Critique me!
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
>>2769089
>>2769090
I love both of these! but there are little issues that you could fix- for instance, the first one is ever so slightly off center, and the shadow on the left doesnt serve much of a purpose. but the shadow from the ladder looks great!
The second one looks great, too- but theres an issue with the bottom bit being cropped off, and its off center too.
overall i love em! just little nitpicky things keeping them from bein gr8
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
How can I improve?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
>>2769093
What do you think of the rest?
>>2769089
the color and urban "aesthetic" is there, but it is just a wall, nothing really to look at, this would be complimented nicely with a figure, or some grafitti
>>2769090
the shape you got here is nice, but its been done to death, again, the color is quite pleasent
>>2769092
as much as i enjoy the sharpness of the, um, mailbox, that doesnt make it a good subject, what does it imply? who the hell is jake alexander?, again, some human interaction would be a nice fit for this photo
>>2769094
i like this more than the first one, cool coloring, great setting, but its been wasted for nothing, again. If you havent got the point thus far, GET A SUBJECT TO LOOK AT
>>2769096
boring composition, boring everything, this photo makes me want to yawn, nice colros again, keep at that i guess
>>2769098
my favorite of the bunch, i really love the guiding lines you got there, and the cameras pointing perpendicular to those lines make for interesting things to look at, the red coloring in this is awesome, only gripe is the thing protruding out of the left, and the fact that the corner of the building is cut off
>>2769102
another waste of great potential, seriously, if you were to make a documentary about when all humans vanished from the earth, you could pull that off
>>2769103
my least favorite, messy composition my eye wants to look at the square "donate $1" when it is blurry and the very right of the picture is in focus
>>2769105
some nice lines you got there, only plus is, once again, the coloring, really digging that shit
>>2769110
its a picture of a bridge, and millions like it on google images and pinterest
IN CONCLUSION: i think you have the "aesthetic" and feel nailed to perfection, but the best advice i can give you is to HAVE SUBJECTS, all of these photos are lacking anything to really look at, which is a waste of great potential in these photos. My eyes gaze these pics and say "thats neat i guess, nothing more to see" and forget about them immediately.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
>>2772288
Too much shadows on the stairs compared to the white snow
>>2769145
yep pretty much this, but "interesting" photos also need a little bit of luck, when did you shoot all those photos?
If the photo doesn't have an interesting subject that can tell you something you'll probably forget about it after the first "it looks nice"
>>2772613
I shoot whenever I get a chance
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
>>2772255
This one is awesome
>>2772979
Why?
Follow me at harleythr3 on instagram
First time shooting ektar. How besides just my lack of a interesting subject, how else can I improve?
I know its kinda dark, but It took me by suprise
I like this photo
I miss the summer man
That's my dawg
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
If I work hard, will I make it into a career
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
>>2772622
Yeah I mean the span/range, when did you shoot the oldest and the newest. I like them
>>2773553
From December of last year to January
>>2772290
this is interesting. id like to know if people prefer
1 - the box centered in the shot
or
2 - how the photo is, taking the box a little to the right to keep that tower in the background in a decent position as well.
>>2774071
Tbh, Im surprised with how the shot turned out. Which others did you like?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi
is this too edgy for an environmental portrait?
>>2772622
This is the only one worth a damn, in my opinion. All of the rest lack an interesting subject and aren't aesthetically pleasing. However, I like the depth and framing of this one.
>>2774119
Why do you say that the rest are not atheistically pleasing?
>>2774118
Post one that isn't thumbnail size and then we'll decide
>>2774124
I'm following the rules, fuckwit. Most of the photos I have posted are 1k on the longest size. Since this is a image board post some of your own so I can critique it.
>>2774118
Her hand makes her look like she got a loose vag
Critique me too, i don't expect anything nice but at least make it a little constructive.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5200 Camera Software ViewNX 2.10 W Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 826 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:02:20 20:40:42 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias -5 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 600 Image Height 400 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2774151
I love the colours, it reminds me of summer. However, I don't understand what I am trying to look at due to all of the lines errywhere
