This was my first roll of black and white, and my first roll using an actual light meter rather than completely guessing (second roll of film ever...).
They all seem a teenth bit under exposed, should I open up an f/stop/slow my shutter speed down by one or could this be in the development process?
This was on a Rollei if that makes a difference.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
Ill post a few from that roll
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
>>2771415
Unless you're posting the whole roll, this doesn't deserve it's own thread.
But to answer your question, it's more likely you don't know how to use a light meter.
If you just pointed it at that scene, the brightness of the highlights would definitely have thrown off the reading.
You should meter for what you want correctly exposed., or if that's too complicated for you, for the shadows, in most scenes when shooting negative film.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
>>2771422
Sorry, Ill just post the whole roll then.
>>2771428
They just seem dark to me
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
This was the only one that I was really happy with as far as the exposure goes.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
The rest of the roll was roll was duplicates of when I thought one thing or the other might have been off.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
Cool renditions of late autumn plantlife stuff.
My rule of thumb is to always meter for shadows or, if everything's uniformly lit - the darkest thing in the shotnI still want properly exposed. Film's very lenient with overexposure, esp. for digitising your shots, so when in doubt always overexpose one stop if it doesnt mess with your desired dof/shutter speed.
Are you sure your meter is working properly? Older ones can give readings that are off by a few stops, can be checked by bracketing a scene and choosing the optimal exposure (so better to do with 35mm, less frames used up per roll).
>>2771495
Good deal, thank you. I guess I was just metering for the whole scene and nothing in particular (some of the shots I couldn't, but I could have in that first shot).
>>2771430
I think this one would be pretty nice without that tree in the foreground. Is that fog over the water, or do you have a light leak across the middle?
It's really tough to judge exposure by looking at the finished product of an unknown scanner operator. Anyone that says differently doesn't know what they are talking about. Only if the negative was grossly over/under exposed would it be apparent in the finished product. Seeing as this was scanned with a Noritsu, I'm going to assume this was done at a lab. A mix of auto-magic levels and manual adjustment intervention based upon the scanner operators level of interest that day. A cell phone photo of you holding the negative up to a light source would tell us more about your exposure accuarcy than these pics will.
>>2771750
Pic related is a good example. 6 stops difference between these photos. You might notice a slight difference when viewing all 4 at the same time. You would NOT be able to judge exposure if I had posted just one of these individually.
>>2771415
I honestly think the exposure looks fine man.
Here's my first b&w 35mm pic that I just took with my phone
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model Nexus 6 Camera Software HDR+ 1.0.106412213r Equipment Make motorola Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:02:22 23:01:41 Image Width 1618 Image Height 2409 Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/2.0 Subject Distance Range Unknown Focal Length 3.82 mm Lens Aperture f/2.0 Exposure Mode Auto Image Height 4176 Rendering Custom Scene Capture Type Standard Saturation Normal Exposure Program Normal Program Sharpness Normal Image Width 2366 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Subject Distance 0.00 m Flash No Flash Contrast Normal ISO Speed Rating 237 Exposure Time 12311/1000000 sec
>>2771764
might be able to tell if it's underexposed since it's got that crushed blacks look and that's the signature hipster film look that everyone learns
>>2771764
this is bullshit. all 4 are the same frame. they vsco'd that shit.
