Which Lens?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
I need your opinion on which lens I should keep.
What does /p/ think.
Is the Sony F4 70-200 better than my Sony 24-240 3.5-6.3 FE
Currently auctioning my 24-240 FE Sony lens.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-G920T1 Camera Software G920T1UVU2COFB Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.9 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:21 17:36:51 Exposure Time 1/103 sec F-Number f/1.9 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 40 Lens Aperture f/1.9 Brightness 4.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash Flash Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID A16LLIC08SM A16LLIE11GM_
In the same situation as OP, can't seem to decide. Any input?
>
Anyways, your judgement is correct.
>>2774666
>F4
Don't bother. Get a Tamron 70-200 F2.8
>>2774666
GM 70-200 2.8
>>2774937
Not OP
I have a sony a7 and I have been thinking about getting the 70-200 F4 as well - why would you recommend an alpha mount 2.8? -wouldnt that be worse of in terms of AF and AF focus points due to the use of an adapter?
>>2775229
no, actually if you get the sony laea4 and a Sony mount lens, you get full DSLR type AF and it's much faster.
>>2775242
Well then I guess I am just a bit of an idiot - I have the la-ea4 but I have been using a tamron 70-300 USD and i have always though that the sluggish AF was due to the adapter, i guess it is just the lens...
