide, I would probably wait at least 6 months or a year before my next major lense upgrade, which would likely be a very fast telephoto and I wouldn't be as budget constrained (could shop for models in the 2000-6000 price range).
Thanks for the tips, both of you!
black or silver Fujifilm X70?
silver has the iconic fuji look,
but black is more sneaky.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:13 19:32:52 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 615
I need a camera, mostly for pictures of objects.
I know basically nothing about digital cameras.
I have very limited funds.
The Sony DSCH300/B caught my eye.
Any thoughts on it?
Any better options at a similar price.
>>2791225
if your sensor is smaller than your head,
you're just a casual pleb.
>>2791647
black.
silver will scratch.
>>2791651
Don't ever buy a fucking bridge camera anon
>>2791653
didnt know about that, thanks.
![Fuji+Fujifilm+X-Pro2+XPro2+XF+35mm+f2+WR[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Nty2HT2.jpg "Fuji+Fujifilm+X-Pro2+XPro2+XF+35mm+f2+WR[1].jpg")
>>2791225
Im a fella who likes it around 35mm lens view
Ive ben using fudgy x100t since its release, and really happy with it, except the lack of weathersealing, and muh need for a little bit higher mpix. And yeah sometimes it feels too small to my hand, but generally I do like OvF.
I also have a nikon d800 which I despise ergonomics and dont use out of studio, and not heavyly invested in glass, so I was thinking of upgrading to xpro2, maybe with a 27mm pancake lens until a 23mm small lens is released (thats my jam).
Im wondering one thing though, anyone knows if fudgy implemented the half press shutter to lock focus, and snap away multiple times? or does the camera still tries to refocus after every half press?
>inb4 AE-L button focus
Im used to half press but oh well.
what do senpai? stay or go for it?
Also, Id love to hear about 27mm, does it feel too much tight or cramped for street photog?
.
>>2791656
Then what do I buy?
>>2791662
>tfw realising 27mm closest focus distance is crap compared to x100t's 23mm
fuck.
>>2791656
it's fine if it's a 1" sensor.
rx100, rx100ii, g3x, fz1000, nikon dl
>>2791663
a used eos m + adapter.
a used sony nex 5r.
>>2791672
New thread
>>2791662
You can lock the focus on burst mode without AE-L. You just have to not be using AF-C
You may prefer the 27mm compact, I like it more than the 23mm 1.4. I'd rather Fuji released a 27mm f2 compact instead of a 23 desu. As for street photog? It works fine for it. When you put the HVF to your eye, the 40mm will see roughly what you see, no need to walk backwards or forwards to frame up.
>>2791684
Thanks for the help familxzki
>>2791757
Wait, the silver finish is painted but the black one isn't?
>>2791835
black is anodized.
What are some good fluid tripod heads under 100?
What's the best video camera to shoot gay porn with?
I am going to be shooting mostly white guys fucking.
>>2791851
> good fluid tripod heads under 100
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/Video-Tripod-Heads/ci/3918/N/3907816565
Or whatever. Though actually good usually is $300+, even on Chinese heads.
>>2791856
> What's the best video camera to shoot gay porn with?
Check out the video general thread for amateur camera suggestions.
>mfw it turns out tripodding is required for a lot of photography.
>>2791856
i've got you covered
>>2791856
olympus, since you'll be covered in semen and will need the weather sealing.
>>2792009
Looks nice.
>>2791674
why the fuck would you spam a new thread dude this one is not even halfway jesus the autism is real
>>2792122
It's just the pentax shill. pay no mind to it.
>>2791856
If you plan on taking some of the cum in your mouth I'd like to recommend the Sony A6300! The best colors and function for filming man love.
Heyo /p/,
I am brand new to photography. I have a roughly $250 budget and need to shoot photos and short videos that will go on the web.
Any suggestions? Should I go with separate devices for each functions?
>>2792188
> $250 budget
I hope you missed a zero. Otherwise, that budget is really destitute and your current smartphone is one of the best options.
> Should I go with separate devices for each functions?
Probably no, but it depends on what exactly you want to record.
>>2792188
>I have a roughly $250 budget
try to hunt down a 550D or an EOS M, plus get some vintage glass. Those cams will be good for both, install Magic Lantern and you're good to go. Not the lightest learning curve but by _far_ the most you can get for your money.
Anyone have the nikon 70-300 non vr. Im looking into one for 180 ish. Is the vr useful, and should i go for it? Pls holp
>>2792234
>Is the vr useful,
Want to shoot at 300 with not really high shutter speeds and get a sharp image?
>>2792234
> Is the vr useful
It is helpful, sure.
> and should i go for it?
If you can afford better lenses, get a better lens. Otherwise, why not...
should i wait to buy a canon 5D mark iii? i mean since the mark iv is going to be announced soon there will be a pricedrop right? How long will that take? how much do u expect it to go down?
>>2792474
> i mean since the mark iv is going to be announced soon there will be a pricedrop right?
Or perhaps the next Sony or a price cut on the A7R II or whatever drops it. But sure, the 5D III will eventually become cheaper.
> How long will that take?
> how much do u expect it to go down?
> should i wait to buy a canon 5D mark iii?
Depends on a lot of factors & nobody knows.
Get the camera you need now, and get an IV later if you need it then.
>>2791662
>Im wondering one thing though, anyone knows if fudgy implemented the half press shutter to lock focus, and snap away multiple times? or does the camera still tries to refocus after every half press?
>inb4 AE-L button focus
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVLhqj-Wn9E
Fuck yesssss
>>2791647
Silver is ugly and cheap looking in person on the x70. Probably because its made in china. Black is slick. Get black.
>>2792532
idk it really depends on the model I have a black x10 and it looks really cheap as well
>>2792547
Yeah i specified i was only talking about the x70. As a general rule i think silver looks better on cheaper fuji x models and black looks better on their higher end x models.
I’ve got a budget of a few hundred pounds and I’m new to SLRs.
How would my experiences differ using a Canon 5D mk1 and a Pentax K50 if they both had similar cost 35mm lenses. Main uses will be street photog and some architecture.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Digital Camera X100T Ver1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:10:18 18:45:51 Exposure Time 1/14 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness -2.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2792556
The Canon is old and horrible, the Pentax somewhat new and entry-level.
http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon_EOS_5D-vs-Pentax-K-50/detailed
Since one is FF and the other APS-C, lenses will appear to be wider on one than the other.
>>2792556
5d1may be fool frame but handles like a dinosaur
hell even the mark2 feels a little dated
Get the 100D
